It is hard to say anything positive about what happened on election night in the United States. A candidate who based his campaign on racism, xenophobia and know-nothing politics that disregarded facts, won the presidency. Intolerance for ethnic and social diversity, not to mention a closed mind to knowledge and learning, can point to a society in decline.
Donald Trump, supremely unqualified to be president of the United States, defeated a woman who worked hard, prepared diligently for debates, and was highly qualified for the office. This must have been a painful reminder for many women who have lost out on promotions to much less qualified men, as well as women who have had to work harder for less.
Barack Obama, because he was non-white and had a non-Anglo-Saxon name, faced questions about whether he was actually American (birtherism) and whether he was loyal to the United States. Meanwhile, Donald Trump ran a campaign stating America was essentially "not great" and he appeared to openly collaborate with a less-than-friendly foreign government, Vladimir Putin's in Russia.
Canada stands alone with the politics of ethnic division being swiftly rejected in the 2015 election.
This is a painful reminder to many visible minorities how their loyalty and identity in North America can be constantly questioned. How no matter how hard they try to be a part of the community, they can be seen as "foreign" and "outsiders," and never quite "one of us."
Furthermore, the fact that Donald Trump's campaign was openly based on hostility to Mexicans and Muslims makes members of these groups feel increasingly under siege and unwelcome.
Also, the next president of the United States is someone who openly bragged about sexually assaulting women, and then multiple women came forward saying he sexually assaulted them. That Trump could be considered fit to be president, be seen as someone who can set an example for the country, is appalling. This sets a horrible example.
The United States is a deeply divided country, it is hard to know if this divide can be bridged. It is hard to know how a Donald Trump presidency will play out. He could potentially undermine America's democratic institutions given his authoritarian tendencies. Also, the very unity of the United States could be under threat (already there is a California independence movement -- #Calexit -- gaining some momentum in the aftermath of Trump's victory).
On the other hand, the ever-unprincipled Trump may strike a conciliatory tone and govern as a moderate. However, that will not take away from the fact that he campaigned on racism and hate, that he was endorsed by hate groups including the American Nazi Party and the Ku Klux Klan.
So what does this mean for Canada?
An article in the Walrus stated that with xenophobic politics on the rise in Europe, and now the United States, Canada stands alone with the politics of ethnic division being swiftly rejected in the 2015 election, and with an official policy of multiculturalism. However, the article warned we cannot take this for granted.
The fact is American media permeates Canada. Donald Trump and his hateful rhetoric is broadcast widely here, it influences children in the schoolyard, and it mainstreams racism and sexism. The struggles and gains in human rights of the past several decades could be rolled back.
Many of us are angry, hurt and afraid. However, we must channel this into action. We must make our voices heard and press policy makers here in Canada to uphold the values of diversity and multiculturalism, to not be tempted to pander to xenophobic elements. We must condemn those politicians who try to play on ethnic and social divisions.
Policy makers must continue to pursue conciliation with First Nations, and must continue to uphold multiculturalism and human rights.
Canada stands alone with the politics of ethnic division being swiftly rejected in the 2015 election.
Public and private sector leaders must press for diversity in leadership -- representation of women and cultural and ethnic minorities -- and recognize the strength of diversity of viewpoints and perspectives this brings.
We must see diversity as a strength. When one is at the mall or downtown and sees people from various cultural backgrounds, speaking different languages, it should be recognized as a strength: an exchange of culture and ideas enriches us and our society, and if people from diverse backgrounds and from around the world want to be here, that is a sign that our community must be a great place to live that people want to come to.
We must try to be friends with people of other ethnic, religious and cultural backgrounds, to try to learn about and understand each other. We must not see each other as hostile or opposed based on ethnic or cultural differences. Extending the hand of friendship and kindness is very effective.
In whatever way we can, we must uphold multiculturalism, as well as civil and human rights. Despair and anger at Trump's election must give way to action. We must be vigilant about his rhetoric of hate and division coming to our side of the border.
