Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
David Suzuki

GET UPDATES FROM David Suzuki
 

A 56-Million-Year-Old Lesson in Climate Change

Posted: 10/21/11 10:12 AM ET

Our planet is an ever-changing sphere of wonder and mystery. By studying sediments, ice-core samples, trees, and fossils, scientists have been able to piece together some of its phenomenal history and evolution. Humans have been here for a relatively short time, our survival and prosperity made possible by the unique conditions that unfolded to create the current balance.

Throughout human history, we have been subject to forces of nature, but overall, the Earth has been in a period that has allowed us to flourish. We can't take that for granted. When we look through a scientific lens, we see amazing hydrologic and carbon cycles, processes such as photosynthesis that allow us to breathe and eat, and so much more. We also see droughts, floods, insect infestations, and mass extinctions that can radically alter the balance of life.

A massive release of carbon into the atmosphere can trigger cataclysmic events. It's something we're facing now, as we burn fossil fuels as fast as we can dig and suck them out of the ground to keep our homes and cities warm and lighted, and to propel ourselves in machines weighing more than 10 times as much as the often-solo person they are transporting.

This is not the first time the Earth has changed in response to carbon overload. Scientists have found that the planet experienced rapid warming about 56 million years ago, long before humans arrived. According to an article in the October issue of National Geographic, a "massive and geologically sudden release of carbon" during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, or PETM, altered the planet's systems, making it possible for new life forms to appear and thrive, including, eventually, humans.

Evidence suggests that the carbon released then was equivalent to the amount that would enter the atmosphere if we burned all the Earth's reserves of coal, oil, and natural gas. The warming effects are believed to have lasted 150,000 years until the carbon was reabsorbed.

The main difference between now and then is that we are fuelling the current change, whereas 56 million years ago, it was a natural phenomenon -- although scientists are still not entirely sure what caused it. The Earth was experiencing massive tectonic upheavals at the time, which would have sparked volcanic activity, but that only accounts for a relatively minor release of carbon and subsequent small increase in global temperatures, even if a comet impact were added to the mix.

The most likely scenario is that the slight warming from those events, or from fluctuations in the Earth's orbit, caused methane hydrates to melt, releasing massive amounts of methane into the atmosphere. As the National Geographic article points out: "The hypothesis is alarming. Methane in the atmosphere warms the Earth over 20 times more per molecule than carbon dioxide does, then after a decade or two, it oxidizes to CO2 and keeps on warming for a long time."

Methane hydrates are ice-like water molecules that form around a molecule of methane. In cold temperatures and under high pressure, they remain stable. Large deposits lie under the Arctic and the seafloor. Scientists believe the current warming could be enough to release these extremely potent greenhouse gases.

Swedish geologist Birger Schmitz, who has studied the PETM science, told National Geographic that we can either wait to see what the result of such a large release will be, or we can look at what happened 56 million years ago. And what happened then "was a wholesale rearrangement of life."

Why would we undertake such a drastic experiment that threatens the survival of the human species when we have pretty good evidence of what the outcome will be? The main reason is that many of us are not willing to give up our newly acquired luxuries and economic systems regardless of the effects on ourselves, our children, our grandchildren, and all other life on the planet. We don't seem to be willing to slow down the pace of fossil fuel extraction and use while we shift to cleaner energy sources and more rational ways of living within this finite biosphere.

We have some tough choices to make. Science increasingly tells us that we must choose wisely and quickly.

Dr. David Suzuki is a scientist, broadcaster, author, and co-founder of the David Suzuki Foundation. Written with contributions from David Suzuki Foundation editorial and communications specialist Ian Hanington.

Learn more at www.davidsuzuki.org.

 
Our planet is an ever-changing sphere of wonder and mystery. By studying sediments, ice-core samples, trees, and fossils, scientists have been able to piece together some of its phenomenal history and...
Our planet is an ever-changing sphere of wonder and mystery. By studying sediments, ice-core samples, trees, and fossils, scientists have been able to piece together some of its phenomenal history and...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 30
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClimateHawk
Think before posting.
03:58 PM on 10/23/2011
Thank you, David.

