In February, the Ontario government began labour talks with our partners in education. Our goal throughout these discussions has always been to make decisions that protect the classroom experience for our students.
Like it did many jurisdictions around the world, the global recession left Ontario with a stubborn deficit. We have one of the best school systems in the world -- recognized as such by the OECD and studied around the world -- and, as a government, we were determined to preserve the gains we've made since coming to office in 2003.
We asked teachers -- who have benefited from on average of 24% pay increases over the past nine years, improvements in working conditions and support for more professional development -- to take a pay freeze and to trim outdated benefits like the banking of unused sick days to be paid out at retirement. Instead of pay increases for teachers, we chose to continue to roll out full-day kindergarten and maintain smaller class sizes. The choices we made have also allowed us to preserve 20,000 teaching and support staff jobs.
Our decision to concentrate funding on students and the classroom experience was easy. Unlike many other jurisdictions, we were able to address fiscal realities without firing teachers.
After 10 months of negotiations, multiple provincial memorandums of understanding, and hundreds of hours, we have seen agreements negotiated representing 55,000 teachers and over 4,000 support staff in the province. Over the holidays, we also reached a template agreement with CUPE -- which represents an additional 55,000 support staff. That's 140,000 education workers who successfully bargained agreements with the government.
These deals -- and others reached with doctors and public sector managers -- show that it's absolutely possible to reach agreements with public sector works that balance their interests with the government priority of protecting important public services.
Unfortunately, after nearly a year of talks, other parties remained far apart, some deliberately so.
Some unions have engaged in strike action that has closed schools, restricted learning for students and created an unstable learning environment. It has been stressful and chaotic for many students and parents.
Then those same union leaders asked the government not to move ahead with collective agreements, yet they had no other solutions to offer -- except more disruption.
That's why, on my advice, through an Order In Council, the Lieutenant Governor in Council has put in place collective agreements for all school boards and unions that were unable to deliver ratified and approved collective agreements by the deadline.
This means that, as a result of the agreements put in place and the good work of those who negotiated local collective agreements independently, collective agreements are now in place for 2012-14 for all bargaining units covered by the Putting Students First Act. Any strike actions while a collective agreement is in place are illegal.
This was not our first option. Negotiation was always our preferred approach. But given the reluctance of some to come to the table and negotiate, putting in place agreements was necessary given our shared fiscal challenges, the steep hill we have to climb to position our province for stability and prosperity, and to meet our goal of protecting the gains we have made in education.
The Putting Students First Act had a specific goal: to protect the gains we've made in education during these challenging fiscal circumstances, and to minimize any labour disruption during negotiations. The Act has now accomplished this goal, and so the government will move to repeal Bill 115 by the end of January.
We heard from teachers that The Putting Students First Act was the only thing standing between students and their extracurricular activities. It is our hope that with contracts in place and Bill 115 ready to be repealed, teachers will do what is best for students and put Ontario students first.
Follow Laurel Broten on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@LaurelBroten
Misha Abarbanel: Ontario Is Cheating Our Children
Malkin Dare: Buying Off Teachers' Unions Works... But Not Forever
OSSTF Teacher
DDSB Local 13
So why is that do you think? And you are okay with it? Labour is getting screwed... so you think everyone should suffer? Instead of trying to build everyone up we should knock everyone back?
Getting rid of Dalton and the other free spending MPPs might be a first step.
Answer, I'm in IT, I have a Bachelors in math (Waterloo, major computer science, co-op, Hons) and a Masters in Engineering (Ryerson, Comp. Eng). I have more than ten years of industry experience, I earn about as much as a public school teacher with a B. A. and six years experience. I work 40, paid, hours a week (and at most of my jobs an additional 20 to 30 hours on evenings and weekends). Currently I am a contractor, working for a national company, so there is an expectation that I be available between 7am and 8pm eastern time. Except that unless there is actual work to do, I don't get paid. Oh and I don't get paid for any vacation time and have to pay my own benefits. (Did I mention the part where I get paid about as much as a teacher?)
Suck it up buttercup!
Oh, wait...
It's about time .!!
The sick days were out of touch with reality & the ability to bank them was completely asinine.
Bill 115 is perfectly legal, it can easily be argued that it follows Section 1 of the Charter of Rights.
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.
Based on the Charter the Liberals have a pretty strong case Bill 115, I seriously doubt a judge would disagree with Bill 115 given the circumstances of today & the temporary nature of Bill 115.
So tell me how Bill 115 is perfectly legal again?
Unionization & it's bargaining process are Rights protected by the Charter (see section 26 of the Charter).
The Charter also clearly spells out that Rights can have limits placed upon them (see section 1 & section 15.(2) of the Charter).
So by showing up to work you accept; not showing up to would be rejecting it... find a new job.
It's a dirty game, but legal, right? And I think the point is this dirty game needed (in her opinion) to be played in order to end any disruption in education. Going back to her priority.
So where is the problem, then? The deal isn't perfect? That's not a contractual requirement. The deal is forced? Not really, the terms are non-negotiable but you still have the right to chose to reject the contract (quit your job). The deal isn't fair? That's purely a subjective point and would obviously differ from person to person depending, especially, on which side of the fence you sit.
All in all, teachers are paid well for their work and their perks and benefits are above standard (which is why that job market is oversaturated and many teachers have a difficult time finding full employment...). But on that same note, of course I'd be displeased if government came into my profession and cut the perks that I get. I'd probably chose to accept the terms of use, though.
I'm not saying I agree with the decision making, but I am saying I think it's legal.
What a crock. You did not negotiate w doctors or teachers. After your administration laundered BILLIONS of dollars through eHealth, Ornge and many other scandals, you have created a deficit that you will force physicians and teachers pay for. You created new taxes (e.g."health tax" that went into general revenues) after promising no tax increases.
This government has set new lows for lying and robbing the taxpayers.
"Figures don't lie, but liars figure." - Mark Twain
It's entirely proper for governments facing huge deficits and enormous debts to curb the pay levels of it's employees. That's what's currently happening and not before time , either.
What sense of financial responsibility do you subscribe to? This isn't about money, it's about the Liberals trying to break or crack the teachers union, something they've tried to chip away at for years. Yes, piss off the union that provides education and support for your kids and the next generation of leaders, that sounds reasonable. What do the Liberals care anyway, by the time these kids try to get out into the working world, they will have already been retired or collecting a very fat MPP pension, which I'm sure does not have any drain whatsoever on the Ontario taxpayers at all.
Purely Draconian that will simply cost you and your cohorts in the next election...
Sad to say, I was once a Liberal supporter at the Federal & Provincial levels but not anymore. Paul Martin soured me on them, Michael Ignatieff ruined them for me and Dalton McGuinty just reaffirmed why I'll never vote for them again.