Former Prime Minister Paul Martin once described Canada as a nation of minorities. His observation was a variation on the way in which the United States has occasionally been described. Underlying the description is the idea that there is a greater degree of empathy for vulnerable communities within society and a better understanding of the challenges that sometimes accompany belonging to a minority (some may insist that empathy is in short supply in the United States given the current state of race relations).
There are multiple ways to identify as a minority in Canada with language, ethnic, religious and/or racial/racialized status amongst the principal basis. Even if in certain situations you identify as a minority, that may not be how you're seen by others and/or how you feel in day-to-day interaction. In my home province of Quebec on the basis of language, at times, opinion leaders will describe francophones as a national minority within Canada and a tiny minority in English North America.
Francophone minority affirmation makes English Canadians part of the country's majority and the latter group includes much of the indigenous population, many members of visible and religious "minorities" and the province's English-speaking population.
To add to the confusion, in Quebec, the English speakers see themselves as part of a minority on the basis of their first language. Anglophones recognize their Quebec francophone counterparts as part of the majority (something about which they are frequently reminded). In sum, most Quebecers can be designated as members of both the minority and the majority on the basis of language.
What about the province's allophones (persons whose first language is neither English nor French)? The government legitimately promotes their acquisition of the French language so as to expedite their integration with Quebec's francophone majority while diminishing the insecurity of the minority francophone population in North America (inside and outside of Quebec some anglophones wrongly see the allophone newcomers adoption of the English language as integration and the adoption of the French language as assimilation).
On the island of Montreal, some demographers point out that the non-francophones are a near majority. To arrive at this conclusion they have to combine the Island's anglophones with the allophones into one group despite the fact the latter possess a multitude of language backgrounds. Many Quebec allophones end up acquiring both English and French languages and by consequence feel as though they're part of the minority within a majority that sees itself as part of a minority (we'll let you guess whether I am referring to anglophones or francophones).
Like many other Quebecers, I experience the occasional identity crisis or what I'll call a bout of "multiple identity-itis." The language I first learned and still understand is Yiddish, which would make me an alllophone; the language I used most frequently in school and later at work was English; and I speak a fair bit of French at home with my spouse. As a result I'm mostly Anglophone, partly allophone and a bit francophone. During our emotional language debates a part of my language persona is often unhappy and/or in a dispute with the other part.
Elsewhere in Canada, language is much less important in defining who we are than are racial, ethnic or religious identification. University of Toronto Professor Jeffrey Reitz has said that "we have difficulty with that subject (race) as a country... 25 years ago they were issuing reports on how cities like Toronto were no longer majority British... Now the Italians and the Poles are considered part of the dominant population, the non-visible minority European-origin population. So the story is we're moving away from a population dominated by people of a European background."
Over the past decade, opinion leaders in Toronto and Vancouver have referred to visible minorities as part of the majority. In 2011, Statistics Canada revealed that in the city of Markham the visible minority population accounted for approximately 72 per cent of the population, some 66 per cent in Brampton, nearly 54 per cent in Mississauga and 49 per cent in the city of Toronto. Within Vancouver's Census metropolitan area, in 2011, the municipalities of Richmond (70.4 per cent), Burnaby (59.5 per cent), Surrey (52.6 per cent) and the City of Vancouver (51.8 per cent) had higher proportions of visible minorities. Many persons of African, Asian or other origins would surely be surprised to learn that they are part of the majority group.
A poll conducted back in 2004 by the firm Environics for the Association for Canadian Studies reveals that some three-quarters of the population tend to view themselves as part of a cultural majority while approximately one in five Canadians feel that they are part of the minority (only one per cent said they were both). Some segments of the population view themselves as a minority with 57 per cent of non-Europeans declaring such status.
Do Canadians regard themselves as part of a minority in a nation that presumably embodies them? If so, there is little evidence to support the claim.
