I must admit I am enjoying all the debate that Harper's addition of the word "Royal" to our navy and air force has created. One would have thought that the debate would have centered on whether this was a throw back to our monarchist ties or simply a reminder to Canadians and our serving members of the proud history of our armed forces. Instead it has spun off into a much larger debate that reminds me of the old hidden agenda attacks that the Liberals used to throw at us.
I am not a monarchist, but I can appreciate the addition of the word "Royal." My former regiment had "Royal" in its name. Such a designation was earned, usually based on a regiment's performance in a campaign and it was something to be proud of and part of a regiment's history. The addition of the word "Royal" doesn't disturb me, nor do I see some Conservative plot in adding it to our navy and air force.
Some suggest that Harper is trying to recast our history so that it is seen from a conservative slant. Others wonder if we are behaving like colonials. Still others see these moves as part of a larger attempt to play down key Liberal initiatives like the Charter, peacekeeping and multiculturalism. I have even seen speculation that this is all about boxing in the NDP in Quebec, even though many of Harper's initiatives pre-dated the last election.
There is nothing wrong with knowing and understanding our history and that includes our symbols and traditions. We need to promote them so that we have a better understanding of where we have come from and who we are today. But if we are going to promote our history, let's look at it openly, warts and all. Only then will we get a true sense of where we come from and who we are.
Any promotion of our military must include our actions in the First and Second World Wars. But we can not forget Korea, nor gloss over our sacrifices in Bosnia or what happened in Somalia. Our peacekeeping role in the Suez crisis and our resulting peacekeeping efforts around the world can not be glossed over. They are part of the foundation that makes us who we are on the world stage today.
If we want to promote our Canadian connection to the Arctic we need to know more about its original inhabitants, their culture and way of life. We need to know who explored that region -- English, French, Danes, Americans and Norwegians to name a few. If we are to focus on the North West Passage, perhaps Canadians should know about the achievements of the RCMP vessel the St Roch. And we need to know about the darker side of our Arctic history as well -- residential schools, the slaughter of the sled dogs etc.
With the number of court decisions that come down every year I doubt any Canadian will forget that the Charter exists, there is nothing that Harper can do about that. Love it or hate it, it is a fact of Canadian history and our daily life. It needs to be taught and understood. We need to come to grips with whether or not it is the Charter that many of us disagree with or is it the judicial interpretation of the Charter? While we are at it, how about teaching new Canadians and our school-age children about the original Bill of Rights that was brought in by John Diefenbaker in 1960.
And while we focus on present day rights, let us not ignore our past. We need to look at the internment of Japanese Canadians, Ukrainians, Italians and others. We need to look at racism in Canada and know that it is not just an American issue. I would suggest that most Canadians know more about racism in the United States than they do about what happened in our own country. Most Canadians know about the American Klu Klux Klan, but do they have any idea that it existed up here?
I also doubt the Conservatives are trying to bury multiculturalism. It has enriched this country, made us much more cosmopolitan and opened our eyes to many different cultures. All positives in a world that gets smaller with every new advance in technology. But when we accept multiculturalism we should not forget who we are. There is no need to bury our history, our symbols or downplay our special cultural and religious days such as Christmas and Easter. If I were to move to another country I would not expect them to change the way they celebrate their festivals or religious holidays. Anyone wishing to move here and eventually become a Canadian needs to know who we are historically, and who we are now, at home and on the world stage and accept what days we view as important... be they religious or historical in nature. We have become far too politically correct.
Promoting multiculturalism and our European history should not mean that we ignore other rich cultures that existed here long before Europeans had a clue that North America existed. Our First Nations have a rich history that all of us, including prospective immigrants should know more about. If we know more about our historical relationship with the First Nations, we will have a better understanding of the ongoing land claims process, their grievances and some of their objectives. And we can not ignore the events and broken promises that have led to the current impasse and difficulties that exist between the First Nations and any Canadian government, be it Liberal or Conservative.
Good for Harper if he wants to promote our history and symbols and give Canadians and new Canadians a better understanding of who we are and how we got here. I don't see a plot or hidden agenda, but I do say it is up to us to learn from the past, change what we don't like and move forward.
