Most observers were surprised to hear that the Ontario Medical Association (OMA) and the Ministry of Health (MOH) had reached an agreement in early July. The Tentative Physician Services Agreement (TPSA), while not perfect, has benefits to both sides.
- No further unilateral cuts to fee codes
- Better funding for the growing and aging population and physician supply
- Equal seat at the table to manage ongoing spending and updating the Schedule of Benefits (fee codes) with third party facilitation*
- Ability to continue charter challenge seeking binding arbitration
* Facilitator recommendations are bindingFor Government:
- Four years of predictable physician spending
- Targeted fee cuts
- Labour peace with physicians prior to the election
- Demonstrated cost savings
- No negotiated binding arbitration
This is how negotiations work. Each side brought their priorities, neither got everything they wanted, and both walked away able to claim success for their side.
Since its release, the OMA, the Professional Association of Residents of Ontario (PARO)* and the Ontario Medical Students' Association (OMSA)* have come out in favour, with the OMA and OMSA encouraging their memberships to vote in favour of the Agreement.
The TPSA was to be put to a non-binding referendum, which would inform the OMA Council who would have the final say. While the referendum was non-binding, the elected OMA council has not previously gone against the will of the membership.
Enter Concerned Ontario Doctors
After the unilateral cuts in 2015 a Facebook Group was formed, now known as Concerned Ontario Doctors (COD). Their early impressive numbers, almost 9000 members, were achieved as people could be added to the group without their permission. The leaders began organizing small protests, meeting the opposition and writing opinion pieces criticizing the government. The media provided significant coverage to this sensational internecine fight.
When the TPSA was announced, COD was incensed. How dare the OMA negotiate a deal without consulting with us first?
They sought help, and help was readily available.
The Coalition was Born
COD partnered with the Ontario Association of Radiologists (OAR) and Doctors Ontario, both of whom have long disagreed with the OMA. Joined by some OMA Section Executives, largely from high billing specialties, they call themselves the Coalition of Ontario Doctors.
The Coalition brought COD two very important things: money and lawyers.
Not content with the non-binding referendum and wishing for increased participation from rank-and-file physicians the Coalition organized a petition. When 5% of OMA members signed they forced a general meeting that gave all members (about 40000 physicians) a binding vote; however, they neglected to do their homework.
General meetings for corporations have specific requirements, including either physical presence or proxies to vote. It also had to be organized within three weeks and the meeting, simply for practical travel and venue choices, would have to be in Toronto.
Rather than enhancing physicians' voices, the general meeting has stifled them. It will necessarily favour voices from Toronto and those who have the means to travel. Talk about the law of unintended consequences.
Ontario physicians should read the TPSA for themselves, ask questions and read multiple points of view.
The Coalition now accuses the OMA of "rigging" the proxy system and has had it invalidated by the courts (a new proxy form was issued on August 3). They demand resignations from the OMA President, OMA Board, Minister Hoskins and Premier Wynne, accusing them of being a "government-OMA cabal." Aghast that the OMA is recommending the TPSA to physicians, they sued the OMA for its membership list and are sending unsolicited e-mails to Ontario physicians.
Why Do We Support the TPSA?
It is important to know that neither of us is on OMA Council or Board. Both of us have significant experience on the PARO Board and, in our respective times, were PARO Presidents.
There has been an incredible amount of misinformation, hyperbole and emotion presented to physicians by COD and the Coalition. They have played on physicians' anger and frustration in, as Andre Picard put it, a very Trump like fashion.
Ontario physicians should read the TPSA for themselves, ask questions and read multiple points of view. They should make the decision based on facts.
This is why we are voting in favour:
1. Stability: This is the most important reason we are in support. The last four years have seen unilateral, across the board cuts arbitrarily imposed by the MOH. This agreement specifically precludes unilateral action by government.
2. Schedule of benefits changes: There is broad agreement amongst most physicians that this needs to happen. This agreement guarantees the OMA an equal seat at the table to ensure that physicians are represented as changes are made and that we hold ourselves accountable. There is a third party facilitator at the table whose recommendations are binding in case of disagreement.
3. Charter Challenge continues: This will not impact the OMA's ability to continue pursuing the Charter Challenge to try and secure binding arbitration for physicians in Ontario, which will take years.
4. Reversal of restrictions on primary care: Programs that have been implemented by the MOH that specifically target new in practice family physicians and primary care practitioners are being rescinded and two of the most contentious provisions in Bill 210 are being revisited by the OMA and MOH.
5. Funding for new programs or unexpected events: The Government has committed to providing additional funding for new programs (e.g. IVF) and unexpected events (e.g. SARS).
6. PARO and OMSA: Both groups have both been given written assurance by government that the changes will not target new physicians and, further, have been given seats at the table as health human resource challenges are addressed.
These are challenging times for physicians, governments and patients. We need to have peace and we need to rebuild trust in order to improve the health system in Ontario and the health of our patients. After 18 months of scorched earth tactics we are open to trying something different.
