Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Daniel D. Veniez

GET UPDATES FROM Daniel D. Veniez
 

God Sell the Queen

Posted: 12/28/11 10:31 PM ET

Queen Elizabeth II has been a tower of strength and dignity for decades. Her unflinching grace has been a source of inspiration to her subjects and to observers around the world through some of the seismic events of the 20th century. The Queen's love for Canada has been unmistakable throughout her reign. On a windy day on Parliament Hill in April, 1982, she signed the Constitution Act into law in the presence of Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau and Minister of Justice Jean Chretien. It was a seminal event in Canada's history.

The repatriation of the Constitution gave Canada the ability for the first time in our history to amend our own laws without asking for the British Parliament for acquiescence. The fact that it took us so long to achieve that basic act of national independence speaks to the complexity of Canada itself. But our Parliament and the legislatures of nine of 10 provinces finally did it, despite the political struggle it took to get there. And while we are the better for it, Quebec's absence from the Canada Act remains an open wound that must be rectified. That is one of several things that modernizing our Constitution for the 21st century should aim to achieve.

It may come as a surprise to some that weren't paying attention in their ninth grade socials class, but Canada's head of state remains a foreigner -- the Queen of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. We also share our head of state with no less than 16 other countries around the world. As it stands, a Canadian can never be head of state; that is the exclusive preserve of not someone who embodies our national character and values, but is determined by an accident of birth. As far as I am concerned, until a Canadian can be head of state, the soul of the nation will have an uneasy emptiness. We cannot become a truly independent nation until we fully claim it as ours.

Since becoming Queen in 1952, Elizabeth has been a profoundly admired figure that has done Canada proud. She has been our head of state for 60 years, almost half of our history. But she should be Canada's last monarch.

My father and grandfather served Canada valiantly in both World Wars. Grandpa, born and raised in a working class neighbourhood of London called Croydon, was wounded several times -- the last time almost fatally -- in the famous battle of Passchendaele, when he lost a good part of his leg. Of the other 10 people in that trench, he was the only one who made it out alive.

At the start of WWII, Grandpa went to the enlistment office in Montreal and tried to join again, but was turned down. I remember him telling me: "I wanted to finish off those damned Germans!" My father and grandfather inculcated in me a deep love for Canada and our history. My learning and experience over the years has only fortified my attachment to my country. I took my parents to Parliament Hill in 1992 so they could see Queen Elizabeth unveil the majestic statue of her on horseback, located between the Senate side of the Centre Block and the historic East Block of the parliament buildings.

In our short history, Canada has become a globally respected voice and example in the world for peaceful change, tolerance, compromise, democracy, active multilateral engagement, and social justice. We have much to be proud of. Our history is very much part of who we are and what we are. But it does not mean that we should hold on to the vestiges of our colonial past. Quite the contrary. While that past should be honoured and celebrated, we must forge a new, bold, and independent path. It is one that signals that we are distinctly and unabashedly Canadian.

The symbols of our identity matter. They help shape our common values and perceptions of ourselves. They define and reinforce who we are and what we stand for and personify our history and traditions. And symbols should also fortify our values and breathe life into our best aspirations for what we can be as a mature and modern nation.

It therefore matters to me that our head of state is not -- and can never be -- a citizen of Canada. It matters to me that the Canada's constitution requires that duly elected Members of Parliament and provincial legislatures require that an oath of allegiance to the Queen of England be taken before they can take their seats. It matters to me that we teach our children that our most important symbol of national sovereignty is a foreigner, and her appointed surrogate, the Governor General. It matters to me that a very large segment of our population -- mostly residing in Quebec -- cannot and will never identify with a monarchy that is an anachronism from another age.

It is no coincidence that the Royal Family bypasses Quebec whenever they are in Canada. How can it remain acceptable to us that a large number of citizens view our head of state as an historical relic at best, and illegitimate at worst? And what does it say about us that becoming Canada's head of state has nothing whatsoever to do with contribution, merit, credentials, or accomplishment, or even Canadian nationality. The only criterion is bloodline. That very notion is anathema to everything we stand for as a country and the very democratic principles those generations of Canadian men and women sacrificed so much for.

The time has come for Canada shed itself of the last vestiges of a colonial past. The time has come to give ourselves a head of state that is a true reflection of who we are and dream to become as a modern and independent nation.

