My town of London, Ontario has an odd feeling of being under siege. The deterioration of the manufacturing sector that made up a significant part of our productive capacity has left us with one of the country's highest levels of unemployment. In a phrase, we're feeling vulnerable.
Add to this mix Caterpillar Inc. and its threat to close down its Electro-Motive plant unless the workers accept an immediate wage cut of over 50 per cent and you can see why we're feeling a little punchy at the moment. Local citizens are increasingly expressing outrage at what they feel is the destructive greed of modern capitalism.
The ability for modern municipalities to respond to such draconian tactics has been limited. Sadly, they are about to face another blow that could undercut any hoped-for recovery. Worse still, it has the potential to limit any chance local communities might have to offset poor federal policy.
The Canada-European Trade Agreement continues to fly under the radar, in part because its main proponents are hoping Canadians don't take too much interest. For any citizen that lives in a community hoping to track its own destiny this could be a game changer.
There remains a distinct possibility that cities might be prohibited, as a result of the deal, from procuring their own supplies or labour. This could well mean that municipalities would have little ability to dig themselves out of difficult economic times or policies from more senior levels of government that could prove detrimental.
In London, Ontario we have recently adopted a Food Charter, designed to limit environmental waste by emphasizing local policies. As the director of the food bank here this is an immensely important sustainable step in the right direction that could suddenly be stripped away should the CETA deal pass and no exceptions are made for local communities where Canadian people live and attempt to work out their civic life.
Prior to the last federal election, I sat in on a parliamentary committee that was discussing the merits of the European Free Trade deal and there was clear disagreement within the committee itself. When one NDP member reminded the committee that Canada might well lose its ability for communities to develop flexible responses to the challenges ahead he was mocked by government members. Later, when I defended the NDP member, the government side didn't know what to say: "Glen, this deal is going to go through anyway. Why don't you just go along with it and make for a smooth transition?"
My answer then is my answer now: Why fast-track such an initiative when it is communities that have felt the worst heat of the recession and if we rob them of their own tools to respond, we've made their fate doubly worse?
There could be some good aspects of the CETA arrangement, but its negative effects could be so profound that, like other previous free trade agreements, it could cement the corporate takeover of the Canadian context. Where is the debate? In the rush to bring in foreign investment we could easily be paving the way for the Caterpillars of the world to take away whatever little self-direction is left for our communities.
There is a clear solution to this quandary that could mitigate some of CETA's most devastating possibilities: simply exclude municipal governments from the deal, thereby keeping democratic decisions at the local level. To date, the federal government has turned a deaf ear to such pleas, mostly because Canadians aren't aware of the consequences.
At a time when the Occupy Movement and the threat of the one per cent deciding the future of the 99 per cent it's not suitable for the imposition of a further corporate structure to be imposed on Canadians from governing elites. These are serious times, and with joblessness remaining at stubbornly high levels, the full implementation of CETA could lock municipalities in an economic whirlpool for good. It's time for citizens to not only stand up for workers but to also oppose any construct that puts their future opportunities into ever fewer hands.
Read this briefing from the Council of Canadians to take action.
Follow Glen Pearson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/glenpearson
state dispute mechanism like the one in NAFTA. The Chapter 11 dispute process has allowed and encouraged large multinationals to sue North American governments for compensation against public health and environmental policies that limit corps..
Trade Justice Network
Apr 19, 2010 10:30 ET
Trade Justice Network Releases Secret Draft of Canada-European Union Free
Trade Agreement, Makes Demands of Canadian and European Governments
OTTAWA, ONTARIO--(Marketwire - April 19, 2010) - As the third round
of Canada-European Union free trade negotiations commence the newly formed Trade Justice Network today publicly released the draft text of the proposed Canada-European Union Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) - the most significant bilateral trade negotiation since the NAFTA. The network is raising serious concerns about the agreement's potential impact on public and environmental policy, and public services in both Canada and Europe, among other issues, and has outlined a set of demands that must be met before negotiations are allowed to continue.
Controversial provisions in the draft text would open Canada's
telecommunications sector to full foreign ownership, stop municipal
governments from implementing local or ethical procurement
strategies, and require a burdensome necessity test for prudential
financial measures designed to help governments mitigate or avoid
banking and financial crises. The text also presents a direct attack on
Ontario's Green Energy Act, and it would virtually eliminate the rights of farmers to save, reuse and sell seed, providing biotech, pharmaceutical, pesticide, seed and grain companies powerful new tools to essentially decide who should farm and how.
The leaked Can-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement document under negotiation is now on line at http://www.tradejustice.ca/
--------------------------------
[2] Synopsis of Events - European participants have been unable to
fly in because of grounding of flights due to volcanic ash; however they
will be participating by skype or video presentations.
--------------------------
[3] Fact Sheets include analysis of impacts on a number of sectors
and services as well as background documents on the Global Europe
policy context in Europe and a Timeline including both Global Europe and CETA developments.
http://www.tradejustice.ca/FactSheets?bl=y
Overview
CETA Timeline and Context
Global Europe Backgrounder CETA
Food Sovereignty
Local Procurement
Public Services
Public postal services
Telecommunications
Trade and Environment
------------------------------
[4] Participation of Scott Sinclair, Dir CCPA Trade & investment
Research, speaking on the jointly released CCPA study "Negotiating
from Weakness: Canada-EU trade treaty threatens Canadian purchasing
policies and public services"
http://www.policyalternatives.ca/publications/reports/negotiating-
%E2%80%89weakness
http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article/235930795-trade-justice-network-releases-secret-draft-of-caneu-fta-ceta
http://fileserver.cfsadmin.org/file/tradejustice/107062cf31075064c01a3e6cd712eb3d3f56f5a5.pdf
state dispute mechanism like the one in NAFTA. The Chapter 11 dispute process has allowed and encouraged large multinationals to sue North American governments for compensation against public health and environmental policies that limit corporate profits.
The Trade Justice Network has outlined a list of 11 demands that its
members feel must be met in any trade deal with Europe. These include: a comprehensive impact assessment of the deal on the economy, jobs, poverty, gender, human rights, farmers, culture and the environment; a fundamental protection for public services and expansion of social policy; a recognition of and protection for the right to use public procurement as an economic development tool, and of the right to regulate in the public interest based on the precautionary principle; a commitment to strengthen labour and environmental protections and make them as binding, if not more binding, than investor guarantees, and a recognition of the primacy of Indigenous Rights over corporate rights in Indigenous lands, territories
and waters.
&
http://www.policyalternatives.ca/publications/reports/negotiating-%E2%80%89weakness
In a recent article Maude Barlow, national chair of the Council of Canadians, points out the dangers Canada faces with the current CETA trade model.
She warns that:
“CETA will open up the rules, standards and public spending priorities of provinces and municipalities to direct competition and challenge from European corporations.†Barlow goes on to say, “Europe is seeking a comprehensive and aggressive global approach to acquiring the raw materials needed by its corporations.
At its heart, this deal is a bid for unprecedented and uncontrolled European access to Canadian resources.â€
She also added, “CETA will likely have a NAFTA-type investor-state enforcement mechanism, which means that European corporations will have the same right that U.S. companies now enjoy to sue the Canadian government if it introduces new rules to protect the environment.â€
If CETA includes something similar to NAFTA’s Chapter 11 which gives corporations the power to challenge laws and regulations that restrict their profits, U.S. and Mexican companies could benefit from any rulings that favour the EU.
Ultimately, like NAFTA and other trade deals, CETA will further serve corporate interests.â€
full article http://beyourownleader.blogspot.com/2011/01/from-nafta-to-ceta-canada-eu-deep.html