Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Christopher Sands

GET UPDATES FROM Christopher Sands
 

Did U.S. Partisan Warfare Kill Keystone?

Posted: 01/18/12 12:40 PM ET

Open partisan warfare between Democrats and Republicans, between the Obama administration and Congress, is underway and the latest clash is the Battle of Keystone, the fight over the Keystone XL pipeline.

By attaching a deadline for a decision to legislation extending the payroll tax holiday by two months, Congress tried to force President Obama to issue a presidential permit that would allow for the expansion of the pipeline where it crosses the U.S.-Canadian border. The president had previously announced that he would delay his decision until 2013.

President Obama today called Congress' bluff: he decided, and rejected the permit, on the grounds that he did not have adequate information in hand to approve the pipeline at present. This is consistent with his explanation for delaying his decision to 2013, despite the lengthy review and hearings process that has already taken place. Congress forced him to make a decision, but did not override his freedom to make that decision as he saw fit, and so he chose - as his aides had hinted he would - to say no.

Environmental groups will cheer the decision, and contribute heartily to re-elect the president. Republicans, though, will cheer as well: they have forced President Obama to reject a project that would create American jobs immediately and lower U.S. oil and gasoline prices over time. In elections this year, Republican candidates will cite this decision as proof that President Obama put special interests ahead of jobs and economic growth.

The importance of the Battle of Keystone will be measured by its significance in the larger partisan war that has raged in the United States for a decade or more. It has been a war from the Gingrich revolution to the battle to Impeach President Bill Clinton, from the appalling invective against President George W. Bush to the defection of Senator Jim Jeffords of Vermont to put the Senate in Democratic hands, to the election of President Obama who promised to change the tone of Washington through to the partisan passage of health care legislation and the 2010 election that signaled a Republican takeover of the House of Representatives.

Frustrated by his inability to pass climate legislation, President Obama turned a routine presidential permit decision into a political weapon. By delaying his decision, he allowed his allies in the environmental movement to raise funds and protest the pipeline in Nebraska and nationwide. The issue rallied a diverse coalition of local and national environmental activists and boosted their fundraising in a bleak, recessionary economy.

The president first delayed his decision on Keystone to the end of 2011, allowing additional time for hearings and study. Then, under pressure from his allies, he decided to add a delay until after the U.S. election, pledging to decide in 2013.

Republicans smelled weakness. Texas Governor and Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry came out with a strong endorsement of the Keystone pipeline, criticizing Obama for the delayed decision. Shortly thereafter, the entire field of GOP presidential candidates endorsed the Keystone pipeline and pledged to approve the permit if elected. The partisan battle lines were drawn.

House Republicans tried to attach language forcing the president to make a decision on the Keystone pipeline and ultimately succeeded in adding to the temporary payroll tax cut extension. The White House initially insisted it would veto any bill that included language forcing the president's hand on Keystone, but when the bill came to his desk President Obama signed it anyway.

The payroll tax cut extension is only good until the end of February, and as Congress returns this week following a recess for Martin Luther King Day, negotiations are about to begin on another payroll tax cut extension as well as another increase in the U.S. debt ceiling by more than $1 trillion. Obama's Keystone decision is a warning shot to Congressional Republicans intended to make the president look stronger for the battles to come.

Like picnickers at the Battle of Gettysburg, Canadians have a great view of the fighting and are not indifferent about the outcome - but for those doing the fighting, they are irrelevant. It is always hard, and sad, to repeat this, but this is all about us in the United States, and not about you in Canada. And whatever Prime Minister Harper, Premier Redford or Ambassador Doer thinks or says about the president's decision, it won't stop the war.

Only the 2012 election can do that now. President Obama's rejection of the Keystone permit can be reconsidered at any time by this president. Or by his successor.

 
 
 

Follow Christopher Sands on Twitter: www.twitter.com/sandsathudson

 
 
  • Comments
  • 64
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wrightthewrong
Medicare for All
12:18 PM on 01/19/2012
Hudson Institute, huh? I think I know enough already. Aren't you going to tell us about the tens of thousands of jobs that this decision cost America? Where are the talking points that groups like yours drummed up?
11:53 AM on 01/19/2012
The idea that this pipeline will lower the cost of gas and oil is completely preposterous.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
11:25 AM on 01/19/2012
TransCanada says it will be submitting a new application with an alternative route to U.S. regulators, and that it kept a previous in-service date of late 2014 for the line. Meanwhile, the Canadian press is pointing out that producers can get the Alberta tar sands crude to markets by expanding existing pipeline capacity. (The United States already has 55,000 miles of crude oil trunk lines.) Producers also can move the Canadian crude to Texas refineries by rail. The Keystrone Pipeline isn't the only way to move the crude oil; it's just the cheapest and safest way.
photo
suzc
Speak the Truth, even if your voice shakes
11:20 AM on 01/19/2012
PS The US is already EXPORTING OIL -- so Keystone will not "lower prices"; it will just make Oil Barons richer at US taxpayer expense (see, federal subsidies for keystone).
photo
suzc
Speak the Truth, even if your voice shakes
11:19 AM on 01/19/2012
Would one of the very rich and/or very stupid supporters of the Keystone boondoggle please step up and guarantee to pay at least 10,000 US workers a minimum of $15/hour 40 hrs/wk for at least 7 years for building this pipeline?

