Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Joshua Ostroff

GET UPDATES FROM Joshua Ostroff
 

How do You Like it Now, Boomers? You're to Blame for the Quebec Protests

Posted: 05/29/2012 1:45 pm

Canada's baby boomer-run media has been pretending that Quebec's student protests are only about tuition, when that's merely symbolic of the boot the older generation is placing upon the necks of their kids. This misinformation campaign reached its culmination with Maclean's magazine's angrily incorrect cover "Quebec's New Ruling Class: How a group of entitled students went to war and shut down a province. Over $325."

The dollar amount is meant to dismiss the student protestors out of hand -- the actual issue is debt and the austerity measures that fuel it, the 75 percent tuition hike is simply the straw that broke this particular camel's back.

But the keyword here is "entitled." Kinda sounds like something the WWII generation would have sneered at the 60s-era boomers, however this is about more than simply growing up and becoming "The Man."

Canada's census just pegged the baby boom generation at 9.6 million, nearly 30 per cent of the population. They represent 42.4 per cent of working age Canadians, up from 28.6 percent in 1991. They also cast a startling 60 per cent of all election ballots.

And now that they're entering retirement age, they've decided to pay their bills by robbing their children of the, yes, entitlements they themselves have enjoyed.

Despite their radical past, boomers are now the generation running the government, banks, media and corporations -- but rather than an Age of Aquarius we got stuck with an Apocalypse Now. By allowing collusion and deregulation, they created the Great Recession.

So boomer politicians beholden to boomer voters are hiking tuition, slashing education, decreasing Employment Insurance and cutting childcare, none of which have an impact upon them. They're then justifying these cuts with a deficit crisis that is partly created by concurrent tax cutting, including dramatically reducing the corporate tax rate to the lowest in the G7. This benefits only the people, predominantly boomers, who can afford to invest in these corporations and will cost $11.5 billion in lost revenue in 2012-2013 alone.

But where they seem to have overplayed their hand was by forcing Millennials to purchase increasingly expensive post-secondary education that no longer necessarily gets them a job, locking them into a debt spiral many never escape. (The average Canadian university graduate owes $27,000 and outstanding student loans total $20 billion.) All in hopes of one day going into even more mind-boggling debt to "own" a house and then not-retiring because the boomers have knocked over our social security pyramid scheme and overloaded the healthcare system.

But wait, aren't they trying to save Old Age Security at least? Actually, Canada's 2012 budget is pushing eligibility back to 67, but that won't begin until 2023 and will conclude in 2029, at which point the last baby boomers (born in 1964) will have retired. Well played.

Harper could have pushed the eligibility back as of last year, when the first boomers turned 65, but that would risk losing the votes of the country's dominant demographic. It's more politically savvy to punish subsequent (smaller) generations.

And just as they never made the sacrifices of their parents' generations, boomers are now trying to offload sacrifice onto their kids in the form of austerity measures that cut government spending on social programs for the young and the poor while keeping their own intact without paying more taxes, despite being at their peak earning age. And so rather than balancing budgets and reducing deficits fairly, Millennials are waking up the fact they'll be shouldering a disproportionate burden.

This -- not $325 -- is ultimately what sparked Maple Spring and sent Quebec's young people out into the streets where 2,600 of them have been arrested, 700 in a single shameful night last week. Another 84 were taken in yesterday, including two student leaders who had just left the Quebec City negotiations and were promptly rounded up by riot police.

It's also what fueled theOccupy Movement and the Spanish Indignados that inspired it a year ago this month when hundreds of thousands of Spaniards took over public squares. They marked that anniversary recently with more occupations, began a squatter's movement to reclaim thousands of unoccupied buildings whose residents had been evicted and launched a teacher's strike against $4 billion in education cuts.

All month long, hundreds of thousands of young people have faced off against riot police in Frankfurt, Moscow, Paris, Athens, Chicago, New York, Oakland (where they rolled out a tank) and elsewhere. Students have been clashing with cops outside of Quebec, too, with education-based conflicts in Mexico, Chile and England.

