Canada's left could not ask for a more perfect opponent: a far-right, socially-regressive prime minister hellbent on outlawing abortion, overturning gay marriage, selling off the CBC, and privatizing health care.
There's only one problem. His name isn't Stephen Harper. He doesn't exist at all, in fact.
But don't tell the opposition.
It's a testament to the power of social media and the increasingly biased way most of us choose to consume our news that the Canadian party system is now largely polarized on the basis of a false dichotomy that exists only in the fevered imaginations of the country's most dogmatic left-wing ideologues. Jack Layton may have claimed that hope is better than fear, but vast quantities of Canadian progressives seem to be motivated by little else.
They scream passionate answers to questions no one is asking, and organize ferociously to quash proposals no one has offered. It's a particularly creepy style of democracy-by-fantasy, but it may well be the new normal.
The paranoid spectacle of what Kelly McParland has dubbed "Harper Derangement Syndrome" reached absurd heights last month, when, on the basis of a single technical argument from a lawyer no one had ever heard of (including the Prime Minister), a hugely successful viral campaign raised overnight "awareness" of the Conservatives' looming plot to revisit, no, overturn, no, ban same-sex marriage.
Though every reasonable legal analysis of the situation concluded that there was nothing to fear, and despite the fact that Harper's own government was so spooked by the rumour it actually took steps to strengthen the status of gay marriage in the aftermath, the damage was done. "Hands Off Gay Marriage," blared a Brian Topp press release.
Cruising the left-wing blogosphere, one finds no shortage of similarly hysterical campaigns to battle non-issues. You can sign a petition to "save the CBC" from a government that has pledged to "maintain or increase" its funding perhaps, or join the vast coalition of pro-choicers working tirelessly to prevent the re-criminalization of abortion under a prime minister who has refused to allow even a symbolic free vote on the matter.
Much as Canadians like to self-righteously assert that our politics are significantly more substantial and mature than those practiced down south, the Canadian left's persistent inability to bash Harper for anything but the most specious and invented charges is very much the ideological reverse of the fact-free drubbing President Obama routinely suffers at the hands of the GOP.
As liberal pundits like Paul Krugman have oft-bemoaned, the present modus operandi of the Republican Party is to attack Obama persistently and relentlessly "for doing things that the president hasn't done" -- such as cutting defence spending -- "and believing things he doesn't believe" -- such as that America is a great force of wickedness and oppression in the world. Fanatic in their desperation, the Canadian left seems to have reverse-engineered the worst excesses of the American movement they profess to most despise.
There's even a strain of Harper pseudo-birtherism. Despite originating from a crackpot conspiracy website, a rumour continues to thrive in some dark corners that since Harper's government was found to be in contempt of parliament, the Prime Minister himself was constitutionally ineligble to serve a third term, and now heads an illegal occupation government as a result. Despite being widely discredited, this phoniest of causes continues to pop up on Twitter and Facebook to this day, where it fits in nicely with the rest of the Harper-as-dictator narrative peddled by more mainstream voices.
Vile though it may be, this stuff works. Emotion has always been a stronger motivator than logic, and in a universe where RSS feeds and an increasingly partisan press affords us the luxury of surgically selecting only those voices and opinions we want to hear, it's easier than ever to engage with the news as a sort of ideological pep rally, rather than an honest learning experience.
We'll happily swallow any claptrap that passes our personal standard of truthiness and face little consequence for doing so -- declining voter turnouts have made politicians exceedingly cautious about calling us out on our own BS. Votes are votes, and there's little to be gained from second-guessing anyone's political convictions in an era where so few of us possess any.
As enjoyable as Harper-bashing chain letters and internet memes may be at the moment, Liberal and NDP supporters should be cautious of the long term consequences of the unprecedentedly paranoid, fact-free political culture they're helping to sow. They'll be back in charge soon enough, after all, and pooping puffins and questions of patriotism are nothing compared to the sorts of mad conspiracy theories and innuendo the right will be able to cobble together once dislodged from power.
Just ask Barack Obama.
Follow J.J. McCullough on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JJ_McCullough
Socialists announce the anti-Harper anti-Conservative Left-wing ...
"The real bully in Ottawa" – Gerry Nicholls - NetNewsledger.com ...
Whether JJ is arguing that this is a new phenomenon or not, he is certainly not excluding "the Right" from being a part of it: while he focuses on examples of Harper-bashing, he references that these are the same tactics used by the American Right against Barack Obama.
Does this imply JJ supports the CPC (or Stephen Harper) as uniquely virtuous, compared to the Liberals, NDP, and Republicans? That's something left ambiguous, in truth. But it's a pretty ridiculous accusation to make because of one article that opposes some of the condemnation of Stephen Harper.
By all means, attack Harper's support of prisons, misplaced budget priorities, and his vision for health care, among other things. But you're wrong, argues JJ McCullough, to attack him for some advancing a Right-wing social agenda or illegally occupying his position as Prime Minister. Trying to defend these attacks is dishonest.
thats exactly what they are doing -----
You completely skipped over the majority of my comment, as well as disregarding anything of value in the article.
Why would you do that, then comment on this?
