In his new play The De Chardin Project, playwright Adam Seybold has the Jesuit priest and paleontologist Father Teilard De Chardin describe his witnessing of a terrible natural event whereby he arose from his cabin aboard a steamer on route to China to find a fire raging along the shoreline. With the furiosité of a freight train and having consumed the entire upper canopy of forest, the inferno chases a lone monkey through the underbrush, who is desperate to outrun this force of nature, lest it consume him as well.
De Chardin, who later discovered and subsequently lost Peiking Man a.k.a. Homo erectus, with Canadian Davidson Black, was chased out of France by the papacy, due to his modern re-interpretation of the biblical origin of human kind as seen through the eyes of an evolutionary scientist. This occurred in the early 1930s, by which time the modern theory of evolution had been well established as a cornerstone of biology, but which continues to today to be inflammatory in fundamentalist circles.
BLOG CONTINUES AFTER SLIDESHOW
This week we celebrate Darwin's birthday and the publishing of the "Great Book" as it is known in biology, On the Origin of Species, in 1859. It was the pivotal date in the modern study of the history of life on the planet and since then multiple lines of evidence have been established that all point to evolution through natural selection as the frame in which we place the biological sciences. Unfortunately, while the Vatican has accepted the theory of evolution, many of the charismatic faiths have not, and in the rookery of modern creationism, the United States, there continue to be assaults on the ability of education to keep out erroneous questioning of evolution at the middle and high school levels. Attempts to introduce what is now called "intelligent design" into the science classroom are active in many states in the U.S.
According to the National Centre for Science Education, there are currently eight bills in six different U.S. states attempting to sneak one past the establishment clause in the U.S. constitution that prohibits state-sponsored religion and get creationism in the classroom. There have been many attempts over the past decades, and each round sees an increasing sophistication; from the original bald claims of young earth creationism, to a pseudo-scientific intelligent design trying to leave the Abrahamic God out of it, and culminating with the "academic freedom" bent of current legislation. In the state of Tennessee last year, the "monkey bill" was passed that allows the teaching of creationism in state schools. One can hope that a challenge similar to the Kitzmiller vs Dover suit will emerge and strike down this bill, but it will be a long fight.
We do not have as overt a challenge to established science in Canada classrooms currently, although the Alberta Education Act amendments last year, spearheaded by the small but vocal religious home-school lobby, may be a start. This poll by Angus Reid in 2008 showed that 20 per cent of Canadians believe that man was created by God in the last 10,000 years, which is a very worrying statistic, and there is a movement with the goal to get creationist ideas into the classroom under the guise of religious freedom. The Canadian Creation Information Portal lists several creationist museums in Alberta, Ontario, and Manitoba dedicated to the biblical interpretation of our origins, as well as links to creationist organizations in six provinces.
Evolution is true, and there is little that is scientific about creation science. While creationists use the "god of the gaps" to fill in those places where we have no answers with the supernatural, evolution remains one of the most successful models of the development of life on earth, and those gaps continue to close as we attain new information through experiment and deduction.
Father De Chardin saw this too, and he did not try to mold his science around an unchanging religious doctrine. Instead, like a scientist, he changed his ideas about the universe and his religion to fit the facts before him. This week we celebrate the exquisite theory of evolution, borne of a human desire to know the universe, and we thank Charles Darwin for pushing us away out of the darkness and helping us to see its true face.
Follow Michael Kruse on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@anxiousmedic
He'd probably say: "Still teaching creationism as fact? You must be americans."
Good luck with that one. Creation.com
And since Christ was a Zealot Jew, I'm not sure where you're getting the 'total freedom' description, either. Total freedom to be an Orthodox Jew, maybe.
Just curious, because the claim to be the 'God of Love' needs a bit more evidence to support it. But I can assume you're not into 'evidence', either.
Folks, this is your brain on religion.
'There is no such thing as spontaneous generation of life." nowhere at no time - now what do you have?
As such both should be taught in our school systems, so the individual can decide for themselves what to believe.
All we really have is the science argument "evolution is based on science so it must be true". Which is funny since science has made many bold claims over the years which have later proven to be pure nonsense, asbestos & thalidomide ring a bell. Science even had empirical evidence for both yet still science was clueless.
The one & only thing biology has shown, which is factual & valid. Is that species which exist within a closed system will share some & often many similarities with one another.
Planet earth is such a closed system.
Grade 10 biology: " there is no such thing as spontaneous generation of life."
I'm betting there's no such thing as your 'no such thing'.
It amazes me when people use science to support their anti-science message.
The modern scientific THEORY of the solar system says the Earth rotates once a day. The Church's position, the sun travels around the Earth, along with billions of galaxies, black holes, quasars, and who knows what else. Now, I know it's just a theory, but I'm sticking with science on this one. Pretty sure the Earth will rotate around and we will see another day.
Evolution is based on evidence, not science per se. Creationism is based on fantasy, with no evidence to support it.
Thalidomide: Evidence showed it disfigured children, so we stopped using it. Relgion prayed for the poor souls and said it was God's will.
Asbestos: Evidence showed it caused cancer so we stopped using it. Relgion prayed for the poor souls and said it was God's will.
And, by the way, life on planet Earth wouldn't last long without the sun, so it's far from a closed system.
Wouldn't you rather KNOW than BELIEVE?
Both thalidomide & asbestos were claimed to be safe by scientists, that is fact.
In thermodynamics, a closed system can exchange energy (as heat or work) but not matter, with its surroundings. Hence your confusion regarding the sun is solved.
Weve been told that the grand canion took millions and millions of years to create, yet we see the EXACT gelological thing happening 1 year after Mt St Helens blew up.
Fosils, wow theres a good one, everytime i go to the beach i keep stepping on those dang fish fossils....NOT. They supposedly took millions of years of sediment to form, which would mean that they must be there now right? I havent seen any myself, you?
As Laputes said, and he is 100% right, the only science that is considered FACTm is proven, and none of evolution can be proven by repeating it. They recently discovered that all dogs, even chiwawas, come from Wolfs. Every single strain, and why? because the wolves were the original dna supplier, through manipulation, we have cretaed the rest by removing information, never adding to it.
So were is the frog bird, or dog cat, or whatever, it doesnt exist, because there is no species cross breeding(biblical again). If we look at the world, and were we are, and how we got here, the Bible story works better than any evolution theory, there are no facts in evolution, only theories, all unprovem to date.
creation.com, get educated, not lied to.