Follow Keith Beardsley on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Atory01
Mark Bourrie: Canadian History Just Bunk to Make a Buck
i prefer a different approach ---one that says we used to be a colony and we used to use royal -----we have moved on from that and are all grown up now---leaving the past behind and moving confidently to the future ----no strings attached
And no, I am mot French. I am just observing.
As Harper relied upon the royal prerogative to over-ride the will of the parliament in 2008, it only makes sense to play up to the senior set, the Royalists, and Crown.
Harper won he elections fair and square.
A larger portion of Canadians agree with him than agree with you.
Stop making excuses.
For example. In the Suez peacekeeping mission in 1956, Canadian troops operating under a UN mandate, who had British helmets, uniforms and designations (including a red ensign flag) found it tougher to gain trust and acceptance from egyptians who looked at the Brits and the Union Jack as colonial interveners and occupiers.
It's not just French in Quebec who are ambivalent about the trappings of pax Britannica. Why take on un-necessary baggage?
I took another look to the world map, and yes, I remembered well - England is far away. Being a grown-up country, I don't think we still need our Mom to look after us.
I do respect my new country laws and holidays (happened to be the same like mines), paying my taxes, but sick and tired to be treated like a retarded child, because I have an accent (and two university degrees under my belt).
Why I am saying this? Because, the only people that treated me in this way were - English. On the other hand, I have English friends that I would trust with my life.
Monarchies at this time and age? No, thank you!
Any well travelling individual will recognize that to all observers - Canada is becoming the 'suburb of the world' - a meaningless, identity-less 'location', where people politely go about their business.
Without a cultural identity we are nothing but a legal contract, subject to interpretation by every subsequent generation who will know less and less about their history, and about who they are.
Canadians fail dramatically on the international landscape in every form of leadership be it innovation in technology, marketing, finance. We are the only prominent Western nation to have only 1 recognizable brand (BlackBerry) and people don't even attribute it to Canada.
We are the joke of the international circuit on all things foreign affairs.
We create no entertainment, film, literature or music that anyone cares to listen to or respects in any way. (Last film produced and made in Canada to feature at Cannes or win an Oscar?).
Because of multiculturalism, we are all forced to shave off inch by inch any semblance of common culture, and we are left with nothing but consumerism.
MULTICULTURALISM IS THE DEATH OF HUMANITY ON THIS PLANET.
WATCH AS WE ALL FADE INTO A STARBUCKS.
Most of what you are mentioning comes from us having a small population - it has nothing to do with multiculturalism. I would rather be in multicultural Canada than a mono-culture country like the US, at least our economy is growing.
Our forces always were 'Royal' until the disastrous amalgamation of the 3 branches in the 1960's during which several Generals and Admirals resigned in protest. We are not 'renaming' anything, we are correcting an error made long ago.
Keith - we live in a Constitutional Monarchy, and the Queen is our Head of State.
We are thankful and respectful of our political tradition which has evolved for almost a thousand years almost without interruption since 1066. Our relationship to our history enables us an a mature identity and wise perspective wherein we may look onto creation knowing that we are much stronger and more capable.
You need to respect that fact - or leave.
There is a Republic to our South that would be glad to have you.
and the chances of being expelled like the Acadians were back in 1755 are nil. One of the nice things that makes this country better than most others is we can change our future and emphasis of our past or not as we see fit - we can even disagree and we will.
We have one primary founding nation, one secondary, and many others.
Even the latest Globe & Mail informal reader polls indicated that more people were supportive of Harper, Nationalism, Royalty, than the Liberals, Social Policy and Multiculturalism.
And - the online readership of G&M definitely skews liberal, so no doubt Harper has clear support on this issue.
Conservatism at its ideological level is more emotional than practical, so the practice of tugging at people's heartstrings with emotional arguments of supporting values and tradition goes a long way. An example would be the wheat board where the principle of freedom of choice is more important than the practical issue of farmers getting a fair return for their products.
About 33% of Canadians identify themselves as conservative and Harper got just under 40% of the vote in the last election - not quite a majority.