 

Follow Daniel D. Veniez on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@danveniez

Queen Elizabeth II has been a tower of strength and dignity for decades. Her unflinching grace has been a source of inspiration to her subjects and to observers around the world through some of the se...
Queen Elizabeth II has been a tower of strength and dignity for decades. Her unflinching grace has been a source of inspiration to her subjects and to observers around the world through some of the se...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:02 PM on 01/07/2012
Two points: Firstly, in this year of all years, it is important to remember that, without the Royal Navy (the "Queen's Sailors") we would be only a baker's dozen of US states. Secondly, having the Queen as Head of State and thus 'signing off' on all legislation is the only thing keeping Harper from being a dictator in theory as well as in (current) practice.
07:58 AM on 01/07/2012
From the article: "It is no coincidence that the Royal Family bypasses Quebec whenever they are in Canada. "

Why let facts get in the way of a good story?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2011/07/02/royal-visit-saturday.html

"Kate and William head to Quebec City
Royal couple greeted by well-wishers and protesters in Montreal"
05:03 PM on 12/31/2011
If Canadians are happy and it seems to work for them, stay with what works. I go fishing in Canada every summer, and have always had a nice time in their country.
02:23 AM on 12/30/2011
As Head of State, the Queen is a fundamental part of Canada's system of government and our sense of identity. She unites ALL Canadians in allegiance and what we so importantly get is a collective sense of belonging to the country. Why would you want to ignore the great history of the monarchy in Canada?? It's OUR history like it or not.
Oh, you are a former Liberal candidate.
04:31 PM on 12/30/2011
Not so. As Veniez correctly points out, Quebec doesn't feel that way at all. Even if you are right and 100 percent of the rest of Canada believes that the monarchy is the best thing since slice bread, over 90 percent of Quebec does not. By itself, that is a major problem. But your sweeping g statement that the Queen is a widely respected and cherished symbol of unity is not borne out by all available experience and evidence. More significantly, effective governance and the need to strengthen our democracy in the 21st century demands that we think long and hard about this.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
10:02 AM on 01/01/2012
First of all, 90% of Quebec is about 20% of Canada.........isn't it about time we quit letting them dictate policy????

How would removing the monarchy "strengthen our democracy'?? the democratic traditions of our nation lead straight back to the English constitution, parliamentary system, and the monarchy.......
08:20 PM on 12/29/2011
The Queen is in fact a Canadian Citizen and carries a Canadian Passport.

The Queen is still the head of state of the Commonmwealth and as long as she remains on the money ,Canadians are still considered to be British. British does not mean English , it means Citizen of the Empire ( Commonwealth ) This includes Scots, Welsh, Irish, New Zealanders, and Australians along with various other Island countries .

The Commonwealth has 54 countries , 28 original and now an additional 26 countries has been added , ( some of which should be tossed out on their dictatorial rears )

As you can see The Queen has quite a bit of influence and she should never be underestimated
in her importance to everyone involved .

Remember we still call ourselves Royal Canadian .
06:01 PM on 12/29/2011
Another excellent and thought provoking article by Mr. Veniez. He writes about the need to modernize our constitution and I have read him mentioned this in more more detail elsewhere. I think modernization is urgently required and unavoidable if we are to take our democracy back.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
okgranny
Egalitarian by birth
01:05 PM on 12/29/2011
With the foreign Queen as head of state, Canada is like a teenager who hasn't left home yet. Immature needy and given to excessive, meaningless pomp and ceremony that belies our egalitarian beliefs. The Queen and her family are irrelevant to Canada.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ansdlmol
02:12 PM on 12/29/2011
Why not kill two birds with one stone. Divest ourselves of both the Queen and Quebec!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
03:47 PM on 12/29/2011
We left home a long time ago, and are quite independent. That doesn't mean we have forgotten, or should ignore our parentage.

Indeed, by definition, the Crown is FAR from irrelevant in Canada.....

:)
05:58 PM on 12/29/2011
No we should not ignore it. But should a prime minister ask the Queen's representative to dissolve parliament? Should the Liberal leader ask the GG to withhold his signature on a piece of legislation passed by the House of Commons? Should our head os state be viewed as illegitimate by a vast majority of Quebecers and a great many young people? Should Canadian democracy have an unelected Senate whose members are appointed until age 75? Does it make sense that our constitutional head of state is a foreigner and her representative is appointed?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
okgranny
Egalitarian by birth
10:02 PM on 12/29/2011
OK maybe not "irrelevant. How about the royal family is a meaningless anachronism?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ware
God hates us all!
12:44 PM on 12/29/2011
Totally agree, Queen Elizabeth II should be Canada's last monarch.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
03:48 PM on 12/29/2011
To be replaced with what???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Stacey
Kill guns, not children.
11:21 AM on 12/29/2011
Thankyou.