Follow HuffPost Canada Blogs on Facebook
Also on HuffPost:
> Immigrants: 7.3 million > Pct of population: 20.7% > GDP (PPP) per capita 2012: $42,734 > Gov’t immigration goals: Maintain Currently, 7.3 million immigrants live in Canada, equivalent to more than 20% of the nation’s total population. As 2011, the Canadian government was one of the few to propose policies that would increase the level of immigration for the purpose of family unification. The level of immigration, more generally, was considered satisfactory in the same year, according to the U.N. In spite of Canada’s exceptionally liberal immigration policies, there has been concern recently over whether Canada’s immigrants are successfully integrating into society. To avoid the potential social tension that could arise from a growing economic difference between immigrants and locals, the Canadian government has restructured its screening process to emphasize factors such as job skills and language fluency. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
> Immigrants: 7.4 million > Pct of population: 11.6% > GDP (PPP) per capita 2012: $35,548 > Gov’t immigration goals: Decrease Just 11.6% or France’s roughly 65 million residents are international migrants. According to the U.N. Population division, while the French government promoted some policies aimed at attracting skilled immigrants as of 2011, the governments overall attitude toward immigration was generally negative. As a member of the European Union, France is obligated to support the free movement of EU nationals between the EU nations. In recent years, however, the European Commission has criticized the French government for expelling Roma, popularly called Gypsies, from the country. France’s existing immigrant population is older, with nearly 20% at least 65 years of age, compared to just 11.1% globally. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
> Immigrants: 7.8 million > Pct of population: 12.4% > GDP (PPP) per capita 2012: $36,941 > Gov’t immigration goals: Decrease About 7.8 million million immigrants live in the U.K., up from just under 6.5 million as of 2010. This is despite the U.K. government’s view, as of 2011, that the large influx of foreigners to the country was somewhat of a problem. The government’s policies intended to lower the level of immigration to the country, including high-skilled workers immigration. Only one of the world’s eight largest destinations for immigrants, the United Arab Emirates, had a higher average annual increase in immigration that exceeded the U.K.’s 4.0%. Although the country’s aging population may actually signal a necessity for more immigrants, British Prime Minister David Cameron has stated that immigration has strained the nation’s public services. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
> Immigrants: 7.8 million > Pct of population: 83.7% > GDP (PPP) per capita 2012: $49,012 > Gov’t immigration goals: Decrease A stunning 83.7% of UAE residents are international migrants the most of any country in the world, excluding only Vatican City. Between 2010 and 2013, the emirates let in more than 4.5 million migrant workers, more than any other nation in the world. The UAE is able to attract workers to come there because the country is extremely wealthy, with an economy driven by oil and finance. As of 2012, the nation’s per capita GDP exceeded $49,000, on-par with that of the U.S. But despite the nation’s appeal for immigrants, the UAE’s government as of 2011 considered immigration to be too high. Additionally, the country has been criticized for the poor living and working conditions faced by many migrant workers. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
> Immigrants: 9.1 million > Pct of population: 31.4% > GDP (PPP) per capita 2012: $31,275 > Gov’t immigration goals: Decrease Nearly one-third of Saudi Arabia’s population consists of immigrants, while between 2000 and 2013 the number of immigrants rose by an annual average of 4.2% per year, higher than most other nations. Between 2010 and 2013 alone, the number of immigrants to Saudi Arabia rose 24.3% As of 2011, the Saudi Arabian government regarded the overall level of legal immigration as too high and implemented policies to reduce immigration, according to the UN had. Similarly, the government’s policies on the naturalization of immigrants were also considered restrictive. Recent news reports suggest immigration policy in Saudi Arabia has only become more restrictive with new measures implemented to prevent undocumented workers from finding employment. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
> Immigrants: 9.8 million > Pct of population: 11.9% > GDP (PPP) per capita 2012: $39,028 > Gov’t immigration goals: Maintain Germany, one of the world’s largest economies, is a popular destination for immigrants. Its well-developed infrastructure and top-rate higher education only add to its attraction. Just under 10 milllion of the country’s 82 million residents are immigrants. As of 2011, Germany’s policies reflected approval of the country’s rate of immigration. In 2012, with the eurozone crisis still unabated, a growing number of young workers immigrated from southern Europe to Germany. But Germany has openly recruited high skilled-workers to live and work in the country permanently, especially as the country’s population ages and shrinks, according to Der Spiegel. Unfortunately, many such workers fail to stay for even as little as a year, and since 2010 the number of immigrants to Germany has actually dropped. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
> Immigrants: 11.0 million > Pct of population: 7.7% > GDP (PPP) per capita 2012: $17,709 > Gov’t immigration goals: Increase More than 12 million immigrants lived in Russia in 2010 and the Russian government was among the few seeking to increase the number of foreigners entering the country. In 2011, the country’s government viewed immigration as too low and oriented its policies towards increasing immigration. However, these policies have failed to attract more net immigrants: as of this year, there are just over 11 million immigrants living in Russia, a decrease of roughly 10% from 2010. Local authorities have not embraced the prospect of single-ethnicity communities for Chinese, Uzbeks, Tajiks and other ethnic groups in Russia ,and have even sought to ban them in some cases, hoping instead to promote integration into Russian society. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
> Immigrants: 45.8 million > Pct of population: 14.3% > GDP (PPP) per capita 2012: $49,922 > Gov’t immigration goals: Maintain The U.S. is by far the largest destination for immigrants, with more than 45.7 million living in the country, according to the UN. As of 2011, the U.S. government’s policies toward both immigration and emigration remained effectively neutral. However, immigration reform has been especially prominent in Congress this year. This reform is expected to address issues related to illegal immigration, while determining how, and whether, undocumented immigrants should be able to attain citizenship. Considering the U.S. has one the highest per capita GDPs in the world, at nearly $50,000, its appeal to immigrants is fairly straightforward. It is the world’s largest economy, as measured by output, and has the second largest total exports. Also, the U.S. offers well-developed infrastructure and financial markets, as well as quality education. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
Follow Hassan Arif on Twitter: www.twitter.com/HassanNB