Follow HuffPost Canada Blogs on Facebook
MORE ON HUFFPOST:
> Immigrants: 7.3 million > Pct of population: 20.7% > GDP (PPP) per capita 2012: $42,734 > Gov’t immigration goals: Maintain Currently, 7.3 million immigrants live in Canada, equivalent to more than 20% of the nation’s total population. As 2011, the Canadian government was one of the few to propose policies that would increase the level of immigration for the purpose of family unification. The level of immigration, more generally, was considered satisfactory in the same year, according to the U.N. In spite of Canada’s exceptionally liberal immigration policies, there has been concern recently over whether Canada’s immigrants are successfully integrating into society. To avoid the potential social tension that could arise from a growing economic difference between immigrants and locals, the Canadian government has restructured its screening process to emphasize factors such as job skills and language fluency. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
> Immigrants: 7.4 million > Pct of population: 11.6% > GDP (PPP) per capita 2012: $35,548 > Gov’t immigration goals: Decrease Just 11.6% or France’s roughly 65 million residents are international migrants. According to the U.N. Population division, while the French government promoted some policies aimed at attracting skilled immigrants as of 2011, the governments overall attitude toward immigration was generally negative. As a member of the European Union, France is obligated to support the free movement of EU nationals between the EU nations. In recent years, however, the European Commission has criticized the French government for expelling Roma, popularly called Gypsies, from the country. France’s existing immigrant population is older, with nearly 20% at least 65 years of age, compared to just 11.1% globally. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
> Immigrants: 7.8 million > Pct of population: 12.4% > GDP (PPP) per capita 2012: $36,941 > Gov’t immigration goals: Decrease About 7.8 million million immigrants live in the U.K., up from just under 6.5 million as of 2010. This is despite the U.K. government’s view, as of 2011, that the large influx of foreigners to the country was somewhat of a problem. The government’s policies intended to lower the level of immigration to the country, including high-skilled workers immigration. Only one of the world’s eight largest destinations for immigrants, the United Arab Emirates, had a higher average annual increase in immigration that exceeded the U.K.’s 4.0%. Although the country’s aging population may actually signal a necessity for more immigrants, British Prime Minister David Cameron has stated that immigration has strained the nation’s public services. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
> Immigrants: 7.8 million > Pct of population: 83.7% > GDP (PPP) per capita 2012: $49,012 > Gov’t immigration goals: Decrease A stunning 83.7% of UAE residents are international migrants the most of any country in the world, excluding only Vatican City. Between 2010 and 2013, the emirates let in more than 4.5 million migrant workers, more than any other nation in the world. The UAE is able to attract workers to come there because the country is extremely wealthy, with an economy driven by oil and finance. As of 2012, the nation’s per capita GDP exceeded $49,000, on-par with that of the U.S. But despite the nation’s appeal for immigrants, the UAE’s government as of 2011 considered immigration to be too high. Additionally, the country has been criticized for the poor living and working conditions faced by many migrant workers. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
> Immigrants: 9.1 million > Pct of population: 31.4% > GDP (PPP) per capita 2012: $31,275 > Gov’t immigration goals: Decrease Nearly one-third of Saudi Arabia’s population consists of immigrants, while between 2000 and 2013 the number of immigrants rose by an annual average of 4.2% per year, higher than most other nations. Between 2010 and 2013 alone, the number of immigrants to Saudi Arabia rose 24.3% As of 2011, the Saudi Arabian government regarded the overall level of legal immigration as too high and implemented policies to reduce immigration, according to the UN had. Similarly, the government’s policies on the naturalization of immigrants were also considered restrictive. Recent news reports suggest immigration policy in Saudi Arabia has only become more restrictive with new measures implemented to prevent undocumented workers from finding employment. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
> Immigrants: 9.8 million > Pct of population: 11.9% > GDP (PPP) per capita 2012: $39,028 > Gov’t immigration goals: Maintain Germany, one of the world’s largest economies, is a popular destination for immigrants. Its well-developed infrastructure and top-rate higher education only add to its attraction. Just under 10 milllion of the country’s 82 million residents are immigrants. As of 2011, Germany’s policies reflected approval of the country’s rate of immigration. In 2012, with the eurozone crisis still unabated, a growing number of young workers immigrated from southern Europe to Germany. But Germany has openly recruited high skilled-workers to live and work in the country permanently, especially as the country’s population ages and shrinks, according to Der Spiegel. Unfortunately, many such workers fail to stay for even as little as a year, and since 2010 the number of immigrants to Germany has actually dropped. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
> Immigrants: 11.0 million > Pct of population: 7.7% > GDP (PPP) per capita 2012: $17,709 > Gov’t immigration goals: Increase More than 12 million immigrants lived in Russia in 2010 and the Russian government was among the few seeking to increase the number of foreigners entering the country. In 2011, the country’s government viewed immigration as too low and oriented its policies towards increasing immigration. However, these policies have failed to attract more net immigrants: as of this year, there are just over 11 million immigrants living in Russia, a decrease of roughly 10% from 2010. Local authorities have not embraced the prospect of single-ethnicity communities for Chinese, Uzbeks, Tajiks and other ethnic groups in Russia ,and have even sought to ban them in some cases, hoping instead to promote integration into Russian society. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
> Immigrants: 45.8 million > Pct of population: 14.3% > GDP (PPP) per capita 2012: $49,922 > Gov’t immigration goals: Maintain The U.S. is by far the largest destination for immigrants, with more than 45.7 million living in the country, according to the UN. As of 2011, the U.S. government’s policies toward both immigration and emigration remained effectively neutral. However, immigration reform has been especially prominent in Congress this year. This reform is expected to address issues related to illegal immigration, while determining how, and whether, undocumented immigrants should be able to attain citizenship. Considering the U.S. has one the highest per capita GDPs in the world, at nearly $50,000, its appeal to immigrants is fairly straightforward. It is the world’s largest economy, as measured by output, and has the second largest total exports. Also, the U.S. offers well-developed infrastructure and financial markets, as well as quality education. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.