Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Kathy Buckworth

GET UPDATES FROM Kathy Buckworth
 

Annoying Parenting Trends That Must Be Stopped

Posted: 01/16/2013 12:59 pm

Another year gone by, another year filled with annoying parenting trends. Here are some fads I'd like to see disappear by the end of 2013:

1) Trophies for all: This one has been around for a while. We are raising our kids in a generation of "everybody wins and nobody loses" and what this does is make losers of us all. Without experiencing losing, kids don't know how thrilling it really is to bring home a coveted trophy or medal. They don't give out Participation Medals at the Olympics; let's stop giving our kids trophies for simply turning up. Think of the money, gold coloured plastic, and particleboard that could be saved.

2) Snacks at every event: From visiting the local park to half-time at a pre-school soccer game, apparently we've decided our children can not a) be hungry at any point or b) be expected to not have a snack every half an hour that c) parents must carry with them at all times. Recess snacks? Snack break at a playdate? End the madness, please.

3) Ramping up holiday time: Kids used to send Valentine's cards to only kids they actually liked. Strange concept compared to today when kids have to send in cards to everyone in the class, and half of them come with candies, stickers, or pencils attached. Then there's the mom who brings in (more!) snacks to the class on her child's birthday. Let's lower that bar (and cost, and calorie count) just a bit, OK?

4) Food Deception: This trend continues to be popular as parents everywhere hide kale, quinoa, broccoli and other healthy foods inside sauces, stews and other mixed dishes. Of course it's great to feed kids nutritious food, but they should also appreciate and learn about what they are eating so that they can make informed decisions once they leave home. One day they'll have decide what to pick for themselves or (gasp) make their own lunch.

5) Kid-Tatorship: In many households, the kid is running the show when it comes to what they eat, when they eat, when they go to bed, what activities they choose to do, and even where to go on vacation. It's not all about the kids, kids. Remember that parents are people too and make sure you're not sacrificing all of your wants for theirs.

Originally run in the Metro News.

Loading Slideshow...
  • No TV in English

    “She [Apple] is cross because I only let them watch TV in French or Spanish. When I’m in Paris, I go to Boulevard Beaumarchais and buy all their cartoons," Gwyneth <a href="http://uk.lifestyle.yahoo.com/gwyneth-paltrow-no-more-children-babies-working-mum-cant-have-it-all-125611877.html">told UK's InStyle</a>.

  • You Can't Have It All

    “Some women can do it and that’s fantastic, but I can’t. You make choices as a wife and mother, don’t you? You can’t have it all. I don’t care what it looks like," she said in the same interview.

  • Morning Flax

    "We got downstairs and I made him a quick breakfast of eggs and toast followed by a spoonful of lemon flavored flax oil that I try to remember to give them both every morning," she <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/13/gwyneth-paltrow-gives-adv_n_808446.html">wrote on GOOP</a> last year.

  • It's All About Balance

    Another <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/13/gwyneth-paltrow-gives-adv_n_808446.html">GOOP tip</a>: "The kids indulge in a super sugary cupcake before bed but I don’t feel too bad because they had a brown rice stir fry for dinner with baked sweet potato on the side. It’s all about balance!"

  • Prepare the Next Day's Uniforms and Ballet Kit

    "I always <a href="http://goop.com/journal/see/112/a-day-in-the-life">lay the kids' uniforms</a> and school things out the night before once they are asleep. When it’s quiet I can check the 'kid list' for show and tell items to bring in, consent forms, ballet kit, etc, so that the morning is less of a scramble."

  • Time Take For the Beauty Salon

    "I'll probably get kicked out of our school for admitting this, but I let Apple stay home yesterday. I just needed to be with her," Gwyneth <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/19/gwyneth-paltrow-in-good-h_n_811152.html">told Good Housekeeping</a> last year. "We went out to lunch, we went to the beauty salon, we were together."

  • Be Mindful

    "Motherhood has taught me mindfulness. If you just parent on instinct, you'll screw your kid up for life. You have to be so mindful," she said in that interview.

  • Get in the Bathtub

    "We all get into the tub together," she<a href="http://www.harpersbazaar.com/magazine/cover/gwyneth-paltrow-interview-0312#slide-1"> told Harper's Bazaar</a>.

