Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Justin Beach

GET UPDATES FROM Justin Beach
 

Gay-Straight Alliances in Catholic Schools: A Matter of Rights

Posted: 09/16/11 10:35 AM ET

On Aug. 31 of this year I attended a meeting of the Toronto Catholic School Board. At issue was the question of whether or not Gay Straight Alliances (GSAs) would be allowed to exist in Ontario's Catholic Schools. I highly recommend that all Canadians who haven't been to one of these give it a try. Nowhere else will you find so much discussion of dogma and scripture within a public Canadian political body. For those of you who don't know, funding for Catholic schools is constitutionally enshrined in Canada. This was done to secure the political support of Ontario's large Catholic minority for Confederation in 1867.

On the night of the meeting, the rhetoric coming from the anti-gay side was both homophobic and not at all in keeping with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It was also not anything close to what the people of Toronto, Ontario or Canada would find acceptable from officials in any other government institution. There were several statements to the effect that Ontario's, publicly funded, Catholic schools should be taking direction from the Pope and not the government of Ontario or even local clergy. This is a Pope, in case you've forgotten, who told Africans that condoms contribute to the AIDS crisis, has been openly homophobic, deeply critical of other faiths, and opposes a woman's right to choose, yet has never fully responded to what appears to be a history of systemic child abuse within the Church.

Over the course of the night, which Andrea Houston has done an amazing job of detailing for Xtra, there were several votes, primarily on proposed amendments. When the anti-gay side lost a vote, homophobia rapidly turned to hysteria. Democratically-elected Catholic School Board members were accused of being anti-Catholic and even "communist" for taking the side of students and the side of tolerance.

Ultimately, of course, those who oppose rights for gays will claim religious freedom and they are, in fact, entitled to it. However there is no age at which Charter rights become effective. Minorities are, for example, protected from discrimination at any age. Girls in Ontario schools, public or religious, cannot be discriminated against at any age. Ultimately the question of GSA's in Catholic schools is not about religion or sexuality. It is about whether or not students in publicly-funded Ontario schools have a right to feel safe and comfortable in their schools and in their own skin. It is about whether or not high school students have a right to free speech and free assembly.

Ultimately it may be time to revisit decisions made, for political expediency, in 1867 and contemplate whether or not Ontario should continue to fund a single religious denomination. Ontario is now a diverse, multicultural province and no other religious group receives this kind of treatment or public funding. If the Catholic School Board wants to take instruction from the Vatican rather than the Charter of Rights and Freedoms or the Government of Ontario we may need to reconsider in fairly short order. That is not the issue for today though.

The push for GSAs in Catholic Schools is not, as critics would have you believe, being driven by some international homosexual conspiracy. Students are driving it and those students need our support. I hope that all Torontonians, of good conscience, will turn up at the next Catholic School Board meeting and stand with these brave kids who are fighting for their basic rights. I hope that individuals will also take the time to contact the Catholic School Board and the candidates running for the Provincial Parliament in their ridings and express their support for protecting the Charter rights of students, particularly within publicly funded institutions. High school is a difficult time, particularly for young people who, for any reason, are labeled as different. Ontarians should not support making those years any more difficult or making students feel less included at taxpayer's expense.

 

Follow Justin Beach on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Justinsb

 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:45 AM on 09/18/2011
The Catholic school board's mission is to provide students with an education. That includes providing a safe environment. In the case of Catholic schools, that obviously means an environment in keeping with the teachings and moral standards of the Catholic Church. This includes showing love and respect for all students regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity and without special mention. No discrimination. No special mention is needed for kids that are fat, brown, white, rich, whiney, shy, stupid, too pretty, too smart, criminals, or in any another terms - not like you and me.

The author does not refer to the Church's moral teachings on loving one another according to the example of Jesus, but rather he turns to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms as his highest moral authority. The author clearly opposes the Catholic Church. So what was the author doing at a Catholic school board meeting? It would appear he was there to use the GSA proposal as an opportunity to oppose the Church. He calls on others to do the same.

If GSAs and the people promoting them oppose the Catholic Church, then obviously GSAs are not compatible with the Catholic school board's mission. Duh.

