Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Don Tapscott

GET UPDATES FROM Don Tapscott
 

What's Louder Than a Formula One Engine? Quebec Protesters

Posted: 06/08/2012 7:39 am

That deafening noise that Formula One fans in Montreal and viewers around the world hear this weekend might not be just the supercharged cars screaming past the grandstands in quest of the checkered flag. It will likely also be the banging of pots and pans by the tens of thousands of protesters filling the streets around the Grand Prix of Canada in order to publicize their fight with the Quebec government.

Racing enthusiasts may have a front row seat on the latest manifestation of youthful alienation that is
metastasizing around the world.

Many Western business and government leaders hoped that young protestors had calmed down since last year and accepted the status quo. With the wind out of the sails of the Occupy movement they wondered what's next, if anything? But the Montreal protests are more evidence that we are in the early days of a global youth radicalization and an era of massive social upheaval. Quebec is the harbinger of things to come.

Downplayed by the international media, the Quebec student nightly protests are the largest demonstrations in Canadian history. Young people used social media to generate a massive march of 200,000 people with 48 hours' notice and for the first time in Canadian history they have received support from youth protests in the rest of Canada. Rather than a replay of the Occupy movement, the Quebec youth have taken protest to an entirely new level, dwarfing the relatively small collections of Occupy campers.

With respect to this coming weekend, one student leader noted, "We're not going to stop protesting because Montreal's having a car race." And race organizers have already cancelled the traditional free open house the Thursday before the race out of fear of interference by protesters.

Initially the students were protesting against a hike in tuition fees. But as the banner at the front of the march last weekend said: "This isn't a student strike, it's a society waking up."

"The reason so many people have come out into the streets is that there's a growing frustration with
inequality in society," says Harold Chorney, a professor at Montreal's Concordia University. "This is really about social justice versus the neo-Liberal, or business-oriented, philosophy."

This is the common thread that runs through the Montreal protest and the similar demonstrations in the U.S. and Europe. But what's new is the massive scale of such actions now coming to North America.

These protests occurred in the wake of the meltdown of the financial services sector and the collapse of the global economy. During the financial services sector crisis, no expense was spared to resuscitate the health of Wall Street. Most of the financial services industry was able to bounce back, with billions of dollars in bonuses being subsequently showered on investment and banking executives.

What followed was the so-called "jobless recovery," leaving millions of Americans and Europeans without jobs. But the politicians say the government can't afford to spend money on job creation programs, let alone fix the underlying economic problems that cause unemployment.

My research shows that the new generation has strong values and they care. But surprisingly, throughout the western world youth voting is declining. Governments face a crisis of legitimacy as increasingly a generation senses that the way to achieve change and build a better world is not through our democratic institutions.

We have the irony of watching massive protests in the Middle East and North Africa as citizens want to be rid of dictators and strive for the sweet taste of democracy. Yet in so-called democratic countries, protesters are saying the system is rigged and doesn't work, regardless of how citizens vote.

The students say that today's democratic countries are failing to deliver on their promise to young people.

The "establishment" said that if young people worked hard, stayed out of trouble, and attended school, they would have a prosperous and fulfilling life. It turns out the establishment was inaccurate, if not dishonest.

Youth unemployment in the U.S. is double the rate of the general population, and ranges from 20 to 50 per cent in Europe.

Young people having no jobs or hope is symptomatic of a deeper set of problems. The world being dumped in their laps is seriously damaged. It is unequal, unstable and unsustainable. Most of the institutions that have served society well for decades -- even centuries -- seem frozen and unable to move forward. The global economy, our financial services industry, governments, healthcare, newspapers, the media and our institutions for solving global problems like the UN, the World Bank and the EU are all struggling.

The sixties baby boomer radicalization was based on youthful hope and ideology. Protesters championed the opposition to war, a celebration of youth culture, and the possibilities for a new kind of social order. Today's unfolding youth radicalization is much different. It is rooted not only in unemployment, but personal broken hopes, mistreatment, and injustice. Young people are alienated.

They are turning their backs on the system.

