Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Maude Barlow

GET UPDATES FROM Maude Barlow
 

Reflecting on the Federal Election Results

Posted: 05/28/2011 10:00 am

The 2011 federal election was historic in many ways and most of us are still trying to process the outcome. It is crucial that we pause to reflect on its meaning and think carefully about the next steps we must take.

While it is true that the remarkable surge in support for the NDP means a more dependable progressive voice in the House of Commons than we have had for years, it is equally true that the most socially and economically right-wing government perhaps in Canadian history has just won a substantial majority in the House and -- along with their control of the Senate -- is now free to implement its agenda even if every member of every other party votes against it.

The Harper Conservatives are now free to:

  • cut corporate taxes and transfer payments;

  • go after public services, public sector workers and public pensions;

  • allow the growth of private health services to undermine Medicare in the lead-up to the expiry of the Canada Health Accord in 2014;

  • vigorously promote more unregulated free trade agreements like the Canada-European Union CETA, that will drastically curtail the democratic rights of local governments to promote local economic development, local resource sovereignty, or local food production;

  • kill the Canadian Wheat Board;

  • fast track the security perimeter deal with the United States that will violate the civil liberties of Canadians and give away crucial pieces of our sovereignty;

  • kill the long-gun registry;

  • continue to decimate environmental regulations, under fund source water protection, promote dirty energy projects such as the tar sands, gas fracking and Arctic oil and gas drilling, while ignoring the rights of nature;

  • and spend our money on military equipment and prisons we don't need and don't want.

This means we at the Council of Canadians and civil society in general have our work cut out for us as never before.

However, there are important signs of hope. The Harper Conservatives do not have the support of the majority of Canadians. Almost 40 per cent of eligible Canadian voters did not cast a ballot in the election and of those who did, fully 60 per cent voted for parties other than the Conservatives. This means that over two-thirds of Canadians who were eligible to vote did not cast a vote for the Harper agenda.

As well, the presence of an opposition with a clear progressive agenda on trade, social and environmental justice and public services will create the opportunity for unparalleled (until now) collaboration between Members of Parliament and progressive civil society.

While we have had good working relationships with some Liberal MPs on some issues, how frustrating it was to see the Liberals side with the Conservatives on signing trade deals with corrupt and criminal regimes in Peru and Colombia. Further, the election of the first Green Party member, Elizabeth May, will open the door for an environmental debate and dialogue too long missing from the House of Commons.

And, as Council of Canadians trade campaigner Stuart Trew reminds us, we have fought battles against both majority and minority governments before and won. Unfair deals such as the Multilateral Agreement on Investment and the Security and Prosperity Partnership were defeated by popular protest.

Unfair trade deals are fought and won outside Parliament, in the court of public opinion, he points out. It was also public pressure that stopped Canadian troops from being sent to Iraq. Similarly, no matter how much Stephen Harper dislikes public health care (and is on record in his preference for private health services), he can go only so far in his dismantling of Medicare, so deeply loved and fiercely protected is this most important of Canadian social programs. And let Harper try to open the doors for commercial export of our water and see how far he gets!

In other words, this country and its values still belongs to the people. As our director of development, Jamian Logue, says, "Neither our democratic responsibilities nor our democratic opportunities ended on May 2. Democracy is a 24/7 pursuit. We have the right and responsibility to act beyond the ballot box."

What is needed now is a coming together of progressive forces in civil society and the labour movement as never before in our country's history. Social and trade justice groups, First Nations people, labour unions, women, environmentalists, faith-based organizations, the cultural community, farmers, public health care coalitions, front line public sector workers, and many others must come together to protect and promote the values that the majority of Canadians hold dear.

And we must work with, and demand the active representation of, the opposition forces in the House of Commons. In particular, the NDP must oppose the Harper agenda with the full weight of its new power and the Liberals must redeem themselves by working alongside the NDP in defending the interests of the people of Canada.

