When Unifor formally opened bargaining with the Detroit Three automakers three months ago, only one thing seemed certain: the future of the industry was at stake.
Today, thanks to the collective efforts and determination of our union, the bargaining committees and the membership, the industry is back on the right path. In fact, Unifor has done more in the last three months to secure the industry's footprint in Canada and offer a brighter future for autoworkers, their families and their communities, than governments have in the last 10 years. Our union secured this without an auto pact in place.
In fact, the previous Harper government ignored the industry in pursuit of petro dollars as the price of oil soared, allowing manufacturing and good jobs to leave the country. It came down to us, the union and the workers at those plants to clean up the mess Harper left.
With new contracts at General Motors, Fiat Chrysler, and Ford, the women and men who work at the Detroit Three have once again done their part to secure the auto industry's future in Canada.
Now it's time for all three levels of government to do their part.
It came down to us, the union and the workers at those plants to clean up the mess Harper left.
To do that, governments will no doubt need to make some tough decisions and be prepared to defend the decisions that need to be made. Doing the right thing always makes the job easier, even in rocky times.
With the Detroit Three, Unifor negotiated and secured a total of $1.5 billion in investment in Canada. Almost half of that was at Ford, with $613 million to bring a new engine to its Essex engine plant in Windsor. Another $100 million will be spent to secure manufacturing commitments at its Oakville assembly plant.
This investment not only saved jobs, it brings jobs back to Canada, it creates new jobs and it helped to save local communities. With GM we not only secured $554 million in investment, but Unifor also brought jobs back to Canada.
Our collective bargaining process had challenges and it took some tough decisions, particularly on pensions for new hires, to get that investment. Our union did however achieve significant improvements to wages and working conditions that ensure being an autoworker remains a good job for a long time to come. Some of the gains made include:
- Two wage increases of two per cent each over the life of the contract;
- A $6,000 signing bonus and $2,000 in the second, third and fourth year of the contract, for a total of $12,000;
- Significant improvements to the progression wage grid to increase the earnings of new hires;
- Benefit improvements, while the health deductible for retirees was cut in half.
The Ford contract, patterned after those at GM and Fiat Chrysler, shows what is possible when you go into negotiations with a clear set of goals and priorities set by members, a strong and passionate team on your side and the need to defend the livelihood for those you are negotiating for.
Unifor's approach and a system of pattern bargaining made a difference in our auto talks. Most of all what made a difference was our unity and capacity to stand together.
At the end of the day, our union achieved our primary priority in these talks to bring new investment and new products to Canada for each of the Detroit Three companies. This is a huge achievement that helps ensure the future of this vital industry in Canada.
Many of the challenges facing the auto sector have not simply disappeared.
But the job is not yet done. While our negotiations and the three ratified collective agreements have put the industry on a stronger footing than it was before these talks began, many of the challenges facing the auto sector have not simply disappeared.
Canada still has inadequate programs from our governments to attract and retain the auto industry in this country. The Harper-era programs of taxable loans remains in place. The program needs to be non-taxable and not loan-based.
This is not new. On behalf of Unifor I told this to the Harper government, and more recently to the current Liberal government as we called on Ottawa to play a significant role in helping ensure a strong future for the auto industry.
In 2016, what has changed is that Unifor now has new collective agreements with the Detroit Three that set out clear plans over the life of those four-year contracts.
With this solid foundation, we are calling on the federal, provincial and municipal governments to work together to further cement the future of the auto industry in Canada. Action to further strengthen auto's footprint begins with Ottawa updating its auto program and working with the provinces and municipalities on local needs.
We have done our bit. Now it's their turn.
Follow HuffPost Canada Blogs on Facebook
Also on HuffPost:
Without trade unions promoting the aim of a 40-hour work week, there would have been no pressure on employers to limit the amount of time employees spend working. While of course employees are free to choose how long they spend working, trade unions worked to ensure this was the choice of a worker, not their boss. The movement for an 8-hour work day peaked at the turn of the 20th century, just before the First World War. And more recent moves towards re-imagining the working day have seen big businesses use technology to limit after-hours email traffic. Arguably such ideas are borne out of trade union campaigning more than a century ago.
While European rules introduced the basic legal right to paid-for annual leave, it is the trade unions which fought for enhanced entitlements over and above the basic EU provision. Since the early 2000s, the Trades Union Congress has fought for increases to the amount of leave, which is now the equivalent of 5.6 working weeks (PDF).
Before the Employers and Workmen Act 1875, workers were the only ones who could be sued for breach of an employment contract. The increased organisation of trade unions and the Great Reform Act prompted both Tory and Liberal governments of the time to take a renewed interest in employment laws. Ultimately this brought about greater parity in the relationship between employer and employee.
Trade unions were instrumental in lobbying government for the provision of leave for new parents - at workers' own discretion. In 1998, the Trades Union Congress launched a campaign to ensure that proposed parental leave would be flexible and well promoted to employees.
Cases of discrimination aren't uncommon, but they'd be a lot more if it weren't for trade unions. As the European Commission says: "Trade unions play a primary role in fighting against discrimination through a variety of actions and tools". They negotiate with employers, support victims, and monitor discrimination cases - keeping up-to-date with the latest case law so that we don't have to.
Although trade unions had reservations about the effect of a national minimum wage, they declared their support for the policy in the mid-1980s. By the 1990s, scholarly evidence caught up with the unions - arguing that a minimum wage would not reduce adult-age employment (PDF). And through the Labour Party, trade unions were able to influence policy in government after the 1997 election.
In the 1840s, unions that were highly centralised and which employed full-time officers brought about negotiation and arbitration as their preferred method of achieving a good deal for their members. This had a significant effect in improving worker/industrialist relations, and while not always successful, they fundamentally changed workplace relationships for the better.
In the 1830s, a Chartist movement was organised around 6 clear principles - and mobilised mass support for its aims through petitions. Just like trade unions, the Chartists' relied on collective aims amongst like-minded people - most visible in the form of three 'monster' petitions presented to Parliament. These contained millions of signatures and proved a desire amongst workers for improved working conditions.
The history of the working week lies in industrial practices, and in Britain factories operated 6 days a week to maintain efficiencies of scale. Sundays were always the day of rest. But trade unions fought to secure the Saturday for workers, too. And now the Monday-to-Friday work week is accepted across industries, as the LSE notes.
Follow Jerry Dias on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JerryPDias