Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Raffi Cavoukian
David Gratzer

GET UPDATES FROM David Gratzer
 

She's a Good Sheila

Posted: 01/18/2012 12:33 am

It ended with a whimper, not a bang.

This past weekend, Sheila Copps fell just 26 votes shy of winning the Liberal Party presidency, against businessman Michael Crawley.

Sheila Copps has since suggested that she has run her last race and will focus on charity, in particular efforts to help Haiti.

So ends a long political career.

Copps first ran for office in 1977. She served in Toronto before going to Ottawa in 1984. When the Chrétien Liberals won in 1993, she joined the Cabinet, holding various roles, including Deputy Prime Minister. She lost a bitter nomination battle in 2004 to Prime Minister Paul Martin's organizers and candidate.

I met up with her in Toronto this past November. I'm not a Liberal, nor was I involved in the race. Still, Copps spoke to me at some length. What was clear was her passion.

Copps argued that the party needed a hand. Though out of office, she felt that she could help the Liberals in the party's greatest time of need.

"The presidency is two years," she said, and then added with a grin: "I think I can work my butt off for two years." In the four weeks before our conversation, she estimated that she had slept in her own bed just three times -- so it was, with a campaign that stretched from sea to sea.

It's easy, after leaving politics, to settle into a more comfortable life -- to leave behind the church basements and rubber chicken dinners, opting for the five-star hotels and the lavish restaurants. Many of her former colleagues in Cabinet have done just that.

There is no problem, of course, with a good retirement after a long political career. If anyone deserved it, Copps did. It's a testament to her commitment to her party and her country that she did re-enter public life, choosing a hard campaign for an unpaid office, out of a sense of duty.

Copps is known for her humour. When John Crosbie told her to "just quiet down, baby" during Question Period in 1985, she responded that she was "nobody's baby."

She crossed swords on more occasions with Crosbie but, in the end, she appreciated that a good political fight wasn't necessarily personal. Crosbie was invited to write the introduction to her autobiography. He did, and began: "I write this Introduction to her new book as a tribute to a feisty, sometimes ferocious, feminist protagonist, never shy or retiring but redoubtable political personality."

For the record, in the end, she had a good line, too. "I lost a provincial election once by 14 votes amongst 35,000. So this is a landslide," she told The Globe.

In person, Copps is witty and clever, too.

But she should be remembered for more than that. In particular, her commitment to public service.

Canadians often grumble about their politicians. We are quick to blame Ottawa, and sometimes rightly so. But in the commitment of people like Sheila Copps, we should also remember that we are also very lucky. Political life is hard; the dedication of people like Copps is important.

Many thanks Sheila.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
murphyj87
08:30 AM on 01/19/2012
David Gratzer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DII7v8yeRjs
09:19 AM on 01/19/2012
This post has nothing to do with the blog (which is great). Why don't you engage the writer, instead of attack him?

btw, he's credible

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gpNjWW9Fqw
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donner_Prize
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frnkndad
12:28 AM on 01/19/2012
When in the brat pack, she went out of her way to make near slanderous accusations, but never provided a shred of evidence.
Then in government, she spent equal effort covering for accusations against the Liberal regime.
Her record is a shining example of what is wrong with politics.
She very well may be a good and honest person.
She may have always thought she was acting in the best interest of Canadians.
But to the casual observer, there's a stench of cronyism and hypocrisy.
05:00 PM on 01/18/2012
She may well be all you say, but it is my opinion that many of them are in politics because they see it a way to a supeior income and a fat pension. Do they do some good? Of course in some cases but too many are their for their own personal benefit. They are far overpaid and enjoy pensions that the average Canadian can only dream about. I would be far more sympathetic to politicians if they were earning an income and pension that was in tune with those by the rest of us.
I have watched the antics in Parliament and have been disgusted by the nonsense that goes on. Being an MP or MPP is not rocket science. I have known a number of people during my lifetime who would be much more valuable sitting in Parliament or the Legislature than many of those that are their now.
06:16 PM on 01/21/2012
This is to assume that MPs and MPPs are representative of the average Canadian - they are not. When it comes to educational background and professional experience (most come from business or legal backgrounds) MPs are usually not making more than they would make if they had chosen to stay in the private sector. I agree, their pensions are a tad exorbitant, but they were introduced in the spirit of attracting high quality MPs. Also, it is ignorant to think that being an MP or MPP is not difficult. The hours are extremely long, they're always victim to public scrutiny, and their work-life balance is non-existent. I'm quite sure that "the average" Canadian doesn't have to worry about getting confronted on their work choices while watching their kids' hockey games or picking up a carton of milk - politicians do. If you're so confident in other people's ability to do a superior job, there is a simple solution - run.
01:27 PM on 01/22/2012
I agree that many of the politicians do have good educations and some have good relative experience in business or the legal world, but many do not. These attributes apply in many cases only to those who are in the hierarchy of their political parties. The run of the mill Mp or Mpp is not in those categories but as long as they can hang around long enough they enjoy perks, privileges incomes and pensions that the average Canadian can only dream about. In the public service( at least one area that I am familiar with) pension contributions are matched with 1.5% from the employer. This for someone who carries a large amount of responsibility and supervise several people.
As to running for office, I will tell you that I have refused twice to do that for the simple reason that I would not have been able to vote my conscience on issues. Until the political system in this country is changed to one that ensures all parties are represented at the cabinet table, we will continue to have a fractured nation.
There is much more to say on the number of items you outlined but it will take much longer for a discussion and I think it is time to close for now. I would welcome further dialogue.