Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Raffi Cavoukian
Edward Jackson

GET UPDATES FROM Edward Jackson
 

Seeding Socialism: The Conservative Attack on Unions and Young Workers

Posted: 06/22/11 03:09 PM ET

The federal election of 2019 should be a very good one for the NDP.. Why? Because there'll be a lot more socialists in Canada by then -- thanks to the Tories.

Right now, nobody is promoting socialism better than the Harper Conservatives. It's becoming one of their core competencies.

In recent days, the federal government has used its legal powers and media platforms to undermine legitimate collective bargaining processes at Air Canada and Canada Post. Openly siding with the managements of these corporations, the government has, among other things, encouraged the parties to keep wage increases low and to put a stop to defined benefit pension plans for new hires.

The unions involved don't like any of this, but have chosen to protect the benefit packages of their current members and retirees.

At this point, young workers have little choice but to accept their fate. They lack voice and choice. But, over the next decade, they will have time to regroup to fight these deals. And who will they turn to help them?

The democratic socialists: the NDP.

There's little doubt that we're seeing the beginning of a prolonged, multi-pronged attack on unionized workers by the Conservatives. Their anti-worker war machine is revving its engines. Sirens have sounded. The first missiles have been launched.

This is a war that will hurt households and communities that rely on unionized salaries and benefits. The multiplier effects of good jobs are always underestimated in public policy and discourse. Take them out of the equation, and local economies suffer.

It is also a war that could strengthen labour. Union leaders, most already committed progressives, will strengthen their resolve. It will be a long four years, and they will have to pace themselves. But this war might actually result in a more energized and united labour movement.

Then there's the rank and file union membership. Election results in union-heavy regions like Ottawa and Oshawa suggest that many union members voted for the Conservatives in the 2011 poll. After the layoffs and pain wrought by this impending conflict, it's hard to believe so many will do so again.

Meanwhile, the infection of economic inequality spreads across the nation. It is not lost on young workers that all the players making these decisions -- ministers and MPs, managers and older union members, even university professors -- retain their defined benefit plans. And young people won't easily forget.

Nor are they oblivious to the fact that the compensation packages for chief executives have risen to obscene and embarrassing levels. In 2009, when economic recession battered all sectors of the economy, each of Canada's top 100 CEOs averaged more than $6 million in annual compensation, according to a study by economist Hugh Mackenzie for the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. And that's without factoring in their future access to millions of dollars more in stock options. (In 2009 Canada Post's CEO was eligible for a mere $640,000 a year in total compensation). Indeed, in this time of job scarcity, CEOs enjoy benefits-packages-on-steroids.

Furthermore, another CCPA study, led by Armine Yalnizyan, found that the richest one percent of Canadians accounted for one-third of all income growth between 1987 and 2007. This report ominously concludes that social inequality in Canada has reached levels not seen since the 1920s.
None of this is lost either on the 3.2 million Canadians who are considered by Statistics Canada to be low-income, or the 1.5 million who are officially unemployed, or the 3.2 million who work at low-wage, no-benefit, part-time, precarious work.

Few Canadians would disagree with the need to contain public spending or to find ways of making our public and private corporations viable in a changing world economy. But there are better ways of achieving these objectives that don't require full-scale warfare against unions and workers. Free collective bargaining is one of those ways.

There are better ways of solving the pension issue, too. Citing the work of economist Bob Baldwin, the Globe and Mail's Barrie McKenna recently pointed out that there are creative ways of designing pension plans that are neither traditional defined benefit nor defined contribution plans -- ways that can provide greater economic security for younger workers while still containing employer costs and risk.

But the Conservatives are not taking Canada down that road. They want war with labour. And they not only accept that economic inequality will grow -- they are committed to taking actions that will help to spread and deepen it.

So be it. They'll be gone by 2019.

Maybe sooner.

 

Follow Edward Jackson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/EdwardTJackson

