Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Daniel D. Veniez

GET UPDATES FROM Daniel D. Veniez
 

Is Democracy Alive and Well in Canada?

Posted: 05/27/11 10:16 AM ET

In April, the Harper government fell because they were found in contempt of Parliament. Never before in our history had that occurred. It came on the heels of five years of parliamentary obstruction and obfuscations.

Winning office on a promise of openness, accountability, and transparency, Mr. Harper's government is widely acknowledged to be one of the most secretive and inaccessible in Canadian history.

Harper ignored his own fixed election date call in 2008, prorogued Parliament twice, made a mockery of his own Accountability Act, made a joke of Access to Information laws, and presided over an unprecedented increase in government spending on flagrantly partisan purposes featuring large cheques with the Conservative Party logo on it.

Harper's government ridiculed independent officers of Parliament, such as Kevin Page, the Parliamentary Budget Officer, and fired heads of arms-length Crown Agencies that refused to tow the line. We lost a seat with Canada's name on it -- to the bankrupt Portugal, no less -- at the United Nations Security Council, diminishing our standing in the world.

And to top it all off, the five year spending spree of the Harper government has left Canada with record deficits and debt and a bloated government.

Sixty-three per cent of Canadians eligible to vote did so, and only 40 per cent of voters elected a majority government on May 2. Many cast ballots for people that they had never heard of and whose qualifications and experience they never bothered to consider, much less investigate.

During the campaign, there were numerous reports of Conservative Party candidates who did not show up for debates. In others, I personally saw incumbents receive one-liners via their Blackberry from campaign handlers in the audience, or stick religiously to their prepared scripts.

In the days following his election triumph, Stephen Harper did something else he promised he wouldn't: He appointed three defeated candidates to the Senate. Two of them had left the Senate only two months before to run for aseat in the Commons, promptly lost, and were immediately reappointed to the Red Chamber.

In the constituency where I ran, nine people stood as candidates. Besides the main parties, the global Green, Marxist and Libertarian "movements" were represented, as were four other single-issue candidates.

The NDP and Green parties did not have a chance of winning, but ran candidates so they could benefit from the perverse incentive of $2.00 per vote subsidy they receive. All of them were given equal time in all-candidate meetings. Voters clearly did not vote for the candidates with their names on the ballot -- notwithstanding their relative fitness for office -- but for the leader and the party they represent.

So next week, our House of Commons -- the paramount institution of our democracy -- will greet new Members of Parliament that had never stepped foot in their ridings, are not fluent in the language of a vast majority of their constituents, have never held a full time job, and who wouldn't know a public policy if their lives depended on it.

The media and others hailed the new configuration of the House of Commons as "refreshing" or finally representing the true make-up of the country.

Canadians often lament the fact that quality people do not stand for public office. Yet they chose to defeat Michael Ignatieff, Martha Hall-Findlay, Gerald Kennedy, Ken Dryden, among many other outstanding Canadians.

If we believe that in a robust democracy we get the government and Parliament we want and deserve, then we should have every reason to feel very content with our collective judgment. But I don't hear anyone cheering with glee at the make-up of our new Parliament. In fact, I detect a degree of detached discomfort and melancholy in the result.

We know that this federal election is far from being a shining illustration of a healthy democracy in action. No one can pretend that it comes close.

Mr. Veniez is a Vancouver-based businessman and was the Liberal Party of Canada's candidate for West Vancouver-Sunshine Coast-Sea to Sky Country

 

Follow Daniel D. Veniez on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@danveniez

 
 
  • Comments
  • 21
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:35 AM on 05/30/2011
All this propaganda is full of half truths and innuendo, right out of the Liberal play book. Some of these half truths came out of Iggy's mouth. He liked to use terms like Harper Regime, when if anyone deserved that word it was Chentien.
08:24 PM on 05/29/2011
I agree with much this writer says, but I wish the Liberal Party of Canada had made a more effective effort in communicating these ideas to the public. In the end the election essentially boiled down to Orwellian or Wizard of Oz politics -- whose images would triumph, not whose ideas. Mr. Ignatieff lost that test badly and could not steer the agenda onto ideas. Getting the public to re-consider ideas -- in particular 'liberal' ideas -- is the supreme challenge of any future leader of the LPC.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Skepticat
Supporting skeptical felines everywhere
12:33 PM on 05/29/2011
63% of elegible voters participated in an election where the winning party had 39% of the vote - versus the party of defeated alleged "quality" candidates who polled about 24%. Get over yourselves politicians - the sad truth is most Canadians don't really like ANY of you very much, and had no really compelling reason to support you or anybody else.
02:32 PM on 05/28/2011
Daniel Veniez does not think the NDP should have been at riding-level debates in the West Vancouver-Sea to Sky riding since "the NDP and Green parties did not have a chance of winning." It is rather informative then that the NDP candidate got MORE VOTES than Mr. Veniez himself:

