The epitome of cinematic coolness.
If there is one film that the cool cats were dying to see this season, The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo would be it.
The highly anticipated on-screen adaptation of the first of the Swedish trilogy by Stieg Larsson, has undoubtedly captured the imagination of the global litterati.
I am probably one of the last remaining handfuls on the planet that hasn't read any of the Larsson releases (or seen the Swedish cinematic version). Which in my opinion makes me the perfect candidate to judge the film on its own merits, independent of the published counterpart.
I walked in, armed with limited knowledge (outside of the breathless mentions of "You've got to read this book" that followed me all summer), into the dark theatre ready to escape into the brillant directorial brain of David Fincher. I knew that out of all the directors to tackle this herculean book-to-screen project, Fincher (Fight Club, The Social Network) has the capability of doing just that, coded in his DNA.
And I wasn't disappointed. Far from it.
As a cinephile, the opening credits are just as important to me as the plotline. In my visual world, it's the proverbial business card, the first impression -- the landing page of the cinematic world if you will.
As soon as the darkness enveloped the hall, the intense futuristic and incredibly edited opening sequence of credits was a feast for the senses. With Oscar and Grammy award-winning duo Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross's spectacular, soul-shattering rendition of Led Zeppelin's "Immigrant Song," the die was cast. My senses were elated and craved more. Much more.
The film follows journalist Mikael Blomkvist played by the brooding Daniel Craig, who after a career downfall gets hired by a retired Swedish industrialist Henrik Vanger (played by the scene-chewing thespian, Christopher Plummer) to help solve the 40-year-old mystery of his grand-daughter's murder.
Blomkvist disguises this mission to the rest of the extended family members, who all reside on the same estate in their respective expansive mansions, as just another journalist working on the family patriarch's biography. He quickly realizes the unending layers of dysfunctionality, mistrust and mysteriousness that has shrouded the family for what seems like generations. Needing assistance in what seems like a bigger case than what he bargained for (a bargain which would affect his own sullied journalist reputation), he hires Lisbeth Salander (played by Rooney Mara), who herself is a pierced and tattooed outsider dangerously floating just below the radar of humanity. Her steely personality, superbly rough-around-the-edges social skills and jarring gaze hide the fact that she is also a force to be reckoned with, armed with her tunnel vision-like focus, photographic memory and, of course, an investigator's dream, uber-computer hacking prowess.
The film's art direction is sublime. Effortlessly capturing the sleek, unpolluted and uncluttered world of Sweden. It's a world of clean lines and cold winters, which makes you want to reach for your mink throw.
Mara embodies the most buzzed-about cinematic character in the most brazen and brilliant way, proving her salt as the modern-day thespian chameleon. To fully appreciate her depth of transition, it must be noted she also played the preppy Ivy-League student who just couldn't deal with the socially inept Zukerberg in Fincher's Oscar winner The Social Network. My point exactly. It's the same girl.
She embraces the shattered-yet-solid soul that relies on her primal instincts -- to basically survive. Mara's acting doesn't reside in her expressions but much deeper. It's beyond the reserves of her soul. She slithers like her tattooed counterpart. Her heart-stopping gaze and short rough responses leaves the recipient just a little less of a person, after the fact.
The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo is filled with familiar faces of big screen and small. Legendary actors (the ever-yummy Julian Sands plays the younger Henrik in the film's various flashbacks), is a delightful surprise to see and Robin Wright plays the editor of the independent magazine for which Blomkvist wrote the litigious story thus landing him in hot water.
However it's refreshing to see that the collective roster of the players weren't cherry picked from the limited and overly relied upon Hollywood Rolodex.
Fincher manages to capture the essence of the story through and through. As many on-screen adaptations of literary works unfortunately fall victim to the apples to oranges comparison, I'm confident The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo won't be one of them.
This film beautifully possesses a soul that is gritty, unreserved and raw. Much like the dragon emblazoned lead.
Follow Hina P. Ansari on Twitter: www.twitter.com/hinapansari
Marshall Fine: Movie Review: The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo -- Unnecessary
Robin S. Rosenberg, Ph.D.: 'The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo': What Happened?
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2011) - IMDb
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo - Official Site
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If the English spoken in the film is supposed to represent the (Swedish) characters' own fluent language, and Swedish is not used for obvious reasons, the only solution should be to use English with similar fluency. This can certainly include accents from within the vast English-speaking domain, but not someone's less-than-brilliant idea of how Swedes speak English to convey the idea of film characters speaking their mother tongue.
"My name is Yon Yonson, I come from Wisconsin, I work in a lumber yard there.... and so does my sister Lisbeth."
As soon as I read this sentence I knew I'd need to take the whole review with a substantial grain of salt. I've never heard anyone claiming to be a "cinephile" suggest a 2 or 3 minute contrived afterthought sequence at the start existing only to flash the names of the cast and crew could in any way be of equal importance to the actual story of the film itself. Who really thinks this way?!
But there is no corrollary between the two. There are plenty of films that have "blown me away" which didn't have opening credit sequences at all, or, like every Woody Allen film, simply had white words over a black screen. And then there have been impressive credits - created by a contracted visual design company, not the director - that are stunning and yet the film is terrible.
You probably have those James Bond films to thank - or perhaps even earlier in films like Spartacus - for elaborate opening credits, not David Fincher by the way.
I've seen the trailers and Mara doesn't live up to the high standard set by Rapace. I don't plan on seeing it.
Now I have not read the books and I have seen the Swedish Girl/Dragon. It was very well done, but it was so well done and some of the plot points so dark, it left me with no desire to revisit the story, not even to re-watch the Swedish version, so I too don't plan on seeing the US version.
Others here are saying that Ms Ansari's review would be different if she had or hadn't done this or that.
Well, yes, but, so? This is her review based on the experiences she takes into the movie and how the movie does or doesn't satisfy her interests as a viewer and a creator.
There's no denying that Lisbeth is a great character and the story is good. Given his talent and the strong raw materials, I have no doubt that Ms Ansari is spot on in reporting that Fincher executed well.
As the Swedish version has been available on DVD, digital download, and – at least when I saw it – on Netflix, I wonder if we are seeing where digital distribution is presenting a different sort of challenge to big studio business models.
The US remake is not a new phenomenon and sometimes it goes very well (Seven Samurai - Ride of the Magnificent Seven) and sometimes it goes poorly (1980s remakes of French comedies). But, with a rapid remake, I imagine the studios would be hoping for a large segment of the movie-going public not having just watched the original, as story freshness is what helps sell tickets.
New to a lot of people was true when foreign films were found in art-houses and back shelves of the video store. This movie foreign version was featured for weeks at iTunes. Add that it came out when other high-profile and franchise movies were released and I can see that as the movie-going choices are made, the "newer" movies will have an advantage.
For this particular movie, I would not use box office as the invalidator of a good review. If it comes out at a different time of year besides summer and Christmas, perhaps it does really well and it does so for the quality of the filmmaking.
Why can't there be two versions? No one is taking away your beloved Swedish adaptation. If you loved the books so much, you should really give the American version a chance and develop your own opinion based on the movie. It follows the book more closely and does a better job with character development. Maybe it will surprise you. In any event, all you have to lose is 2 hours watching a story that you love so much.
You say: "You should see the original instead of hyping on what a great job everyone did." The point of this review is that she HADN"T, and therefore was going in with an open mind, unlike yourself. She is forming her own opinion of the movie based on the merits of the movie, not automatically discounting it because of some weird obsession with the Swedish movie.
Because if not , well you know the rest of your argument.