Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Erica Berman
 

Not a Biological Parent? How to Tell Your Child

Posted: 10/01/2012 12:00 am

As an infertility counsellor, I see a lot of clients who are using third-party family building strategies. This includes using sperm or egg donation and/or a gestational carrier.

For some, the decision to use donor egg or sperm is a no-brainer: they want children, they cannot use their own gametes, so they use someone else's. For these individuals the desire to parent is so strong, that they are unconcerned with the lack of biological tie that they themselves, or their partner, will have with the child.

This is not new, of course, since the same can be said for people who adopt. For others, however, coming to grips with having a child using someone else's gametes is a difficult decision, one that requires a lot of soul searching and contemplation. One of the many concerns these individuals have about family building using these methods is what they will tell their child.

As has become accepted practice with adoption, counsellors like myself who work in the area always recommend to Intended Parents (IPs) that they disclose the details of the child's conception to the child (rather than keep it secret), and that they do so as soon as possible.

When to do so depends on the child, but is generally appropriate when the child starts asking about where babies come from. This question can begin as early as age two!

Once the child asks where babies come from, I recommend that parents first give the basic information, in age appropriate terms, about sperm and egg. Then, in the case of egg/sperm donation, they say something like: "In our case, mommy's eggs (or daddy's sperm) were broken, so a nice man/woman (or Uncle Jon/cousin Sarah, etc. if it was a known donor) gave us some so we could have you!"

For same-sex couples (or a single woman), the conversation might include something like:
"There were no men in our family, so we went to a doctor who helped us get sperm from a nice man..."

When a child hears this story right from the beginning, he or she will accept it. It will simply be his/her birth story. The important part for the child will be knowing how badly he or she was wanted and how thrilled his/her parents were when they conceived.

What I have come to believe is that all children, even those conceived "the old fashioned way," should be aware of all the ways a family can be formed. In our house, I make a point of discussing family diversity with my two daughters. They understand that some kids have two mommies, some have two daddies, some kids look like their parents, and others do not. Some kids live with only one parent, and some kids have two full sets of parents. I think this is an important part of helping kids develop tolerance, open-mindedness and acceptance of differences.

If you are thinking that this is just going to complicate what already feels like a stressful task: discussing reproduction and sex with your children, fear not! There are now some great books for kids of all ages that discuss the wide variety of family forms that are now commonplace.

The one my kids have is called "It's Not the Stork" by Robie H. Harris. Reading about these issues to your child from an age-appropriate book, rather than sitting your child down for a formal, awkward face-to-face discussion can make the whole process much more comfortable. No one should feel ashamed of how they were conceived and educating our youth about the many ways families are formed and babies are made will help foster greater understanding and acceptance for family diversity.

 

Follow Erica Berman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/erica_HCT

FOLLOW CANADA LIVING
 
 
  • Comments
  • 30
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:32 PM on 10/01/2012
I can see why it's good to tell a child about their origins from the beginning. However they may naively tell someone who is not as open-minded. How do you protect them from that? You may not want to tell them that it's a secret because then they may feel that there is something to be ashamed of.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdncommentator
11:54 AM on 10/02/2012
It doesn't have to be a secret, and it doesn't have to be shameful, or something that "you tell them". It should be story you start telling them when they're just goo-gooing, so that they grow up with that story.

I suppose the first thing is that the parents concerned have to get over and deal with any unfinished baggage they have around how they made a family. Once the parents feel whole with the story, and find that it touches their heart strings, they will naturally convey that feeling to their children.

If you model secrecy or shame, your child may run the risk of feeling that too. If you model honest feelings of love, appreciation, and how much of a gift this child was, then your child will most likely feel that way too.
09:30 PM on 10/01/2012
I can see that it's better for a child to know where they came from, from the start, in term of them accepting their history. However they may, at a very young age, naively tell their story to people that are not as open-minded about the different ways in which families can be created. How do you protect them from that? If you tell then not to say anything, it may give then the feeling that their 'secret' something to be ashamed of.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdncommentator
11:59 AM on 10/02/2012
We must always arm our children, at any age with the self-confidence to be proud of who they are. And if they get hurt because someone says something hurtful, we as parents have to be there to help them work through it and learn from the experience. Every adoptive parent faces a situation where their kid's friend says: who is _____ real parent? You have to be prepared to answer in front of your kid, proudly, and with a smile: "I'm his real parent". Most kids will just accept this. You can even have a laugh with your kid about it later. As for adults, most annoying comments are as a result of ignorance. Be patient and explain. And don't be afraid to do so if front of your child because he or she needs to know how to educate others about diversity as well.

