Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
J.J. McCullough

GET UPDATES FROM J.J. McCullough
 

The Left Fully Succumbs to Harper Derangement Syndrome (HDS)

Posted: 02/ 2/2012 8:21 am

Canada's left could not ask for a more perfect opponent: a far-right, socially-regressive prime minister hellbent on outlawing abortion, overturning gay marriage, selling off the CBC, and privatizing health care.

There's only one problem. His name isn't Stephen Harper. He doesn't exist at all, in fact.

But don't tell the opposition.

It's a testament to the power of social media and the increasingly biased way most of us choose to consume our news that the Canadian party system is now largely polarized on the basis of a false dichotomy that exists only in the fevered imaginations of the country's most dogmatic left-wing ideologues. Jack Layton may have claimed that hope is better than fear, but vast quantities of Canadian progressives seem to be motivated by little else.

They scream passionate answers to questions no one is asking, and organize ferociously to quash proposals no one has offered. It's a particularly creepy style of democracy-by-fantasy, but it may well be the new normal.

The paranoid spectacle of what Kelly McParland has dubbed "Harper Derangement Syndrome" reached absurd heights last month, when, on the basis of a single technical argument from a lawyer no one had ever heard of (including the Prime Minister), a hugely successful viral campaign raised overnight "awareness" of the Conservatives' looming plot to revisit, no, overturn, no, ban same-sex marriage.

Though every reasonable legal analysis of the situation concluded that there was nothing to fear, and despite the fact that Harper's own government was so spooked by the rumour it actually took steps to strengthen the status of gay marriage in the aftermath, the damage was done. "Hands Off Gay Marriage," blared a Brian Topp press release.

Cruising the left-wing blogosphere, one finds no shortage of similarly hysterical campaigns to battle non-issues. You can sign a petition to "save the CBC" from a government that has pledged to "maintain or increase" its funding perhaps, or join the vast coalition of pro-choicers working tirelessly to prevent the re-criminalization of abortion under a prime minister who has refused to allow even a symbolic free vote on the matter.

Much as Canadians like to self-righteously assert that our politics are significantly more substantial and mature than those practiced down south, the Canadian left's persistent inability to bash Harper for anything but the most specious and invented charges is very much the ideological reverse of the fact-free drubbing President Obama routinely suffers at the hands of the GOP.

As liberal pundits like Paul Krugman have oft-bemoaned, the present modus operandi of the Republican Party is to attack Obama persistently and relentlessly "for doing things that the president hasn't done" -- such as cutting defence spending -- "and believing things he doesn't believe" -- such as that America is a great force of wickedness and oppression in the world. Fanatic in their desperation, the Canadian left seems to have reverse-engineered the worst excesses of the American movement they profess to most despise.

There's even a strain of Harper pseudo-birtherism. Despite originating from a crackpot conspiracy website, a rumour continues to thrive in some dark corners that since Harper's government was found to be in contempt of parliament, the Prime Minister himself was constitutionally ineligble to serve a third term, and now heads an illegal occupation government as a result. Despite being widely discredited, this phoniest of causes continues to pop up on Twitter and Facebook to this day, where it fits in nicely with the rest of the Harper-as-dictator narrative peddled by more mainstream voices.

Vile though it may be, this stuff works. Emotion has always been a stronger motivator than logic, and in a universe where RSS feeds and an increasingly partisan press affords us the luxury of surgically selecting only those voices and opinions we want to hear, it's easier than ever to engage with the news as a sort of ideological pep rally, rather than an honest learning experience.

We'll happily swallow any claptrap that passes our personal standard of truthiness and face little consequence for doing so -- declining voter turnouts have made politicians exceedingly cautious about calling us out on our own BS. Votes are votes, and there's little to be gained from second-guessing anyone's political convictions in an era where so few of us possess any.

As enjoyable as Harper-bashing chain letters and internet memes may be at the moment, Liberal and NDP supporters should be cautious of the long term consequences of the unprecedentedly paranoid, fact-free political culture they're helping to sow. They'll be back in charge soon enough, after all, and pooping puffins and questions of patriotism are nothing compared to the sorts of mad conspiracy theories and innuendo the right will be able to cobble together once dislodged from power.