  • Let Them Suffer

    “When I’m tired, when my chips are down – that’s when I don’t parent the way that I want to parent. I can get impatient and at the end of my rope…. And I hate that and I hate feeling out of control, even if I’m just saying, 'That’s enough!' Like, I can’t deal. It’s not the way that I would aspire to be. But then I think, I do really believe that part of our job is to equip them for the world. And we can’t make everything okay for them, we can’t take away all of their suffering. It’s not good for them," she said on <a href="http://blogs.babycenter.com/celebrities/06232012-gwyneth-paltrow-talks-parenting-fails-s-e-x/"><em>In Conversation with Amanda de Cadenet</em></a>.

  • Work Out

    "Every woman can make time — every woman — and you can do it with your baby in the room," she <a href="http://www.health.com/health/gallery/0,,20603375_5,00.html">said in 2010</a>. "There have been countless times where I've worked out with my kids crawling around all over the place. You just make it work, and if it's important to you, it'll be important to them."

  • Don't Feel Like a Terrible Mother

    "I do feel so guilty and, like, <em>What am I doing?</em> but I also want them to know work is really fun for me — 'Hey, look what I get to do!' As opposed to feeling like, <em>Oh, I'm a terrible mother</em>. Because that really just doesn't get you anywhere. It doesn't get them anywhere,'" she told Good Housekeeping.

 

Follow Kathy Buckworth on Twitter: www.twitter.com/KathyBuckworth

FOLLOW CANADA LIVING
Another year gone by, another year filled with annoying parenting trends. Here are some fads I'd like to see disappear by the end of 2013: 1) Trophies for all: This one has been around for a while. ...
Another year gone by, another year filled with annoying parenting trends. Here are some fads I'd like to see disappear by the end of 2013: 1) Trophies for all: This one has been around for a while. ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 53
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
10:51 PM on 02/26/2013
4. Exercise is more valuable than winning or losing. Most adults don’t play competitive sports. Or if the do, they often don’t place much of their self worth in whether they win or lose. We play sports to relax, to de-stress, to socialize and to be healthy. By participating in sports, kids do all these things. This is the ‘real-world’ lesson. Participate in sports throughout your life. Work hard. Play passionately.

I challenge those who rage against participation ribbons to consider what they want to teach their children. By arguing that giving other kids participation ribbons diminishes the thrill of the winner, you are telling your kids that having something is only valuable if others don’t have it. That there can’t be winners without losers. I also ask parents to consider what contributes to athletic ability and whether the child has control over those factors. My handing out participation ribbons, tells the kids who didn’t win that winning is not the be all and end all, as long as they showed up and played hard. In the end it’s not my goal to find the best athlete out of all my students. My goal is to find the best athlete in each of my students.
10:51 PM on 02/26/2013
2. Genetics plays a huge factor in athletic ability. Some kids will work hard at every practice and still place 5th. Some kids will show up the day of the meet and take first. By giving the kid who placed fifth a participation ribbon, I’m telling him that his hard work deserves recognition. If you only reward the kid who wins, you tell everyone else that hard work means nothing, winning is everything. In academics you get some sort of grade for showing up and completing the work. Should be the same for sports.

3. Kids who play private sports have an advantage. Private sports are expensive. That’s the whole point of school sponsored extra-curricular sports. That’s why I take time out of my day to run them. Because every child, no matter their parents’ income, should get the chance to participate in sports. Why should the kid who doesn’t have the opportunity to develop their skills through private sports be told through a lack of ribbon that no matter how often they show up for practice or how hard they work, those who have more, will likely get more ribbons.

cont...
10:51 PM on 02/26/2013
Dear Ms. Buckworth,

I am a teacher who believes in handing out participation ribbons. Here's why:

1. If you’re hungry, chances are you won’t run very fast. A lot of parents come to me with the argument that in giving the kid ‘who just shows up’ a participation ribbon, I’m devaluing the competitive nature of sports. But this parent doesn’t know what I know. I know that the only thing this kid has eaten today is the bowl of cheerios I gave him when he got to school. I also know that he shared a box of macaroni and cheese with his three siblings for dinner last night. This kid doesn’t need a lesson in winning and losing. He’s already getting the message that he’s losing loud and clear. He sees it in the new clothes of the other kids, their tales of family vacations, their filling lunches and snacks. This kid needs someone to hand him a ribbon that tells him that his ‘showing up’ made the team stronger and the game better.

cont...
01:47 PM on 02/01/2013
I have noticed the constant snacking, moms bringing along little bags of cereal or little crackers or whatnot at ALL TIMES. God forbid they should ever leave the house without ziplocks with snacks! Geez. What is the point of this, seriously? Is it just to get the kids to shut up? Give them something to eat so they'll be quiet? I honestly don't remember this from my old childhood, being fed little niblets at any and all times throughout the day... Rather, it was more "don't eat that, you'll ruin your appetite".