There are many ways people can turn out to be different than what we think of as the norm. Being adopted or coming from a surrogate or a sperm donor, or egg donor is just one way. Being freckled, gay, bi, handicapped, gifted, driven, artistic, emotional, intuitive, curious, shy, etc. etc. are other ways of being "different". The point of being a parent is to raise independent children who are equipped to love their differences.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:48 PM on 10/01/2012
"I'm not your birth parent"
10:46 AM on 10/01/2012
Adoption can't be compared to other forms of family separation because adoption is a reaction to family separation not the reason for it. You'll see a variety of different family separation circumstances, even children sold by their mothers through traditional surrogacy are among the larger group of adopted people
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdncommentator
12:06 PM on 10/02/2012
I honestly don't understand what you're talking about and why you are pathologizing anything but standard male-female procreation with female incubation.

The term "family separation' is a terrible term and high negative. It doesn't do justice to the different ways of constituting a family. I'd hate to be a kid with parents who refer to me as having been separated from my family. How does someone ever get over that? How abusive!

Adoption is a positive choice for a person or people who are not prepared to take on the unbelievable burden of being a parent. Better to choose adoption than to regret having become a parent and giving your child a terrible life because you weren't ready. It's not a reaction to anything. It's a choice. And a loving choice made for a human life that you have determined you cannot properly take care of.

For a child to know that their birth parent chose to give them the best family ever because they could not be that parent is a statement full of love. To say to a child that when you're older and if you want to meet that birth parent, we will help you find them, and lucky you, you might end up with an even bigger loving family is beyond anything a child could hope for.
08:18 PM on 10/03/2012
I'm not saying that adoption is a bad choice at all what I'm saying is that adoption is a reaction to various types of family separation it is not in and of itself the cause of a family separating. Like for instance a person's parents were so abusive that they lost custody, that person would typically end up being adopted after a time in foster care. Another person might end up adopted by their step parent because their father was MIA in the vietnam war and their mother pressured her new husband to adopt. Or someone might end up adopted because their mother signed a surrogacy contract where she promised to make a baby for a man and his wife - the result being the mother gave them up for adoption to their father's wife, in a step parent adoption. Another person might wind up adopted because their parents were only 15 or 16 at the time and felt that it would be best if older people raised their child for them. There are all kinds of reasons why families separate and adoption is the reaction to that separation. So you can't say being a donor's offspring is the same or different than being adopted. I've helped reunite people who were both - donor offspring and given up for adoption.
02:18 AM on 10/04/2012
I'm from San Francisco I am totally pro sleep with and marry whoever you want you have me confused with a whole different kind of person.

I got to point out though that humans are still the result of human reproduction, whether it is in a dish or a bedroom whether it involves a turkey baster whatever, in the end when a person is born that person will have two biological parents whose cells reproduced to create them. So in the world of donor reproductive therapy its the clinic customers who are helping the donors reproduce themselves by underwriting the effort financially. The donor does not help infertile people conceive or reproduce, the donor does that.

Other than that I agree with you of course. Its just real clear that the parent has to fail before the social paren
09:48 AM on 10/01/2012
n my experience reuniting separated families (many of which were separated by gamete donation), what the author says is true. Donor offspring who are told early are not angry at having been deceived into believing they were the offspring of the people raising them.

I disagree however with the author's statement that "The important part for the child will be knowing how badly he or she was wanted and how thrilled his/her parents were when they conceived." Telling them they are not related to you means that they are related to someone else - they have family they are not allowed to know who are not allowed to know them.
12:38 AM on 10/02/2012
Marilyn - I'm curious. Your post seems to indicate a negative perception of gamete donation, is that an accurate inference to make? I wonder what alternative you might suggest to those people instead of using donated gametes to create a family - don't have one unless you adopt? I understand that this is a highly personal issue and that everyone will have different opinions and beliefs.

Your closing statement 'they have a family they are not allowed to know who are not allowed to know them' poses the question in my mind - would you tell these children it would have been better if they hadn't have been created at all?

That said - (and depending on laws in different areas I understand this differs) in many places even anonymous donors are required to release their identities to offspring once they reach 18 or 21 (relevant age of consent). Also as mentioned in the article many people use known donors such as family members and friends. What is your reaction to families created using donated gametes where the resultant child DOES in fact know their intended birth family as well as their biological family?

