Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
David Suzuki

GET UPDATES FROM David Suzuki

Climate Change Deniers Can't Refute 24 Hours of Reality

Posted: 09/11/11 04:38 PM ET

Most reality TV has little to do with the real world. But here's an online show that will reflect what is happening in and to our world: 24 Hours of Reality will feature 24 presenters in 24 time zones talking about the climate crisis in 13 languages. It starts Sept. 14 at 7 p.m. local time in Mexico City and wraps with a live multimedia presentation from New York City by Nobel laureate and former U.S. Vice President Al Gore at 7 p.m. on Sept. 15.

Climate change is reality. It's happening in front of our eyes, and massive volumes of research from climate scientists around the world confirm that it will get worse if we fail to do something about it. The facts are no longer in dispute. Greenhouse gas emissions, mainly caused by humans burning fossil fuels, are warming the planet. And the consequences aren't pretty: health problems caused by pollution; increasing extreme weather events leading to floods, droughts, and storms; shrinking glaciers and related impacts on water supplies and agriculture; insect infestations; conflict over dwindling resources; threats to the survival of plants and animals... the list goes on.

Some people don't recognize how serious the problem is, delaying efforts to resolve it. And the longer we put off finding and implementing solutions, the harder and costlier it will be to overcome the impacts. Former World Bank chief economist Lord Stern estimated that keeping heat-trapping greenhouse gas emissions below levels that would drive climate change to catastrophic levels could cost up to two per cent of global GDP, but failure to act could be economically disastrous.

People accuse me and other environmentalists and scientists of being "alarmist". But the situation is alarming, and it's even more alarming that some people ignore it, perhaps believing it will go away -- or that the crisis doesn't even exist. In part, this disconnect with reality is because industrial interests spend billions of dollars sowing doubt and confusion, continually promoting discredited theories -- just as they've done with issues including the dangers of tobacco smoke and the harmful effects of chlorofluorocarbons on the ozone layer. They tell us climate change doesn't exist, or that it's caused by volcanoes or the sun, or that it's part of a natural cycle -- even that God will regulate the climate to the advantage of humans.

But as Al Gore points out, "The deniers may have millions of dollars to spend, but we have a powerful advantage. We have reality." That reality includes mountains of published, peer-reviewed research by close to 98 per cent of the world's climate scientists, as well as real-time observation.

The David Suzuki Foundation's executive director in Quebec, Karel Mayrand, will deliver the 24 Hours of Reality French presentation at 7 p.m. French Polynesia time (midnight Montreal time). He'll be joined by two more Canadians, Peter Schiefke in Victoria at 7 p.m. Pacific Time on Sept. 14, and Carl Duivenvoorden from New Brunswick at 7 p.m. Greenland time (6 p.m. New Brunswick) on Sept. 15. They and others will show there is no debate among scientists and knowledgeable people over the existence of human-caused climate change. If there is to be debate it should focus on what to do about it. Doing nothing, as some of the industry shills argue we should, is not a viable option.

Solutions exist, although the cost and severity of the challenge is greater now than in 1988 when climatologists first called for emissions reductions. As more people become aware of the problem and its causes, and learn about the motives of the deniers, it becomes more likely that we'll find ways to reduce the consequences and put humanity on a path to healthier lives on a healthier planet.

We can't argue with people who deny reality. All we can do is to make sure the voice of reason speaks louder and that those of us who care about humanity join together to find better ways to live on our Earth. Please visit ClimateRealityProject.org to find out how you can tune in to 24 Hours of Reality. Choose the presentation and time zone you want, or take part in the entire event. You can even set up viewing parties with family, friends, neighbours, and colleagues. And spread the word. We need to speak up for the future of humanity.

The time to act is now.


Dr. David Suzuki is a scientist, broadcaster, author, and co-founder of the David Suzuki Foundation. Written with contributions from David Suzuki Foundation editorial and communications specialist Ian Hanington.

Learn more at www.davidsuzuki.org.