Democracy has broken down because the unsympathetic and unprecedented Boomer voting block has made the young feel disenfranchised, driving them to demonstrate in numbers not seen since, well, the 60s. Sure, Obama got elected, but had his hands quickly tied by an austerity-crazed Congress which won't dare touch Medicare or Social Security (at least not yet). And while young people succeeded in making the NDP the official opposition in Canada, it was at the cost of handing Prime Minister Harper a majority government so he could push austerity full bore.

These policies purposefully increase income inequality by reducing social services for the young and poor without increasing tax revenue via the wealthy and corporations. But when that austerity-driven gap reaches its breaking point -- as it did during England's riots last summer -- an underclass of young people who feel like they have no future also have no qualms about burning their towns down.

Nobody of any age group wants to see that happen. The post-Terror era was supposed to be about hope and change -- those signature calling cards of the 60s -- and instead young people today feel hopeless and trapped. And as the Baby Boomers retire en masse while retaining their outsize political influence, it's only going to get worse for everyone else.

But they have one more chance to change the world, to remember their own uprising back in 1968 and to realize that they are now the powers they once protested against. The Boomers can maintain the status quo until the system crushes their kids or they can rediscover their idealism and, as is beginning to happen in Montreal, join them in the streets.

 

Follow Joshua Ostroff on Twitter: www.twitter.com/joshuaostroff

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 182
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
12:11 AM on 07/09/2012
Honestly I wouldn't be into blaming any generation for anything like this...but as a young 24 year old with a degree I feel I am able to at least pick up on the undercurrent here....most people I know who are the baby boomers or trying to be like them share one feature....they don't like to take responsibility and they don't want to be proven wrong....no matter what. So it doesn't matter what is actually happening in Canada, or who's to blame, or if its actually more realistically a mixture of both parties being a tad silly, I feel like my personality and expectations from life suits that of my post-holocaust experiencing grandmother more then my suburban booming parents....that's a division that's not going to change...I've done things to get by financially that my parents never had to, including taking care of them when they couldn't take care of themselves...if I wasn't getting the inheritance from my Dad passing away from cancer recently and using that capital to get my feet under me....God I don't know what I'd do to get out of this never ending cycle of minimum wage and dead end seasonal jobs....but it's something you can't understand unless you've gone through it....which is a quality I haven't found in most baby boomers that I know...do what you want with that, I'm just saying...
12:48 PM on 06/08/2012
Real estate prices are infalted not because of "foreign investors who don't live", but because the government is giving loans to people to purchase houses. The person who would otherwise not have the means to purchase a condo or a house is then able to purchase one, and as you have more demand the prices go up.
12:53 PM on 06/02/2012
This article is wonderfully accurate!!!!! Bravo!!!!! Its not superficial or easy to bring this up against the status quo. I am 29, and I am not opposed to austerity measures or tuition cuts, if cuts go across the board affecting all generations equally. I am opposed to picking on the poor, the weak, and the young because it is politically savy. Yes medicare should be up for discussion if tuition is up for discussion. All social programming should be equally up for discussion. When we discussion the cuts I think we need to make them based on whats best for the long-term strength of the country. Thanks for the article and keep it up!
