Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ken Georgetti

GET UPDATES FROM Ken Georgetti
 

This Labour Day, Consider the Union Advantage

Posted: 09/03/2012 12:00 am

On Labour Day we celebrate the many contributions of working people who helped to build our country and its economy. Despite negative comments about unions from some business groups, we do make a positive difference in the health of our communities and the lives of business owners. We call this the union advantage.

The Canadian Labour Congress released a research study in August showing that on average unionized workers in Canada earn $5.11 an hour more than do non-union workers. That extra money in the pockets of individual workers means the union advantage is worth a cumulative $793 million per week that is added to our economy, and it represents a gain for local communities and small businesses as well.

Our research study highlights 29 separate communities across the country to show the benefits that unionized workers provide. We have found that centres with more union members enjoy relatively higher incomes overall and support a richer mix of businesses and services -- dentists, chiropractors, therapists, health specialists, family lawyers. These services benefit everyone. In short, these communities are better places to work and live.

Belonging to a union is especially important for female workers. We have found that 53 per cent of non-union women earn less than $13.33 an hour, compared to just 6.4 per cent of women who belong to unions. So the next time someone says union workers make too much money, ask them if they would prefer their mothers, daughters, sisters and aunts to make less than $13.33 an hour for their labour.

Unionized workers are more likely than non-union workers to have access to workplace pension plans, drug and dental plans. This means that millions of children have proper dental and vision care. Their parents can more easily afford to enroll them in camps and sports programs and later send them off to college and university. But the union advantage doesn't belong just to union members. All workers share in what union members have fought hard to achieve -- better wages, good benefits and safer workplaces.

When unions stand up for fairness, they raise the bar for everyone. That is why, for example, the Canadian Labour Congress is working to convince governments to improve Canada Pension Plan benefits. We want to make sure that every retired Canadian -- whether or not they belonged to a union -- will receive a livable $24,000 a year from CPP. It can be done and it's only fair.

Decent wages and pensions mean prosperous communities because unionized workers spend most or all of their paycheques close to home. For this reason, we find it odd that some people and organizations who claim to speak for small business are supporting proposals that would make it more difficult for people to join unions.

The International Monetary Fund and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development have confirmed that broadly-based collective bargaining is the best mechanism to build a healthy middle class. In short, when workers, through their unions, are able to bargain freely for decent wages, benefits and pensions, there are benefits for society as a whole. Unionized workers help to build a stronger middle class and a stronger economy for everyone.

For generations, Canadians and our governments have understood the value of unions and of free collective bargaining. Unfortunately, our current federal government and some provincial governments want to ignore both history and the facts and turn back the clock. All of this should trouble Canadians whether or not they are unionized workers. There is a direct relationship between attacks upon unions and the growing income gap in our society and the quality of life every Canadian deserves. Local businesses that benefit from the union advantage will also suffer if wages fall or remain stagnant.

On this Labour Day we hold our heads high as we salute the contributions of ordinary working Canadians. Behind every successful private business, entrepreneur or public service, there is a group of dedicated workers. This is a day to say thank you to the 95 per cent of Canadians who work for someone else, but who also strive for a fair and prosperous Canada.

Ken Georgetti is president of the 3.3 million member Canadian Labour Congress.

 

Follow Ken Georgetti on Twitter: www.twitter.com/CanadianLabour

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
On Labour Day we celebrate the many contributions of working people who helped to build our country and its economy. Despite negative comments about unions from some business groups, we do make a posi...
On Labour Day we celebrate the many contributions of working people who helped to build our country and its economy. Despite negative comments about unions from some business groups, we do make a posi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
06:55 PM on 09/03/2012
"Unionized workers are more likely than non-union workers to have access to workplace pension plans, drug and dental plans. This means that millions of children have proper dental and vision care."
----