As the old union saying goes, "Don't mourn -- organize!". The Harper majority is unfortunately really due to our "first past the post" system. (An American friend writes that he and his colleagues are having trouble understanding how Stephen Harper is Prime Minister with way less than half the votes in Canada. This reminds us of the urgency to promote proportional representation.)

But support for the Harper agenda is paper-thin, as most Canadians do not share the values of this agenda. This then is our task: to work hard over the next four years to protect the laws, rights and services that generations of Canadians have fought for from being dismantled; fight the corporate-friendly, anti-environmental, security obsessed agenda that will come at us; and prepare the way for the kind of government in four years that does in fact, express the will of the people -- one with an agenda of justice and respect, of care for the earth, of the more equitable sharing of our incredible bounty.

This will be hard work and will take a great deal of courage and commitment. But really, what more important thing do we have to do?

 
Around the Web:

BLOG by Stuart Trew

 
 
  • Comments
  • 100
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
08:56 AM on 05/31/2011
You forgot they are going to lock up people for gardening!
Jack Canuckski
Canadian Observer of the passing scene
10:19 PM on 05/30/2011
I am so glad to see Maude Barlow writing here. She has been speaking up on issues that really matter for Canadians for a very long time.

I found myself very upset, even angry, on the night of May 2nd, when another majority government was formed with minority support. It wasn't just that the conservatives won its "majority" with less than 40% of the vote (39.6% to be precise) but that hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of Canadians were attempting to vote strategically to avoid just this outcome. In other words, a significant portion of the 60.4% who didn't vote for the Conservatives were specifically voting against them rather than for either the Liberals or NDP.

There have been two attempts in the last few years, one in BC and then Ontario, to go to a proportional representation voting system, and both attempts have failed because they were too complex.

I think we need a simple solution, such as a run-off election by the first and second place candidates in any riding where no candidate wins an outright majority of the votes.

That way, we could vote for the candidate we most support with out worrying that we will end up electing the candidate we least want.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
waynerism
06:18 PM on 05/30/2011
I almost feel sorry for you and yours Maude ! .. then again who cares in that you are absolutley correct - there is nothing you and yours can do about anything now for years to come and this is as it should be. I know I really should make an effort to at least pretend to care and sound all sympathetic BUT frustrated harper haters have become tedious and sounding more and more frustrated daily - I think I will enjoy watching the yelling and rending of garments all to no avail though. Harper is clearly in the drivers seat with a clear majority in both Houses and is now firmly in charge of the agenda and there is nothing you and yours can do about it - thank god!
09:03 PM on 05/30/2011
Some people just can't help but root for the villain, I guess... It is fun I guess when the plutocratic class that you support rigs the game and crushes their enemies, but I don't revel in the destruction of the human race.
Linda from Deerfield
Paying attention
10:54 AM on 05/30/2011
Outsider here. I just want to know what became of the Canadian natural gas shortage. From my perspective, it just seemed to disappear without explanation, along with liberal government, like there was some kind of pact ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuyCybershy
06:26 PM on 05/30/2011
What natural gas? We don't have any natural gas. Don't pay attention to disinformation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NewAmericanCenturySucks
Clearcutting humans to prop up the petro$ is wrong
06:54 PM on 05/29/2011
Same as every election: a vast majority (61%) of Canadians rejected the far-right agenda.

New this election: a much larger proportion - by voting NDP - added an exclamation point.
05:08 PM on 05/29/2011
Hey Harper, you are now free to bring back the middle ages, or better said, the Dark Ages.
English Canada, in their infinite wisdom just gave you a free hand to do it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuyCybershy
07:24 PM on 05/29/2011
Quite perceptive indeed, that is exactly what we shall do. And you will get your best chance yet at sovereignty. You're welcome.
rogergoldkin
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance
03:21 PM on 05/29/2011
Kiddies, get ready for a reaming! The ultra right does not care for social democracy.
02:35 PM on 05/29/2011
The author says: "..remarkable surge in support for the NDP...". More people in fact did vote for the NDP. Almost all of that additional support came from the same group that gave Mulroney a landslide in Quebec in 1984 and took Quebec out of the national government for most of a generation by voting for the Bloc. For now the Quebec nationalists have swung to Mr. Layton because he talked up their cause and the always bellweather Quebec vote chose not tosupport a loser in the liberals this time around. That vote went for the liberals in many previous elections. Will the author speak of the "..remarkable loss of support for the NDP..." when they leave?
02:40 PM on 05/29/2011
The author says: "...the most socially and economically right-wing government perhaps in Canadian history ....". This is hyperbole designed to elicit fear based response in those who prefer a less conservative government and is not helpful to a discussion of policy. If she said: "A more conservative government has taken power." would it have the same effect? It's closer to the truth, but less emotionally inciting.... so perhaps doesn't suit her purposes.