01:37 PM on 05/31/2012
Rather than dreaming up a facile and superficial "generational divide", try doing what journalists are supposed to do, get out in the street and see who is actually supporting the students. Or try reading a bit: the CLASSE has included "solidarité syndicale" (lots of grey heads there!) from the outset. Your "analysis" does not hold up the known facts.
The austerity agenda is the common enemy here, NOT any particular generation. Blaming the boomers for neocon austerity is like blaming women for Thatcher (I'm showing my age -- you might need to look her up on wikipedia).
01:31 PM on 05/31/2012
In fact, there are far more boomers in the streets (in Québec, and now across the country) supporting the students than in the government pushing the austerity agenda. The CLASSE has included "solidarité syndicale" (lots of grey, balding heads there) from the outset!
Rather than dreaming up a facile and superficial "generation divide", try actually getting out and seeing who is in the streets standing with the student movement. The austerity agenda is the enemy, not anyone's generation!
06:51 AM on 05/31/2012
Sorry, Bubbsie - too many of the Boomers I know are cheering for the protesters, and there are young people who are spouting the Conservative line like it was a mantra. I think this is agism in disguise
04:31 AM on 05/31/2012
Ageism is not a critical discourse. It's discrimination. We're all a part of the problem and the solution. Stop generalizing and letting your emotions take over. This kind of irrational behaviour just makes your argument not worth discussing. I'm a debt-free BC student who is paying my way through a 2nd degree. I've learned early on that student loans weren't good, so I funded myself through jobs and my own savings. It's not easy money wise and tuition sucks yes, but I'm there to learn nonetheless. I do care about what's happening, I'm not apathetic, but I have a problem with a lot of these arguments. I'd have to disagree that my parents generation are about to "rediscover their idealism" and question what "ideals" you think they were fighting for at the time. I can see how solidarity is confusing for many of all ages in this country. It's bad enough I'm trying to voice an opinion online as it is a horrible place for a proper critical discussion.
03:32 AM on 05/31/2012
I think you are missing what really happened and it could happen again. The boomers that took power are not the hippies. Politicians come primarily from law and business not the general population. Seniors are being hit too. Nursing homes are dreadful. The savings of many seniors were devastated by the financial collapse. You are looking in the wrong direction. Look up, look way up, look for the Oligarchs. As long as they succeed in dividing us they have us fighting over the leftovers. We need to get beyond the divisions of age, race and gender. Defeat the oligarchs and there is plenty for everyone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Transitteer
and another thing . . .
02:44 AM on 05/31/2012
I'm in my 60's, and I don't agree with this article at all. Real Estate values are inflated because of foreign investors who don't live here, gas prices are high because there is no more cheap oil, and the jobs aren't here anymore because no government has made any efforts to think outside the box to generate new jobs, so students run up debt in pursuit of jobs that don't exist. I wouldn't punish my kids the way this article intimates I would. The 'entitlement' thing is a misrepresentation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:41 PM on 05/30/2012
Many years ago I did what many Canadians apparently don't do. I listened as my parents told me what it was like when they started out. And I asked them if things are better now. They said it was far better, not just for them but for all of society.