CON John Dunbar Weston 28711
NDP Terry Plat 14812
LIB Daniel Veniez 14103

Perhaps it is Mr. Veniez himself who was running so the Liberal Party "could benefit from the perverse incentive of $2.00 per vote subsidy they receive." More sour Liberal grapes from a failed candidate from a party that still hasn't learned from its defeats that you have to earn your votes, you're not entitled to them!
11:37 PM on 05/27/2011
Fixed elections
Senate term limit
Senate by vote
Gun registry

If passed all BETTER for Canada, losing votes, not pandering to get votes, but what is good for Canada/ I think its great, perfect no, but great.
11:35 PM on 05/27/2011
Harper has been taking tough stands on many things that are good for Canada, E.G. not funding the Quebec city hockey arena.
11:34 PM on 05/27/2011
There was no guarantee that Harper would be reelected, the 2 MP's who stepped down from the senate to run took a chance. It shows what a great leader Harper is!
I think its great, he will get even more that 40% in 4 years, he wont call an election like Chrentien, everytime he looked good in the polls.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesse Wright
03:28 PM on 05/27/2011
Mr. Veniez
I think that the title of your article is a little misleading. What your article should address more is how we are represented in our votes. Even though only 40% of Canadians want Mr. Harper as our Prime Minister, he was granted a huge majority...that shows that there is something up with our current electoral system and I'm sure that many Canadians would agree with me. Part of the problem is that many people want to vote for the leader of the country rather than their elected official. Such was clearly the case with the Liberal party in this recent election, or rather, lack of wanting him as Prime Minister. I'm also with many of the others who have commented in saying that rather than blaming democracy, the Liberal Party really needs to evaluate themselves as a party. The Liberal Party has been flailing since the days of Chretien and they don't link that with an internal problem, but rather an external problem. One cannot fix its problems until it acknowledges them. Take the defeat as a defeat and grow from it.
12:21 PM on 05/27/2011
...and when the NDP's teen activist MP's start throwing pies in the House of Commons, you can add that to the list.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
12:10 PM on 05/27/2011
Staggering that Mr Veniez would comment on the decay of democracy in Canada without commenting at all on the even worse situation than in Ottawa that exists at the provincial level in BC. Of course he IS a Liberal and not likely to comment on anything that could implicate other Liberals, provincial or otherwise (not that the BC Liberals are the same thing as the federal Liberals, but enough connections exist to require "discretion"), but it's interesting to see the selective squirming in this article, and the attack on the NDP's coterie of wet-behind-the-ears MPs who most people see as fresh new blood for Parliament, a refreshing change from the gaggle of lawyers, accountants, "financial consultants" and all those other political elitists who figure themselves better qualified to "serve the public" (more like "serve up the public interest").

Of course if Mr Veniez had any political acuity at all he would not, as a Liberal, have run in West Vancouver-Sunshine Coast, which is a diehard Big Money Establishment riding with no chance at all of either the Grits or the NDP winning....

Bitching about problems in Ottawa is an old way of avoiding having to talk about problems in BC, pretty much stock-in-trade for any BC-based politician (at least those not on the government benches).

C'mon Huffington Post, give us real political commentary from Canada, not just recycled CBC items and MP-mouthpiece orations like this one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Pepperoni
Where did all the good Republicans go?
01:25 PM on 05/27/2011
Actually Mr Veniez's riding elected a Liberal as recently as 2006. Clearly you have no idea of the make up of the the Sunshine Coast and Sea to Sky, which is not Big Money Establishment.

He is a federal politician commenting in a blog about federal politics. Not exactly staggering.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
02:56 PM on 05/28/2011
.....the point is, if criminal behaviour - collusion, fraud, conspiracy, rigged bidding, influence peddling on a GRAND SCALE - by a provincial government cannot be brought to heel by the justice system under that government's control, then if it is not the federal government's responsibility, then WHOSE THE HELL IS IT?

Staggering that you don't know any of this. What gets me all too often is the tone of moderate apologism finding reasons to not look at any of this, or rationalize it into the done-deal category the BC Libs want it to remain....in your case I detect a whiff of the wet-blanket thing. No big deal, nothing to see here, folks....not a federal matter.

Like hell it's not a federal matter. If the prevention of crime by provincial governments is not policeable by Ottawa.....who are we supposed to go to? The Queen? The ICC? Take it to a US congressional hearing?