And unlike the 1960 they are gaining broader support in the population as the Quebec upsurge illustrates.

Today, this deeply frustrated generation has at its fingertips the Internet, the most powerful tool ever for finding out what's going on, informing others and organizing collective responses. Just as the Internet drops collaboration costs for businesses it radically drops the costs of dissent, rebellion and even insurrection.

The youth of Quebec learned from the Occupy movement. Small gatherings of people sleeping in parks and engaging in civil disobedience are inadequate to bring about change. But the combination of social media and mass mobilizations can galvanize and change the relationship of power between a people and the institutions that rule them.

We need to solve the problem of unemployment, fix the schools, enable affordable housing and education, make government relevant again and eliminate the growing impediments to having a good life that face a generation.

If we don't, Quebec provides more evidence that we will see the rise of a global social explosion that
makes the 1960s look like kids' play.

Don Tapscott's new book is Macrowikinomics: New Solutions for a Connected Planet.

 

Follow Don Tapscott on Twitter: www.twitter.com/dtapscott

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 82
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:32 AM on 06/10/2012
After they were stopped on Thursday, the Emile Gamelin protesters broke through the perimeter on both Friday and Saturday. On Saturday the police tried to keep them from the vulnerable point on the perimeter that permitted their entry on Friday but failed to do so. They tried to muster their forces on that square, racing to it,  but left the next street open for the protesters to breach the perimeter. I guess the protesters are just too clever.
03:07 PM on 06/08/2012
Fantasic to see such qualified and vocal replies. It gives me much hope for our future to see you all seeing the obvious and being independent thinkers and concerned over the future over our COMMON future. supporting innovation in new technologes truly new ones will be the key..old systems die naturally when radical new concepts are introduced and made practical.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:43 PM on 06/08/2012
I'm so glad to see these students have the balls to stand up and say..... "This system is corrupt, were not going to sit on the sidelines and allow our future to be misguided by the generation before us." The Boomers and my generation HAVE sat on the sidelines and allowed government and corporate corruption to go unchecked, hopefully this young generation will put an end to it.
04:35 PM on 06/08/2012
I agree. But what does this have to do with a private business or function such as the F1 race?
05:55 PM on 06/08/2012
The protests didn't just start because of the race, they've been going on for over 100 days now. While I don't think disrupting the events themselves or trying to break through the police barricades and antagonize them serves any benefit to the movement, I also think they are wise to take advantage of the international media while it is there.

After over 40 days of daily protests, did anyone really think they'd just "shut up" during the Grand Prix?

Also, a large part of their complaints revolve around the entitlement of corporations at the expense of the population... wouldn't it make sense to protest at an event with so much corporate sponsorship involved? I mean, last time I was at the Grand Prix in Montreal I could practically smell the greed and corruption in the air as I walked down Crescent... Just a thought...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:13 PM on 06/08/2012
Exposure. Millions will be watching worldwide.
07:19 PM on 06/08/2012
I honestly cry during the protests because of this... I'm from the Great Canadian Slump generation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
All Seeing Guy
Center of the storm
02:23 PM on 06/08/2012
Now buy my book kids!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:19 PM on 06/08/2012
Thank you Don, great article.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ally Solver
Problem Solver Extraordinaire
12:41 PM on 06/08/2012
Let them protest. Then bill them for crowd control and clean up.

Then everybody can continue to ignore them.

Censorship is evil.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
silverstreet
All you need is love
01:58 PM on 06/08/2012
"Everyone"?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:44 PM on 06/08/2012
Now there's an inane comment.
This comment has been removed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:27 PM on 06/08/2012
I hope you are right about their passion for justice! It seems like the rest of us fell asleep and haven't woken up.
11:32 AM on 06/08/2012
I hope that the student protest does indicate a higher political awareness and social-leaning stance.

Canada needs more of these protesters especially with the radical policies of Harpo's gang threatening the very fabric of Canadian values and culture.

Get out the pots and pans and show our support.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:45 PM on 06/08/2012
fanned
11:24 AM on 06/08/2012
If they had jobs, these demonstrations would be tiny.
Students have plenty of time on their hands, it seems.