And they're right. By any reasonable historical standard we live in paradise. The "terrible injustices" listed above by Ostroff are a joke compared to what has been suffered before in Canada, and to what happens everyday in other countries.

Yes, sometimes it's tough finding a job. Yes, housing in some cities is costly. Yes, sometimes the government has to moderate spending. So what? Canada is a free, safe, prosperous, and remarkably generous society that offers immense opportunities, and most people in this world would give their right arm to live here. Ostroff's depiction of it is utterly absurd. He is determined to play the victim and blame those who have provided him with a truly blessed life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scotty Roller
01:34 AM on 05/31/2012
Maybe Canada was a wonderful land of opportunity and rights in your youthful days, but that was thanks to your parents. You just take what they fought for for granted and assume that young people today have those same opportunities and benefits that you were given. And any youth who complain when their rights and opportunities (that you took for granted) are taken away, they are "entitled" and "playing the victim" and "lazy."

Happy retirement, except without the retired part. Because guess who will have to pay for your services? Youth. And if they are unable to find jobs, YOU will have to pay for those services yourselves or re-enter the work force.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:38 AM on 05/31/2012
This idea that the baby boomers grew up in a land of easy jobs and vast opportunities is pure nonsense. I know. I grew up in that era.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:20 PM on 05/30/2012
This is about the most preposterous article I've read in some time. And I read a lot of articles.
07:37 PM on 05/30/2012
these young people who have this entitlement problem have only themselves to blame for the mess they are in. if it wasn't for your parents, idiots you would not be here, maybe they should have used better birth control. to bad you all think we should take care of you like the petulant children you are being. if you think you have it so bad why don't you go on a great adventure to some other country then we won't have to listen to you whine anymore, cause job losses in a bad economy, scare away tourists whose revenue we badly need and just plain irritating so many people. You complainers think you are so hard done by but if you look closely you are in the minority agmonst students so time to shut up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scotty Roller
01:25 AM on 05/31/2012
Yes, we youth are so "entitled," says the self-centered baby boomer. And that they only have themselves to blame for the mess they are in. How about instead of attacking youth, how about you boomers look past your own lives for a change? Yes, you worked hard throughout your lives. Yes, you earned your pensions. But did you risk your lives to bring in those pension plans and worker rights? No your parents did. You just took what they fought for for granted and just assume that the young generation has the exact same rights and opportunities that you were given, and any youth who complain when those opportunities and benefits are taken away is "selfish" and "entitled." Classic ignorant response.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scotty Roller
01:25 AM on 05/31/2012
The pensions and worker rights that your parents fought for? Are now being stripped away thanks to the conservative government which a large number of you boomers voted in. Lisa Raitt never fails to take the management side and turn back labour rights 50 years. But you don't care about that because you will be out of the work force soon and won't to deal with that anymore. But you actually should care.

You do realize that, when you retire and you are needing services, your children will be paying for them? And taking care of you. So before you go off on a hate-filled rant about how we feel that you should take care of us and that we are "petulant," you might want to tone down the insults. Show us respect and we will in turn help you later on when you need those services. Otherwise happy retirement, but without the retired part as you will be forced to re-enter the work force or pay for those services yourselves.
12:32 PM on 05/31/2012
I would rather be in jail for shooting harper than to ever even think about voting for the jerk
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lb65423541
05:03 PM on 05/30/2012
So you wanna cut old age security and medical care for free University?? This article is a disgrace

I don't know of a single "Boomer" or any other that would intentionally burden the younger generation, thier children and grandchildren or harm them in anyway so they can live it up in retirement. You think student housing options are bad, go have a look what seniors have available, it ain't the Ritz!

Nobody is forcing students to go to university, if you don't like it go somewhere else or do something else with your life. Education is free until you are 18 years old. After that what you do with your life is your choice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scotty Roller
01:45 AM on 05/31/2012
In these days, you need a minimum of post-secondary education to get a job. Gone are the easy days where you could walk out of high school and immediately find a job. It's ridiculous to find work if you are a youth now, I know as I'm out there everyday applying. And even with a post-secondary degree, I can count on one hand the number of times employers have called me back in the last 5 years.

And, as many of the boomers fail to realize because they are too busy spouting out insults at us youth, youth will be paying for your services in retirement. And if they are unable to find work, good luck to you. And happy retirement, except without the retired part as you will either have to pay for those services yourselves or re-enter the work force. So it would be wise to cutback on your insult throwing, youth are not getting the free ride that you think we are getting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amitchell3251
Blues, guitars, motorcycles & Reformed Theology
03:26 PM on 05/30/2012
I'm 56. I have 3 children - all in their 20's. 2 are in university, 1 soon in college. All will graduate without debt. Why? When our first child was born; when we were living on one, inadequate income, we decided that they would not suffer the burden of student debt as us.

Despite the hardship we saved. Interest was high at first and we did well. This money is available to our kids. Now that my wife and I are both employed, we find ourselves covering all kinds of shortfalls and unexpected expenses for them.

There are all kinds of boomer parents doing the same thing, so the notion that we are putting a "boot on the neck" of the millenials is harsh.

I believe that all education should be free of charge in Canada. I have long supported extending O.H.I.P. et al, to cover all medications; dental care to16 and things like physiotherapy. Years ago, most of us expected this to happen in time.

Before any of this happens, blaming another generation will need to change to engaging one another in honest, sincere discussion. We boomers moved things a huge distance from where they were in the 50's. Women's rights and racism are some things that changed under our watch. We can still help, but it's time for millenials to shoulder the burden of change.