The author says this new government is free to: "•go after public services, public sector workers and public pensions;" In this statement she evidently presupposes that the government will unfairly disadvantage public sector workers. If a fair minded assessment of the current treatment of public sector workers was found to to be overly generous in some way and was therefore unfair to non-public sector workers and tax payers....would she be honest enough to recognize an adjustment that addressed that unfairness as being appropriate? Or does she only root for the home team and glory in running up the score, even at someone else's unfair disadvantage?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuyCybershy
07:26 PM on 05/29/2011
Maude and her ilk will learn shortly that Alberta is the only "home team" that still counts.
09:06 PM on 05/30/2011
Workers in the Western world are pampered. They've been saying so for 30 years. They keep saying it. Take a little more from them, take a little more. After all, it's only most of the population! I don't understand people who seem to revel in the idea of a permanently lower standard of living for the majority unless of course you're an environmentalist who thinks this will save energy and resources.
02:42 PM on 05/29/2011
The author says: "The Harper Conservatives do not have the support of the majority of Canadians. Almost 40 per cent of eligible Canadian voters did not cast a ballot in the election and of those who did, fully 60 per cent voted for parties other than the Conservatives. This means that over two-thirds of Canadians who were eligible to vote did not cast a vote for the Harper agenda." This is wishful thinking.

The 60% voter turnout is typical of modern elections both in Canada and elsewhere, so has no meaning in the context she has put it. (ref. http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=res
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NewAmericanCenturySucks
Clearcutting humans to prop up the petro$ is wrong
07:03 PM on 05/29/2011
I agree the statement "over two-thirds of eligible voters did not for Harper" is misleading.

It was over three-quarters:

40% did not vote (typical? yes; irrelevant? no.)
37% voted against
23% voted for

Harper has a less of a mandate to govern than the PQ had to separate in 1995.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuyCybershy
07:29 PM on 05/29/2011
That 40% who did not vote are our secret weapon, and it is in their name we rule. Apathy and ignorance: Canad's tag team for victory!
01:40 PM on 05/29/2011
And a note all the readers of these comments - this divide and conquer strategy worked the exact same way in the US. And read the comments, it's working in Canada too.
Soon some Canadians will refer to themselves as "true" Canadians. And others as educated elites.
They're not even changing the plays. And it's working just as well.
Good luck. You will need it. You're falling for the same ridiculous, but highly effective, tricks used here in the US.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuyCybershy
07:34 PM on 05/29/2011
All societies function much the same way. Every group within society must have another group to look down on, and another group to look up to. We are a hierarchical species, it is hard wired into our very nature.
09:07 PM on 05/30/2011
It's better to hate the rich. Well, some people must compensate for the worship they're getting.
10:41 PM on 05/30/2011
hard wired in the primitive brain.
01:33 PM on 05/29/2011
I'm sorry but there is a twisted sense of irony here. It's Canada for G sakes. But no more. When Canada becomes like the US, you will see.
And of course you forget privately-funded elections. As soon as bribery is made legal in Canada, it's over.
Lowering of the corporate tax rates is another ploy they used here in the US. All that money will then be used for lobbying, ie. legalized bribery.
It's over. Sadly you folks don't even realize it. Even the knowledgeable among you hold out hope. And the vast majority are ignorant as ever. Sound like the US??? You folks ain't seen anything yet.
Brush up on your recent US history. This is all just a replay of what happened in the US. Good luck. You will need it.
10:41 AM on 05/29/2011
What a terrible piece, not worthy of the Council of Canadians. Too much fear mongering and totally biased. You'd think Canada is going to devolve into some sort of hyper-ferengi society run by soulless corporations. Mr. Harper, and the Conservative party are where they are because the opposition parties failed to convince Canadians that they could advance our society as well the conservative alternative. Mr. Harper will govern from centre-right, just as the liberals had governed from centre-left, and Canada will be a better place for it. It's not the end of the world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wirehedd
03:22 PM on 05/29/2011
The article is dead on.

