The party that calls itself Europe is over.
The sovereign debt crisis afflicting its weakest members has ended the eurozone's political Ponzi scheme -- the proclivity to hand out entitlements today and run up a tab due tomorrow.
The continent's La Dolce Vita lifestyle will disappear along with subsidies; cushy civil servant jobs; six-week holidays; 30-hour work weeks, Freedom 50 retirements and its people's belief that the world owes them a living.
This is the Great Markdown in Europe. A more gradual one is underway in North America. Both are due to debts, deficits, demographics and democracy.
Europe's situation is compounded by its badly devised, decentralized and balkanized fiscal regime -- one currency for 17 out of 27 countries and a central bank in each nation state. This is like herding cats and unsustainable as last week's political upheavals revealed.
Two democratically-elected leaders in Greece and Italy were unceremoniously pushed aside and replaced by technocrats and the IMF.
Greece's prime minister was replaced by a de facto "bankruptcy trustee" whose job is to take orders from the IMF, in the hopes of turning around the bankrupt country.
Then Italy's playboy prime minister was replaced by a "soft receiver," Mario Monti. He's a tough-minded academic, with huge political and moral leverage across the European Union, who will make Margaret Thatcher look like Mother Teresa.
By the way, Italy is not a basket case like Greece, Ireland or Portugal. But its bonds are under siege, which could prove ruinous for the region, and this is not due to fundamentals but to trading games that can be halted as described below.
Here are some facts about Italy:
By the way, the relatively seamless transition from elected to technocrats is a healthy and necessary way to circumvent short-term democracies which have failed to cope with this crisis. This is no different than a private sector "workout" where the CEO is removed from a failing corporation and is replaced by the bankers' representatives.
Those reforms are now in place and new leaders in Portugal, Ireland and Spain (in this weekend's election) are kowtowing to the dictates of bondholders and bankers.
But financial reform is necessary in order to arrest and cool off the world's hot money. These are hedge funds and others who have caused the sovereign debt contagion and profited from it by making self-fulfilling short-selling bets.
A fascinating set of remedies has been suggested this week by Leonard Waverman, dean of the Haskayne School of Business at the University of Calgary and former professor at London University.
He rightly suggests that the Euro crisis is similar to the Asian contagion in 1997 when speculators picked off one currency after another. The difference is that, in this case, there is one currency, the euro, but the similarity is that there are the bonds of 17 eurozone members to pick off. This permits a "classic run" because the bonds are substitutes for currencies that can be pummelled down in value for a profit.
"These one-way bets are yielding large profits to some at the expense of hundreds of millions of people," said Waverman.
It is time to put "sand in the wheels" of the "herd" through "capital controls." These include eurozone members mopping up embattled bonds and paying higher than market prices to destroy short-seller profit-taking; raising margin requirements to 50 per cent or more and imposing a Tobin Tax on trades.
It's interesting that in an imperfect currency union, the bonds of each country behave like separate currencies to market players. Waverman also notes that Malaysia was able to avert a currency run in 1997 by deploying such controls.
The European situation is considerably more serious than next week's "drama." The U.S. Congressional "super committee" is supposed to come up with $1.5 trillion in cuts and tax hikes by the end of the week, but they are also politically challenged.
Investors are assuming nothing will be accomplished. This means that the only big news will be if these American politicians actually agree to make cuts before the football games start on Thanksgiving Day.
But don't count on it. The Europeans stand a better chance of fixing their problems before the 2012 U.S. federal election because they have learned how to unseat the incompetents in between elections.
-- Financial Post
Follow Diane Francis on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@dianefrancis1
That, Ms Francis, is otherwise known as a coup. Which, here in America, is also called treason. I recommend resisting the urge toward ego inflation and the advocating of policies that are fundamentally unconstitutional, lest you find yourself on the authoritarian side of history, part of that long list of usurpers and destroyers. This is a country of people - one person, one vote - not a corporation. Your words betray your comfort with that top-down, dictatorial hierarchy, and your lack of attention to the ideas out of which America was conceived - that there are urges toward power that must be checked, or freedom becomes what usurpers and dominators decide it will be.
www.offthgridmpls.blogspot.com
For example, if you compare the current state of the British economy and the French, Dutch or Austrian economy it's certainly not understandable why the later are "pressured" and the UK is not.
On a broader scale it's irrational because:
A) no nation is able to just pay back all the sovereign debt in just a year or even a decade alone. The only sustainable option is to now embark on a course that will quickly balance the budgets and then start to pay back the accumulated debt continually.
B) the current practice of "gaming the system"/ creating self- fulfilling prophesies and then shorten the sovereign bonds to capitalize (in utter disregard of rational, national economic considerations) will probably only end in all nations taking extraordinary measures, like for example all EZ nations just defaulting on all (foreign held) sovereign debt or a harsh monetary reform.
So the result is a moral hazard only "The Markets" can solve for themselves since if they continue their current practice their institutions and investors will find themselves being legally, forcefully disowned. Because in the end, they are people, thus they are under national jurisdiction and unlike maybe their money they are not beyond the reach of the law.
Don't you think it's ironic that on the one hand some consider computer hacking as an act or at least a pre- stage of w@r but organized, foreign speculation against the wealth of sovereign nations not?
Take a GOOD look.....most of the problems are due to good, old fashioned, deregulated, laissez faire style capitalism.....as practiced by the banks, stock markets, oligarchs, and incompetent politicians.
For example, what I could read Italy was not fully opposed, just skeptical.
I do agree that there is only slim chance to implement it EU- wide (UK, Sweden). But I think it's possible EZ-wide; especially if you follow political dynamics. For example, if you look at your list of "opposition", one can pick out Malta, Cyprus(, Italy) and Ireland who will, because of their dire situation and (future) need for help by France, Austria, Germany and Finland, probably reluctantly compromise.
From the people's point of view (and supported by many economists) it makes sense. First, the current, deregulated situation is obviously damaging and needs to be fixed. Solving the sovereign debt situation needs the contribution of all national forces, including the financial sector. And last but not least, a fair share of the recent jump in sovereign debt is attributed to the damages incurred by the financial sector.
There were many arguments against the FTT: (a) First and foremost was the argument that the FTT isn't a tax on financial institutions, it's a tax on retail investors and retirement plans. This information was mentioned by the UK, the Netherlands and others who said that pensioners would end up paying a sizable portion of the tax. (b) Many other EU FMs referred to the EC "Impact Assessment Report" that predicted higher EU unemployment as a result of the FTT. One of the FMs(I think it was the Czech) pointed out that after factoring in the effects of unemployment and reduced GDP the FTT is actually a net negative tax because the income taxes lost will be greater than the FTT collected. (c) The Swedish FM said the EC study was overly optimistic because it over-estimated FTT revenues and underestimated unemployment. He also said it would increase the cost of capital thereby increasing the costs of goods and services resulting in a secondary "tax" on consumers. (d) Many others (e.g., Malta and Cyprus) were against the FTT unless was implemented worldwide, otherwise the financial sector would simply relocate to Switzerland, Hong Kong, Singapore, Canada, Australia, the US, China, Russia, South Korea etc.