The 2011 federal election was historic in many ways and most of us are still trying to process the outcome. It is crucial that we pause to reflect on its meaning and think carefully about the next steps we must take.
While it is true that the remarkable surge in support for the NDP means a more dependable progressive voice in the House of Commons than we have had for years, it is equally true that the most socially and economically right-wing government perhaps in Canadian history has just won a substantial majority in the House and -- along with their control of the Senate -- is now free to implement its agenda even if every member of every other party votes against it.
The Harper Conservatives are now free to:
This means we at the Council of Canadians and civil society in general have our work cut out for us as never before.
However, there are important signs of hope. The Harper Conservatives do not have the support of the majority of Canadians. Almost 40 per cent of eligible Canadian voters did not cast a ballot in the election and of those who did, fully 60 per cent voted for parties other than the Conservatives. This means that over two-thirds of Canadians who were eligible to vote did not cast a vote for the Harper agenda.
As well, the presence of an opposition with a clear progressive agenda on trade, social and environmental justice and public services will create the opportunity for unparalleled (until now) collaboration between Members of Parliament and progressive civil society.
While we have had good working relationships with some Liberal MPs on some issues, how frustrating it was to see the Liberals side with the Conservatives on signing trade deals with corrupt and criminal regimes in Peru and Colombia. Further, the election of the first Green Party member, Elizabeth May, will open the door for an environmental debate and dialogue too long missing from the House of Commons.
And, as Council of Canadians trade campaigner Stuart Trew reminds us, we have fought battles against both majority and minority governments before and won. Unfair deals such as the Multilateral Agreement on Investment and the Security and Prosperity Partnership were defeated by popular protest.
Unfair trade deals are fought and won outside Parliament, in the court of public opinion, he points out. It was also public pressure that stopped Canadian troops from being sent to Iraq. Similarly, no matter how much Stephen Harper dislikes public health care (and is on record in his preference for private health services), he can go only so far in his dismantling of Medicare, so deeply loved and fiercely protected is this most important of Canadian social programs. And let Harper try to open the doors for commercial export of our water and see how far he gets!
In other words, this country and its values still belongs to the people. As our director of development, Jamian Logue, says, "Neither our democratic responsibilities nor our democratic opportunities ended on May 2. Democracy is a 24/7 pursuit. We have the right and responsibility to act beyond the ballot box."
What is needed now is a coming together of progressive forces in civil society and the labour movement as never before in our country's history. Social and trade justice groups, First Nations people, labour unions, women, environmentalists, faith-based organizations, the cultural community, farmers, public health care coalitions, front line public sector workers, and many others must come together to protect and promote the values that the majority of Canadians hold dear.
And we must work with, and demand the active representation of, the opposition forces in the House of Commons. In particular, the NDP must oppose the Harper agenda with the full weight of its new power and the Liberals must redeem themselves by working alongside the NDP in defending the interests of the people of Canada.
As the old union saying goes, "Don't mourn -- organize!". The Harper majority is unfortunately really due to our "first past the post" system. (An American friend writes that he and his colleagues are having trouble understanding how Stephen Harper is Prime Minister with way less than half the votes in Canada. This reminds us of the urgency to promote proportional representation.)
But support for the Harper agenda is paper-thin, as most Canadians do not share the values of this agenda. This then is our task: to work hard over the next four years to protect the laws, rights and services that generations of Canadians have fought for from being dismantled; fight the corporate-friendly, anti-environmental, security obsessed agenda that will come at us; and prepare the way for the kind of government in four years that does in fact, express the will of the people -- one with an agenda of justice and respect, of care for the earth, of the more equitable sharing of our incredible bounty.
This will be hard work and will take a great deal of courage and commitment. But really, what more important thing do we have to do?
I found myself very upset, even angry, on the night of May 2nd, when another majority government was formed with minority support. It wasn't just that the conservatives won its "majority" with less than 40% of the vote (39.6% to be precise) but that hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of Canadians were attempting to vote strategically to avoid just this outcome. In other words, a significant portion of the 60.4% who didn't vote for the Conservatives were specifically voting against them rather than for either the Liberals or NDP.
There have been two attempts in the last few years, one in BC and then Ontario, to go to a proportional representation voting system, and both attempts have failed because they were too complex.
I think we need a simple solution, such as a run-off election by the first and second place candidates in any riding where no candidate wins an outright majority of the votes.
That way, we could vote for the candidate we most support with out worrying that we will end up electing the candidate we least want.
New this election: a much larger proportion - by voting NDP - added an exclamation point.
English Canada, in their infinite wisdom just gave you a free hand to do it.
The author says this new government is free to: "•go after public services, public sector workers and public pensions;" In this statement she evidently presupposes that the government will unfairly disadvantage public sector workers. If a fair minded assessment of the current treatment of public sector workers was found to to be overly generous in some way and was therefore unfair to non-public sector workers and tax payers....would she be honest enough to recognize an adjustment that addressed that unfairness as being appropriate? Or does she only root for the home team and glory in running up the score, even at someone else's unfair disadvantage?
The 60% voter turnout is typical of modern elections both in Canada and elsewhere, so has no meaning in the context she has put it. (ref. http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=res
It was over three-quarters:
40% did not vote (typical? yes; irrelevant? no.)
37% voted against
23% voted for
Harper has a less of a mandate to govern than the PQ had to separate in 1995.
Soon some Canadians will refer to themselves as "true" Canadians. And others as educated elites.
They're not even changing the plays. And it's working just as well.
Good luck. You will need it. You're falling for the same ridiculous, but highly effective, tricks used here in the US.
And of course you forget privately-funded elections. As soon as bribery is made legal in Canada, it's over.
Lowering of the corporate tax rates is another ploy they used here in the US. All that money will then be used for lobbying, ie. legalized bribery.
It's over. Sadly you folks don't even realize it. Even the knowledgeable among you hold out hope. And the vast majority are ignorant as ever. Sound like the US??? You folks ain't seen anything yet.
Brush up on your recent US history. This is all just a replay of what happened in the US. Good luck. You will need it.
Harper is a shameful and embarrassing stain on our country. A vote for Harper was either made in ignorance, apathy or betrayal of Canada's ideals.
The naive notion that these charlatans will govern from the "centre-right" is laughable. Just like GW Bush did for the USA? Harper is no better and in some ways worse. At least Bush was servile to his own country and the interests it holds. Harper is beholden to those same powers and would sell this country out in a heartbeat. He and the rest of his reformer cabal should be run out of Canada at gunpoint and sent off to Afghanistan where they can explain their actions and live with them. His betrayals of Canada place him at the lowest levels of political filth.
He is unworthy of even holding Canadian citizenship.
The FACT that he and his are guilty of "Contempt of Parliament" which necessitated the election speak volumes about his disloyalty and untrustworthiness.
We need to remove him and his by whatever means available and once we do there need to be laws passed that will protect our country from any like him who would ever come again.
Canada has no need for corporatist fascist filth like Harper and the shame he represents for all Canadians with a conscience.