 
Most reality TV has little to do with the real world. But here's an online show that will reflect what is happening in and to our world: 24 Hours of Reality will feature 24 presenters in 24 time zones...
Most reality TV has little to do with the real world. But here's an online show that will reflect what is happening in and to our world: 24 Hours of Reality will feature 24 presenters in 24 time zones...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 294
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
05:35 AM on 09/15/2011
Can't refute that a young man from Australia somehow identified passing air over his hometown as infected by my cars engine. Climate is a worldwide phenomenon. I'm so pleased we all recognize it has changed during our lifetimes. But what does knowing about it here change and effect the temperature that covers the earth? It's cool to be smart, and right about these things. Is a colder average temperature more desirable? If so, latest awareness efforts prove to effect only readers, since the atmosphere on our planet has been around longer than American politics. It tends to behave on a grander scale than I would ever admit I could change. But, whatever.
aintnoliberalnow
Old,cranky and retired
02:35 PM on 09/13/2011
Spend three years working outside in a rural environment anywhere in North America and you can watch the climate variables. I don't know if it is warming, cooling or just mother nature adjusting but in a lot of locations, our climate has changed drastically in the last 20 years and where I live we now routinely get weather we never got 30 years ago. Less snow, more rain per storm and less often, stronger winds, more warm days, much shorter winters and the list goes on. Something is happening.
Oginikwe
I think therefore I'm dangerous
11:16 PM on 09/14/2011
Yep. As an herbalist who spends a lot of time outside and has to be in touch with plants, I've been watching things change a lot since the late 1980s. Things bloom out of schedule, insects and animals are spreading to places they've never been before, trees are getting more diseases, and plants burn up when they don't grow in some shade. Our winters are very warm compared to what they used to be and our summers are hotter than they've ever been. We're 400 inches short of moisture we should have and need 200 inches of water just to stay even at our current drought level.
Fact is, it's too late. Fasten your seatbelt, it's going to be a bumpy ride.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
givemtheirwish
Science is the belief in ignorance of "experts"
12:17 PM on 09/13/2011
GLOBULL WARMING MELTDOWN #987

I think Alan Caruba sums up the warming movement's meltdown: The Slow, Certain Death of the Global Warming Theory
Sunday, September 11th 2011, 2:46 AM EDT Co2sceptic (Site Admin)
I have been predicting the death of the global warming theory since late in the last decade when it became obvious that the Earth had entered into a cooling cycle. By 2009 the leak of thousands of emails between the “scientists” whose computer models the claims were based upon revealed they were in a state of panic regarding this obvious phenomenon.

Employed by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Global Warming (IPCC), those “scientists” have since been protected by the universities who benefited greatly from the huge grants of public funding they received. The issue of whether such men should be prosecuted for deceiving the entire world remains to be decided.

The lead player, Dr. James Hansen, still on the payroll of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, is the man who told Congress in 1988 that global warming threatened mankind and the Earth. He has since switched to lying about coal and oil, two of the fossil fuels on which the economies of all nations depend, claiming they are deadly pollutants that must be abandoned in favor of “clean energy”, wind and solar.
[READ ON]
http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=8325
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CanadianSkeptic
Amazingly, thinking can solve most problems
02:36 PM on 09/13/2011
Been predicting the end of global warming for the last ten years? Yeah, how's that working out for Carbura? Where does it say the earth is entering a cooling period? I doubt you can find scientific evidence supporting that (links or it's bull!).

Also, the IPCC scientists and others Caruba is attacking were all cleared of wrong doing by several investigations, both internal and independent, which is why no one lost their jobs or were prosecuted.

And are you really agreeing that coal and oil are not deadly pollutants?

