Last week, Bob Rae named me the Liberal Party 'critic' for Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development. I have always preferred the title in French, 'porte-parole' -- the word for 'spokesperson' instead of 'critic.'
I thought being the spokesperson for the party and stakeholders was more positive. I had always thought that the job of Opposition members is to occasionally admit when the government of the day is caught doing something right!
So as the new critic/porte-parole/spokesperson for Aboriginal Affairs, my job was to scrutinize the Speech from the Throne last Friday like a Talmudic scholar. Every line relating to my portfolio was highlighted and analyzed. There were three important sentences:
"Canada's Aboriginal peoples are central to Canada's history, and our Government has made it a priority to renew and deepen our relationship. The contribution of Canada's Aboriginal peoples will be important to our future prosperity. Concerted action is needed to address the barriers to social and economic participation that many Aboriginal Canadians face.""Our Aboriginal Canadians have some of the worst outcomes in health, education, economic status and environmental conditions. After delay after delay, the Conservative Government finally endorsed the U.N. Declaration on Indigenous Peoples... but there had not been even an assessment of what our Aboriginal peoples believe is necessary for the full implementation of the commitment, let alone a strategy, the costing and the necessary investments."
"So we hoped to see commitments in the budget on housing, on education, on provision of safe drinking water... meaningful commitments that would help solve the significant problems facing Aboriginal Canadians."
Although we didn't see evidence of 'concerted action' in the Speech from the Throne the proof would be in pudding in the 2011 budget. Would we see a plan for 'concerted action?' What would be the investments?
On Monday afternoon, the answer was clear. The government had totally abdicated their responsibility to our Aboriginal peoples. It was also clear that 'critic' was to be the more appropriate title for my role.
Instead of investments, what we saw was a chart with a history lesson on previous investments as part of the Economic Action Plan (p. 135 of the budget)... and an outright refusal to admit that this budget means no further investments on these key issues, like housing.
But even more insulting was their response to the overwhelming need for investments in education -- the re-announcement of a commitment to a meeting:
"Building upon a Budget 2010 commitment, the Government, in collaboration with the Assembly of First Nations, has announced that a Panel of Experts will lead an engagement process to develop options for concrete and positive changes in First Nations education to bring greater success and opportunities for First Nations students."
The National Chief Shawn A-in-chut Atleo has been very clear that education is the priority of the Assembly of First Nations.
Surely the government's commitment 'to renew and deepen our relationship' with Aboriginal peoples should be firstly to recognize the mandate of the National Chief in a government to government relationship. If the National Chief is asking for 'equitable, stable and sustainable funding' on education, then the government has an obligation to listen and then put the resources in place to make it happen.
Our Aboriginal people lag terribly behind in completing high school -- according to the 2006 census, 34 per cent of the Aboriginal population aged 25 to 64 do not have a high school diploma, compared to 15 per cent for the non-Aboriginal population, while only 8 per cent of Aboriginals have a university degree compared to 23 per cent of non-Aboriginals.
When it comes to housing, I am concerned that the government has cut its financial support for On-reserve housing through the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation by $127 million. In the budget, the Conservative government also unilaterally decided to invest $22 million in replacing fuel tanks and only $8 million to promote the deployment of clean energy technologies.
In 2004, then-Prime Minister Paul Martin and his cabinet put in place a process that allowed our Aboriginal peoples to choose their priorities and design the blueprint. They chose five areas: education, health, housing, economic development and accountability. The federal government, provinces and territories and the Aboriginal leaders worked together for 18 months to achieve a real plan that became the $5 billion Kelowna Accord.
In 2006, Stephen Harper's government cancelled the Kelowna Accord. The money had been booked, the path forward had been agreed upon. The Conservative government demonstrated a total contempt for the process, the plan and most importantly the gravity of the situation. They decided to use the money for other things. Despite this, the need has only increased. In my riding, so often I am asked what we are doing about this appalling situation.
Every year we put on a day on 'Women in Politics' for the young women in the riding. We have three panels -- politicians, activists and media. One year we invited Bev Jacobs, the President of the Native Women's Association to be on the activist panel. In the Question-and-Answer period, all the questions were directed to her. She gave the history of the Indian Act put also she had a prescription. She believed that age-appropriate Aboriginal studies needed to be part of the curriculum of all Canadians students.
Last year, when I was at the 'Women Deliver' conference in Washington. I met some Kiwi midwives. I asked them why Maori history, art, culture are part of the identity of every New Zealander. They answered that there was age-appropriate Maori education from Kindergarten to grade eight... and then optional in high-school. New Zealand has transformed their First Peoples from victims to leaders. Canada must do the same.
