It took a month, but when the Harper government moved to respond to the crisis in Attawapiskat, they moved fast. Stephen Harper made his move on Monday Nov. 28, a month to the day since a state of emergency had been declared in the impoverished northern community. He made his move just as the cargo plane carrying emergency supplies from the Red Cross was touching down in Attawapiskat. I was standing on the tarmac watching the relief plane taxi to a standstill, the fading northern sun turning the snow a dark blue. Shivering on the tarmac beside me was our national leader, Nycole Turmel, Red Cross volunteers and a long line of media cameras and journalists.
The crisis in Attawapiskat had been going on for weeks with barely a notice of concern from the federal government. But then the Huffington Post published footage and an article I wrote on the desperate conditions in the community. Almost overnight the story went viral. The images of families living in sheds and tents without running water or toilets appalled the nation.
The response drew Canada's Red Cross to intervene with a disaster management team. And now as their plane hit the ground, it seemed as if this could be the game changer moment. But as the cargo bays opened and the mundane task of unloading sleeping bags and heaters began, the Harper government decided to make their own game-changing play.
In the stately splendor of Canada's Parliament, Stephen Harper stood up and announced that he wanted to know what happened to all the money his government had given Attawapiskat. We have paid $50,000 to "every man, woman and child in the community," he fumed, and where has it gone?
Value for money, taxpayer dollars, Indians, mismanagement. It was the dog whistle that rang out loud and clear for the Harper base across the country. The sentiment had been there all along - on talk radio, on the vitriolic comments being left on the comments section of every online article about Attawapiskat. But now, the master of the black arts of politics conjured up this simmering sentiment and cast it onto the national stage.
Within a day, the media coverage turned from humanitarian relief to a full out national exercise in a forensic investigation of the behavior of a desperately poor community. Where did the money go? Why was the Band hiding its finances? Why, questioned one reporter on national television, was such a poor community even "allowed" to have a hockey arena?
It did little to explain that the Band's financial statements were posted online. Or to point out that $50,000 per person divided over six years, works out to about $8,300 per person per year, less than 50% of what is spent on Non-Native people. Or that 80% of this funding is allocated for education, 10% for social programs, leaving a paltry 10% to maintain housing and deal with infrastructure.
All of this could be explained, but as one veteran politico used to tell me, "in politics when you're 'splaining, you're losing."
As the humanitarian story stumbled momentarily on questions of accounting, Harper stuck the knife home. He deposed the elected Band Council, blaming them for the problems in the community. If any victim could be found in this whole affair it was the government. As Minister John Duncan opined, "If the Department (of Indian Affairs) is guilty of anything, it is extreme patience."
Band council deposed. State of emergency ended. In terms of tactics, Harper had grabbed the ball and tried to move it up the field. His big problem was that his point man Duncan continued to fumble under the media glare.
And yet, the bigger question remains - now that Minister Duncan has assumed control of the community -- what is going to be done to secure a long-term housing plan? There are 26 families or individuals living in sheds and tents. There are 90 people housed in substandard construction trailer. There are another 120 families living with relatives in mould-infested homes.
Does anyone really believe that imposing a third-party manager is the first step towards a rebuilding of this shattered community?
So far the only response from Minister Duncan is to assure Canadians the homeless are being moved to the hockey arena. As media stories percolated with salacious gossip about who was sleeping with whom in the Band administration, the 'solution' of housing people in a barely heated arena without showers or adequate cooking facilities has been given little scrutiny.
But this "plan" is not being overlooked by people in Attawapiskat.
"They are putting us in the arena and then they're going to leave," said one Attawapiskat resident. "I guess this is the Native people's Katrina moment."
Attawapiskat is Canada's Katrina moment. The bumbling inaction from Minister John Duncan certainly resembles the Bush government and the FEMA response. But on a more symbolic level, Harper's response to Attawapiskat exposes an ugly, underlying racial divide, just as the indifference to the Black population in flooded New Orleans tarnished the American reputation internationally.
Attawapiskat is certainly not on the scale of Katrina. But Attawapiskat is the tip of the iceberg for the numerous Bantustan-style homelands of the far north. Years of chronic under funding and bureaucratic indifference has created a Haiti north where dying in slow motion on ice-filled shantytown is considered the norm.
Over the last week I have done extensive interviews where the suffering of people on the ground has not been mentioned once. Where is the money? Why are we spending money? Shouldn't these people have taken some responsibility? These are questions that would never be asked of farm families living on a flood plain or a community caught out by a forest fire.
Throughout this time, my thoughts return to Attawapiskat. They are hopeful, wonderful people. They are self-reliant. I have been to their celebrations and their funerals. But they don't share their frustrations or their hurts very easily. With outsiders. Last week I stood in minus 20C weather in an unheated shack where a young couple was so poor they didn't have blankets.
The woman stone-facedly answered question after question from national media; about living in a home with no heat; about her husband who spat up blood when he tried to cut firewood; about her dream of having a place to put some nice little mementos and the dream of being able to wash her dishes.
And then the media asked her about her children. She remained stone-faced for a moment as she described how they had been taken away from her and shipped to foster homes hundreds of kilometres away because, as a mother living in a shed, she couldn't take care of them. That was five years ago. And then she started to weep - deep, painful, gut wrenching weeping. Rachel crying for her children because they were no more.
Attawapiskat has been a moment when we see our nation as something less than we thought it was. But I believe Canadians want us to restore the promise of this great nation. All across this country, school groups and individuals continue to organize fundraising drives. The Red Cross continues to deal with the catastrophe. The world continues to watch.
And as for the people in Attawapiskat, one Band member summed it up -- there is no going back for us. We can only go forward. It's a message for all Canadians.