Alan Caruba is a public relations counselor NOT a climate scientist. He's not even a science journalist. Taking science advice from him is like tuning if to Dr. Phil for you're annual physical.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lbsaltzman
Permaculture and Sustainability
05:52 PM on 09/13/2011
We should be abandoning fossil fuels and replacing them with wind and solar. I applaud James Hansen for pushing that campaign.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
givemtheirwish
Science is the belief in ignorance of "experts"
07:26 PM on 09/13/2011
Yep, I believe that becomes a reality shortly after world peace.....................
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jean Bastien
Fear is the game of the Powerslave
02:08 AM on 09/14/2011
Silly. Just silly...
What do you drive right now?
You won't take my gas guzzler!
10:33 AM on 09/13/2011
People are smarter than you acknowledge. They are not moved by the doom prophecies because so many dire predictions did not materialize, or have had to be substantially revised, and we are not seeing a series of climate catastrophes occurring. Low lying islands are not being swallowed up by the nonexistent rise in sea level. The Gulf has not been annihilated by the increased numbers and intensity of hurricane seasons. The US Northeast, England and Europe are not becoming snow-less-- infact they have had plenty of it. People will start to believe your apocalyptic forecasts when they present a better track record of accuracy people can see.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
canuckhoser
Don't mind the man behind the curtain
11:03 AM on 09/13/2011
Who said "The US Northeast, England and Europe *would* become snow-less"...?

Please provide the science. Then provide how many times it was cited in the scientific literature...

The rest, people can see just fine...if they pay attention...

Pakistan, Australia, Japan, Russia, Vermont, Texas, California, Somalia...just in the last year alone.

heatwaves, floods, storms, fires and droughts....they are all materializing. They are all growing in strength, not only science and observation prove this, insurance claims for flooding surpassed everything else for *the first time* last year....

Predicted and materialized...

I still want that paper on the "snow-less" claim...back it up

Thanks
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
B Wood
11:09 AM on 09/13/2011
Two thirds of Americans aged 18 to 24 cannot find Iraq on a map

41% of Americans do not know who the Vice President is

A Pew poll in 2007 found only 68% of Americans knew we had a trade deficit.

And what was your point again?
03:03 PM on 09/13/2011
Nuff said... and FANNED!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:59 AM on 09/13/2011
Science deniers can and will deny anything. They don't believe that cigarettes cause cancer, or that asbestos does, or that coal dust causes black lung, they don't believe that dioxin caused the birth defects at Love Canal, or that HIV causes AIDS, or that vaccines prevent polio. They don't believe in evolution, or that clouds don't hear prayers, or that the universe is billions of years old.

What do they believe in? Money and Power. Money is their only God and Power is their Goal.
photo
ideasmatter
Knowledge is free
11:26 PM on 09/12/2011
"Climate Change Deniers Can't Refute 24 Hours of Reality". Wishful thinking: they can and they will.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrew Harvey
Don't F with the Jesus
11:43 PM on 09/12/2011
Based on all the factual errors Mr. Gore made last time he did a TV show, how can anyone be anything but critical?
08:51 AM on 09/13/2011
What 'factual errors' would those be, on your behalf? Recall that while you may be imagining some sort of 'errors' to suit your rhetorical conclusion, others may not share your delusional miscomprehensions of climate science and the physics concerned with such. Please, with specific details, what sorts of 'factual errors' you were referring to
09:18 AM on 09/13/2011
I am skeptical of the 'wishful thinking' on the behalf of the "Climate Change Deniers". When will you be refuting "Reality"?
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
09:34 PM on 09/12/2011
Isn't this the same David Suzuki who denies ag science?

Science denier Suzuki in action about GMOs:
http://archives.cbc.ca/science_technology/biotechnology/clips/11008/

Real scientists who study agriculture disagree with him. Suzuki is not a plant pathologist. He is not an ag scientist. He thinks Norman Borlaug was wrong about GMOs. Borlaug! He saved one billion people and won the Nobel Peace Prize for it! Does Borlaug have more cred than Suzuki? Borlaug supported GMO
http://www.torontoglobalist.org/2010/11/24/the-man-that-saved-a-billion-lives-norman-borlaug-gmos/
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
10:00 PM on 09/12/2011
I kinda agree with Suzuki, although I'm on the fence. I think GMO is a technology like nuclear technology: its a profound game-changer. Eventually, as with nuclear, it'll revolutionize human society for the better. But thats only after much trial and error, and the consequences of error are intense. My objection to GMO is biological, not chemical, actually. GMO foods are potentially SO different from their parents (do they HAVE parents?) as to constitute introduced species. The biologists tell us we are in a great extinction process brought by man, comparable to the one that destroyed the dinosaurs. And a major reason for these extinctions is introduced species. Do we really want to place the introduced species threat on steriods? Thats what GMO will do.