Just ask Barack Obama.

 

Follow J.J. McCullough on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JJ_McCullough

 
 
  • Comments
  • 88
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
12:29 PM on 02/04/2012
The hysterical children of the nanny state don't like their substitute teacher....they want the warm and fuzzy liberals back telling them sweet little lies....
07:02 PM on 02/13/2012
The natural order of things I suppose is that represented by slavery... life is hard, life is not fair, there are winners and losers, winner take all, loser is a slave... yes, we get it.
05:08 PM on 02/03/2012
The point of this article isn't that Stephen Harper has done no wrong, it's that there's a rabid culture of attacking him for things he hasn't done.

Whether JJ is arguing that this is a new phenomenon or not, he is certainly not excluding "the Right" from being a part of it: while he focuses on examples of Harper-bashing, he references that these are the same tactics used by the American Right against Barack Obama.

Does this imply JJ supports the CPC (or Stephen Harper) as uniquely virtuous, compared to the Liberals, NDP, and Republicans? That's something left ambiguous, in truth. But it's a pretty ridiculous accusation to make because of one article that opposes some of the condemnation of Stephen Harper.

By all means, attack Harper's support of prisons, misplaced budget priorities, and his vision for health care, among other things. But you're wrong, argues JJ McCullough, to attack him for some advancing a Right-wing social agenda or illegally occupying his position as Prime Minister. Trying to defend these attacks is dishonest.
07:40 AM on 02/04/2012
.By all means, attack Harper's support of prisons, misplaced budget priorities­, and his vision for health care, among other things

thats exactly what they are doing -----
05:03 PM on 02/05/2012
That wasn't even a contested point, in my comment or in the article.

You completely skipped over the majority of my comment, as well as disregarding anything of value in the article.

Why would you do that, then comment on this?
07:03 PM on 02/13/2012
Only now has Harper had the means to push through an extremist agenda... the people who say, gee, Harper didn't do too much harm or say too many scary things for six whole years as prime minister, clearly he can be trusted" either know zero about our political system or are saying this because they want Harper's extremism to be implemented on an unsuspecting public.
12:01 AM on 02/14/2012
You have a chip on your shoulder. That's okay, everyone does. I know I do.

But I think you would enjoy Harper going full conservative. It gives you something to be fight passionately for (or more accurately, against), where right now there's a really unremarkable state of politics in Canada. There's nothing wrong with that, but at least acknowledge that it comes from some kind of fantastic bias. I followed links in the article and, along with other sources, have found no evidence for the Government intending to make some sweeping social-policy changes.

It's observable that there are some things that Harper is biased toward himself, and would like to see happen, but history has shown that he is consistently mild in almost every political respect.

Will a generation of Conservative politicians effect Canada's culture? For sure. But to say that there is some lurking threat of despotism is dishonest.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Irazu
I have nothing to declare
11:19 AM on 02/03/2012
Perhaps we might identify a new condition: "Pundit Derangement Syndrome"

This is when a right-wing pundit becomes so blinded by his own hubris that his fantasies begin to resemble reality in his own mind.

The fact is, Harper rode to power by reason of most Canadians voting AGAINST him.

Is it any surprise, when a government is elected by a minority of its citizens, that there might be some unhappiness with the policies it enacts?

Oh, poor poor Stephen Harper and his Conservatives. Boo Hoo, Call the Whambulance.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hal Wood
02:52 PM on 02/03/2012
I am not left or right but you are the problem , you are the person the article is about. Eventually the Conservatives will lose power but they are taking big steps in correcting immigration, Native funding etc. and other problems that Liberal governments have created.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Irazu
I have nothing to declare
05:24 PM on 02/03/2012
You say you are not left, and I have no reason to doubt you.

When you say that you are not right, I must agree with you wholeheartedly.
03:47 PM on 02/03/2012
No, Harper became Prime Minister because a majority of Canadians chose the Conservative Party rather than the Liberal or NDP Party.

