The National Rifle Association (NRA) doesn't speak for gun owners, not even for its members. The NRA speaks for gun makers and gun sellers. And the message is simple: buy more guns.
For many, the name NRA brings images of commandos and vigilantes, of survivalists and trophy hunters. People see the celebrity faces, the bombastic Charlton Heston, the wild-man Ted Nugent. They rarely see the what the NRA really is: the organization of Glock, Remington, and Smith & Wesson.
The NRA comes off as crazy to many of us, because, well, it is crazy. Opposing background checks on all gun sales -- crazy. Opposing gun owners having to notify police when guns are lost or stolen -- crazy. Supporting gun ownership for people on terrorism watch lists -- double crazy.
But crazy can be good strategy as they surely know. Not wanting to see the door cracked open even an inch, the NRA fights any and all restrictions on guns and actively works to loosen those that exist. A good starting position. Even if the NRA loses a skirmish here or there, the Guns "R" Us nation they've helped create is protected.
The NRA can get away with crazy because they are both very well-funded and because they downplay who they really work for, who they really represent. They are fundamentally a business lobby group, but unlike your usual business lobby group they claim to represent the customer. In this way their crazy doesn't taint the companies relying on them to create markets (as if selling guns isn't taint enough).
Nearly a hundred makers and sellers of guns, ammunition and gun accessories contribute to the NRA. Gunmaker Beretta gave the NRA $1 million dollars in 2008 alone. The infamous Blackwater Worldwide (their new weasel name is Xe), has given over half a million. Fifteen of the companies giving the NRA money make assault weapons. Dozens make or sell high capacity ammunition magazines. Could that be why the NRA is so opposed to restricting them?
Once an organization that claimed to not be affiliated with any gun companies, the NRA has received tens of millions of dollars in contributions from them since 2005 alone. Any company giving $25,000 or more gets to be part of their "Ring of Freedom." Giving $5 million or more gets you dinner at headquarters with the NRA CEO. Five million dollars before the CEO will have dinner with you? I guess that shows how much money there is in guns and how lucrative it is lobbying for rich gun makers.
The NRA gets money from its regular members as well, but what the NRA doesn't do is represent their views. Polls show that NRA lobbying has been out of step with its members' beliefs. This year's poll of gun owners by Republican strategist Frank Luntz shows the continuing disconnect.
Nearly 75 per cent of NRA members support background checks for all gun owners, 64 per cent agree owners should have to report lost or stolen guns, 71 per cent are against terrorism watch list members owning guns. Almost all NRA members believe that states should make their own laws for concealed handguns while the NRA has been lobbying for federal legislation that would force concealed handguns on everyone.
And would gun owners support the NRA position that the country's national public health agency, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), shouldn't work to prevent violence and injuries? The NRA lobbied to have the entire injury prevention section of the CDC shut down but settled for having Congress defund the violence prevention program. Congress also forbid the agency from supporting gun control as a possible path to injury prevention.
The NRA's fingerprints are all over the CDC restrictions, or should I say gun manufacturers' fingerprints. Such is the influence of big corporate money. Gun money has bought politicians, silenced agencies, shifted politics to the right. It has kept dubious second amendment half-truths ringing in everyone's ears, disguising them as full truths through repetition. It has limited the political viability of serious gun control.
Once an organization that supported common-sense gun regulation, the NRA now sells guns at any cost. Once an organization that opposed guns being carried around in public, it now wants to arm as many Americans as possible. Once an organization of reasonable gun use, it is now behind the unreasonable number of guns and gun deaths the United States is famous for.
We need to start seeing the NRA for what it is: a marketing and lobbying machine for the gun industry. When we recognize that the NRA is just trying to make money for gun makers, all their crazy starts to make a little sense. A little.
Kapil Khatter is a family physician who writes about health and corporate accountability, here and at illgotgains.com.
"I wish to God she had had an m-4 in her office, locked up so when she heard gunfire, she pulls it out ... and takes him out and takes his head off before he can kill those precious kids," Gohmert said of slain principal Dawn Hochsprung on Fox News Sunday. He argued that shooters often choose schools because they know people will be unarmed.
"If people were armed, not just a police officer, but other school officials that were trained and chose to have a weapon, certainly there would be an opportunity to stop an individual trying to get into the school," he told WTOP's "Ask the Governor" show Tuesday, warning that Washington may respond to such a policy with a "knee-jerk reaction."
Gov. Haslam says he will consider a Tennessee plan to secretly arm and train some teachers, TPM reports. The legislation will be introduced by State Sen. Frank Niceley (R) next month. "Say some madman comes in. The first person he would probably try to take out was the resource officer. But if he doesn’t know which teacher has training, then he wouldn’t know which one had [a gun]," Niceley told TPM. "These guys are obviously cowards anyway and if someone starts shooting back, they’re going to take cover, maybe go ahead and commit suicide like most of them have."
State Rep. Mark McCullough (R) told the Tulsa World he plans to file legislation that would bring guns into schools, calling their absence "irresponsible." “It is incredibly irresponsible to leave our schools undefended – to allow mad men to kill dozens of innocents when we have a very simple solution available to us to prevent it," he said. "I’ve been considering this proposal for a long time. In light of the savagery on display in Connecticut, I believe it’s an idea whose time has come." Sen. Ralph Shortey (R) told the Tulsa World that teachers should carry concealed weapons at school events. "Allowing teachers and administrators with concealed-carry permits the ability to have weapons at school events would provide both a measure of security for students and a deterrent against attackers," he said.
Baxley, who once sponsored Florida's controversial Stand Your Ground law, told the Sarasota Herald-Tribune that keeping guns out of schools makes them a target for attacks. “We need to be more realistic at looking at this policy," he said. "In our zealousness to protect people from harm we’ve created all these gun-free zones and what we’ve inadvertently done is we’ve made them a target. A helpless target is exactly what a deranged person is looking for where they cannot be stopped.”
At a Tea Party event Monday night, Perry praised a Texas school system that allows some staff to carry concealed weapons to work and encouraged local school districts to make their own policies.
Cornish plans to introduce legislation that would allow teachers to arm themselves, according to the AP.
In an email obtained by Gawker and excerpted below, Richardson tells three superintendents that he could have saved lives had he been armed and in Sandy Hook on Friday: If I had been a teacher or the principal at the Sandy Hook Elementary School and if the school district did not preclude me from having access to a firearm, either by concealed carry or locked in my desk, most of the murdered children would still be alive, and the gunman would still be dead, and not by suicide. ... [O]ur children's safety depends on having a number of well-trained school employees on every campus who are prepared to defend our children and save their lives?
"And I'm not so sure -- and I'm sure I'll get mail for this -- I'm not so sure I wouldn't want one person in a school armed, ready for this kind of thing," Bennett, who served as education secretary under Ronald Reagan, told Meet the Press Sunday. "The principal lunged at this guy. The school psychologist lunged at the guy. It has to be someone who's trained, responsible. But, my god, if you can prevent this kind of thing, I think you ought to."
Follow Kapil Khatter on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@IllGotGains