Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Raffi Cavoukian
David Suzuki

GET UPDATES FROM David Suzuki
 

Why Canada Can't Say "No" to Asbestos

Posted: 07/18/2012 1:17 am

Mesothelioma is a nasty cancer that affects the lining around a person's lungs. It can also damage membranes around the abdomen, heart, and testicles. The prognosis for those who have it is poor. It causes close to 90,000 preventable deaths a year. More than 90 per cent of cases are attributed to asbestos exposure.

Asbestos is made up of tiny fibres that can be inhaled, penetrating the lungs. Because they are mineral-based, they can't be broken down by the body's natural defences, so they cause inflammation. The fibres also remain in the lining around the lungs, and over time -- often 20 to 30 years or more -- may cause mesothelioma or other diseases.

Because asbestos is a known carcinogen, it has been banned by more than 50 countries, including all members of the European Union. They appear to be getting along fine without it, probably because there are safe alternatives for construction, fire-proofing, and other asbestos functions. Canada and the U.S. have not banned it but don't use it much anymore.

Although Canada doesn't have a domestic market for asbestos, we actively support the industry and promote exports to other countries, especially India. In fact, Canada is one of only a few countries that still exports asbestos. And despite these times of government cutbacks, the Quebec government has even stepped in to keep the industry alive by agreeing to lend the Jeffrey Mine in Asbestos, Quebec, $58-million to restart and expand.

The Jeffery operation is one of the two last asbestos mines in Canada, both of which were shut down last year. Proponents also hope to restart the other, Lac d'amiante du Canada in nearby Thetford Mines. Quebec has one of the highest rates of mesothelioma in the world.

Meanwhile, the Quebec and federal governments had been funding the Chrysotile Institute, an asbestos industry lobby group, to the tune of a quarter million dollars or more a year. Federal funding was axed last year and the institute closed earlier this year. The federal government has also blocked international efforts to have asbestos listed as hazardous -- against advice from Health Canada -- by repeatedly voting to keep it off the UN Rotterdam Convention, a treaty listing hazardous substances and requiring exporting countries to inform importers of bans, dangers, and safe-handling methods.

Asbestos may be good enough for export to Indonesia and India, but not for the politicians who support the industry here at home. The federal government has spent millions of dollars to remove asbestos from buildings on Parliament Hill and from the prime minister's residence. As for the stuff that will be removed from the Jeffrey Mine -- more than 200,000 tonnes a year for the next 20 years -- it will be sent to developing countries that may not adhere to safety standards for its use and handling.

Interestingly, the Jeffrey Mine's owner had asked for a loan guarantee, but the government offered a direct loan. Maybe the private sector didn't see much future in trading a known carcinogen that countries around the world are moving to ban. It's particularly disappointing to see the Quebec government, which otherwise has a pretty good environmental track record, support a project with known negative environmental and health risks.

It also says a lot about the absurdity of an economic system in which creating a few jobs and boosting wealth is a higher priority than preventing cancer, protecting health, and having a clean environment. The Jeffery mine re-opening is expected to create just over 400 direct jobs, each paying about $16 an hour.

Is such a small economic boost worth the misery and death continued extraction and exports will cause? Many health and environmental experts from here and around the world don't think so. The Canadian Medical Association, Canadian Cancer Society, Canadian Public Health Association, Canadian Labour Congress, and other organizations have called for a ban, with labour groups also asking for a just transition strategy for affected workers. Around the world, numerous health agencies, scientists, and doctors, including the World Health Organization, have warned of the dangers of asbestos and have recommended banning it.

We must urge the governments of Quebec and Canada to listen to scientists, experts, and the public and put the brakes on this deadly industry.

Written with contributions from David Suzuki Foundation Editorial and Communications Specialist Ian Hanington.

Learn more at www.davidsuzuki.org

For more insights from David Suzuki, please read Everything Under the Sun (Greystone Books/David Suzuki Foundation), by David Suzuki and Ian Hanington, now available in bookstores and online.

 
 
 
FOLLOW CANADA
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:29 PM on 07/20/2012
Demand for chrysotile asbestos products is very strong in all major developing countries representing 60 % of the world’s population. They are ideally suited to answer basic needs such as housing and drinking water supply for the poorest of the world, mainly because of their low cost as compared to the alternatives. The choice for these people is to have a chrysotile roof, or have no roof.

High-density chrysotile cement products similar to those being manufactured and installed in those countries were installed in tens of thousands of houses and buildings in Canada for decades and pose no problem; an important number of those buildings are still standing. Indeed, such products are being installed now in the McGill University Health Center, a major hospital now under construction in Montreal. Many people would be surprised to know the number of buildings where such pipes have been installed throughout Canada in the past two decades alone. As recently as 2003 chrysotile pipes still accounted for 19 % of Canada’s drinking water distribution network.

These products are entirely different from the «sprayed» or « loose-asbestos» insulation products that were used extensively in developed countries for a long time but that have been phased out some 30 years ago.

When such loose products are removed, as was the case for example in the Canadian Parliament buildings, very strict safety measures must be taken. But modern chrysotile products can be installed safely, anywhere in the world

Guy Versailles, chrysotile industry spokesperson
03:07 PM on 07/18/2012
I know it is hard to fathom, considering that some people ascribe infallable wisdome on everything Suzuki deems to make pronouncements on, but maybe the persons who are paid to make decisions on this affair and who have all the information they require to do so, might be better at deciding what must be done for the greatest good of all.
It is easy to secound guess decisions made by others particularly when you have nothing to loose and lot of publicity to be gained.
03:51 PM on 07/18/2012
I was going to say Suzuki finally got one thing right. The asbestos market isn't much of a market at all. Shut down the mine already. This is simple vote buying 101.
photo
albertarick
These are questions for wise men with skinny arms
11:16 AM on 07/18/2012
This is a great example of the "new normal" that is being imposed upon the general population. Wealth concentration at the top, has made even the most laughable trade offs, 400 jobs @ $16/hr for almost certain illness, seem like a bargain.
11:00 AM on 07/18/2012
Seems to me India has a smart enough government to ban an unsafe product. Why do they want it anyway? Surely there are some safe uses of this product. The miners in Quebec aren't dropping like flies.
02:44 PM on 07/18/2012
No one is dropping like flies from mesothelioma because it is a chronic desease that takes many years to develop... Doesn't matter.. you don't want it. Interesting though that the article states Quebec has one of the highest instances of mesothelioma in the world. So, your last statement may be terribly false.
04:04 PM on 07/18/2012
It takes about 30 years to get mesothelioma and 80% of the cases are from asbestos exposure. The main source is mining and manufacturing. It is tough to avoid asbestos exposure in mining but it may be possible to limit exposure in manufacturing. So for some specialty products, India may see the risk as worthwhile. Most of the risk is in mining it. It should be banned.