Harper is a shameful and embarrassing stain on our country. A vote for Harper was either made in ignorance, apathy or betrayal of Canada's ideals.

The naive notion that these charlatans will govern from the "centre-right" is laughable. Just like GW Bush did for the USA? Harper is no better and in some ways worse. At least Bush was servile to his own country and the interests it holds. Harper is beholden to those same powers and would sell this country out in a heartbeat. He and the rest of his reformer cabal should be run out of Canada at gunpoint and sent off to Afghanistan where they can explain their actions and live with them. His betrayals of Canada place him at the lowest levels of political filth.

He is unworthy of even holding Canadian citizenship.

The FACT that he and his are guilty of "Contempt of Parliament" which necessitated the election speak volumes about his disloyalty and untrustworthiness.

We need to remove him and his by whatever means available and once we do there need to be laws passed that will protect our country from any like him who would ever come again.

Canada has no need for corporatist fascist filth like Harper and the shame he represents for all Canadians with a conscience.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuyCybershy
07:41 PM on 05/29/2011
It's spring time here in Calgary, we have waited a long time for this victory, perhaps the greatest electoral triumph in all history. The patience of the people of Alberta has been exemplary, and now we shall reap our just reward! WE shall rule Canada for as long as it exists, and beyond!
09:08 PM on 05/30/2011
No, Harper did not have full control and he has indicated that he wants more neoliberal structural reforms that are naturally "irreversible" to make for a more unequal and meaner society and one where the quality of life is lower for everyone.
07:16 AM on 05/29/2011
the canadian democracy ----when there are majorities---------is a series of rotating dictatorships
Bernique
Solar is clean, cheap and plentiful
07:39 PM on 05/28/2011
I wish you were the Prime Minister of Canada, Ms. Barlow. Our "hemisphere" could regain some hope if you were.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
sonoffestus
Got smart & got out!
07:07 PM on 05/28/2011
Wait till we have the honor of paying for the Harper's Government F35 budget overruns. Though he said last week he can buy them cheaper than the US military. This will be fun, though expensive to watch.
Jack Canuckski
Canadian Observer of the passing scene
10:48 PM on 05/30/2011
It will be expensive, but it won't be fun, unless you're receiving some of those defense contracts.
05:57 PM on 05/28/2011
It is unfortunate that the issues were not part of this last election, because I doubt very much that the average Canadian, and certainly those who voted CP of C, can discuss any of them beyond the depth of the icing on their cup cakes. I take this stand because an analysis of the positions taken by Canadians who responded to questions about each of these issues revealed that the average Canadian is most closely aligned with the position of the Liberal Party more than they are with any of the other parties. That is, most Canadians are politically oriented closer to a centre between the right and left wing as represented by the Cons and the NDP. This anomally suggests that voters cast their votes on the basis of personalities of the leaders as projected by the popular media, and not on deeper knowledge of the issues, or indeed, the real nature of any of the leaders or their respective party platforms. For example, Canadians preferred Harper over the others in spite of his conduct in office, his deceitful practices in campaigning, and the fact he cannot defend his position on any issues without smearing opposition members and distorting history. I would venture to say almost no one has taken the trouble to see who Ignatieff really is, nor have they any concept of how opportunistic and cynical Jack Layton has been through the last four elections, sabotaging legitimate progressive legislation in his own self-interest.