Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Gillian McEachern

GET UPDATES FROM Gillian McEachern
 

Enbridge Pipeline Plans Under the Microscope

Posted: 10/28/11 10:04 AM ET

Right about now, oil pipeline company Enbridge may be realizing that getting approval for its pipeline plans isn't going to be a walk in park.

This week, the National Energy Board (NEB) responded to concerns from landowners, First Nations and environmental groups to Enbridge's proposed reversal of its Line 9 oil pipeline in Ontario by asking the company to come clean on the full extent of the project.

Enbridge's message is a confusing one -- it's asking for permission to reverse only a portion of the pipeline, yet media reports have shown that the real project is much bigger than being put forward to the NEB and could mean reversing the pipeline through Ontario, Quebec and all the way down to Portland, Maine. By splitting the project into smaller pieces for regulatory approval, the full environmental and social impacts aren't taken into account, such as bringing tar sands oil into Quebec and Maine for the first time, according to environmental groups, and possibly sending oil from Maine to the Gulf refineries via supertankers.

Now, the NEB has asked Enbridge to clarify the scope of the project, which we hope will lead to greater transparency and scrutiny of Enbridge's plans before any approval is handed over.

And, on the other side of the continent, a record-breaking 4,000 individuals and organizations have signed up to have their voices heard at the upcoming hearings on Enbridge's proposed Northern Gateway tar sands pipeline. Given that each person is allowed 10 minutes to voice their opinions, that means 650 hours of public hearings on top of the testimony by expert witnesses on the more technical aspects of the pipeline (which, given the engineering challenges with building a pipeline through sheer mountains, is bound to also take a while).

This shows that the public wants to have a say in Canada's energy future. Decisions that get made now about pipelines and other fossil fuel infrastructure risk locking us into several more decades of oil dependence at a time when other countries are making the investments needed to rapidly embrace clean energy and scientists are clearer than ever that we need to act now to avoid catastrophic climate change.

 
Right about now, oil pipeline company Enbridge may be realizing that getting approval for its pipeline plans isn't going to be a walk in park. This week, the National Energy Board (NEB) responded to ...
Right about now, oil pipeline company Enbridge may be realizing that getting approval for its pipeline plans isn't going to be a walk in park. This week, the National Energy Board (NEB) responded to ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:32 PM on 10/28/2011
The money put into transporting fossil fuels and the lies defending this are mindboggling. Producers of fossil fuel will lose big way if people embrace insulation and energy saving devices. but these fossilfuel dinosaurs would lose mot of their cash revenue if that were to happen and so they won't let it happen. dollars to doughnuts they will get what they want. People are customers and like the credit card companies and other companies which prey on the poor, fossil fuel companies must make sure the government supports them and not what is good for people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:20 PM on 10/28/2011
For those that don't know, the Northern Gateway project is about building a dual pipeline to ship crude oil from Alberta to the west coast of British Columbia, where it will then be loaded onto oil tankers, and to ship natural gas condensate in the opposite direction.