Your clear explanations are always appreciated.
03:02 PM on 10/23/2011
Quote frm the documentary "Jesus Camp":

"Science has never proved anything".
10:09 PM on 10/22/2011
In my view point the agruement should be about if we want to continue to import our fuel from enemies. We have more geothermal energy in the west to run all of our power needs. We have more solar power in the south west to provide all of our needs. We have tidal, at both coasts. Wind power in the plains areas. Etc. Why not use our own sources?
05:59 PM on 10/22/2011
Not only that, now there are 7 billion people on earth, whatever we do, good or bad, has tremendous consequences.
We have to work on finding long-term solutions for earth's limited resources.
02:41 AM on 10/22/2011
All this fuss about the 3% extra CO2 humans add to the less than 4/100 of 1% of the atmosphere that is CO2. Yup, that's what 391 parts per million translates to. I shake my old head in wonderment that folks are so easily fooled and stampeded into actions based on such delusion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TokyoStormWarning
If you're not outraged you're not paying attention
06:03 AM on 10/22/2011
I shake my ahead at how some people embrace and broadcast their own ignorance--willfully.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Midnight Toker
07:24 AM on 10/22/2011
say Toke..

why isn't your side winning?

if CO2 from fossil fuel is really the issue your side makes it out to be..

then why are you and your side not all over the Re-Legalization of Hemp?

it is a Known and Revered Alternative Fuel Source.

ru serious about saving the planet or just posturing?
BlackbirdHighway
Brawndo's got electrolites!
09:58 AM on 10/22/2011
"less than 4/100 of 1% of the atmosphere that is CO2"

This is what is called a logical fallacy. Just because something makes up only 390 ppm of the atmosphere does not mean it doesn't have an effect.

For instance, 390 ppm of cyanide in the atmosphere will kill a person in 10 minutes. I am glad the effect of CO2 works slower!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
04:46 PM on 10/21/2011
Fumes and Heian, enjoying the notion that hypocrisy trumps science and reality once again.

Here are the children left behind.
04:26 PM on 10/21/2011
That the earth is warming is not in dispute among sane people. The cause can be somewhat debated. It is also possible that the earth has under-appreciated systems to moderate temperature change, (i.e., melting polar ice desalinating the oceans, slowing the Oceanic Conveyor, thereby reducing global temperatures). But why pump billions of tons of pollutants into an atmosphere the size equivalent of the skin on an apple? If we commit to clean energy it is doable, and in short order.

But when you can stick a pipe in the ground and have it pump out millions of dollars a week, and you realize a small fraction of that money can be used to keep the foolish fooled, and the buy-able bought, you don't have a recipe for sensible action.
03:10 PM on 10/21/2011
we are doing nothing on any scale as mentioned above and never will. And we are 2/3 the way to doubling CO2 without the predicted temp. rise.

the main difference between now and then is there is no comparison
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
Proud member of the reality-based community!
09:24 PM on 10/21/2011
"A new study says the seas are acidifying ten times faster today than 55 million years ago when a mass extinction of marine species occurred. And, the study concludes, current changes in ocean chemistry due to the burning of fossil fuels may portend a new wave of die-offs."

http://e360.yale.edu/feature/an_ominous_warning_on_theeffects_of_ocean_acidification/2241/
BlackbirdHighway
Brawndo's got electrolites!
10:14 AM on 10/22/2011
"without the predicted temp. rise"

The temperature is rising fast and following the predictions closely.

Once we finally stop putting CO2 in the atmosphere that won't immediately stop the warming because the CO2 that we have added will stay there for decades to centuries and keep warming that whole time.

After the temperature rises is way too late, just like once you drive a car over a cliff it is way to late to stop. You are arguing that we shouldn't stop because the car hasn't gone over the cliff yet.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Midnight Toker
10:45 AM on 10/21/2011
''Science increasingly tells us that we must choose wisely and quickly.''
-------------------------
lol..

then why all the jet travel to meet here and there to ''discuss'' the emergency?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doubleB
12:40 PM on 10/21/2011
I see... so you agree it's an emergency. But don't think we should fly on jets all over the place to discuss it.

I agree. We can do so via electronic means.

The problem is when bloggers on dark corners of the internet lie about the science. When that happens, and gullible people believe them, and those gullible people have the same voting power as the rest of us, we have a problem.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Midnight Toker
01:06 PM on 10/21/2011
dB..

no i don't agree we have ''an emergency''..

if we did Hemp would be legal again yesterday..

and all airports would be closed until ''the emergency'' was over.

say dB..

have you heard the latest:

Snowball Earth hypothesis challenged
October 12th, 2011 in Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
The hypothesis that the Earth was completely covered in ice 635 million years ago has received a serious blow. The atmospheric concentration of CO2 during that period was much lower than previously thought, according to a team of French researchers from the Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris (CNRS, France), working in collaboration with scientists from Brazil and the US. Their work, which is published in the journal Nature on October 6, challenges part of the so-called Snowball Earth hypothesis and rekindles the debate about the origins of the deglaciation mechanism.
http://www.physorg.com/print237628927.html
03:11 PM on 10/21/2011
its not even close to an emergency.
03:10 PM on 10/21/2011
good point...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Midnight Toker
10:07 PM on 10/21/2011
thankyou!

(how do alarmists sleep at night?)