We are voting yes, and we hope you are too.
Dr. Kaif Pardhan
Dr. Alim Pardhan
Neither of their views reflect the organizations for which they work.
Follow HuffPost Canada Blogs on Facebook
ALSO ON HUFFPOST:
Many women start to feel like they're dragging in their late 30s and 40s. They're losing testosterone, which may act as an antidepressant, and experiencing a flux in their levels of estrogen and progesterone, which may also influence mood and energy. One of the most effective tactics for perking up comes down to how you plan your meals. "Many of my clients seem to think that by filling one meal with energy-generating nutrients -- say, a green smoothie for breakfast or a salad at lunch -- they've done their duty for the day," says dietitian Ashley Koff. "But your body needs several energy pit stops so you can refuel." Koff suggests small meals every three hours that combine a variety of nutrients. Her energy-boosting meal plan: Breakfast: Oatmeal with hempseeds. A.M. snack: Half cup of cottage cheese with berries. Lunch: Half a turkey sandwich with salad. P.M. snack: Half cup of tuna salad with wheat crackers. Dinner: Wild salmon with nonstarchy veggies.
Two free surefire solutions: diet and exercise. Losing even a few pounds can provide tremendous relief. One study found that for every pound you drop, you take four pounds of pressure off your knees. "Low-impact exercises -- walking, swimming, cycling -- help maintain a healthy weight and muscle mass as well as release endorphins, all of which can lead to a decrease in pain," says Roxanne Wallace, MD, an orthopedic surgeon at Marshfield Clinic in Wisconsin.
Down, girl. As long as you have no open wounds, you can welcome Sparky's affection. "A healthy immune system is strong enough to fight off most bacteria in a pet's saliva," says Jennifer Gabriele, a vet at Heart of Chelsea Animal Hospital in New York City.
really the new evil?"" width="52" height="52"/>
Sorry, cupcake, it doesn't look good. Too much of the sweet stuff can wreak havoc on your entire body. Added sugars have been associated with inflammation, a condition linked to obesity, type 2 diabetes, and heart disease. In fact, a 2014 study found that people who consumed 17 to 21 percent of their daily calories from added sugar had a 38 percent higher risk of dying from heart disease than those who got only 8 percent. For most women, the American Heart Association recommends no more than 100 calories from added sugar daily.
You can ignore the old eight-glasses rule: Six is typically plenty to hydrate you and keep everything in working order, according to a review in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
You may have small intestine bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), a condition common among those suffering from chronic bloating. SIBO can occur when bacteria in the colon migrate up into the small intestine and ferment the carbs passing through, creating gas. Consider switching to a diet low in fermentable foods (which include dairy, wheat, and high-fructose fruits) so the bacteria will have less to feast on, says Johns Hopkins gastroenterologist Gerard E. Mullin, MD, author of The Gut Balance Revolution. Research has shown that the plan works: A study in the journal Gastroenterology found that the majority of subjects with irritable bowel syndrome reported significantly less bloating when they followed a diet low in bacteria-loving foods.
"If you misrepresent the facts, you limit what your doctor can do for you," says Lissa Hirsch, MD, an obstetrician and gynecologist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. Some of your lies will be revealed by your blood work or the number on the scale, but otherwise your doctor has nothing to go on but what you report -- and that could be dangerous. Say you fib and tell her you're following a diet and exercise program to lower your blood sugar. When your "plan" doesn't seem to be working, she may prescribe medication you don't need, unwittingly putting you at risk for unnecessary side effects. In other words, when your pants are on fire, you'll be the one who gets burned.
Depends on what you're eating, says health reporter Catherine Price, who spent three years putting that question to more than a dozen top doctors and researchers for her recent book, Vitamania: Our Obsessive Quest for Nutritional Perfection. "If you're eating a good amount of foods naturally rich in vitamins, like produce, and those that are fortified, like cereal or bread, a multivitamin is probably superfluous," she says.* But if you do decide to take one, keep in mind that the FDA doesn't test dietary supplements to ensure that what's on the label is actually what's in the bottle. Check for a seal that says NSF or USP VERIFIED -- both are respected third-party companies that vitamin-makers can pay to review their products. *A multivitamin containing folic acid is always a good idea for women during their reproductive years.
Of course no one has a magic formula, but Marie Bernard, MD, deputy director of the National Institute on Aging, has a few ideas: See your doctor regularly. "At the turn of the 20th century, the average American life-span was about 45 to 50 years," says Bernard. "Today people live well into their 70s and beyond, and many experts believe that increase is due in part to preventive health measures." Maintain friendships. A new Brigham Young University review revealed that social isolation increases your risk of mortality by up to 32 percent -- on par with obesity. Learn a new skill. A recent University of Texas at Dallas study found that people who mastered a new and challenging skill (like digital photography or quilting) showed greater gains in memory than those who performed passive activities, like crossword puzzles. So get out there and start learning!
Follow Kaif Pardhan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/kaifpardhan