Here is our new video
(Warning: Graphic images)
Chelsea Vowel: Attawapiskat: You Want to Be Shown the Money? Here it Is.
Gerry Nicholls: Harper: Not as Scary as Advertised
Romeo Saganash: Two Sides of the Same Bay
Daniel D. Veniez: We Can't Fix Attawapiskat Until We Fix the Indian Act
Now I'm not saying that the Attawapiskat Band is committing fraud. I'm just saying we don't know.
If you don't want others to know how you spend their money you stonewall. In fact this happens with politicians . . . just ask Charlie Angus to provide his detailed expense accounts for the last several years. He will tell you that everything was done properly and in accordance with requirements. (just like the Attawapiskat Chief says). And yet Charlie and the Chief will not provide details.
So we really know nothing. And Charlie and the Chief are comfortable in saying we know all we need to know. If we trust them, that's fine. If we have concerns, they fall far short of satisfying us.
I have spent over 40 years auditing financial performance and investigating all kinds of financial fraud. And I will say that financial statements are generally only a place to start asking questions. The fact they are audited only means they are accurate within predetermined levels of materiality. And remember the auditor who signed the final statements does not prepare the statements. The auditor only provides an opinion on the statements.
A lot of jargon but important to know the limitations of financial statements. The auditor is only concerned with a material misstatement and does not express an opinion on internal controls.
What this means is that the statements could include incorrect allocation of expenses. And more importantly they could contain fraud. For example the organization could purchase houses for the chief and other band members in a larger southern city and this could be acceptable on the financial statements. (OK to be specific they purchase property in the band's name, pay all expenses and only allow specific band members to use the properties). A chief or council member could travel across Canada to visit family members and show these as band business with all costs expensed to the band. The auditor would not be expected to find these misallocated expenses and specific band members get more perks.
Remember Enron, Worldcom and Berie Madoff. These all had audited financial statements.
BENEFITS - 11.2 million. Yup - Attawapiskat has problems for sure. Now, lets publish these numbers for that 23 year old single mother in, lets say, Elbow, SK that makes 32,000 a year...and pays municipal, provincial and federal taxes. Lets see what she has to say about where here tax money went. All she has to do is look at the Band revenue for Attawapiskat for 2010/11 (it's 51 million - go look it up) a then wonder what the heck is going on. I sure do!
Similar here, no money is enough, because if it is, then you wont get even more.
Did you even bother to watch the video? Did you read about the way the money was spent? Let's face facts CanStan - you hate Native people. You don't want a dime being spent. Well I'll tell you what - I don't want my tax dollars going towards your psychotic Conservative parties dreams of war.
Chretein could have made massive strides on this issue with his pull and influence, and yet here this ridiculousness still sits.
So why don't you look beyond trying to protect the band and the council, and others can look beyond blaming the government and start dealing with the REALITY of the situation to make it better.
Or is that just too much to ask?
Maybe we can learn something from the Millennium Village Project.
What is stopping people from Attawapiskat to do the same?
It's also called luck: your parents were lucky to have relatives working who could afford to watch over you.
First Nations move to the city, and the only places around they can afford are areas with names like Skid Row. There's no jobs in Skid Row, and there are no jobs on the reserve. At least on the reserve, they have family. In Skid Row, they got nothing.
Don't be trying to confuse good luck with hard work. There are millions of immigrants who end up in the slums rather than making it to the middle class like your family.
I am not criticizing First Nations people at all and I do understand there are other dynamics at play. I am just giving you an example of our community.
Stolen ? and where did your people get it from ? Do you have receipt for it ? What law of nature or science said it was stolen or says it was yours to begin with ? The natives here all descended from Siberia and Mongolia and their DNA can be pinpointed to within 300 miles of where their ancestors came from .
Maybe what should have happen here is what occurred in all countries conquered by the Spanish ....and they did conquer those civilizations , wiping out 3/4's of most races.
Yes , in retrospect maybe the British should have done the noble thing and did what the Americans did - go to war against the natives . The U.S. has 10 X our population but only 25% the native population .
Stolen land ? When asked to outline their land about 10 years ago the FN bands claimed 120% of Canada- prior to the Europeans the tribes warred and stole land from each other . Today one of the biggest barriers to settling treaties is the inability of FN's to agree on communal boundaries.
Oh by the way , thousands of Scots were deported here when the English started the Clearances in the late 1700'-early 1800's , clearing the Scottish Highlands . Not everybody's descendants came here willingly - but that's life .
(Except, of course, the actually Attawapiskat Community, they get to blame everyone else but themselves for their circumstances.)
What on earth is wrong with you.....
Anyhow for the record: It takes a village to accomplish such stuff!
Poverty. Financial hardship. Inequality. Being "homeless" - These things are not and never were "self-inflicted." No matter how much some of us may like to pretend they are.
They get millions.
Some residents fear that housing is not a priority for the local council because some projects have received questionable funding, including a new zamboni at the hockey arena paid for out of an education fund.
Read more: http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/TopStories/20111130/attawapiskat-help-arriving-111130/#ixzz1fVSzykqs
http://www.attawapiskat.org/financial-statements/
How do you maintain a home with no money? How do you get food, when you don't hunt and you don't have work to get money?
Someone explain it to me. I want to help. I want to see this work, I just can't get my head around it.
Someone needs to explain to me, rationally, how this works.
When I want to show compassion, I'm hammered with facts that while true provide no illumination on it.
When I ask for facts, I'm hammered with angry retorts about racism and bigotry that still provide no illumination.
I cannot be the only person who is utterly 100% willing and 100% frustrated with the lack of anything resembling a real discussion of reality.