I'd like to see ONE federal politician stand up and raise all this in the Commons. Just one. I'm not expecting it to be a Liberal.......
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
03:04 PM on 05/28/2011
[moderator - this and subsequent were meant to be posted first]
I'd forgotten about the 2006 win there, and yes long ago it was a Liberal cabinet seat during the Trudeau years (Ron Basford I think,,,,at one time Austin Sinclair too I think). The North Shore does have a Liberal tradition but in recent decades, particularly provincially, it's a bastion of the hard right/big money crowd, particularly with Whistler thrown into the mix (Squamish and the Sunshine Coast have a decidedly more orange union and eco-left tinge).

The reason for my strong language is because of ongoing frustration with the evasiveness and apologisms as to anything to do with BC Rail et al, which includes federal silence - from all parties - on matters such as the suspect parachuting of a judge (with prime ministerial approval and cooperation) during the most politically-charged trial in BC's entire history, the conduct of ACJ's Dohm and Mackenzie and likewise the unexplained catapaulting of her from obscurity to ACJ (also with prime ministerial approval and cooperation) and other justice matters related to this case - a Special Prosecutor appointed contrary to legislation, with deep personal and political contacts with both the Office of the A-G and the Liberal Party itself). Add in RCMP unwillingness to act on matters arising during the preliminary hearings, the unprecedented publication bans, the rearranging of court schedules without notice, inaction on the destruction of evidence by "someone" in the Premier's Office (no investigation, no contempt or other charges)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnanimation
03:22 AM on 05/28/2011
FYI, the BC 'Liberal' party is liberal in name only (and are thinking of changing it actually).
They are in reality 'Free Enterprise' Conservatives, no affiliation with or similarity to the federal
Liberals.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
05:44 PM on 05/28/2011
Only one sector of that party is seen to be Big-C "Conservative" - and most of those are ex-Reform Party and never federal Conservatives, though there are some. The old-guard Liberals are very much part of the alliance that is the party (Liberal-Reform-Old Socred) and that includes the current premier and her guard and her inner circle (and her ex, no less), and her campaign team, and many of the same cast of characters were behind the Campbell regime, which was sponsored by federal Liberal-allied money and organized by the same campaign/backroom team that manoeuvred Christy Clark into power recently. It is a "Free Enterprise Coalition", and the same people who vote BC Liberal provincially tend to vote Conservative federally. The Wilson Liberals were another matter, a party of upstarts that was shoved aside by the old-guard Liberal machine to replace it with the righter-wing end of the federal Liberals in alliance with the Reform/Socred types. Even so it took a complete lie ("we won't sell BC Rail") to get them to power. The pretense that they are not the same as the federal Liberals allows the latter to dodge responsibility for the provincial party's conduct and modus operandi, and the provincial Liberals free to rail at Ottawa no matter who's running the show.

Did you notice the conspicuous lack of contact between provincial Liberals and the federal Liberals attending the leadership convention...a charade only.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
05:45 PM on 05/28/2011
Yes, they do behave as LINOs (Liberals in Name Only); but the ties to the federal Liberals are very much there; and may yet see, now strengthened, the party come to pieces (which is what that "name change" rumour is really all about).
10:54 AM on 05/27/2011
you know...I'm tired of this. I'm particularly tired of this "dumping " on young candidates who participated in our democracy by allowing their names to stand , not to mention, the people who voted for them.

With all due respect, If Liberals lost to candidates who were barely present in their riding during the campaign, says something about the LIberal campaign to me.

Your not wrong...it's disgusting that Harper reappointed failed Tory candidates to their Senate positions. And that's just one example. But I fail to see how Liberals are going offer an alternative
when all I'm seeing is complaining that smacks of sour grapes.

Time to stop blaming everything and everybody else....I want to see a vibriant Liberal party in Canada but it's not going to develop in an atmosphere of "it's everybody else's fault we lost" thinking.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Pepperoni
Where did all the good Republicans go?
01:29 PM on 05/27/2011
I agree. The Liberals have only to look inward if they want to regain a significant role in Canadian politics. Maybe 4 years in the wilderness will give them a new vision.

As for the young candidates, you can't blame them for stepping up at all, but it sure shows the confused state of the Canadian voter.
10:43 AM on 05/27/2011
We've been electing majorities with ~40% of the vote since the implosion of the old PC party. I bet you weren't complaining about it when it was Chretien winning and not a tory.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnanimation
03:26 AM on 05/28/2011
Though I am a long time Liberal supporter I must agree with you. This is our system,
like it or not. Time for Liberals to suck it up, get to work and rebuild the party. The Conservatives
crawled back from a two seat shellacking in the 90's. Stop whining Liberals, toss out the deadwood,
lay low for a few years and work to build trust and relevance.