Canada has one of the strongest tech markets right now; with hundreds of new software and startup companies all looking for strong market capitalization and rapid growth. While the dream for many startup founders is to reach that point of rapid trajectory, the irony is sometimes that growth comes as a double-edged sword.
Founder CEOs are the rock stars of the tech world, but ironically when these rock star founder CEOs do really well, that also increases the chances that they're going to be replaced. Transitions between founder CEOs and non-founder CEOs are one of the least talked about aspects of a maturing software industry, but also one of the most important.
Typically, early in the life of a company the founder is the best person to be leading the company with their vision in mind. However, when that initial milestone is reached, when the founder CEO has successfully led the company in its most important task, the challenges within the company change so dramatically that the person who was best suited to lead the early stage of company development may no longer the best person to continue leading the company.
In 2011, I was asked to join ACL, a software company with big potential and a strong legacy. Like many other incoming CEOs, I would be tasked with leading an amazing group of talented people to a vision of wider scale growth and markets. The only catch was that I'd be taking the reigns from the company's founder, the person who had spent years of sleepless nights, hard-fought wins and personal toil to build his company from the ground up. Scary proposition for both parties, but one that sometimes is an absolute necessity for a tech business to thrive.
When the time comes to bring in new leadership, that transition can be fraught with tension, frustration and power struggles that come with "breaking up the band." But it doesn't have to be that way. With humility, smarts, and understanding, non-founder CEOs can create massive success through collaboration with their founders. Focusing on a few key pain points will help alleviate the nature growing pains associated with this change:
We discovered quite early on that we had to be aligned with values and vision. Not only the outgoing founder and myself, but also our board and organization as a whole. If we couldn't get along as people, we weren't going to get along as business associates.
By overtly mapping our respective "day jobs," boundaries were clearly set at the beginning. These are constantly revisited and evolve year after year as the company progresses. Our founder plays an immensely strategic role as executive chair of the board, yet is definitively out of the day-to-day operations allowing those responsibilities to fall on trusted team members such as myself.
A transformation of this nature is going to affect more than just the incoming and outgoing CEOs. The entire company has to adjust, which requires the incoming CEO to build strong relationships with employees new and old. Part of building these relationships comes with developing an understanding of what's been working from a culture perspective, and not being afraid to introduce fresh ideas. We recently moved into a new office space that has given the entire staff a new energy, while keeping hold of our previous value system.
Objectively, a founder CEO may agree that bringing in a new CEO adds new skill sets and clarity that they may not possess, but emotionally they are still very attached to the company they founded. Honest dialogue helps set the appropriate boundaries and fosters an environment of trust.
Picking your Battles
As a new CEO taking the reins, there will likely be a number of changes you'll be looking to sink your teeth into. However, not every battle is a winning one, and knowing which ones to see through and which ones to let slide will be key in navigating this new landscape. Pick two or three areas that truly matter, and fight for those.
Building a company is a deeply personal endeavor, especially for founder CEOs. Their company is like a child, having spent thousands of hours nurturing and helping it grow. The trick is knowing when to let go, and give that child an opportunity to grow independently and learn from other mentors and role models. If the founder CEO is willing, and the incoming CEO is able, then the transition can be a huge milestone for the company's growth.
Follow HuffPost Canada Blogs on Facebook
MORE ON HUFFPOST:
> Founder: Richard Schulze > Percent voting share: 20.24% > Date founded: 1966 Best Buy founder Richard Schulze has presided over a company that has struggled to stay relevant in a sector that is increasingly moving online. Best Buy’s business has taken a sizable hit from online retailers such as Amazon.com. Some industry experts and analysts point out that Best Buy is increasingly becoming a showroom for electronics consumers — meaning that people go to the store to check out the product only to buy it online at a lower price. In the most recent quarter, Best Buy lost $10 million as revenue fell 4% compared to the previous year. The company’s share price is approximately one-third of what it was five years ago. Schulze has also found himself embroiled in a company sex scandal. A Schulze lieutenant, former CEO Brian Dunn, was forced to resign from the company after it was discovered that he had an affair with another staffer. The founder received criticism after an internal investigation found that he did not report that information to the board despite knowing about Dunn’s affair. Schulze announced his retirement from the board shortly after that investigation. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
> Founder: Dov Charney > Percent voting share: 43.3% > Date founded: 1989 Dov Charney started and ran American Apparel from his dorm room at Tufts University in the late 1980s. Twenty years later, in 2008, the apparel company had more than 6,700 employees and 197 stores worldwide. But provocative ads and rapid expansion did little to address the problems plaguing the company. In 2009, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency said that a quarter of workers at the company’s downtown Los Angeles manufacturing facility were illegal immigrants. In 2011, two sexual harassment lawsuits were filed against Charney. In December, a former store manager accused Charney of choking him and rubbing dirt in his face. Charney has denied all allegations of misconduct. The company has also struggled to stay afloat financially, running an operating loss in the last 12 months for which financial statements have been released. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