Ahh, so two tier privately funded health care IS a good thing now?
Funny how the song sheet on that changes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tokenblackman
11:00 PM on 09/03/2012
Dental and Vision care were never part of basic Medicare in Canada. You should know this.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
06:46 PM on 09/03/2012
Why are unions allowed to have such strict monopolies?
The left would go nuts if any corporation had anything like that kind of monopoly.
photo
Billk29
Justified Ancient of Mu
06:09 PM on 09/03/2012
Unions are a very good thing. Watching non-union management people get jerked around and have to asskiss and grovel for their jobs on a daily basis makes me appreciate unions even more.
Even so the federal and provincial governments are eroding unions more and more every yr with their 'necessary back to work 'legislation.
photo
Gnomish
ego doctus ignarus
03:30 PM on 09/03/2012
Consider this ...In my company the only people left are the union members all the rest get cycled yearly. Some like sales monthly!
02:59 PM on 09/03/2012
Unions also protect the weakest link. Too often in union shops, the most productive employees just carry on doing what they do, while the whiny, unproductive workers have all the complaints. If unions want to contribute meaningfully, they shouldn't resist having pay scales tied to productivity, efficiency, or some measure of competency. It works well in the real world.
photo
Machine Head
I`d rather have a full bottle in front of me......
06:36 PM on 09/03/2012
"they shouldn't resist having pay scales tied to productivity, efficiency, or some measure of competency. It works well in the real world". What like all of the executives that took million dollar bonuses while their companies lost money last year? I wouldn't have a problem having my wages tied to productivity and/or profits if the executives (like John Surma of US Steel) did the same; always asking for concessions in benefits and wages while "earning" over 400 times what the highest paid bargaining unit worker earns. Fact is that until the top dogs start sharing the pain, there will be no economic turnaround for workers.
07:23 PM on 09/03/2012
No, not like all the executives that took bonuses. I know it's hard for a union ideologue to understand, but workers and management are different. If everyone could be a CEO or vice-president, then the position wouldn't be worth squat. There are a lot more people who can work an assembly-line job, or for the civil service, usually without much post-secondary education. This keeps the value of that job lower.
As to your predictions for an economic turnaround being tied to executive salary reductions, I would say that the cessation of taxpayer dollars going blindly into failing corporations would do far more, as companies would have to operate with their own capital or credit. That should apply to banks, car manufacturers, oil companies, etc. Shareholders would be forced to jettison inept or corrupt managers, to the benefit of all in the long run, as a profitable, efficient company will provide more long-term employment for the average worker.
Also, I didn't say anything about tying wages to profits, as that is a totally different thing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kenneth T Tellis
11:50 AM on 09/03/2012
I thimk that Ken Georgetti has made a point, and that UNIONS protect the rufgts of the worker. But, there have been instances when UNIONS have not done that. I was in a UNION of which the men representing the UNION became a private CLUB, that count nit be bothered with complaints because it eposed what was going on within the UNION. When that happens, the workers are without any protection. But, I must agree the the corporate entities do not like UNIONS in the main, because they want workers who cannot complain and will accept no protection and less pay. To these corporate BUMS, the idea of a UNION is anathema, because they cannot do what they want to their workers.

Remember, that corporations will use the workers and break every rule in the book to make a fast BUCK. Thus, they do not want UNONS around.

The UNION is still, warts and all the best protection for workers against eploitation from the forces of the Corporations and even private businesses in our present day world.
10:16 AM on 09/03/2012
Yes, indeed.
And even more important, nobody has yet stolen the "u" from the Canadian word "labour".
Labour in Canada is still labour and labour is still spelled l-a-b-o-u-r.
Now that's something to celebrate.

Gimmee an l. Gimmee an a. Gimmee a b. Gimmee an o. Gimmee a u. Gimmee an r.
What do we got?

Three minimum wage jobs just to pay the rent!
Yeeeeaaaaaaaah!!!!!!!!!!!!!
03:21 AM on 09/03/2012
In June 2 members representing the steel workers union showed up at my workplace. We had 2 days notice they were coming. They had an agreement they had cleared with management. Something done without our knowledge or cooperation, and we were being asked to ratify it. Accept the agreement and we'd be union members. What was the offer? Cliffs note version... a raise of 0.33 cents per hour. The agreement while very detailed, when it came to union dues, fees etc it couldn't have been more vague. The 2 morons the union sent when asked about dues used phrases like " approximately" and " somewhere around" while bragging about the billion dollar strike fund they were sitting on. They had to be read aloud portions of the agreement because it became clear very early that they hadn't actually read it. With there vague answers and some math. The raise minus union dues and "fees" amounted to a net loss for all of us., Not a huge loss, 4 to 5 dollars a month, but a loss all the same. Their explanation. We hadn't earned a better agreement yet, and would need to stick with them for a few years before they would get us something better. We all voted no. Being the highest ranking employee who is not management, it was my distinct pleasure to inform these 2 that should I see them again, or anyone representing the union, I would bodily throw them from the building.
photo
Machine Head
I`d rather have a full bottle in front of me......
08:48 AM on 09/03/2012
So you are the "highest ranking" employee; there's an interesting concept. Does that entitle you to seniority rights? I suspect not. Does it entitle you to have any real say in management decisions? No again. The dues structure that the USW has negotiated with its members amounts to approximately 2 hrs. in wages per month, more if you work overtime. What that gives you is access to a grievnce procedure and representation. It gives you seniority rights that really don't exist in a non-union workplace. It gives you a collective agreement that addresses issues such as vacation time and scheduling (got that now? I thought not). It gives you a legal contract that governs how your employer must deal with ALL of his employees that are paying dues (not just the blue-eyed boy "senior employee"). It gives you bargaining power. Union representation has done more for the Canadian worker than most can ever conceive of : Improvements to health & safety legislation and equality pay were driven by unions and their members . These things would all either disappear or be watered down drastically if not for the continual pressure brought to bear by unions and their members. Don't want to be unionized? That's your choice, but I have always said that I'd rather have the security of knowing that someone will fight for my rights when my employer decides to arbitrarily make a decision that affects me.
photo
Gnomish
ego doctus ignarus
03:35 PM on 09/03/2012
I don't believe a word of this beyond the treat of violence.
Sorry this is talking point material.
04:35 PM on 09/03/2012
Like unions have never used violence to get what they want... I'll treat you the same way you'll treat me when i cross your picket line