Canada has received a rebuke from a United Nations treaty monitoring body for its lack of respect for human rights. The Human Rights Committee (HRC) released a lengthy list of issues it cited as concerning as part of its concluding observations on the country's review of civil and political rights. Included was an important reference to the federal government's efforts to silence human rights organizations and advocacy through the Income Tax Act -- a welcome expression of support for charities under audit.
Canada Without Poverty (CWP) had taken this issue to Geneva earlier in July to raise awareness of the "advocacy chill" and the threatened environment charities have been forced to work in for years. The organization is one of many charities being audited to determine if it has allocated too many of its resources to speaking out about laws and policies that need to be changed to alleviate poverty. The ITA caps charitable activities deemed "political" at 10 per cent of its resources, even if these actions are pursuant to defined charitable activities or in defense of human rights.
Today the UN recommended that Canada ensure the Act "does not result in unnecessary restrictions on the activities of non-governmental organizations defending human rights." This strengthens the message of charities under audit who have consistently spoken out against this undemocratic practice.
In a press release CWP's Board President spoke of the apprehension charities have felt in the face of government audits, "These audits have resulted in mounting fear of losing charitable status, and therefore necessary funding sources, across the entire charitable sector. Human rights in Canada are under assault, and the UN Human Rights Committee noted that today."
The HRC pointed to the scope of the section of the Income Tax Act that relates to political activity, "The Committee is further concerned at the ambit of section 149.1 of the Income Tax Act relating to donations to non-governmental organizations registered as charities whose activities are considered as political activities when they relate to the promotion of human rights." A comment that should not be taken lightly.
As a signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Canada is subject to review periodically. The last review was 10 years ago and during the time the government's approach to human rights seems to have changed.
A number of charities and non-governmental organizations released a statement on the Committee's observations noting that over the past decade the "state of human rights in Canada has seriously deteriorated." The groups, representing a wide scope of interests -- Aboriginal rights and women, equality, freedom of expression, human rights implementation, refugees, anti-terrorism, advocates for economic and social rights -- called the UN recommendations "serious, important, and timely." Noting that Canada has both the wealth and capacity to tackle these human right violations, they called for a meeting of federal, provincial and territorial ministers to determine solutions.
The Committee also listed four positive actions Canada has taken in the past 10 years with respect to civil and political rights. You read that right -- four. And of the four, three are provincial actions: two pieces of legislation that support human rights (Newfoundland and PEI), and an adjustment to the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal that now allows it to receive direct complaints. These are noteworthy steps deserving of praise, but it also demonstrates that lack of federal government engagement towards their international human rights obligations.
With the Income Tax Act on the minds of policy makers these observations could be the push they need to make the necessary reforms. Change is not just about respecting charities; it's about respecting human rights.
The government will be updating the committee next year on the progress it has made from these recommendations. Let's hope that fixing the ITA is one of their accomplishments.MORE ON HUFFPOST:
The court rules that the Harper government cannot use Parliament alone to impose Senate term limits, allow consultative elections for senatorial candidates or abolish the upper chamber. The justices hold that the first two changes would need the consent of seven provinces representing half the provinces. Abolition would require provincial unanimity.
The government's Truth in Sentencing Act sought to stop judges from routinely giving inmates extra credit for time spent in jail before custody. The court ruled judges have the discretion to allow up to 1.5 days credit.
The court rules 6-1 that Justice Marc Nadon, named to the Supreme Court by Harper last year, is ineligible to sit. They found he did not meet the special criteria laid out for candidates from Quebec.
The court struck down the country's laws prohibiting brothels, streetwalking and living off the avails of prostitution. The Harper government had strongly argued in favour of the laws. The 9-0 decision gave the government a year to enact a new statute.
The court rules that Vancouver's controversial Insite safe-injection facility can stay open. The Harper government tried to close it by denying it a renewed exemption under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. The court found that denial contravened the principles of fundamental justice and ordered the exemption renewed immediately.
Follow Megan Hooft on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@CWP_CSP