For what it's worth, I would hazard a guess that the known/unknown conundrum and disclosure of donors' identities is definitely a huge issue and nowhere near an easy decision even for those who do go down that road. But that is me assuming.
02:04 AM on 10/04/2012
But you know that in order to have the opportunity to raise someone else's offspring, that someone else has to fail to take care of their offspring. There has to be a reason why a person is not performing their parental duties, they are the default caregivers for their own young and when they fail other people are gracious enough to step in and fill the parental void left empty by the estranged parent. So it is always sad when a person's parents fail to take care of them and there is nobody in their own family to step in and help keep the family together by taking over where the parent left off. When a person is not raised by their bio parents because of some accident or tragedy or even abuse and addiction its just one of those things. The person caught a stroke of bad luck got dealt a bad hand and they can be angry at their negligent parent but not really upset with the people who adopted them, it was not their intention for their bio parent to fail to raise them, their adoptive parents would have preferred never to have been needed would have preferred that the adopted child never had to suffer the loss of their family to begin with. Donor offspring can't say the same thing of the people raising them because they did want their bio parent to fail, they did want the donor's offspring to be separated from their family.
06:19 PM on 10/04/2012
Hi Marilyn, thanks for your reply. Obviously the concept of 'family' is a hugely subjective one which nobody can really define for anyone else. (i.e I'm pretty sure that people adopting children would have the intention and right to consider themselves that child's 'family' as opposed to merely "[the]people [who] are gracious enough to step in and fill the parental void").

But that's another debate entirely. What I'm interested in, and what your reply didn't answer, is the two questions I originally asked:

"Your closing statement 'they have a family they are not allowed to know who are not allowed to know them' poses the question in my mind - would you tell these children [created by donor gametes from anonymous sources] it would have been better if they hadn't have been created at all?"

and

"What is your reaction to families created using donated gametes where the resultant child DOES in fact know their intended birth family as well as their biological family?" [examples given of friends/relatives donating gametes and being a part of the child's life in the article].

I can see where you're coming from with adoption, and I said nothing to disrespect people who choose that path because I think they are amazing people!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdncommentator
08:19 AM on 10/02/2012
My adopted children who grew up always knowing their birth story would disagree with your characterization. The parents are the people this child knows: the ones who provide the kisses, hugs, feedings, emotional support, etc. Biological mothers and fathers are simply part of the child's birth story, and people the child may or may not seek to meet when they are old enough to be prepared for a full range of reactions. Parents would be irresponsible taking a 6 year old to meet people they know little about, and little about the reasons for choosing adoption. a child needs to be old and mature enough to handle the fact that the birth family may not want contact, or may have problems of their own. Of course the ideal situation is accepting birth families which add to the child's circle of family, but parents have no control over this.

Characterizing adoption as "separated families" is not only negative and harmful to children who were adopted and who have loving families; it is indicative of a situation that seems to have been handled very badly by the adults concerned.
11:44 PM on 10/03/2012
"Characterizing adoption as "separated families" is not only negative and harmful to children who were adopted and who have loving families; it is indicative of a situation that seems to have been handled very badly by the adults concerned."

You would agree that your adopted children could not be adopted by you unless they had first been separated from their families, right? Everyone is the offspring of parents who reproduced to create them and their parents relatives are their relatives as well. We can say that those people don't matter, that they are inconsequential, lower than low, good for nothing dna donors and that we are not interested in them at all - but it does not make the family relationship go away. Since the people who reproduced are responsible for taking care of their offspring, they have to fail to take care of their offspring in order for their offspring to need to be cared for by someone else.

Adoption is wonderful but we need to remember that adopted people already have family, they have parents its just that their parents are not doing their job, not fulfilling their obligations. They're a complete family, they just are not functioning as one where the parents take care of their children. Adopted people expand upon their existing relationships by adding an adopted family. I'm sure that from the adoptive parent's point of view its different because
11:58 PM on 10/03/2012
It is impossible to adopt a person who is not separated from their family. That is the primary criteria for adoption - their parents are not going to raise them. Someone needs to take care of them while they are minors so they need to be adopted, or fostered or have some kind of a guardian. Adoption is a solution for a minor who is separated from their family. That is not a contraversial statement at all its a boring fact. It is always a tragedy when someone is unable or unwilling to raise their own offspring because it means their offspring will end up separated from their own family that by rights they belong to and this is very sad when it has to occur. We do expect people to take care of their own young and when they can't their children wind up in alternative living situations like foster care or like being adopted or having a guardian. All of those situations can be incredibly positive solutions to the problem of who is going to take responsibility for minors whose of parents will not fulfill their parental obligations.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdncommentator
08:22 AM on 10/01/2012
I would go even further and say that you should start talking about the joy of seeing the baby for the first time (no matter when that was and what the circumstances were) right from the beginning, even before the baby has begun to speak. If you have pictures of the first moment or first day...great! The point should be that the child never has to ask about their birth because it's a story they've known from day one.