The fact that Canada has multiple parties always splits the votes; this situation is the norm - whether for Chretien or Harper. After all, one could also say that a majority of Canadians rejected the NDP party. And the Liberal Party.

Your error, as I'm sure you know, is to merge ALL the opposition parties into one and suggested, even more, that anyone voting for these parties did so only as a rejection of the Conservative Party. Untrue; someone who voted NDP did NOT also choose Liberal. So, you can't merge them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Irazu
I have nothing to declare
05:36 PM on 02/03/2012
No error, here. YOUR error is to forget that the NDP and the Liberals are on the left side of the political argument. It is a simple fact that more people voted for left-leaning parties than voted for the Tories. I'm not trying to make a big deal of it - it's just the simple truth.

The Tories won because they were able to benefit from a split in the left vote between the NDP and the Liberals.

I understand that the first-past-the-post system works this way, and that's the way it works.

So... what? Are we all supposed to suddenly change our left-leaning attitudes and refrain from criticizing the Great Leader?

It's hard to understand the disconnection from reality that makes the author of this column think the way he does: apparently, if one dislikes Harper or his policies, one has a "syndrome" rather than a reasonable argument.
09:50 AM on 02/03/2012
Why put the onus on individuals. Why not put the onus on our leaders, those in government and opposition for the lack of rational dialogue. Citizens are reacting the way their MPs want them to. If we had decent leaders who were rational and cooperative citizens wouldn't be so polarized. It seems the political leaders in Ottawa want to polarize all issues from the left and right and never compromise or engage in dialogue between the two. The author is blaming the wrong people. He should be looking at our so called leaders, the left, center and right ones. They are not uniting this country they are helping to divide it.
09:27 AM on 02/03/2012
I find it ironic that Mr. McCullough wants to blame the left for polarizing the country and for ignoring reality and yet provides a perfect example of his own hypocrisy when he calls Paul Krugman, a Nobel Prize winning economist, a "liberal pundit". In short, it is clear that Mr. McCullough is just as guilty of being hyper partisan as those he is blaming for dividing the country. This is further proven by the fact that he seems to think any criticism or attack on Mr. Harper's politics is completely uncalled for, unwarranted, and even goes so far as to hunt down conspiracy websites nobody has ever heard of in order to pad his case against the "left".

One could easily argue that depiste having a number of minority governments, Harper's unwilingness to work with ANYONE or do anything other than have his way 100% all the time could show disrespect for democracy and encouragement of a bitter partisan divide.

One could also easily make the case that searching down blogs on the internet, while ignoring the 24/7 "liberal derangement syndrome" from the likes of Sun Media, right-wing pundits, and nation wide right-wing talk radio is much more prominant and has been around MUCH longer than "Harper Derangement Syndrome".

But let's ignore all of THAT blind partisan evidence-free finger pointing. It is only the left who is partisan and irrational. And Mr. McCullough has the unheard of conspiracy theory blogs to prove it!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DirkNeptune
I love raspberry pie, damn it.
08:40 AM on 02/03/2012
Let's see, we know that, if Harper had his druthers, he would outlaw abortion, overturn gay marriage, sell off the CBC, and privatize health care.

It's not a secret. That's the standard right wing playbook. We have quotes from Harper's lips saying he wants to privatize health care.

Plus some Conservati­ve MPs and expressed their desire to re-open discussion­s on abortion, gay marriage and the CBC.

We also know that Harper constantly misleads and lies to the Canadian people. Stories on this very site have revealed as such.

And we're the ones who are deranged?

The people who are "deranged" are poor and middle class Canadians who think Harper has their best interests at heart.
03:51 PM on 02/03/2012
No, Harper has consistently said that he won't re-open the abortion discussion. What he himself considers as ethical is not to be made the law of the nation. Same with gay marriages. As for selling off the CBC, there are many Canadians who support such an action.

As for privatizing parts of health care, that is already being done. The Quebec Supreme Court declared that citizens had that right because the public health system was inadequate. It's already occurring in Ontario and other parts of the country for the same reasons.

