The Canadian Forces will once again have to wait to receive new much-needed equipment. Whether it is new fighter aircraft, ships or vehicles, the federal budget has postponed more than $3.7 billion in military spending until 2020 -- or later.
As a matter of fact, the latest federal budget is another slap to the Canadian Forces' face. Bill Morneau, Canada's finance minister, said the Liberals are postponing defence spending to figure out defence priorities.
"In order to make sure we have the funds available at the time when they need those funds, we've reprofiled some in the fiscal framework," he told a news conference prior to tabling the budget in the House of Commons.
I believe it could be a good occasion for Canada to start looking abroad to provide quality equipment without long delays to the Canadian Forces.
"So, when we need the money, the money will be in the fiscal framework. So, we believe that is the appropriate action to take to ensure our military has the appropriate equipment, the planes and the ships they need."
However, it is pretty clear what kind of spending Canada has to do to bolster its defence. It is not the priorities that needs to be overseen, it is the kind of ships, aircraft and vehicles that Canada will choose to replace the ageing equipment.
The Liberals could postpone for a year and go forward with resuming defence spending. Delaying until 2020 means the Canadian Forces will have to wait another four years before getting modern equipment; a long time if Canada deploys more soldiers abroad.
Fighter aircraft replacement
First, the Liberals needs to quickly figure out what fighter aircraft will replace our ageing CF-188 Hornets.
The F-35 fiasco is draining our funds and we're still contributing to the program, even if Prime Minister Justin Trudeau pledged to step away from it during the election campaign. As a matter of fact, Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan said in a statement that the bidding process for the replacement of the CF-188 Hornets would be "open" thus keeping the F-35 in process.
There are many options available on the market to replace Canada's fighter aircraft. For example, the combat-prove Dassault Rafale would be a great replacement aircraft. Dassault even announced back in 2014 that it would allow Canada to build part of the aircraft at home. That said, other options are available, but I won't go into more details.
"Should the Canadian industry wish to assemble or produce part of the Rafale in Canada, we are fully open to it," Dassault's vice-president Yves Robins told CBC News in Montreal.
That is a prime example of finding an alternative that would cost less and create jobs in Canada. There would be no production delays due to performance issues, as the Rafale is already in production and could quickly start after the contract is signed.
To be honest, I think the Liberals are being hypocrites when it comes to the F-35. I believe Lockheed Martin lobbyists are putting a lot of pressure on the newly elected government to keep the F-35 on track, and it's working.
The Liberals will not publicly say it, but I believe the F-35 will be Canada's choice regardless of their promises due to the lobbying efforts.
Without external pressure, I am positive a better alternative would've been found already.
National Shipbuilding Procurement Strategy
Secondly, the National Shipbuilding Procurement Strategy (NSPS). When announced, the program was estimated at more than $38 billion. The plan was to design and build the warships here in Canada. Last November, the estimated costs of an offshore fisheries science vessels were up 181 per cent, a clear indication of the bad estimation.
That said, it was the Conservative that announced the NSPS and the Liberals now has the opportunity to review it. However, the Liberals are not known for their defence spending strategy.
The whole procurement strategy is so complicated that even the government has to fully review it. I have tried to closely follow the NSPS, but it is almost impossible to keep track.
It is pretty clear that the Royal Canadian Navy is desperately in need of new warships. The Halifax-class frigates have been modernized, but other programs such as the Harry DeWolf-class Offshore Patrol Ships (AOPS) and the Queenston-class Joint Support Ships (JSS) have been terribly delayed.
Even for the Halifax-class frigate, the Canadian Surface Combatant (CSC) ships are estimated at more than $1.73 billion per ship -- an outrageous amount considering a French FREMM frigate, one of the world's best, is worth approximately $990 million CAD. The CSC was estimated at $26 billion last year, but its cost have exploded.
Adding to that, Irving Shipbuilding has been chosen to build the CSC. The same shipyard that built Hero-class ships for the Canadian Coast Guard -- ships that have been deemed unsafe.
Do we really want to spend $26 billion to build warships that might prove to be unsafe instead of buying ships abroad?
While the Liberals are delaying some defence spending, we can only hope the NSPS will be "fixed" and the Royal Canadian Navy will receive decent ships.