The Charter was created by government to give government moral guidance. If you think the government should tell you what to think and where to stop thinking, then go ahead and use the Charter as your personal moral guide - it's a free country.
07:18 PM on 09/16/2011
Roman Catholic schools, it should be remembered, see "education" being, first and foremost, to inculcate dogma and doctrine. The rest is evidently an add-on to keep the government happy and paying the bills, and has no influence on policy or practice. That is, it is not education in the way that most people understand it. And, when it comes to anything outside of their dogma and doctrine, their approach is normally malicious and wilfully ignorant. Still, better than the old days; modern secular governments do not permit their traditional response to difference: torture and mass murder.
06:17 PM on 09/16/2011
The Catholic Church is 2,000 years old. It is the ones who are challenging their teachings who are the bigots. Think about it. The discrimination is against the largest charitable institution in the world who preaches and practises the teachings of Jesus in a school environment.
07:30 PM on 09/16/2011
2000 years old...its from the bronze age and thats where its stays....2000 years behind the times.
10:12 PM on 09/16/2011
Gravy,
you're out by a 1,000 years on the Bronze Age, but you'll catch up.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Skepticat
Supporting skeptical felines everywhere
03:41 PM on 09/18/2011
Don't recall Jesus saying anything about, gays, abortions, or protestants, or the Pope, or other doctrines created long after His time on Earth - nor do I see any reason why taxpayers not of the faith should continue to subsidize a parallel education system just because of political pandering for votes back in 1867.
04:31 PM on 09/16/2011
I really have to wonder what is wrong with the laws in this country, if public funding helps catholic schools use religion as a basis to be bigots. It's as the article says; "Girls in Ontario schools, public or religious, cannot be discriminated against at any age." So why does the LGBT community? The way I see it, either the catholic schools need to except that the LGBT people have rights to a GSA, the same way the girls have a right to a girls sports team, if so interested, and respect the charter of rights. Or, the people fight back and demand to have catholic schools taken from public funding. You want to use religion as an excuse to be a homophobe? thus, making yourself feel better about your judgment on others. Then by all means, do so... On your own dollar, because i refuse to found bigots and cowards who hide behind a vial of lies.

I will certainly be keeping my eyes and ears open for any news about this issue and if I lived in the GTA I would be going to these meetings myself. As a proud lesbian women, I hope for a safe and comfortable future for the next generation of LGBT kids.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:30 PM on 09/16/2011
People send their kids to Catholic school so that they can learn the teachings and values of Catholicism, which is "hate the sin, not the sinner." Whether you personally believe homosexuality is a sin or not is not the debate here, it is already an established fact that Catholics don't encourage homosexuality, period, and therefore would not want a club operating on their property that promotes something they do not support. If a Catholic school is forced to go against their own beliefs, then what is the point of having a separate religious school system? The issue then becomes, should the catholic school board be publicly funded if they aren't going to accommodate everyone's needs? Well, that I can't answer. I have no idea how many Catholics still exsist or attend school in Ontario, I would think there must still be a relatively large number (much more then any other religious denomination) or school enrollment would drop well below the level needed in order to operate a school, and the schools would shut down. So to sum up, I think a religious school should absolutely be allowed to teach the doctrine of their faith, if not, what's the point of sending your kids to a religious school? If that school should be publicly funded I think depends on how much of the population is accessing those services.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesse Wright
04:01 PM on 09/16/2011
It absolutely appalls me that the Catholic School Board is allowed to discriminate anyone in this manner. Not being religious, I have largely been against Ontarian's spending money to promote one religious denomination strictly because I didn't think it was right to push religion in schools. But once the idea of sexuality being pushed/or pushed away in schools I was down-right angry. I can't believe for one minute that the people of Ontario would want to continue funding such a place. The Catholic School Board should wisen up and realize we could make this a bigger deal than they're willing to put up with. If they disagree, we should take this argument and use it for a cause to end funding. With all the rest of the arguments (cost effectiveness in saving administration, buildings, resources, etc.) we should be able to make enough Ontarians realize that funding needs to end.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pax333
01:13 PM on 09/16/2011
Excellent article, Justin. I will start to attend these meetings as it isn't enough to support gay rights if we continue to allow any of our schools teach intolerance, prejudice and to continue to minimize other human beings. If one thinks about it it would seem most likely that the RC schools by behaving in this manner are actually not only approving sin but preaching it.....the irony fairy thinks they need a smack down.
12:46 PM on 09/16/2011
"...those who oppose rights for gays will claim religious freedom..."

When in reality it is religious intolerance, prejudice and bigotry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lacrosselamore
sick of sacntomony and deluded fools
12:15 PM on 09/16/2011
Wow. Things sure are different in Canada. Give public money directly to a Catholic school?
If that is the case, they should have to allow GSA's . Either that or turn off the spigot of public funds. Knowing the RCC they will probably not change and do without. So save yourselves some money, Canada.