Let them yap, won't change a thing.

Now if people who have families and jobs join in...then watch out because then change is on the way!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sgillhoolley
Occupy the discussion.
11:41 AM on 06/08/2012
Do you know how many families go to the occupation protests in the USA? Do you see real change hurling through their society?
11:53 AM on 06/08/2012
I followed the press accounts and websites devoted to OWS. I would have to say that the number of people that clearly had jobs and families were a tiny minority.

The vast majority of people involved were either footloose youths or professional protestors. And I am being charitable in that assesment.

The Tea Party was a success in changing the political landscape because there were serious people involved.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
silverstreet
All you need is love
01:59 PM on 06/08/2012
Do you think college students don't have families?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:13 AM on 06/08/2012
Intersting is they never mentioned exactly what the hikes in tuition were. Currently canadian students pay less then $3000 for a year of school and the price hike being asked is a scant $250/yr. Basically they are protecting to keep tution the same as it was in the 1970's. This just shows the depths of greed that abounds in social systems. The students shouldn't be allowed to mooch from others for their degree, they should pay for it themselves as an investment for their future.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JUSTBAKERS135
11:30 AM on 06/08/2012
Actually, that way of doing things negatively impacts earning potential and standard of living. If students were forced to pay the full cost of their tuition, the economic ramifications would be massive. This is part of why 20-somethings decisions not to have children, graduating with a debt burden impacts purchasing decisions from home-ownership to cars.

Collectively, society needs to embrace young people and encourage them to grow and create a vibrant society.

If there is an entitled generation that needs a wake up call, it's the boomers - they didn't pay enough into CPP and thus should see their take reduced to keep the country prosperous after they are gone. Don't penalize the young for being born.

Your argument is dumb because why not charge a baby for his/her birth as an investment in their life. Start life with $20k in debt and be a debt-slave for life? Sound like a great plan 8-|

(I am a pro-Harper Conservative FYI). Thank goodness the PM is smarter than you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:40 PM on 06/08/2012
Good lord, what nonsense. No one has to go into debt. You can save money before you start your education. How many students are professional students, or have degrees where they can't find jobs?

No one should go deep into debt for jobs that can't pay them back. Education is an investment in your future. Make your choices wisely.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sgillhoolley
Occupy the discussion.
11:43 AM on 06/08/2012
You and I have already had this discussion, and I cannot believe that you are willfully ignoring the facts I gave you, which you are free to verify on your own. Tuitions in Quebec in 1979 was $600, which is $2000 in real dollars (accounting for inflation). Students today pay $2500, which is already 25% higher than that which the baby boomers had to pay, and if the increase goes through it is $325 a year, for 5 years, bringing their new tuition up to $4000 a year, which is DOUBLE in real dollars that which the Baby Boomers graduating in 1979 had to pay.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
silverstreet
All you need is love
02:00 PM on 06/08/2012
Of course he's ignoring the facts.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RocketPower
10:33 AM on 06/08/2012
The problem is, especially if you read the threads on articles of this subject, that a certain group of citizens are so enamoured with the status quo that they will defend neo-libs/cons and their policies to the point of mocking those who dissent. People want to be pigeonholed categorized labeled and complacent. They don't appreciate the power of free speech and the progress to a freer and more enlightened society. They just think of the present, and have no vision of the future. This is dystopia, it's here, and I'm glad as an ex-student in debt that they have the balls to protest against tuition hikes when we spend absurd amounts of money on de-civilizing the world with war and corruption and greed.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:32 PM on 06/08/2012
F&F'ed
10:10 AM on 06/08/2012
My generation had it too good. We could afford to be complacent, as our gov'ts, Liberal and Conservative and NDP, realized they were working together for all Canadians. We might disagree with them and their actions, but nothing was sos serious that it couldn't wait till the next election.

Harper has shown us this is no longer the case, and Quebec's provincial gov't is simply responding to his message that the end justifies the means. The end will not be pretty, and the means are deplorable. I'm glad to see so many coming together to fight the rising numbers of injustices we are seeing in this country.