Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Keith Beardsley

GET UPDATES FROM Keith Beardsley
 

NDP Leadership Race Is a Campaign of Nobodies

Posted: 11/28/11 12:46 PM ET

It was Pierre Trudeau who famously said that MPs were nobodies once they were 50 yards from the Hill. That reference could certainly apply to the present day NDP leadership campaign. It's a bit of a con game (i.e., a campaign of nobodies).

While the candidates are a decent bunch of individuals and hard-working constituency MPs, can Canadians envision all but a couple of them as the next prime minister of Canada? I say that because in the end, that is what this leadership race is all about. Whoever wins will be the leader of the Official Opposition and potentially if everything falls into place for them, our next prime minister.

It might seem like a pretty harsh judgment, but federal politics is the big league in Canada. It is a brutal battleground where only the toughest and best survive. Being a nice person and a hard-working MP doesn't mean that you are prime ministerial material or even party leadership material. That has been proven time and again and if you look back over the last 10 to 15 years in Canadian political life you can count quite a few leaders (from all parties) who didn't survive.

Of course, politics is as much about ego as it is experience and the low financial commitment required to enter the NDP leadership race has allowed those with the ego, if not the experience or ability, to run for the NDP leadership.

Thomas Mulcair and Robert Chisholm at least have some senior-level provincial political experience and they are well known in their respective provinces. A couple of others might be well known inside the Queensway and Ottawa bubble, but they are hardly household names. Brian Topp is well known to the rank and file in the NDP party, but again largely unknown to the public at large and he is someone who has never been elected at any level. It remains to be seen if the backroom boy can take the heat of a leadership race that is still in its infancy and which has yet to turn ugly.

As for the rest ... other than the candidates themselves, how many Canadians can envision Prime Minister Paul Dewar or Prime Minister Niki Ashton? How many can see Martin Singh, Peggy Nash, Romeo Saganash or Nathan Cullen as our prime minister? Could they stand toe to toe with Stephen Harper and the Conservative brass knuckle style of politics?

The Official Opposition is the government in waiting. The MPs you see in the House are potential cabinet ministers. Can you see 30 to 40 of the present NDP MPs sitting in cabinet being led by one of the present leadership candidates? If you can't, then the NDP has a problem that the present campaign must address; something it has so far failed to do.

Having spent some 30 years in politics, I have seen and participated in my share of leadership contests. I know that some candidates are putting their names forward because they want to be better positioned for when the leadership race after this one opens up. There is also a chance that the two main contenders, Topp and Mulcair, will battle to a draw and the party will then turn to a third choice. But if that should happen, it won't mean that they will be any more competent to govern, but it will mean a relatively unknown MP will be suddenly thrust into the spotlight of prime time coverage. That option doesn't always work, remember "Joe Who"?

The party still has plenty of time to raise the candidates' profiles and improve their name recognition with Canadian voters, but with a limited number of leadership debates, that will be difficult task. Until then, it will be up to the candidates themselves to raise their profiles as they criss-cross the country to meet party members (hopefully not on their MPs travel points). Either way they have a difficult task to convince Canadians that they should be the next prime minister.

For now, once these MPs leave the spotlight of the daily Question Period and once outside of their ridings, they remain largely unknowns, an example of the nobodies Trudeau referred to.

 

Follow Keith Beardsley on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Atory01

It was Pierre Trudeau who famously said that MPs were nobodies once they were 50 yards from the Hill. That reference could certainly apply to the present day NDP leadership campaign. It's a bit of a c...
It was Pierre Trudeau who famously said that MPs were nobodies once they were 50 yards from the Hill. That reference could certainly apply to the present day NDP leadership campaign. It's a bit of a c...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:01 PM on 12/03/2011
Perhaps whoever wins the leadership will disappoint Mr. Beardsley enough that he relegates himself to textbooks of history rather than boring us with his current irrelevance.
02:50 PM on 11/30/2011
Right, because that's what people are saying right now, "we need leaders with lots of experience in traditional politics"...way to keep your ear to the street Keith...I think it's you who needs to take a break from the "50-yard radius around the Hill".
09:21 AM on 11/29/2011
I seem to recall that the current boarder at 24 Sussex was a nobody when he first arrived in Ottawa. Isn't the whole point of a leadership contest to test the mettle of a bunch of aspirants to see who has the ability (and timing) to be successful? And by the way, I applaud the low financial commitment required by the NDP. It's probably an old fashioned view, but most of us are not in favour of buying power.
photo
TT Esty1
Failure is a temporary condition.
01:56 AM on 11/29/2011
Methinks you are vying for membership in the Grumpy Old Men's Club so sourly put your assessment of these good people who aspire to leadership. You hang your argument on one bare pole that they are not widely known and, perhaps, forget that even Trudeau furrowed brows at introduction. It seems that you would have us search for a virgin birth to send into the convention hall.
07:14 PM on 11/28/2011
It is kind of sad... but if it wasn't for the odd editorial here and there... Most people wouldn't there's a leadership race.

On the positive side, they DO have one... something the Liberal can't quite afford just yet...
06:31 PM on 11/28/2011
Yes I can, that's why this former Conservative keeps sending them money, votes for them and talks to everyone I can about why we need to support the NDP. Your a another neo-con lined up here by Frum's wife along with the rest of her family so your words count for nothing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
05:13 PM on 11/29/2011
Cronyism is never heard about or explored much in teh Canadian media because the media are part of the cronyism system, part of the lateral linkages of nepotism which tie the press and the political establishment together in this country. It was (and is) one of the main complaints from the Occupy movement - including the Canadian Occupy movement - but as with the rest of what that movement is/was about, the media do the "who, me?" thing and say, re charges of cronyism, that they don't know what they're talking about and that problem doesn't exist in Canada. "No, not us", they all say together, in print, and then sit down together over dinner (more likely a conference call). "The movement had no clear message" means "the movement had no message that we wanted to convey, because it indicts us as part of the problem".
georgee2
My Canada Includes Everyone
05:19 PM on 11/28/2011
Anyone but Harper
05:19 PM on 11/28/2011
Who could have envisioned Lizzy McHarper as the Prime Minister back when he became leader of the CCRAP? Somehow it happened (to the misfortune of all of us). This is the classic Catch-22 insanity: demand X as a qualification, yet deny any opportunity to create X.
04:28 PM on 11/28/2011
I don't want an opposition leader who resorts to the "brass-knuckle" dragging of Harper's gang. What we need is someone who operates differently, listens to Canadians, and can offer a fresh approach to the problems we face. We have been been conditioned by the media to believe that only old, rich, white men have what it takes to lead our country. These men are close-minded and jaded from years in politics, and are out of touch with younger people and the world we live in. Allowing some young blood into politics will help our country move forward, instead of the backward plunge we are now experiencing under Harper.
02:49 PM on 11/28/2011
This is exactly what Canada needs new faces with new ideas. We presently have PM while a house hold name, even if most would not like him in their house, who has nothing but old and failed ideas on how to solve our problems. It is high time we start engaging the young people with new visions in the governance of this country.

Why is it that the young men and women of Canada are so brave and heroic when we need someone to kill or be killed yet they are irrelevant in the area of governance?
02:44 PM on 11/28/2011
comment
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
A radical leftist with a JS Woodsworth avatar.
01:42 PM on 11/28/2011
Aren't such judgements slightly premature?
11:57 AM on 11/29/2011
yes
01:27 PM on 11/28/2011
Certainly, none of these faceless, obscure people is qualified to be prime minister. It's so good that we have the dazzlingly famous Keith Beardsley (yes THE Keith Beardsley!) to tell us this.