As Ontario's General Election approaches its midway point, politicos and voters alike are trying to determine what the ballot box question will be. At the start of the campaign, the Liberal's $10,000 tax credit for employers hiring new Canadians seemed to provide a flashpoint. While a recent poll showed a majority of Ontarians disagree with the Liberal proposal, the story did not have the traction needed to define the campaign.
The Green Energy Act is an issue that has been festering in rural Ontario communities for years and it appears has the potential to provide the clarity Ontarians need for a good ballot box issue. Opposition to Ontario's Green Energy Act has centred around three key issues: health and environmental impacts, process issues around decision making and the economics of the feed-in-tariff program.
Individuals living near industrial wind developments are reporting serious health effects that are preventing them from being able to stay in their homes. Industry buyouts of impacted residents and internal documents obtained by the Ministry of the Environment acknowledge there is a real problem in communities that host wind turbines, yet the Government of Ontario continues to refuse to implement a moratorium until a proper health study is completed to determine safe setbacks. Seventy-seven municipal councils have called for a moratorium until such a study is completed to no avail. Municipalities and citizens also complain that local planning rights have been taken away and have called for the restoration of local planning authority. As hydro rates have spiked in Ontario and further increases are planned, heightened awareness about the cost of the feed-in-tariff program and Samsung deal has further encouraged opposition to the Liberal's plan.
The Liberals are campaigning in defence of their Green Energy Act, while the opposition takes starkly different positions.
Ontario's Progressive Conservatives have promised to put in place a moratorium on industrial wind development until proper health studies are done, local planning control is restored and the feed-in-tariff program and Samsung deals are cancelled to save Ontarians from having to subsidize these projects going forward.
The NDP has taken a more nuanced approach with Party Leader Andrea Horwath saying she isn't surprised so many municipalities have called for a moratorium, but stopping short of saying whether she'd support such a move. Horwath has also said she supports more involvement of municipalities in decision-making, stopping short of restoring planning control, and has pledged to keep the feed-in-tariff for some projects.
In the last week local coverage of all-candidates debates around Ontario have demonstrated it doesn't matter if you live in Bruce-Grey Owen Sound, Carleton-Mississippi Mills, Chatham-Kent Essex, Glengarry-Prescott-Russell, Haldimand-Norfolk, Huron-Bruce, Simcoe-Grey, Peterborough, Prince Edward Hastings, Simcoe Grey or anywhere else in Ontario, a party's position on industrial wind energy and Ontario's Green Energy Act is proving to be a demarkation point for voters.
When Dalton McGuinty's government introduced the Green Energy Act into the legislature the premier said his government had found a 'sweet, sweet spot' with this legislation, but politically it is turning into a sore spot for Ontario Liberals across on the campaign trail.
A forum research poll in June 2011 showed that 56 per cent of Ontarians supported Tim Hudak's plans to cut the amount of wind and solar energy produced to reduce hydro bills, while a poll conducted by Liberal Campaign Manager Don Guy confirmed in August 2011 that just 40 per cent of Ontarians believe the Liberals are on the right track on electricity.
Education Minister Leona Dombrowsky and liberal candidate in Prince Edward Hastings was reportedly booed on occasion for her party's position on industrial wind turbine development this week, as was Minister of Agriculture Carol Mitchell, the liberal candidate in Huron-Bruce for her responses to questions on wind energy, hundreds of kilometres away from Dombrowsky's riding.
Liberal candidates in Bruce-Grey Owen Sound and Simcoe Grey have offered voters opinions that differ from their parties stance on the issue. Kevin Eccles of Bruce-Grey Owen Sound suggesting the Act 'needs to be tweaked' while Simcoe-Grey Liberal candidate Donna Kenwall told an all candidates debate she would call for an environmental assessment to be completed (something the Green Energy Act exempts wind developers from).
The Green Energy Act as a ballot box question for Ontario's General Election gives all voters a clear choice, and provides a democratic consultation that rural Ontarians have been missing since the bill became law in May 2009.
Follow John Laforet on Twitter: www.twitter.com/laforet
Candidates clash over health care, green energy in Rankin
Leeds-Grenville candidates debate green energy future
Branch denies Tories are anti-green energy
Why spread misinformation so irresponsibly?
The health risks other energy sources (coal and nuclear) easily trump any health risk of a wind turbines. Is anyone suing the coal and nuclear plants? And there is no doubt that these old and dirty energy sources will just get more and more expensive but there's lots of old money invested in them so that's why Conservatives will try to say otherwise.
Here's 2 links showing how much worse nuclear and coal energy is for our health:
http://www.energyjustice.net/coal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_impact_of_nuclear_power
This following link outlines the common lies or myths people like to spread
http://www.whywind.org/pb/wp_a1b4e1bf/wp_a1b4e1bf.html
In Germany wind is used for 9% of all power generation now and it's brining the cost of energy down for consumers there. Oil and gas are just going to rise. Wind and Solar will get cheaper and cheaper and cheaper. Take a look at this article from Business News Week:
http://news.businessweek.com/article.asp?documentKey=1376-LRVKJ207SXKX01-47415GF9HK7FC3OEN2S2K17J5P
it would not exist todwy were it not for government subsidies in the eary days --subsidized both by the quebec government and the federal government .
On a more personal note, I agree this election has been sparse on actual debate and engagement on issues which is too bad and isn't great news for our democracy, there are a lot of reasons for this and I'm still working out in my mind what are the most significant reasons for such a low key campaign.
Any thoughts on why you feel the candidates are acting the way you perceive them to be?
Frankly, you only got a little traction there for one simple reason - the publisher of the sole news outlet on the Island has a particular interest in your cause because of its aesthetic threat to tourism.
I doubt that he has any more regard for the science behind your case - which is weak - if not faulty.
You were single minded enough to come forward with this opposition without proposing alternatives - just stop it or at least move it to someone's elses back yard. The example of Manitoulin is a great one to support the Liberal Green Energy plan. No-one wants carbon based power generation there - although some entrepreneur is exploring a marsh gas seepage that has been flaring for at least a century on the island. We have one small hydro project almost as old - and the water levels that drive that have been dropping alarmingly in recent times. Manitoulin is on the end of a very tenuous branch line of power generated from the Bruce - tenuous because any serious windstorm can knock out the supply for hours. Before I have any respect for your campaign I frankly want to see you produce Green alternatives - and they are springing up on farms all over the island as farmers commit to solar units.
How about thermal? (my personal fav). 5 meters down it's about 12C so that would cover air conditioning and at least a baseload of heat in winter to heat up from as opposed to whatever the air temperature is at that time. Some savings there. Costs are all upfront like wind, in this case for the drilling, but I'm guessing would pay off over time. All the other thermals may scale better too. Solar thermal using temp of air or hydrothermal, using the temp from under the water in a similar fashion
WCO has always taken the view that it is not for us to provide a preferred alternative but ensure the health and safety of this option is addressed along with the gross subsidies so it can be responsibly proposed and those proposals judged on their merits compared to other generation sources.
If we are to rule out specific technologies or rule others in, I think thats a debate all Ontarians should participate in.
Also - if you don't like our facts -- let's agree to an independent scientific study we can all support the outcome of.
As far as Human Rights go, the largest mass arrest in Canadian history happened here in Ontario under Dalton McGuinty's watch and he's doing nothing to give justice to those who were wronged on those days. It was his cabinet that passed a secret law giving massive powers to police without telling the public.
As far as records on democracy and human rights go - McGuinty's is far worse than any Ontario Premier in the history of our province.