In any case, this is a global warming thread, and you are far afield. Suzuki has a right to his GMO opinion, and you can fight that battle somewhere else. I still support nuclear energy, even after Fukushima, but I don't blame a large fraction of my fellows in thinking I'm crazy for that support. Fukushima is exactly what Suzuki's caution over GMO's is about. Eventually, these game-changing technologies will revolutionize human society. But, if we rush into application, they could destroy it. Thats just a consequence of how powerful they are.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:34 AM on 09/13/2011
The problem with GMO foods is not in the science, its in the strong distrust any sane person has for mega-corporations like Monsanto. Given all the horrible things the mega- corporations have done, it will take a lot of work for GMO companies to get anyone to trust them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
B Wood
11:18 AM on 09/13/2011
Strawman alert!!!!
This American
An end to all this nonsense
09:28 PM on 09/12/2011
"Climate Change Deniers Can't Refute 24 Hours of Reality"

This is not a true headline. Two word are all that is needed to refute this ridiculous publicity stunt.

1. Albert

2. Gore
08:52 AM on 09/13/2011
I see you're still appealing to a belief, and presented nothing in the way of scientific facts to support your opinion(s) regarding anthropogenic climate changes. Better luck next time?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
canuckhoser
Don't mind the man behind the curtain
11:06 AM on 09/13/2011
This pathological h_atred for a person is quite boring....

More content, less noise
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
06:49 PM on 09/12/2011
You know what I find fascinating about the 'climategate' scandal? That we're all talking about what we read in the hacked emails of climate scientists. We sniffed through their dirty underwear, and didn't like what we smelled. And that means that THEY have a problem...

Why aren't we sniffing through the hacked emails of fossil fuels executives? I dunno, but suspect it has something to do with 1984. In any case, climate scientists are under attack: it seems powerful oil lobbyists want to read through more of their emails. The scientists are mounting a legal defense, but despite all that extraordinary U.N. support that made them rich for telling a lie, they don't have enough money. They are asking for the public's financial assistance at this website: http://profmandia.wordpress.com/2011/09/09/donation/

Someone once said it would be a good day when defense companies had to hold a bake sale for new weapons systems. I would settle for a day when we are all sniffing through the hacked emails of oil company executives and filing legal action for more emails. Of course, they would have all the money they needed to keep that from happening. Unlike the scientists.
06:48 PM on 09/12/2011
Lets look at from a capitalist perspective-
If we do nothing and the world goes to hell = no so good.
We do something and there is no global warming = we saved energy, polluted less and have more resources.
Can't see the downside regardless of your 'side' and really, unless you are truly knowledgeable what is the value of your opinion? Also, the status quo not working so well for most of us - let's adapt and change our behavior and thinking.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tygartman
Hoping for Change in 2012
06:18 PM on 09/12/2011
One man's "reality" is another man's "propoganda".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trepasky
Sanity is neither free nor easy
08:52 PM on 09/12/2011
Unless the reality can not be avoided.

BTW your comment makes your comment propaganda
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Dobbins
I may be dumb but I'm not that dumb
06:13 PM on 09/12/2011
Wake me when Mr. Gore agrees to debate those from the other side rather than produce an infomercial of tacit data points and name calling. Until he is ready to face scientific challenge in person to defend his ideas as is the norm in our scientific community, this is just more arm waving.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trepasky
Sanity is neither free nor easy
08:54 PM on 09/12/2011
Al Gore is not a scientist and the 'other scientists' have reviewed much of the work of those who 'deny' human caused climate change.

Why ask a non-expert to debate your 'experts'

Maybe because in some reality politicians hold more 'weight' than scientists?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
canuckhoser
Don't mind the man behind the curtain
11:16 AM on 09/13/2011
The science is challenged in the 200 years old scientific method of peer-review, blind studies and the verification process through reason and empirical data...

It's not a reality show debate-off...and Gore isn't the issue, no matter how hard you want to deflect it towards him...
05:17 PM on 09/12/2011
I'm not a denier, but I am a tad skeptical about the 'universality' of all this.