Is this how 'picky eaters' are created? They snack all day, no wonder they don't want to eat come mealtime...
12:33 AM on 01/18/2013
I have a beef with the regular snacks one... and I've been approached about it in person, which infuriates me. My son has Juvenile Diabetes. He didn't ask for this, and it wasn't caused by bad habits (for those of you who are uneducated). It's genetic. But because of this, he's on a strict regiment. He was diagnosed at 7, and now at 8, things are better. BUT... his meals are on a schedule per Dr's orers. He also required a snack between each meal, and quick acting sugars when he gets low. If he's playing sports (which he does), he requires a snack with X Carbs every hour of activity. When I see people such as Kathy, except with the ballsto approach me in public, and tell me I'm overfeedng my child, I get mad. I have no choice, HE has no choice. Maybe tending to YOUR children is a better thing right? Mine eats healthy, doesn't rule the house and includes others. As for hidden foods, try alternative preparations. I for one, hate boiled carrots, but I love them raw. Quite the opposite for my son. But he eats them. My dad likes them grated with a bit of light mayo mixed in. Carrots are Carrots... no?
05:55 PM on 01/17/2013
Geez, let them have a snack.
10:15 PM on 01/18/2013
or get hungry. it wont kill them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
the3rdmuskateer
04:12 PM on 01/17/2013
Don't agree with number one.Only the Olympics is mentioned, but not everyone is physically fit enough to be able to win golds in the Olympics. Why is only physical attributes mentioned in the strive to be better than everyone else? I sure know I felt better as a kid getting a participation ribbon then receiving nothing which was almost always when we had activity ranked competitions in school. And I wasn't a fat spoiled malnutritioned kid either.
Why teach children to become competitive which may lead to corruption?. Aren't those the qualities in society we want to eliminate? Lance Armstrong just admitted to doping, because he wanted to do anything he could to win. Is that what we want to teach our children? Either your a winner or you're nothing? And to become a winner, you have to do everything in your power, even if it comes down to cheating, and being extremely sneaky so you don't risk getting caught?
Teaching kids we're all winners, doesn't say we're all losers. It teaches them that they can all participate and have a fun time, not that the one kid whose the most athletic get's all the glory, and the rest of us suck it up and move on knowing we're not good enough.
05:51 PM on 01/18/2013
On this one, I do agree with the writer. When I was a kid, there were all kinds of contests. There were winners, and there were those who didn't win. It's not a matter of "not being good enough". It's more about not winning this time, but next time you try harder. It gives kids something to look forward to. A good example is report cards. One student will be a straight A student, the next a mixture of As & Bs with a C tossed in. If the child with the mixed grades feels that he wants better grades to hit that all As mark, he'll study more, put more time into a project, just try harder all the way around to improve those grades. To award every child for partisipating only teaches the child that competing to be the best doesn't matter and once they're adults out there in the working world, they'll not be prepared for the disappointments as in the working world, all is determined by their job performance to determine raises and promotions and less by just showing up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
the3rdmuskateer
10:12 PM on 01/21/2013
They mention nothing about academics in this article now do they? Strictly physical, strictly school related public activities. Not everyone has the ability to win at a race, so why should everyone be forced to run that race to get a crappy ribbon? How does it only teach children competing doesn't matter? Maybe it's more of a group effort, be happy with what you did thing? If one child knows they're better and doesn't have the give a flip attitude if they don't get gold, they'll try as hard as they can knowing they did good. If anything it teaches children to appreciate what they did on a personal level in a positive way, and that others matter too. If a child wants to be the best, let them be. They can do it in extra curricular activities where those who want to be the best can be, and receive special training and coaching to do as such. There's a reason why people go into specific fields after school, because if they know they're better at something, they'll choose to pursue it. Not be forced to do something they don't want to. Everyone has skills they can bring to the table, all those skills are important. It's not whether you win or lose, it's what you can do that's important. So why do you need a special gold ribbon to show for it?
10:22 PM on 01/18/2013
to give awards to everyone diminishes the value of the trophy for everyone. maybe it seems harsh, but its a valuable lesson. not only do they learn that there is value in striving to succeed, they will learn that everyone is good at something. losing is a good incentive to pursue other interests and makes for more complete people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
the3rdmuskateer
10:02 PM on 01/21/2013
