It would have been better by light years if Canada had ended its Kyoto agreement responsibilities with a new and better environmental agreement already in hand -- instead of slinking away like the juvenile delinquent who missed so much school that catching up with the other students became completely out of the question.
Where is the leadership to replace Kyoto with a better plan for reducing airborne emissions if Kyoto was so deeply flawed? I don't see it. The emptiness of intergalactic space compares with the dearth of leadership we see in Ottawa on air quality issues.
Environment Minister Peter Kent is merely the person taking the heat until we all get busy with other things and recall only wistfully the days of Kyoto's promise of a better biosphere.
That's not to slight Kent, a former journalist with impressive credentials by any standard and a thoroughly decent person in every way.
Not incidentally, it was Kent's documentary "The Greenhouse Effect and Planet Earth" which aired on CBC's The Journal in January 1984, that got people talking about greenhouse gasses. "The greenhouse effect must be considered as the world's greatest environmental concern," Kent told surprised Canadian and American viewers. How things have changed!
If I were less naïve, I'd say Kent was chosen to lead the environment portfolio because of his personal character and outstanding courage as a combat journalist in the Vietnam War and other wars since.
How could anybody politically attack him? Seriously, the man is a hero.
If only the Conservatives had chosen someone else for the position of minister of the environment. Then environmentalists could tar and feather away to their heart's delight, without any remorse whatsoever. What a wonderful world it would be. I'd be there -- we could do lunch!
But if Conservative strategists planned long in advance to play juvenile delinquent on Kyoto -- the only Canadian who could possibly make enviros feel guilty about going on the attack would be Kent. Dang him for being so nice -- and so accomplished!
Where is all this leading if we refuse to hold MP Peter Kent's feet to the fire? Nowhere!
We -- those who breathe air on this planet -- need a new agreement. We need a binding international air-quality agreement so that environmentally wishy-washy governments can't just wash-out any time they like, because it may require effort to actually execute an agreed upon plan.
Apparently, solving the CO2 problem was too big of an undertaking for our Conservative government. So, let's give Ottawa a problem to solve that should be within its capabilities, one that will address airborne emissions and one that will help to make the air far less toxic than it is today. And, if Conservatives can't execute that play properly -- we vote them out of office at the very next election.
Why not? They work for us, remember? We decide who gets to ride in the limo, not them.
Toxic gasses other than CO2: Think about that for a minute. Some of the most horrific airborne carcinogens and other highly toxic gasses exist as emissions on every continent.
I have written (and quoted from the Common Language Project, a nonprofit journalism organization) previously in the Huffington Post that 410,000 people die per year in China from exposure to toxic emissions. Over four years that's 1.6 million deaths in China alone. Carbon dioxide is not the only pollution they are dying from.
Our environment minister could take a page from former president Bill Clinton's book and have a small sign made for his desk: "It's the other gasses, stupid!" Here is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) original airborne pollutant list and six common airborne pollutants.
On a positive note, every one of these killer emissions is well-known -- there is no uncertainty this time and avoiding responsibilities by politicians will no longer be an option. This science is already done! No need for a climate debate -- this will be a short but simple life vs. death debate.
We already have enough information and technology available to begin saving thousands of lives per year -- on every continent.
This time, let's get it right. Just be ready to make your point at the ballot box!
Follow John Brian Shannon on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@JBSCanada
Dennis Bevington: Shut Out: Opposition MPs on Kyoto Decision
Canada pulls out of Kyoto protocol | Environment | guardian.co.uk
Canada pulls out of Kyoto Protocol - Politics - CBC News
Post-Kyoto, a search for 'a subtle skill' in tackling climate change ...
Kyoto Protocol: Peter Kent's 1984 CBC Climate Change ...
Environment Minister Peter Kent says Canada withdrawing from Kyoto
Post-Kyoto, a search for 'a subtle skill' in tackling climate change ...
Canada pulls out of Kyoto protocol | Environment | guardian.co.uk
What does Canada's withdrawal from Kyoto protocol mean? | Adam ...
Kyoto Protocol: Peter Kent's 1984 CBC Climate Change ...
Environment Minister Peter Kent says Canada withdrawing from Kyoto
http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2011/12/our-changing-arctic-is-change-permanent.html
While these changes may be due to normal environmental fluctuations, they may also be a result of a long-term change in global climate. Unfortunately, we won't know until it is too late.
Read "Merchants of Doubt" and you'll no longer have any that the world has been played by the deniers to everything's detriment.
I'm the Sub-Committee: Buy an economy car. 2moro. Yes! You. Or better yet, take the bus. I dont care if its uncomfortable. Stop smoking right now of you still are stupid enough to smoke. Make a list when you go shopping so you don't have to go back home. Follow ur manufacturer's instructions. Stop being so callous with resources that do not belong to you. Everything you use - is on loan - At least turn off the VCR...I mean, come on !
I know this for sure: I live 150 miles from Los Angeles and 80 miles from Mexico. I am willing to bet your air quality is a *&^^& of alot better than mine !!
I come from the most beautiful Province in Canada. I currently live in an area where there is more wind and sun and sand than we know what to do with and we have the same problems you do; Air quality sux, diseases with a variety of causes are rampant, prices are high, no one cares and politicans are crooked.
Sadly, this is all too common. You are correct. Some other story will shortly replace the 'Kyoto' thing - and we will all go on about our sorry lives until some other event catches out attention - we're like squirrels.
The school wall emblazoned with an 8 foot high sun, slashed across in 5 colors of paint (lead based?) declaring this school has won:
THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S AWARD FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EXCELLENCE !!!
4 times in a row.
Wind and sun are free where I live. And only in the last year has it become somewhat popular to harness that - why ? Because it has become profitable. Politicians have gotten behind this movementNot because it will improve the over all health of the planet but because it PAYS.....People, mankind and governments in general want the most pay off for the least effort. No one does anything unless THEY benefit...until and unless you and I benefit - we won't do anything - the threat of some possible side effect is never enough - until its too
This is not the first time we have had to deal with other nations by forming agreements. Starting in the '50s, damage to lakes and forests in Canada from the Lakehead to Nova Scotia became so severe that governments were forced to make clean air agreements to protect human health and property. Because the dangers were so well advanced and obvious to the most cantankerous believer, both Canada and the USA signed agreements to limit acid rain . Those strategies are still in force and still necessary.
Similar agreements were made to reduce the impact of the Ruhr Valley industriies for the betterment of the Netherlands, France , etc., in Europe.
It seems that people must have their own health and property affected by a threatening disaster before they can act. They won't wait long this time. And they may never recover from the losses. IT is Katrina deja vu.
Do you have a blog-site on the topics you mentioned? If so, I'd like to read it.
Best Regards,
John Brian Shannon
No active blog.
the world to be so concerned over global warming (which I personaly
think is a lot of hog-wash) many scientists still believe it's a natural
occurance that has happened over centuries or longer & will continue
to happen no matter what the population of the world does or doesn't do,
So whether or not we have a Kyoto Accord &/or strict Pollution controls
the results good or bad will be seen in the future. I for one am still learning
and following your Blog and the NEWS to see what's happening next.
Enjoy!
It is time to get on with the next attempt to repair the damage we humans have caused this biosphere.
Hand-wringing won't accomplish anything when the other side just doesn't care about CO2 emissions in this country.
My blog recognized that Kyoto is OVER. I suggested we come at them a different way. All the science is done on the other very toxic gasses we produce. There will be no arguments about the science - and addressing such toxic emissions would prevent many deaths to humans and other life on our Earth.
http://cjunk.blogspot.com/2012/01/canadian-senate-committee-hears-from.html