Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Raffi Cavoukian
Keith Beardsley

GET UPDATES FROM Keith Beardsley
 

Trudeau Had Everything to Lose in Garneau Challenge

Posted: 02/26/2013 12:38 pm

Poor Marc Garneau, he wanted a one on one debate with Justin Trudeau and Trudeau turned him down. That was a smart move on Trudeau's part, dumb one on Garneau's.

While it's true many people would like to know where Trudeau stands on a variety of issues, there is no reason for him to get involved in a one-on-one debate. Right now he is the front-runner and he has the most to lose with such a format.

If Trudeau is ahead what point is there in accepting such a challenge? It would put him at risk of making a mistake or in this case, having Garneau prove to the public and media (those that don't already suspect it) that Trudeau is "policy light." There is simply no upside for Trudeau in accepting such a challenge.

In addition, if he had accepted the Garneau challenge, Trudeau would have indicated to the other challengers, delegates and registered leadership voters that he was concerned about Garneau's momentum and that he needed the debate to knock Garneau down a peg. Accepting would have raised Garneau to equal status as a front-runner, something he is clearly not at this time.

Trudeau also had to look beyond the debate as well. Losing a debate to Garneau would have given the "anyone but Trudeau" folks, as well as the supporters of other candidates, someone to rally around to stop the Trudeau juggernaut. It certainly wasn't in Trudeau's interest to risk providing that opportunity.

As for Marc Garneau, outside of the temporary blip in media interest that his press release caused, did he seriously think Trudeau would accept? Such a move also signals that Garneau just might be getting a bit desperate that he hasn't closed the gap on Trudeau, either in supporter numbers or dollars raised.

Garneau's challenge to a one-on-one with Trudeau also brings into question whether or not Garneau is a team player. How does he think the other leadership challengers will view his wanting to bypass them? If he is so willing to insult them (and their supporters) by wanting to bypass them at this stage of the leadership race, does he still expect their support later on? Win or lose he still has to work with them in the future.

Certainly Garneau's challenge provided a few minutes of interest in what so far has been a pretty dull leadership race, but it went nowhere. Did the challenge help Garneau move ahead in the contest? I doubt it; instead he might have alienated more supporters than he gained.

Loading Slideshow...


 

Follow Keith Beardsley on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Atory01

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:28 PM on 03/02/2013
Liberals have had plenty of time to practice doing the "smart" thing and third place is where it got us. What kind of fool gets excited about a leader that never does the "right" thing? The right thing to do would have been to accept the challenge and have a deeper debate than what we have been fed so far.
12:03 AM on 03/03/2013
I normally agree. As a progressive i see politics ad morals as hand in hand. But here the truly politically smart choice was the one he took.

The liberals had no problem finding someone to "do the right thing. I am not a LIb but Dion is by all accounts intelligent, and many of his ideas were framed by the cons in a bad light, despite being the smart and right thing for Canada.

What we need are people who are right, smart, moral but also know when and how to pick a fight, Trudeau made the right decision.
05:38 AM on 03/01/2013
Eventually Canadians will need to know where Trudeau stands on issues and he cannot live on fluff and puff forever. That is the whole point Garneau is making. Populous politics can pop like a balloon and once it pops, you're done.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
esemple
04:26 PM on 02/27/2013
NO reason for a debate between only two of the candidates.
04:40 PM on 02/26/2013
That 'challenge' to JT showed disdain for the other candidates and brought into question Garneau's judgement. Beeg mistake.
Also, Garneau is a rather boring candidate. Matches up well with Harper. Can you picture the two of them debating? Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
03:22 PM on 02/26/2013
Garneau would have shown Trudeaufor what he i - fluffy and puffy. Garneau has the intelligence, the education and the skills needed to lead the Liberals to victory.
04:16 PM on 02/26/2013
That's just your opinion
11:02 PM on 02/26/2013
How did you guess siverbird? You must be a genius.
This comment has been removed.