Cuz if you're going to question the way the deniers are funded, you also have to question the international "grant money circlejerk" used by the world's climate scientists. You know: they need grants to have a job (and feed their families), and grants are given out by panels of their peers ...their studies are reviewed by their peers...who also need grant money to stay alive. It's one big, happy club that functions on the "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" model.

One thing that WAS crystal clear in the Climategate "scandal" is that anyone not toeing the established memes on climate change are/were ostracized, marginalized & basically booted out of their little club. And c'mon...did anyone not believe that was happening before those emails came out?

All of this has led to a regimented 'universality' that needs to be viewed just as skeptically as who's funding the deniers. It's almost like North Korea & 'human causation of climate change' is the Dear Leader!! Anyone who joins The Party will be fed...anyone committing heresy is exiled.
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
05:38 PM on 09/12/2011
To witness controversy about global warming amongst climate scientists, you'd have to travel back to the 1960s and 1970s, which were the last decades there was any real disagreement among them about what was going on. In the 1970s, already, about 60% of the papers written were about global warming. I studied under a climatologist, in the early 80s, who was studying the urban heat-island effect. Most skeptics don't know that climatologists studied this long before the skeptics 'discovered' it, and that effect is incorporated into climatological models. I believe that what you're hearing expressed in the 'climategate' emails is pure animal frustration. To those of us who have been there from the beginning, its beyond bizarre that this is still a subject for conversation... anywhere. Actually, that's the opinion of most of the world. Someone councilled below that we should all 'keep an open mind' until the science is settled. What are we waiting for, the remaining 3% of climate scientists to switch? As long as there is an oil industry, that's not going to happen.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lbsaltzman
Permaculture and Sustainability
07:07 PM on 09/12/2011
When you have some hard science I will listen. I am uninterested in personal attacks on the integrity of the many hardworking scientists who have alerted us to this danger. Few if any of them make more than an adequate living. You offer no substantiation for your attacks other than vague innuendo.
photo
julieintx
End the Hollywood tax cuts
02:47 PM on 09/12/2011
Why isn't this site doing more to support this Reality project? I've seen more about it on righty sites than here, and the righty sites have only briefly mentioned it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
03:00 PM on 09/12/2011
That's a great question Julie.

Any moderators want to field that one?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bubblessharky
Where sanity dares to tread
04:28 PM on 09/12/2011
Perhaps a reality TV programme - like what are we doing to get ready for climate change. In an ideal world it would feature on Fox, as they are the dudes who need to hear the message the most, but of course Fox, being Fox won't...
01:50 PM on 09/12/2011
Ultimately, science will decide whether the "Warmists" or the "Skeptics " are correct. until that time arrives, it would be wise to keep an open mind , as any scientist worth his salt , would do .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
03:01 PM on 09/12/2011
that's a foolish way to hedge a bet. if warmists are right then the warmists, skeptics and everyone sitting around on their hands are going to pay dearly.
04:52 PM on 09/12/2011
One does not spend hundreds of billions of dollars and impoverish millions, just because warmists might be right. That would be real foolishness !!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bubblessharky
Where sanity dares to tread
04:26 PM on 09/12/2011
Science will decide nothing. Events will dictate and unfortunately by that stage the Pandora will be truly out of the box...
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
04:41 PM on 09/12/2011
I think you're right. Both climate change and population are exponential phenomena: they eventually 'blow up'. A characteristic of such phenomena is that once you define the vertical axis value at which 'things blow up', you can zoom out and discern a horizontal part of the curve, at the start, and a vertical part of the curve, at the end. In between is a 'knee', where the curve went from horizontal to vertical. It turns out that if you define the 'things blow up' point as 20 billion people (for population) and 4 C of temperature change (for climate change), then for both phenomena, the 'knee' is right now, the early 2000's. What that means is that from this point forward, both phenomena will 'go vertical'. From this point forward, changes will get heaped upon changes in ever increasing amounts. This will be impossible to ignore. Pandora is out of the box. Think about the weather events that have occurred in the last year and a half. As well as the sheer population-induced changes to the Middle-East. Interesting times are no longer hypothetical.