> Founder: Andrew Mason > Percent voting share: 19.5% > Date founded: 2008 Andrew Mason, Groupon’s quirky founder and CEO, has stumbled repeatedly in his role during the past couple of years. His company, which provides discounts and daily deals online, had to revise its financial reports in August 2011 after regulators and analysts took issue with its accounting methods. Groupon issued another revision to its financials in early 2012 as the company overstated its 2011 profit by more than $20 million. Because of these problems, along with general concern that the daily deal fad — the company’s core business — may be slowing, the stock price has been declining. It is now roughly a quarter of its initial public offering price of $20 a share, with the company’s market capitalization at $3.3 billion. It didn’t have to be this way. In 2010, Groupon rebuffed Google’s offer to buy the company for up to $6 billion. There has been talk that Mason isn’t mature enough to run a company of this size. For instance, he was criticized for drinking beer at a company meeting and for his public gaffes commenting on why it turned down buyouts. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
> Founder: Angelo Mozilo > Percent voting share: 1.5% > Date founded: 1968 Former Countrywide CEO Angelo Mozilo became the face of the subprime mortgage mess once that market collapsed. Under his watch, his company began financing mortgages to high-risk borrowers, which during the housing boom drove the company’s large growth. In 2006, Countrywide financed about 20% of all mortgages in the U.S., more than any other mortgage lender in the country. But the company fell apart when the housing market tanked and borrowers defaulted on their high-interest loans. Countrywide was eventually sold to Bank of America in 2008 for $4 billion, with Mozilo forced out a few months later. The company then faced a barrage of lawsuits arguing that the company used deceptive practices to get people to apply for mortgages they could not afford. Mozilo’s integrity was also called into question when it was reported that several government officials and politicians, such as then-U.S. Sen. Chris Dodd, received favorable mortgage deals simply by being “Friends of Angelo.” In 2010, Mozilo settled an insider trading charge with the SEC for about $67 million. He is also permanently banned from serving as an officer and director of a public company. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
> Founder: Mike Lazaridis > Percent voting share: 5.7% (of outstanding shares) > Year founded: 1984 Mike Lazaridis co-founded BlackBerry, formerly known as Research In Motion, in 1984 and served as co-CEO of the company, alongside Jim Balsillie, through January 2012. The two pioneered the smartphone revolution. Lazaridis, however, failed to prepare BlackBerry for the upcoming competition from consumer-facing rivals Apple and Samsung. Among the largest mistakes that marked the end of Lazaridis’ tenure were the BlackBerry PlayBook tablet, a four day global service outage — which left phones unable to browse the Internet or access emails or instant messages — and a focus on business professionals even as consumer-centric products such as the iPhone absorbed market share. In the third quarter of 2012, BlackBerry’s worldwide market share of mobile device sales, by operating system, was just 5.3%, down from 11% in the third quarter of 2011 according to Gartner. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
> Founder: Martha Stewart > Percent voting share: 86.7% > Year founded: 1997 Martha Stewart remains chairman of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia even as the company continues to struggle. Stewart’s audience is aging and the company relies too much on the its print magazines. Martha Stewart’s image took a serious hit in 2004 when she was found guilty of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and making false statements to a federal investigator after she was indicted for insider trading. Although Martha Stewart launched a high-profile “comeback” campaign after her release, her efforts have not paid off for the company, which has not turned a profit in any year since 2007. The company’s stock price is down more than 58% in the last five years. Part of the problem is executive turnover. There have been at least five CEOs and five CFOs since the company’s inception. Many executives argue that Stewart’s excessive involvement has hampered their ability to make change. The sixth CEO, Lisa Gersh, announced in December that she was leaving the company after serving in the position for just five months. Despite the company’s struggles, Martha Stewart was paid more than $21 million between 2009 and 2011. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
> Founder: Aubrey McClendon > Percent voting share: Less than 1% > Year founded: 1989 Aubrey McClendon, CEO of Chesapeake Energy since he helped co-found it in 1989 has become known for his lavish compensation packages and extreme bets on his company’s performance. In 2008, McClendon had lost much of his personal fortune after borrowing money to buy massive stakes in his own company. That same year, Chesapeake paid McClendon $100 million. Between 2009 and 2011, Chesapeake paid McClendon more than $57 million in total compensation. In April 2012, Reuters reported that McClendon had again borrowed a large amount of money, in this case $1.1 billion, using his stake in the company’s natural gas and oil wells as collateral. Reuters also uncovered that McClendon was running a $200 million hedge fund that speculatively traded in “the same commodities Chesapeake produces” from within company headquarters. That same month, McClendon gave up his position as chairman due to concerns over potential conflicts of interest with shareholders. He is scheduled to resign as CEO on April 1, 2013. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
> Founder: Michael Dell > Percent voting share: 13.97% > Year founded: 1984 Michael Dell started his company in 1984, when he was just 19 years old. By 2001, the company he founded as a college student was the largest computer systems provider in the world. In 2004, Dell resigned as CEO but returned to the position in February 2007. By then, the company had already begun to lose its appeal with consumers in the competitive PC business. Despite Dell’s return, the company continued to struggle in its core business. Dell’s worldwide PC market share fell from 15.9% in 2006 to just 10.7% in 2012. Consumers’ growing preferences for tablets and smartphones over PCs have also hurt the company. In addition to losing ground to competitors, the company also caught the attention of regulators. In 2010, the SEC fined Dell $100 million, and Michael Dell $4 million, alleging the company engaged in accounting fraud intended to mislead investors about its performance. On February 5, 2013 Dell reached a deal with a group of investors that included Michael Dell to go private for $24.4 billion, the largest leveraged buyout since the financial crisis, according to The New York Times. Read more at 24/7 Wall St.
Follow Laurie Schultz on Twitter: www.twitter.com/SchultzLaurie