We've been spoiled with above average temperatures for the past two months here in Toronto, but Christie Blatchford's latest column, "Toronto, City of Sissies," carries with it an admonition common to the coldest of February frosts.
Blatchford's thesis is simple: we, the men who call Toronto home, are "sissies" and "delicate creatures" who have seemingly lost sight of our evolutionary roots.
The impetus for her column was the embrace of two pre-teen males in Toronto's Rosedale neighbourhood. She was "mortified", and now I am too, but for different reasons. For one, her lack of apathy towards the situation, and two, the accusation that I am less of a masculine figure if I hug my peers.
Perhaps if I refer to them as "bros" my actions will be rectified.
Blatchford's solution is an overall shortening of our emotional spectrum, but most importantly, the advocating of sexism against men. Ironic, given that as a marquee woman in the media, she herself has more than likely braved the detrimental effects of this discrimination.
Females in the workplace who discard their emotional roots to fit someone else's archetype of an efficacious manager are often branded the "B" word. I wonder if Blatchford would be so quick to lament the loss of the "femme females."
In Blatchford's utopia, men are either gay or a derivative of Chuck Norris. Gays get a pass, the rest must ascribe to an antiquated, ever-shifting definition of masculinity perpetuated in nearly every marketing campaign by Canada's top brewing companies.
So, if I'm paying attention, "real men" exist within thinly-defined parameters, replete with contradictions. For example, real men engage in physical violence, the antithesis of a civilized society. Real men are groomed and professional, yet many do so without much thought. Real men are emotionally reserved while simultaneously running the gauntlet of life experiences including failure, grief and heartbreak.
Living in Blatchford's nirvana is a near-crippling experience. It is no place for the fashionably conscious, non-violent, or the emotionally accessible. It's a dwelling for the "bad boys," the same group our young women are instructed to avoid.
One of my colleagues actually advocates for the division of household chores into "pink and blue jobs." This is, as he frames it, how it should be.
So here's to the rest of us! Somewhere along the line we traded regressive thinking to venture outside of our evolutionary roots. We traded our bats for an occasional hug. We extended our interests beyond the realm of sports, beer and cars. We've even shed a tear at the death of "man's best friend."
See, that's the thing about my dog: he would lay down his life for mine, yet he's an emotional little bugger. But most importantly, he interacts with me and everyone else around me on his own terms.
"I remain convinced that the best way to stop a bully is not to go mewling to the teacher, who will only call the victim’s mummy, or to your own mummy, who will only call the teacher.. The best way is to take the bully out for a short pounding after school – and may I make it plain, please, that I don’t mean the victims should do this, but rather others. The onus for stopping bullies lies not with the people being bullied, but with those who see it happen."
So in Blatchford's ideal society, those ultra-manly, emotion-hating men would shun all civilized and orderly attempts to discourage bullying with discussion and education, and instead, her utopia would be kept safe by gangs of violent vigilantes. Oh, and magically, those vigilantes would target the bullies and not the minority groups who have historically been the targets of people who think with their fists and don't always understand the concept of "diversity". Moreover, somehow, this choice of target would occur without any of the anti-bullying or pro-diversity education for which she has so much contempt.
Riiiiight.
One would think that a women might be happy to see that men are becoming more emotionally available beings. I guess Christie would like to have her cake and eat it too: be a masculine woman surrounded by a bunch of old fashioned masculine men.
It's time to man up once in a while.
That's the point of being one.
Having a grown man sit me down at 15 and tell me that being gay was bad, despite my protests, was more than a little embarrassing. Such are the consequences of caveman thinking.
The irony of course is that I am not gay. But I'm not much of a sportsman either. I don't like hunting, guns, fake breasts, hockey or car shows. I do like fine art, live jazz, European liquor, a good book, and a nice suit.
I wonder what Ms. Blatchford would say? The cave dwellers are alive and well and lurking in your media channels.