Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Raffi Cavoukian
Michael Geist

GET UPDATES FROM Michael Geist
 

Canadians Speak Out Against Digital Locks. But Who's Listening?

Posted: 02/10/2012 10:32 am

The second reading debate on Bill C-11 will conclude today with the bill headed to committee for further hearings and possible amendment.

Yesterday, the Globe published an opinion piece by Peter Nowak that juxtaposes the widespread consultation on copyright reform in Canada with digital lock provisions that "wilfully ignores" public opinion.

Nowak notes how the U.S. ultimately responded to public concern in stopping SOPA, while the same appears to be happening in Europe as protests over the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement continue to grow (there are continent-wide protests planned for February 11th).

One of my posts this week focused on concerns that Industry Minister Christian Paradis has said he cannot speculate on how Bill C-11's digital lock rules will be enforced. The post identifies numerous examples of how the rules could harm creators, students, researchers, consumers, and even the visually impaired (further background information on Bill C-11 here and here). Yet these concerns are not new and have been raised for several years. Indeed, it is instructive to see how the public concern over the digital lock rules and now possible inclusion of SOPA-style amendments has mushroomed over the years.

According to documents recently obtained under the Access to Information Act, Industry Canada received thousands of letters of concern about Bill C-61, the 2008 copyright reform bill, the overwhelming majority of which focused on digital lock concerns. Just one month after the bill was tabled, the government had tracked over 27,000 letters and emails. In fact, the message on digital locks predated Bill C-61 as the public outrage over possible DMCA-style rules was already coming through loud and clear. The categorization of the letters is particularly noteworthy as digital locks were the dominant issue with few Canadians writing to express support for the government's approach.

A year later, the government held its national copyright consultation. It generated enormous public interest with over 8,000 submissions. A full summary of the responses reveals that digital locks were once again the dominant public concern.

Fast forward to the 2012 as the public outrage over SOPA effectively kills that bill, while in Europe tens of thousands take to the streets to protest ACTA. Over the past two weeks, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Latvia have all suspended plans to ratify the agreement and this morning Germany indicated even signing the agreement is on hold. Canadians have yet to take to the streets (though some rallies are now planned for cities across the country) but they are speaking out in unprecedented numbers. On Wednesday night, I moderated a panel on lawful access that included participation from NDP MP Charlie Angus. He advised that he has received over 50,000 emails of concern over Bill C-11 in the past couple of weeks, at times receiving upwards of 400 emails per minute. Liberal MP Geoff Regan also raised the 50,000 figure in the House of Commons on Wednesday.

The public opinion on Bill C-11 is clear. The majority support reform on two key conditions. First, no SOPA-style amendments such as website blocking or expanded liability should be added to Bill C-11. Second, the digital lock rules should be balanced by linking circumvention to actual copyright infringement. This approach provides legal protection for digital locks and is compliant with the WIPO Internet treaties. The compromise is broadly supported not only by individual members of the public but also by both major opposition parties, business groups, creator associations, consumer groups, and education associations.

Canadians have been speaking out on copyright reform in general and digital locks in particular for years with widely held views that reflect Canadian sensibilities about balancing protections and consumer property rights. The numbers keep growing and will continue to do so. If you have yet to speak out, write, email or tweet at the ministers and your MP providing your views on Bill C-11, now is the time to do so. If you are following the anti-ACTA rallies this weekend or tracking the C-11 debate in the House of Commons and wondering what you can do, write, email or tweet once more, asking Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore, Industry Minister Christian Paradis and your Member of Parliament: can you hear us now?

 

Follow Michael Geist on Twitter: www.twitter.com/mgeist

FOLLOW CANADA BUSINESS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:45 PM on 02/14/2012
This government does not listen to the people they are far too busy listening to the Corporations and enacting legislation to make them and the upper 1% wealthier. Harper and his lackeys will continue to enact poor legislation to the detriment of Canada as a whole.

Governments need to stop being led around by the corporations and ultra-rich and start championing for us the poor, working and middle class, after all it is us who vote them in, it is us who they should be listening too.

The poor, working poor, working and middle class have lousy lobbyists, unlike the wealthy who have the best that money can buy.