Millenials must commit to voting - elect politicians who represent their concerns. Protesting is fine - voting is what changes things - however
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scotty Roller
01:55 AM on 05/31/2012
Look around you. Employers are refusing to hire youth simply because of their age, even if they do get a degree or diploma. You can't just walk out of high school and get a job now. Youth have it ridiculously hard these days, they are not getting the free ride and won't be able to afford the burden that your generation has placed on them. Youth will be paying for your services in retirement, and if they can't find work, good luck to you. Happy retirement, except without the retired part, as you will either have to pay for those services yourselves or re-enter the work force.

This rhetoric and insults coming from the baby boomers needs to stop, because youth cannot do much more than what they are doing now. And insulting them is not exactly going to inspire them to help you when you need services, so it would be wise to respect this generation of young people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amitchell3251
Blues, guitars, motorcycles & Reformed Theology
01:15 PM on 05/31/2012
Hi Scotty;

I certainly agree that the "rhetoric and insults" need to stop and I share you frustration about it. It is entirely unhelpful. However, I'm afraid your attack on those of us who will retire in the next decade falls into these categories.

Two things about older folks. Retired people remain part of the economy as consumers of goods and services. In this regard they continue to create jobs. In fact given our longevity as a generation, we may create more, longer-term jobs than previous generations of seniors. They also care about coming generations. I spend a great deal of time with retired people. Although they may cling to old, conservative values, (old habits and beliefs are hard to change), they want a better world for their children and grandchildren. They are per capita the greatest source of volunteer workers and also the biggest givers to charitable causes.

Also, the young are not the only ones affected by the current high level of unemployment. Ask anyone over 50 what it's like to find work if you are downsized or layed off. Even those with valuable skills and a proven track record are often passed over in favour of younger candidates, (even though age discrimination is illegal).

I don't have any answers to all this, but I know for sure that "rhetoric and insults" won't forge a helpful way forward.
02:12 PM on 05/30/2012
I'm a young person, and here are my views.

The houses are too expensive. The gas is too expensive. Food prices are going up.

But the jobs just aren't there.

That is why young people are angry.

The boomers had it easy, jobs were abundant. My father made a great living with just a high school education and was able to raise a family, buy a house, and live comfortably. In the 60's and 70's you could go out with a CV and get a job the same day. It's not like that now.

If you want to get people out of the streets, there needs to be more jobs. Job creation needs to be taken seriously. Government corruption (which the Charest government is very guilty of) needs to be eliminated. That money needs to be invested more wisely.

Young people are very well educated now. They are smart enough to realize there is a Sword of Damocles hanging over the concept of traditional middle class life, and that their future will not be as comfortable as their parent's. Unfortunately, it will be hard to make big sweeping changes to our idea of western life if you have the retired 'comfort class' bogging us down. The boomers need to be on board too.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:01 PM on 05/30/2012
"The boomers had it easy, jobs were abundant."

Not even close. Here's a graph.

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?id=CANURNAA

Jobs have rarely been easy to come by in Canada, and the boomers on the whole had it much tougher than you. And never mind the high inflation, high interest rates, and high taxes of the 1970s and '80s.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scotty Roller
02:08 AM on 05/31/2012
Sorry but during the 70s when the boomers had their movement, the unemployment rate was lower than it is today. Not only that but you could leave high school and immediately find work without ever needing a degree or diploma. My parents told me about their youth days. Youth have to now, and even then it is ridiculously hard to find work.

Before you throw at me the unemployment rate during the 80s, I feel the need to remind you of the neoliberalism movement. The conservative governments, that baby boomers voted in? Was it a coincidence that the unemployment rate was so high during the conservative era? I can't help but wonder. But regardless, do you feel that youth should be punished because the unemployment rate is lower now than when you boomers made the poor decision? What happened to taking responsibility for one's actions? Or does wanting those retirement benefits trump whatever responsibility you have?