As Minister of State for Public Health, I had an amazing opportunity to learn from our Aboriginal peoples. The Indigenous Physicians Association welcomed me warmly. They taught me that the holistic approach of the Medicine Wheel was far superior to our medical model -- the tyranny of the acute.
We would never be able to keep Canadians healthy without addressing the social determinants of health -- poverty, violence, the environment, shelter, equity, education. Bill Mussel taught me that without a secure personal and cultural identity, self-esteem, resilience, people make bad choices that risk their health. In particular the horrible consequences that colonization has brought to our Aboriginal peoples.
I know that listening is key to 'deepening our relationship.' Bob Rae has already set an amazing example. Our country will only ever be as strong as our most vulnerable people. We need our Aboriginal peoples to be able to lead again... as they did when they helped the European pioneers survive their first winters. I am so grateful that Bob Rae has entrusted me with this portfolio. I look forward to sharing everything I learn in this space.
Miigwetch.
Follow Hon. Carolyn Bennett on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Carolyn_Bennett
Harper Government breaks Throne Speech commitment on Indigenous ...
Well that is certainly quite a bit of hyperbole there isn’t it? Billions of dollars a year with no accountability (that would be racist) and no results equals a total abdication of (our) responsibility?
Billions of dollars spent/wasted and all we have is a connected “elite” (Band Chiefs etc) paying themselves and their relatives incredible $6,7,800 k salaries while the people they’re supposed to represent live in squalor. All enabled and maintained by a second level of lawyers and activists who make their livings off this mess.
Throwing more money at a problem is not the solution despite what the Liberal and NDP playbooks suggest. Repeatedly doing the same thing and expecting a different result is the definition of insanity is it not?
Time to wean these folks off the public teat and have them integrate as full and equal tax-paying members of society.
But this is Canada and we all know that will never happen. Victimhood is a full-time, extremely lucrative industry.
So carry on.
One possible model could be an initiative of indigenous-led development, including proven successful strategies such as providing access to microfinance. Indigenous-led development and microfinance projects can help to get money past corrupt power holders and directly into the hands of those who could actually use it. These strategies have shown great success in the field of international development. They are also known to empower women and increase the level of equality in a community, a necessary step in any development initiative.
It's the waste and lack of transparency that bothers people.
I find this comment rather vexing. It's isolated without context or explanation as to why the Medicine Wheel is a superior medical model to the medical system which is used by the majority of Canadians.
The first problem with your comment is that it pigeonholes the medicine wheel as a "medical system." It isn't. The medicine wheel is a teaching system which includes teachings about health. This distinction is important because the existence of a "medical professional" exists within all cultures, and the medical practices of this class cannot be easily or correctly lumped in with the teaching-oriented medicine wheel, even if there is some crossover.
Your summation of our country's primary medical model as "the tyranny of the acute" is also troublesome. By labeling it as so you risk alienating those who work within the current medical model, the very people best equipped to change it. While there are certainly problems with our current model, it also has its advantages. A push towards a greater focus on public health initiatives will never be successful if it utilizes language which marginalizes and provokes the actors within the current medical professional sphere, the large majority of whom are sincerely and personally dedicated to improving the health of Canadians.
Money spent by all parties in the 2008 U.S, presidential and congressional election: About 22 greenbacks per voter.
And the Canadian amount might drop in the next election due to new election financing laws.
Yeesh.
The reserve system is an utter failure. For crying out loud, it was the model for Apartheid in South Africa!
The tax exemptions and social assistance have created nothing but dependency.
It's time to stop pretending that giving more will help. To stop treating 'aboriginals' as if they're underprivileged. Give them a path to integration instead of handouts to prop up a failed system. Give them a choice where prosperity can occur, but don't doom another generation to dependence out of guilt and flawed logic.
Finally, Mrs. Bennet - "They were here first"? That's your justification? No wonder the Liberal party - the party I choose as my own - is in such disarray. You say "We need our Aboriginal peoples to be able to lead again... as they did when they helped the European pioneers survive their first winters." What tripe.
Will that happen through coddling and recognition of their 'special needs'? Or will it be built through respect, acknowledgment that the solution to-date has failed and a decision to give aboriginals an opportunity to join the rest of Canada as proud, prosperous people?
I vote the latter. It's one of the reasons I doubt I'll be voting Liberal again any time soon.