Although I don't agree with postponing much-needed defence spending, I believe it could be a good occasion for Canada to review its procurement strategy and start looking abroad to provide quality equipment without long delays to the Canadian Forces.
Buying abroad doesn't mean cutting jobs in Canada, there is always maintenance and modernization contracts that could be awarded to the Canadian defence industry.
Follow HuffPost Canada Blogs on Facebook
MORE ON HUFFPOST:
FIIn this file photo taken on July 14, 2011 and released by U.S. Air Force, a USAF F-35 Lightning II joint strike fighter (JSF) aircraft soars over Destin, Fla., before landing at its new home at Eglin Air Force Base. Japan selected the Lockheed Martin F-35 stealth fighter Tuesday, Dec. 20, 2011, to replace aging jets in its air force and bolster its defense capability amid regional uncertainty. (AP Photo/U.S. Air Force, Staff Sgt. Joely Santiago)
A F-35 Lightning II sits on stage during the United Kingdom F-35 Lightning II delivery ceremony on July 19, 2012 at Lockheed Martin Corporation in Fort Worth, Texas. The ceremony marked the first international delivery of an F-35 Joint Strike Fighter to a partner nation. (Photo by Tom Pennington/Getty Images)
(Photo by Brendan Smialowski/Getty Images)
Plane models stand outside the Lockheed Martin Corporation during the United Kingdom F-35 Lightning II Delivery Ceremony on July 19, 2012 in Fort Worth, Texas. The ceremony marked the first international delivery of an F-35 Joint Strike Fighter to a partner nation. (Photo by Tom Pennington/Getty Images)
The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter jet sits in front the entrance of the Asian Aerospace 2004 show in Singapore 24 February 2004. The Asia Pacific offers one of the world's strongest prospects for defence-related spending, US aerospace giant Lockheed Martin said Tuesday as it expressed confidence in remaining a major supplier to the region's governments (AFP PHOTO/ROSLAN RAHMAN)
(AFP PHOTO/CARL DE SOUZA)
A Lockheed Martin's F-35 Lighning II fighter jet sits on the tarmac for static display at the Singapore Airshow in Singapore on February 12, 2012. Boeing's much-delayed 787 Dreamliner is set to star at the Singapore Airshow this week where companies touting private jets and defence hardware to the Asian market will also be out in force. (ROSLAN RAHMAN/AFP/Getty Images)
(ROSLAN RAHMAN/AFP/Getty Images)
On Feb. 16, 2012, the first external weapons test mission was flown by an F-35A conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) aircraft at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. The F-35A is designed to carry up to 18000 pounds on 10 weapon stations featuring four weapon stations inside two weapon bays, for maximum stealth capability, and an additional three weapon stations on each wing.
IN AIR, NAVAL AIR STATION PATUXENT RIVER, MD - FEBRUARY 11: (EDITORS NOTE: Image has been received by U.S. Military prior to transmission) In this image released by the U.S. Navy courtesy of Lockheed Martin, the U.S. Navy variant of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, the F-35C, conducts a test flight February 11, 2011 over the Chesapeake Bay. Lt. Cmdr. Eric 'Magic' Buus flew the F-35C for two hours, checking instruments that will measure structural loads on the airframe during flight maneuvers. The F-35C is distinct from the F-35A and F-35B variants with larger wing surfaces and reinforced landing gear for greater control when operating in the demanding carrier take-off and landing environment. (Photo by U.S. Navy photo courtesy Lockheed Martin via Getty Images)
Courtesy: NAVAIR/JSF Program/Lockheed Martin
Highlights of F-35 flight testing at NAS Patuxent River, Md., NAS Fort Worth Joint Reserve Base, and Edwards AFB, Calif.
The first night flight in the history of the Lockheed Martin F-35 program was completed on Jan. 19, 2012 in the skies above Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. Piloted by Lockheed Martin Test Pilot Mark Ward, AF-6, an F-35A conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) variant, launched at 5:05 pm PST and landed after sunset at 6:22 pm
An F-35 test pilot talks about airstart testing at Edwards AFB, Calif., in early 2012.
Follow Jonathan Wade on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JonathanWadeCD