But I think you would enjoy Harper going full conservative. It gives you something to be fight passionately for (or more accurately, against), where right now there's a really unremarkable state of politics in Canada. There's nothing wrong with that, but at least acknowledge that it comes from some kind of fantastic bias. I followed links in the article and, along with other sources, have found no evidence for the Government intending to make some sweeping social-policy changes.
It's observable that there are some things that Harper is biased toward himself, and would like to see happen, but history has shown that he is consistently mild in almost every political respect.
Will a generation of Conservative politicians effect Canada's culture? For sure. But to say that there is some lurking threat of despotism is dishonest.
This is when a right-wing pundit becomes so blinded by his own hubris that his fantasies begin to resemble reality in his own mind.
The fact is, Harper rode to power by reason of most Canadians voting AGAINST him.
Is it any surprise, when a government is elected by a minority of its citizens, that there might be some unhappiness with the policies it enacts?
Oh, poor poor Stephen Harper and his Conservatives. Boo Hoo, Call the Whambulance.
When you say that you are not right, I must agree with you wholeheartedly.
The fact that Canada has multiple parties always splits the votes; this situation is the norm - whether for Chretien or Harper. After all, one could also say that a majority of Canadians rejected the NDP party. And the Liberal Party.
Your error, as I'm sure you know, is to merge ALL the opposition parties into one and suggested, even more, that anyone voting for these parties did so only as a rejection of the Conservative Party. Untrue; someone who voted NDP did NOT also choose Liberal. So, you can't merge them.
The Tories won because they were able to benefit from a split in the left vote between the NDP and the Liberals.
I understand that the first-past-the-post system works this way, and that's the way it works.
So... what? Are we all supposed to suddenly change our left-leaning attitudes and refrain from criticizing the Great Leader?
It's hard to understand the disconnection from reality that makes the author of this column think the way he does: apparently, if one dislikes Harper or his policies, one has a "syndrome" rather than a reasonable argument.
One could easily argue that depiste having a number of minority governments, Harper's unwilingness to work with ANYONE or do anything other than have his way 100% all the time could show disrespect for democracy and encouragement of a bitter partisan divide.
One could also easily make the case that searching down blogs on the internet, while ignoring the 24/7 "liberal derangement syndrome" from the likes of Sun Media, right-wing pundits, and nation wide right-wing talk radio is much more prominant and has been around MUCH longer than "Harper Derangement Syndrome".
But let's ignore all of THAT blind partisan evidence-free finger pointing. It is only the left who is partisan and irrational. And Mr. McCullough has the unheard of conspiracy theory blogs to prove it!
It's not a secret. That's the standard right wing playbook. We have quotes from Harper's lips saying he wants to privatize health care.
Plus some ConservatiÂve MPs and expressed their desire to re-open discussionÂs on abortion, gay marriage and the CBC.
We also know that Harper constantly misleads and lies to the Canadian people. Stories on this very site have revealed as such.
And we're the ones who are deranged?
The people who are "deranged" are poor and middle class Canadians who think Harper has their best interests at heart.
As for privatizing parts of health care, that is already being done. The Quebec Supreme Court declared that citizens had that right because the public health system was inadequate. It's already occurring in Ontario and other parts of the country for the same reasons.
As for your comment (and it is a personal comment; you have no right to begin your sentences with 'we'; speak for yourself alone)...that Harper misleads and lies - that's your personal opinion. Others don't agree - and remember, speaking of ''hubris', you have no right to speak for others.
And as for health care, Harper has indicated he wants a dramatic shift in Canadian health care. Under his vision, every Canadian would not be covered automatically.
And I have just as much right to start a sentence with "we" as do right wing pundits such as David Frum who posted this headline on here recently:
"Canadians Want a Pipeline, Not a U.S. Campaign Issue"
-- without a poll or statistics to back up his claim.
Plus my use of "we" was clearly referring to left-wingers -- the group of people who were being targeted by this pundit's column.
Whatever you may think, Harper does mislead and lie to the Canadian people. As do his MPs. All you have to do is Google it.
If you think Harper always tells the truth, then he should be very happy to have you as a supporter.
As for having a Town Hall meetings, yes, Harper has had lots of them. Simply google 'Harper and Town Hall Meetings'. The usual format for such meetings is for the MP, not the PM, to hold them.
And, could you provide evidence that Harper 'doesn't even speak to opposition politicians'.
Your post seems to be filled with ungrounded personal opinions.
After awhile, their hysterical protests only fall on deaf ears.
I believe the Conservatives have the support they deserve.
They seem to be doing the things they said they were gonna do.
In time, they'll get arrogant and lazy and it will be time for them to go.
Its predictable.
Its human nature.
But right now neither the Liberals or the New Democrats have anything to offer.
Other than hysteria.
Hysteria is a hard sell.
http://www.friends.ca/news-item/10545
*see gay-marriaÂge, abortion issues
As for the courage of the Libby (NDP) petition (which you seem to dismiss out of hand): 24 CANADIANS died in 9-11, is it too much to ask for our own investigation? What does the U.S. government have to fear? Even their own citizens don't believe the "final report". CNN Poll: 90% Believe US Government Covering Up 9/11 http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/cnn_poll2.htm
All they need to do is recycle his own rants he spouted aginst the Liberals when he was in opposition.