they may learn there is value in striving to succeed, but for those who are forced to attempt to strive in something, even though they aren't good at it and know it is more of a humiliation than anything. The article only mentions physical in public related activities. It mentions nothing about mental activities, the fact that there are extra curricular activities, etc. If you CHOOSE to do something, and are PAYING to do it, then yes, let there be winners and losers. You're going for one purpose, to get good and to win. For public schools especially in elementary, you're forcing kids to do things they may not be good at, and know they aren't good at, but forcing them to do it anyway. You're forcing them to lose to the kids who are good at that activity. It's degrading. It teaches the lesson that you're just a stepping stool for those who are better than you, and to shut up and do it. Knowing you're going to lose the minute you attempt is diminishing in itself, and that you have no other choice. At least participation teaches that you get a pat on the back for trying, and that no matter how good you are, you still tried. To those who know the deserve better, can go the extra mile to participate in something extra curricular to be able to express that they are better.
03:13 PM on 01/17/2013
Another thing that annoys me is parents who put their 3/4 year olds in a stroller every time they go anywhere. As soon as my kids where walking steady on their feet I no longer had them in the stroller.
02:00 PM on 01/17/2013
6. And get off my lawn too!
07:08 AM on 01/18/2013
she does sound like a curmudgeon, doesn't she?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeyB06
12:57 PM on 01/17/2013
Trying to turn their kids into adults before they're 5. The biggest problems I see with kids occur when the parents bow out of parenting too soon. Just because your kids are as tall as you are does not mean that they possess the maturity and experience that you do. And encouraging a 3 year-old to "make good choices" is nonsense. Failure of parents to exercise control over their kids at young ages results in parents who are unable to control their kids when it counts at 13. And by control, I do not mean punishment; I mean having the respect of the child so that he/she listens to you when you are giving him/her advice and counsel.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
the3rdmuskateer
04:04 PM on 01/17/2013
I think it's a good thing to encourage a child to "make good choices", but the control shouldn't be solely left up to the child. They're called children for a reason, whether they're 3 or 13. At younger ages, the parent should have control and explain why it is a good choice, leaving the child to be left with the chance of making good choices as they grow older, more leniency in the decision making, as well as the authority to make their own decisions. Every 'good' choice should be explained, so even if the child believes it's not a good choice, they come up with their own reasoning against why it is not a good choice and chose to believe or do so otherwise. At least they're educated with an iron fist of common sense.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeyB06
04:40 PM on 01/17/2013
No disagreement here.  I often tell the story of a father in the neighborhood, whose 3 year old had picked up a tree branch and was swinging it around at eye level in a group of kids, who told the kid about 5 times to "be careful with that tree branch" before I finally went and grabbed the stick out of the kid's hand.
12:43 PM on 01/17/2013
#6) Let's get rid of the competitive tone of modern parenting. We don't all have to have the best stroller, the greatest daycare or the most awesome organized activities. None of this will affect in the slightest the kind of people your kids turn out to be. This is just another realm in which we've become suckers in the modern fear based marketing machine of consumer capitalism.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdncommentator
10:43 AM on 01/17/2013
From your mouth to society's ears!!!
10:20 AM on 01/17/2013
Other than re "food deception", I agree on all points with this article. Let's also nuke over-blown birthday parties, goodie bags, and giganto strollers, too. When my son was a baby I had a giganto stroller (it was a gift) but it was strictly used for afternoon walks. I did not haul it onto public transit or block the aisles with it in restaurants, or mow down other people with it in at museums and zoos - I had a (much cheaper and smaller) umbrella stroller, for crowded public places. Another annoying public parenting trait is allowing LOUD talking. The kids talk loudly and endlessly about inanities - which I blame foursquare, on the prevalence of cellphone culture. They probably hear their parents talking , loudly and constantly. While I believe children should be allowed to express themselves, there are polite and non-intrusive ways to do so. And they need to learn to be considerate of other people's personal space, or it's going to be a rough ride for them, when they grow up.
09:28 AM on 01/17/2013
I Have to disagree on not feeding kids when it is appropriate, when they are hungry. Depending on the clock and needing privacy to feed your children creates false reliance. After working out or playing is the best time to consume nutrition to replenish energy. Who wants to deal with the feelings related to exhaustion and hunger?
Blending food like rice and broccoli is bad? A proper snack should blend as many nutrients as possible, don't let over-thinking get in the way of having the healthiest body for your child.
05:52 AM on 01/17/2013
Very informative post. I agree with you here Kathy. These are the most common things that parents do to their kids not knowing that it can cause 'not-so good' effects. I am guilty of kid-tatorship and I know I really need to do something about it. Thanks for making me realize and also for sharing this!