Our governments have become Corporatists (http://www.answers.com/topic/corporatism) and in Canada we have a what appears to be a Corporatocracy (http://www.answers.com/topic/corporatocracy) not a democracy. And in fact it seems once a governing party gets a majority is becomes a democratic dictatorship in that they stop listening to the people and only follow their own agenda at times to the detriment of the people. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=democratic%20dictatorship
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopgeorge
Paper Ballots WORK. Unverifiable e-voting doesn't
01:59 AM on 02/11/2012
Just think of all the time, manpower, money and energy this whole system will take.

Then think of how far the entertainment industry would be if, 20 years ago, they dedicated their money to innovative business models that didn't revolve around selling digital content. Instead, they took the easy route and hired more lawyers and paid more politicians.

Shame on the entertainment industry for helping to destroy the free internet and the property rights for the consumer for sheer laziness!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
06:58 PM on 02/10/2012
I just don't understand how this will have a negative impact on me.
I have never downloaded a movie or album or video game or any kind of softwear. (except windows updates)
I've been online since 1995.
And my business is all internet driven.
Whats the big deal here folks.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cael
01:13 AM on 02/11/2012
So because it doesnt affect you then you dont get it?
Let me explain. I buy a ebook from amazon, it is in a special format that only can be read on amazon products. Say for some reason Amazon no longer supports that format or stops making kindles, or maybe I just dont like the kindle anymore and decide to go to a competitor. Well all those books I bought, let me explain, I bought, just like a book from the store. I cannot read them on other devices. There are ways to remove the drm, but this bill makes it illegal.

Therefore, I bought something, I own the copy, yet I am not allowed to read it on the device I choose. I am forced to support Amazon for the rest of my life, or until they stop supporting it, and if they do all the books I bought or useless, unreadable.

So standard example of protect the company and artist but who cares about the consumer. It is very one sided. There is 0 protections to consumers and if this continues the concept of ownership no longer exists, everything you buy will be considered a time rental.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
06:20 AM on 02/11/2012
You buy the product knowing full well the limitations.
You could buy a book and have it for years, lend it out to your friends ect
Or you could go to the library where its free.
Thats what I do.
Sorry, but I'm still not convinced it's that big a deal.
Thanks for your input though.
Anyone else?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
05:47 PM on 02/10/2012
Crisis?
What crisis?
05:01 PM on 02/10/2012
The Harper Boys & Girls don't like to listen. In this case as in every other. His nibs micromanages like Dubya delegtaed. It'll bounce back. Newtonian Laws and all that-
-30-
04:26 PM on 02/10/2012
harper government moves to limit debate on bill..........(fill in the blank)

this is getting to be an all too common refrain ------evidently they are clearing the decks for something or other -------i wonder what could be so important
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sunnyokanagan
Increase compassion. Decrease suffering
03:54 PM on 02/10/2012
Truly, what motivation has Harper to listen to the plebeians? They (we) have shown by their disinterest in voting and by their willingness to be lead by the nose, that they are relatively content to acquiesce to his Government's wishes. The Corporatist puppet masters are the class to which he is beholden, and to whose tune he will dance.

Until people get up off their bums and cause sufficient disruption to the Harper machine, and actualy bother to turn out and VOTE when the oppportunity arises, he is completely free to "willfully ignore" anything we bleat about.
photo
Jay from Ottawa
sovereignty sale, 1.3T OBO
03:53 PM on 02/10/2012
Harper, putting Americas interest ahead of our own (Canadians).
03:50 PM on 02/10/2012
I worte to my MP today, but he's NDP, so his voice will not be heard. I guess that is better than if my MP were a Torry, they would just ignore me altogether.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norma Ward
02:36 PM on 02/10/2012
What is rather concerning about this whole issue is that the United States, through the annual report of the United States Trade Representative, is attempting to force other nations around the world, including Canada, to implement similar legislation as shown here:

http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2011/06/piracy-and-counterfeiting-us-trade.html

Apparently, the Harper government would rather listen to the pleadings of the United States and its entertainment industry than its own citizens..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
samseed
We're here for a good time, not a long time
03:35 PM on 02/10/2012
Ha, we wish! Harper is determined to transform us into US-lite. The bad part is that he has the power to do it. Bill C-10, Bill C-11...doesnt matter. Its clear, he doesnt care what we think or what the evidence says. We are going to watch our health, savings, environment, rights and freedoms blow away in the wind for so called security and corporate profits.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
okgranny
Egalitarian by birth
04:44 PM on 02/10/2012
Not a surprise.