On August 13, 1941, Canada's chief press censor sat down at his desk and typed a memo to the head of military intelligence.
The two men had just come from a rancorous meeting. The military wanted a tougher censorship system. The censors, backed by the federal government of William Lyon Mackenzie King, were opposed.
This was a time of total war.
France had fallen. The Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Czechoslovakia, Austria, Yugoslavia, Albania and Greece were under the Nazi jackboot. Most of the rest of mainland Europe was in the hands of Nazi puppet rulers. The Panzers were fighting on the plains of the Ukraine, encircling entire Soviet armies.
The United States was still sitting out the war, smug in its isolation.
Any betting person would have put their money on the Nazis.
So it was important to make sure the media in this country wasn't a useful source of information for the Nazis about troop movements and convoy sailings. And there was a dire need to maintain morale in this country in the face of more than a year of defeat laid upon defeat.
But Wilfrid Eggleston, the head of English censorship, dug in his heals. The people needed to know what was happening in the country. Giving them pap, happy talk and lies could make life easier for the government and the military, until the day came that Canada was under attack. It would not help Canada win the war.
Eggleston wrote in his memo that the press plays a vital role in any democracy, including Canada. It provided truthful feedback to governments, the kind of information that bureaucracies are loathe to tell their masters.
Eggleston pulled out some paragraphs from the latest issue of Fortune magazine:
"The press in a democracy is still the fourth estate; it is almost a fourth branch of government. It is not, as in Germany or the U.S.S.R., a branch of the government, but a part of our constitutional system.
"There is the legislative, the executive, and the judicial branch -- and there is the press. It is impossible to imagine governmental processes in the U.S. without a press. Its first function is to inform, its second to criticize. Censorship is a direct threat to both functions and hence a direct threat to effective democracy. Without information there is no basis for criticism and without criticism there is, as the saying goes, tyranny."
The struggle between Eggleston and the spies is being played out today.
Last week, the Tories sent out a fundraising letter saying the party needs cash to fight its real opposition, the Parliamentary Press Gallery.
At last weekend's Conservative convention, former Canadian Alliance leader Stockwell Day went after the national press corps.
Day said the media engages in too many personal attacks.
"Oh, listen, we made mistakes absolutely we should be and should have been taken to task for, but for some of these personal things, for which the attacks were so incredible, I hope that just as there is a maturing in the process in the House of Commons, I say at some risk, to my dear friends in the media, that there could possibly be a maturing of that process also," Day told the Tory faithful.
Day did get a rough ride from the media. His arrival on a jet ski at a Lake Okanagan press conference was truly mock-worthy. A Liberal operative's use of a Barney doll to mock Day's religious faith was a sleazy low blow, one that was broadcast on national TV.
But attacking the media is as ill-advised now as it was in the worst days of the Second World War. The media, despite its faults -- and people make entire academic and legal careers pointing those out -- is as much part of our system of democracy as it was 60 years ago.
Stephen Harper has worked hard in the past eight years to de-legitimize the role of the media in the political system. He deliberately worked to create bad feeling with the Parliamentary Press Gallery, then hammed up the role of victim when the press fought back.
And the press didn't fight hard. Very quickly, they rolled over and allowed Harper's flacks to decide who asks questions. They didn't complain much when the cabinet began meeting at secret times and in hidden places so the press would not buttonhole ministers. Very few complained when the bureaucracy was gagged.
And every major newspaper in Canada except for the Toronto Star endorsed Harper in the election campaign.
Some victims.
But the press makes a good whipping boy. Public support and understanding of the media has shriveled as neo-cons continue to smear the media as elitists, a charge that rings true as some major media, like the CBC and the Globe and Mail, become ever-more unbearably smug.
The U.S. press gets more access to the president of the United States than the Parliamentary Press Gallery gets from Harper. Being premier of Canada is a nice job, but, really, the entire country has about the same population and GDP as California. Time to deflate a few egos around here.
But that won't happen. The Tories have made their plan quite clear. Parliament is no longer important, now that Harper has his majority. The public service is gagged. The courts are being filled with Tory appointees, as are any boards and commissions that might have tried to act off-script.
The press still has the potential to be a loose cannon. It looks like we're going to get the full blast of the smear machine, once the Tories are finished passing the hat.
Keith Beardsley: Stephen Harper Arrogant? Not Yet
National Post editorial board: Canada's universities, bastions of ...
Guelph-based software censors the Internet in the Middle East ...
Censorship Gone Too Far? Canadian Catholic School Bans Rainbows ...
Canada's Censor Board Forces Word TV is taken Off Air “Permanently”
Guelph-based software censors the Internet in the Middle East
United Nations warns of mounting Syria casualty rate
As Facebook's Empire Expands, US & Canada Interest Declines [Report]
Chinese Users Flocking to This Social Network
Censors must not arbitrarily black out public documents, panel rules
It seems to me that this supposed war between the Parliamentary Press Gallery and the PMO and his cadre is just a red herring, as much a farce as the ongoing conservative nostrum that the papers and media are left-wing and a charade meant to act that out. All but one of the papers that are represented in the PPG endorsed Harper in this election, and all of them have tugged the forelock, not only putting up with the restrictive nature of interviews and questions and the lack of the old scrums but also with avoiding topics of importance or pandering to the PMO's language and agenda. They're part of the sell-job, painted up to look like critics but not really doing that at all....
Secret cabinet meetings? Yeah, knew that, but step back from that . Is this a democracy? No. Secret meetings by ministers are not part of the constitutional history of this country; and as Poles said during the Solidarity Year, any government that locks itself away from its people should stay locked up.
Are so many Canadians unable to see the painfully obvious parallels between our own experience with under a Neo Con movement (which represents the final phase of corporate America's takeover of government) and what is happening in Canada ?
Muzzling of the press is one of the first clues, done under the guise of "security" and the ever present fear of something not very tangible (e.g.: liberalism or a minority government...). Next will be giving corporations the right to vote or otherwise control the electoral process (e.g.: we had Citizens vs. United and you'll be getting an end to party subsidies using public funds). Increases in the state security apparatus will follow, along with the dismantling of any medicare system in favor of private insurance and clinics...
Canada should be very very worried !
http://thinkingaboot.blogspot.com/2011/06/tax-lemmings-lemmings-are-native-to.html
How dare someone smear the press! Everyone knows it's supposed to be the other way around.
The proposition that decreasing respect for the media is due to the Harper government is absurd. If respect is indeed decreasing, the media managed it all by themselves through their laziness and partisanship.
In case you are wondering, you just signalled your unease with the most basic principles of freedom and democracy.
You're really selective in how you apply your "basic principles of freedom" aren't you?
Free human beings get to speak their truth at any time, anywhere, to anyone on any subject.
This is a struggle of Titans.
It is our independent presses that need public support to counter attacks on our freedoms.
major media is very controllable-- via ad revenue, or outright ownership by corporations and/or by tax breaks. (for blatant agenda, see Sun Media. or try listening to talk radio like 640... it's the same talking points over and over: unions are bad, fear muslims/terrorists/everything, etc. ) it's no surprise that Harper wants to defund the CBC. watch also-- there will be some sort of internet-related control laws coming... like traffic-shaping, or something, to control the 'net more.
readership is falling for newspapers as a result of people feeling they aren't getting the real story, and the media hasn't grasped this. people are turning to the internet not just because it's faster, but because often they feel they are getting more real information. whistleblowers are go to the web, because they know they won't face the roadblocks of a few media corporations.
http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2011/04/what-stephen-harper-said.html
We get what we deserve.