The federal election of 2019 should be a very good one for the NDP.. Why? Because there'll be a lot more socialists in Canada by then -- thanks to the Tories. Right now, nobody is promoting socialis...
The federal election of 2019 should be a very good one for the NDP.. Why? Because there'll be a lot more socialists in Canada by then -- thanks to the Tories. Right now, nobody is promoting socialis...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dclintn648
Conservatism is dread
08:56 PM on 07/05/2011
For years, I fell for the corporate "freedom" marketing campaign that they've been marketing since the 60's believing that in North America, we were all equal and everyone had the same opportunities, and we had a strong democracy, so who needed unions? Now I see it was just that - a marketing campaign.
09:07 AM on 07/05/2011
McGill got me fired up as a Marxist and pro unionist worker. In my first job on a mine, I joined the union. First break down in my image of unions being for the workers was when the union filed grievances that were silly and stopped work and damaged work relationships, had strike days on sunny fishing days and winked about it, protected workers faking workers' compensation claims, got the best salary gains in their own categories, and many many more. The worst was their defiance in salary levels when our mine was going to be closed. Management dropped their salaries by 50% to keep the town open but the union would not budge. So after having squandered their company position with their sordid and immoral behaviour, they could not even take a cut to stop the closing of the mine. Later, we found out that the leadership in Vancouver had their pensions and jobs. Sickening. Unions need a whole new paradigm if they want the workers to see the benefit. My grandfather was one of the Scottish ship builders' unionists who brought down the shipping industry with their confrontation with the management and Marxist thinking. During his last days he said that the shipping industry would return.
We need to think critically of the common good provided by unions - there were some. I just remember quite sadly as the behaviour of the union took down the scaffolding of my belief in its public worth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Transitteer
and another thing . . .
02:27 PM on 06/23/2011
Yes, I think that the Ideologues in these Conservatives will set the course, and a lot of people who voted Tory will not like it. The pendulum needed to swing right I guess, for most people to see what they'd sanctioned giving up without knowing. The Tories, hopefully, will not be there long enough to inflict too much damage - as the Mulroney Tories did [quadrupling the debt, bringing in the g.s.t. etc]. And we know that Conservatives are not money managers, just big money spenders. We'll see what comes.
12:52 PM on 06/23/2011
“Few Canadians would disagree with the need to contain public spending or to find ways of making our public and private corporations viable in a changing world economy. But there are better ways of achieving these objectives that don't require full-scale warfare against unions and workers.”

Interesting you added this little nugget of reality near the end of your article.

Full-scale warfare is unfortunately what union thugs have been practicing since the beginning of time. What happens to private property and replacement workers when union terrorists don’t get what they want?

Very moving and inspirational piece for the hard-left crowd (but “The first missiles have been launched” – really?), however totally ignorant of economic reality. Common theme with tenured ivory tower university professors and union laggards where incredible benefits with endless vacations and sick days are the norm.

Definitely not defending bloated CEO salaries and golden parachutes but those scandals pale in comparison to several hundred thousand (million?) unionized “workers” who think that they should be able to hold a province or country hostage at will and who think it's perfectly acceptable that they can't be fired.

Dinosaurs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peter sfikas
Yia sou
10:50 AM on 06/23/2011
Bravo! Professor.You hit the nail on the head.But why have the union leaders gone fishing? Were are
all those wronged union members? How come they are not demonstrating against this injustice?
Maybe they should drop their begging cups and pick up the megaphones.
08:28 AM on 06/23/2011
amazing that there is so much anger against unions. unions stopped child labor, got safety laws enacted, etc. etc. for those who say 'yeah but that was a long time ago'... do you think corporations are benevolent?

most union workers receive a middle class wage. as studies have shown, the middle class has not seen income rise for the last few decades, despite an expanding economy... yet CEOs pay has grown enormously. (not even that many people are even in unions--around 10% of the population)

where's the anger at the banks? or other businesses bailed out/propped up by the gov't? why is it socialism for the big companies (bailed out on taxpayer dime) but capitalism for the rest of us?

who do you think is putting big money into union busting? do you think it's the little guy? no-- it's big corporations who create think tanks to write policy, pay massive amounts to lobbyists, fund (pay off) politicians who repeat their agenda...

the Tea Party movement in the States was funded by the billionaire Koch brothers, whose companies would benefit by not having organized workers to force them to fairness.

(and no, i'm not in a union.)
07:23 PM on 06/22/2011
I see no reason why govt. employees should get a risk-free "defined benefit" plan, while the rest of us must face reality, and the risks, associated with "defined contribution" plans.

Get with it, Ed, and join the 21st century!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:40 PM on 06/22/2011
Apart from back-to-work legislation of two public (ish) unions, not much meat on this bone. This article is mostly hypothesis and allegations.

Although there is moderately high unemployment, it's not near as bad as the States, and few think it would be lower under a less business-friendly government.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Karmazenuk
Author, Freelance Journalist, Curmudgeon
03:17 PM on 06/22/2011
Let me guess...there can be no justice until the workers control the means of production and the power is in the hands of the proletariat?

This is a backlash against a big union that got too greedy and reached too far, hardly Capitalist oppression of the Working Class.
02:30 PM on 06/22/2011
Jackson is becoming one of Canada's most perceptive bloggers. This piece on the war against labour confirms his timeliness and evidence-based style.
09:10 AM on 07/05/2011
Did not sway me.