As for your comment (and it is a personal comment; you have no right to begin your sentences with 'we'; speak for yourself alone)...that Harper misleads and lies - that's your personal opinion. Others don't agree - and remember, speaking of ''hubris', you have no right to speak for others.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DirkNeptune
I love raspberry pie, damn it.
04:15 PM on 02/03/2012
I didn't say that Harper was going to re-open the abortion issue.

And as for health care, Harper has indicated he wants a dramatic shift in Canadian health care. Under his vision, every Canadian would not be covered automatically.

And I have just as much right to start a sentence with "we" as do right wing pundits such as David Frum who posted this headline on here recently:

"Canadians Want a Pipeline, Not a U.S. Campaign Issue"

-- without a poll or statistics to back up his claim.

Plus my use of "we" was clearly referring to left-wingers -- the group of people who were being targeted by this pundit's column.

Whatever you may think, Harper does mislead and lie to the Canadian people. As do his MPs. All you have to do is Google it.

If you think Harper always tells the truth, then he should be very happy to have you as a supporter.
07:05 PM on 02/13/2012
How convenient. The public health care system is 'inadequate' because austerity-minded governments such as Harper's have been ideologically committed to starving that system.
07:45 AM on 02/03/2012
The article assumes Harper is not doing anything wrong. It also suggests we should be more rational. For Harper it has always been his way or the highway, he is not unifying the country he is dividing it. Has the author noticed how partisan the country is? People are angry that their prime minister is not listening to them, millions of us. Having said that, the author is right, we need better public discourse, we need people to be rational and talk to us about real issues, spur rational debate, where both sides get a voice. Has Harper ever had a town hall, has Harper ever spoken to the citizens in a serious manner. I follow the news a lot and Harper is no where to be found, he does not engage the politicians or the citizens on the left and that is what is causing this author to write this piece. Had he worked with anyone who opposed him, this author would never have had to write this. Harper is so partisan he doesn't even speak to opposition politicians that were voted in, yet according to the author its the citizens fault for being crazy lefties, when our voices have not even been heard since 2006. Im not asking him to side with us, Id just like to see him listen to us.
Dinsdale Pirahna
"lookin' out the 'ole in the wall"
10:24 AM on 02/03/2012
An honour to be your first fan. Welcome to Huff. Post.
05:58 PM on 02/03/2012
Could you provide some evidence for 'his way or the highway'? And for your claim that the country is 'partisan'?

As for having a Town Hall meetings, yes, Harper has had lots of them. Simply google 'Harper and Town Hall Meetings'. The usual format for such meetings is for the MP, not the PM, to hold them.

And, could you provide evidence that Harper 'doesn't even speak to opposition politicians'.

Your post seems to be filled with ungrounded personal opinions.
07:23 AM on 02/03/2012
Ah yes, nothing to see here, go back to sleep, stick your heads in the sand, there's no hidden agenda, don't worry, when we're through the prison budget will be doubled, the prisons population will explode, the pension system gutted and the ideological agenda for a Devil take the hindmost dog eat dog utopia will be well on track.
09:30 AM on 02/03/2012
Hey, but at least we'll have a bunch of shiny new military planes that we willjust have to assume were a fair and reasonable investment...even though the US has recenltly ditched the same planes for being over priced and crappy. But let's not talk about the usefullness of having contractors bid against each other for tax dollars. That is just too partisan. We must all assume Harper is always right and always acts in the publics/taxpayers best interests or else we may be accused of "Harper Derangement Syndrome".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
06:18 AM on 02/03/2012
Thanks JJ. That pretty much sums it up.
After awhile, their hysterical protests only fall on deaf ears.
I believe the Conservatives have the support they deserve.
They seem to be doing the things they said they were gonna do.
In time, they'll get arrogant and lazy and it will be time for them to go.
Its predictable.
Its human nature.
But right now neither the Liberals or the New Democrats have anything to offer.
Other than hysteria.
Hysteria is a hard sell.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Colin Speth
A Claymore for your thoughts
06:58 AM on 02/03/2012
Except on the Huffpost lol where it's the stock and trade. Well put sir and probably pretty accurate.
Dinsdale Pirahna
"lookin' out the 'ole in the wall"
10:55 PM on 02/02/2012
Hey JJ, Look what I 'imagined' today, silly me: "Tories petition to scrap CBC" by Kris Sims Jan 31, 2012

