Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Johannes Wheeldon, Ph.D

GET UPDATES FROM Johannes Wheeldon, Ph.D
 

Should We Treat the Globe and Mail as a Cheating Student?

Posted: 09/24/2012 8:19 am

In a remarkable reply to the detailed allegations against Margaret Wente for repeated plagiarism, the Globe and Mail has shown itself to be unequal to the tasks associated with running a national newspaper.

In short, basic journalistic integrity at the Globe is dead. Gone. It has "flown the coop, kicked the bucket, shuffled off this mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin' choir invisible."

The problems with the reply by the Globe's public editor Sylvia Stead are numerous. The largest issue is that Stead fails to address the fact that Wente used a paragraph, almost identical to one written by Dan Gardner, after removing the quotation marks. In short she passed off observations of another as her own. This is plagiarism. Period. Full stop.

As an educator, I know something about this stuff. I see it often. I have argued it is a function both of the technological ease of copying and pasting, and the fact that we simply do not teach students what plagiarism is, why it matters, and how it can be avoided. For three years now, I have been using a version of the quiz provided here to try to assist my students.

But what about columnists and journalists? As HuffPost has pointed out this has been quite a summer for journalistic ethics. Fareed Zakaria and Jonah Lehrer have both been investigated and were both suspended, although Zakaria has since been reinstated at CNN. In the U.S., journalists and media companies take this stuff seriously.

In Canada? Crickets. The silence on this issue has been deafening. Few journalists have expressed an opinion on the matter, and no mainstream brick and mortar newspapers have covered it. Why you ask? According to Sabrina Maddeaux: "Everyone is scared shitless."

So what might be done? Since, as Maddeaux points out, copy editors and fact-checkers are all but extinct in Canada's lame stream media, perhaps you and I can assist. I propose a project organized through kickstarter or some similar organization to raise enough money to buy a subscription to TurnItIn. The Globe and Mail cannot be the only Canadian publication with a plagiarism problem and this project will assist by providing access to a useful tool to identify the number of cut and paste jobs (past and present) presented as original work. Imagine how pleased Canada's illustrious media will be!

Working together we can use TurnItIn's OriginalityCheck and help the media do its job. It's easy -- copy and paste questionable text into the space provided, the program compares the submitted text against a text comparison database and presents an originality index so anyone can see how much of a journalist's or columnist's work is original.

What say you? Shall we crowdsource the Globe's plagiarism problem?

 
 
 

Follow Johannes Wheeldon, Ph.D on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JusticeLawDev

FOLLOW CANADA
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:49 PM on 09/24/2012
Could we NOT use "lame" as a pejorative? K, thanks!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doctor Nick
Hi, everybody!
05:09 PM on 09/24/2012
Is it wrong that I prefer a plagiarizing Margaret Wente over one that comes up with original thoughts and content?
03:58 PM on 09/24/2012
I read Wente the odd time. It's hard to believe that she liberated someone else's work and they came forward. Her writing is so awful that I'm surprised that anyone would claim any part of any column as their own.
12:03 PM on 09/24/2012
Do the right thing. I am decidedly no fan of Margaret Wente's, but I would not want to see her disgraced. Her columns well illustrate that she can do that perfectly well on her own.

These are days of vilification and character assassination. HuffPost should not add to that clamour just because the Globe is competition. However, if Wente's misdeed is a serious violation of journalistic ethics, then she should experience an appropriate level of censure. I'm not sure what that would entail, but somewhere out there, someone does. Deal with it and move on.
georgee2
My Canada Includes Everyone
10:51 AM on 09/24/2012
The Globe and Mail long ago stopped being a paper with integrity.
10:40 AM on 09/24/2012
It is typical: Wente's readers simply parrot the right-wing rhetoric that she provides. Apparently, Wente doesn't come up with this ridiculous nonsense, she simply chooses to parrot it.
photo
Gnomish
ego doctus ignarus
08:58 AM on 09/24/2012
If neither of Wentes readers noticed does it really matter?