Didn't think so. Stop screaming "jobs" as if you meant it..... or knew what you were talking about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cajundave
11:18 AM on 01/19/2012
Are there any Republicans that will stand up for environmental causes? If so, are they just too scared to contradict the NRP?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheGreatRenewal
We're living a Great Renewal
11:00 AM on 01/19/2012
The Keystone pipeline is just a way for the dirty oil from Canada to find itself on the 'free market'. It has nothing to do with US energy independence any more than all the oil produced in the Gulf of Mexico from 'leases' that is also put on the Free Market. Stop this insanity. Put your billions of $ into green energies and creating 'sweet crude' from algaes rather then ripping up the earth and transporting it in a straw to the ocean to be sold overseas.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kvanness
Follow the money and the rest will make sense
10:57 AM on 01/19/2012
"Republicans, though, will cheer as well: they have forced President Obama to reject a project that would create American jobs immediately and lower U.S. oil and gasoline prices over time."

Mr. Sands, do us all a favor and quit repeating this GOP lie.
- The jobs will not appear for 2 years. (The project is still in planning: Nowhere near shovel ready.)
- Of the 135K jobs projected to be created, only 5000 a expected to be NEW jobs INSIDE THE US. The rest are either overseas, or are conflated from secondary and tertiary sources.
- None of the oil will stay in the US. XL terminates at an export terminal in TX, and all the oil is ALREADY CONTRACTED to China.

So, thanks for repeating the liars, and have a nice day.
03:52 PM on 01/19/2012
pretty interesting idea. do you have any idea the workforce it would take to nearly double U.S. oil exports? if you exported the entire keystone capacity the U.S. would become the 3rd largest exporter of oil in the world, up from 12th.

Do you know how much oil you sell to China already? Nothing. China imports from Russia, Iran,the Saudis, the Sudanese and a whole host of other central asian countries. Keep listening to the Sierra Club bud.
10:41 AM on 01/19/2012
What happens across the border does matter. If we can't be trusted, what is to keep Canada from cozying up to our enemies? The SHAM here is that the Federal Government is involved at all. Why not let the individual state legislatures of the states affected decide if they want a pipeline traversing their territory and performing the appropriate permitting?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wikwox
So there I was, playing the piano....
10:07 AM on 01/19/2012
I like the lie about "lower oil and gas prices over time", oil is a commodity, it essentially costs the same all over the world and another pipeline the comes here will not lower prices a dime. This is all about America's cold civil war, largely a war fought with money and Big Oil has plenty of that. But they've been beaten for the moment so the money tape will be turned on full as they seek to buy off "our" politicians yet again.
10:02 AM on 01/19/2012
Most people do not know that it is an Indian company that was going to build the thing.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
iskra
Natural enemy of sharks and tro//s
09:31 AM on 01/19/2012
As I understand it, the project isn't gone, the decision has been delayed until the data about it is available. 

What a concept! Making decisions based on data instead of knee-jerk reactions. Personally I applaud that kind of thinking.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kye154
08:42 AM on 01/19/2012
It is more than that. There was suppose to be a large amount of federal subsidies outlays required for the pipeline, also right of way issues, and the issue of pay-outs to the states. The pipeline cuts across Republican states. They all want the money. But yes, partisan politics has gotten worse in the U.S. America has become one of the most hostile countries in the world.
08:32 AM on 01/19/2012
Learn your American history, fella. There were no picnickers at Gettysburg. The battle your speaking of is the First Battle of Bull Run (or Manassas Junction, if you're using the confederate vernacular). And if you recall, the stampede that followed after it became apparent that Union forces lost the battle wound up sweeping the picnickers up in it, leaving many of them hurt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Obama cares about all of U.S.
06:24 AM on 01/19/2012
The only people winning from this project were the rich.

Sure it would have created a few temporary jobs. ( probably mostly for foreign workers).

But the oil will be sold on the international market and the potential external costs

far outweigh any potential short term gains.

This is a victory for America.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BDrummer
08:42 AM on 01/19/2012
Completely agree frank. I love this line

"Frustrated by his inability to pass climate legislation, President Obama turned a routine presidential permit decision into a political weapon."

I guess that's one way to look at it, but I would say if anything he was frustrated by the half-a$$ed environmental study they performed...