http://www.friends.ca/news-item/10545
03:03 AM on 02/03/2012
Did you even read the article? "Presenting a petition" does not represent government policy. Libby Davies once presented a 9-11 Truther petition.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Colin Speth
A Claymore for your thoughts
06:48 AM on 02/03/2012
They never read the article. Just the headline, it"s easier.
Dinsdale Pirahna
"lookin' out the 'ole in the wall"
10:18 AM on 02/03/2012
Gee, did I hit a nerve? If what you're saying is that Tory MPs don't represent government policy, you have a point - but we already knew that. That only proves the "Harper as dictator" point the author, who looks (suspiciously) like you, poo-poos in his (your) article. Anyway, the petition has been out since Monday but I don't hear Harper denouncing it or re-affirming his election commitment to provide stable or increased funding. Usually when he's against something his MPs say he is 'all over them'*. Instead he lets these "rogue" MPs put this together while he covers his eyes, ears and mouth.
*see gay-marria­ge, abortion issues

As for the courage of the Libby (NDP) petition (which you seem to dismiss out of hand): 24 CANADIANS died in 9-11, is it too much to ask for our own investigation? What does the U.S. government have to fear? Even their own citizens don't believe the "final report". CNN Poll: 90% Believe US Government Covering Up 9/11 http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/cnn_poll2.htm
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tyler Austin
Women = people. Corperations ≠ people.
09:47 PM on 02/02/2012
The left dosen't need to make up charges agaisnt Harper.
All they need to do is recycle his own rants he spouted aginst the Liberals when he was in opposition.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tokenblackman
09:38 PM on 02/02/2012
I am glad you vote for him and like him so much. I did not vote for him. I do not like the way the country is moving and I am not going to stop complaining about it. Don't like my complaining. Tough.
10:29 PM on 02/02/2012
Could you just make sure your criticisms are based on fact and not fantasy?
07:57 AM on 02/03/2012
That's wicked. Now the author has sparked conservative thinking that everything the left is saying is fantasy. Way to go JJ. Your media spin now tells conservatives that everything anyone from the left talks about is fantasy and nothing of substance. So they will ignore us even more then before. Way to help unite the country JJ.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tokenblackman
08:03 AM on 02/03/2012
That is funny and It ridiculously easy. Look at the Dumb on Crime legislation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Lives
The Venus Project ... look it up
09:32 PM on 02/02/2012
Until we use a system that negates both left and right ideology, this is what you get. Instead of running our lives on ideology, lets try the scientific method. There would be no need for politicians if such a system was put in place.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BigLittle
09:00 PM on 02/02/2012
Roll up another one, son. You're just getting started...
08:54 PM on 02/02/2012
I have obviously disagreed with a lot of things PM's and their parties have done but Harper is truly scary. He supresses the press and healthy debate. He ignores the advice of people whose work will be adversely affected by his decisions. The police chiefs opposed the ending of the long gun registry. Judges and lawyers oppose mandatory sentencing. Despite a falling crimme rate he has to build three prisons which will cost a fortune and another fortune to staff it and feed and house the prisoners. Mr. Harper hopes the fake lake, Peter MacKay and his trip out to a press conference on a military helicopter and government jet, Tony Clement and his fifty sneaked in millions which he distributed in his riding, four ethics commissioners resigning because of the lack of ethics, the six fake new citizens who appeared on tv waving flags and not doing the work they were meant to do. The list goes on - Kyoto, the UN, the jets we can't afford and which won''t work and the new naval vessels and now the new military vehicles. Reform ran a mafia man in one riding. Giving aid to impoverished third world women is pretty useless if you don't include birth control and abortion. Why Canada has suddenly become the unquestioning friend of Israel suddenly beats me. Mr. Harper is an evangelical and I resent his unquestioning support of all the things his religious belief advocates. I oppose shariah law and I oppseChristian fanatacism. Etc.