Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michel Kelly-Gagnon

GET UPDATES FROM Michel Kelly-Gagnon
 

Why I Love "Big Oil"

Posted: 07/11/11 09:53 AM ET

The Disney-Pixar film Cars 2 has recently been released and my four-year-old son and I went to see it a few days ago. Like the previous installment, it is very well done.

Loosely inspired by the James Bond concession spy, Cars 2 is the story of Mater, a rusted tow truck as the unlikely hero. The plot centers on the attempts of an oil tycoon to secure greater profits by eliminating a bio-fuel alternative to traditional petroleum. John Lasseter, the movie's producer, recently gave an interview to the Wall Street Journal where he confirmed that the "über villain" in his movie was "big oil."

The idea of big oil companies as evil wrong-doers that will destroy anything standing in their way to make profits is pretty widespread and, yet, completely wrong. In fact, producing oil is not just about pumping, drilling and selling, it is one of the most amazing ventures that mankind has undertaken in contemporary history.

Let me recount how oil first became such a useful resource. After the discovery of a process by which oil became kerosene to light up homes, there was a rush to the oil fields. Some got rich, however most failed. It was only when John D. Rockefeller began to construct high quality wells, hired the most efficient and productive personnel, bought off poorly run operations and made them profitable that the industry finally took off. Moreover, he began to explore for new sources of oil, found new ways to reduce costs and discovered new by-products of petroleum like lubricating oil, paraffin wax, Vaseline, paint, varnish and most importantly, gasoline.

Because of such inventiveness and superior efficiency, Rockefeller managed to reduce his costs. But, despite his "dominant" position, he didn't indulge in "price gouging". On the contrary, prices for refined oil dropped from 30 cents per gallon in 1869 to 8 cents in 1885.

Such thrusts to innovate and create value are still needed today. Oil corporations must invest billions of dollars in exploration, new equipment, research and development. They must constantly find ways to become more efficient and more productive or face the risk of losing markets shares to their competitors. Furthermore, and contrary to clichés, they do not take an inordinate amount of profits. It has recently been estimated that the average profit margin for the five largest oil companies in the United States was of 6.65 per cent between 2006 and 2010. This is quite low compared to, for example, Apple's 22 per cent and Coca-Cola's 33 per cent.

As a result of all these innovations since the beginning of the oil industry, some say the price of retail gasoline, adjusted for inflation, has been on a downward trend in spite of numerous ups and downs. We should thus marvel at the inventiveness of this industry because without its constant thrust to innovate and become more efficient, we could not have benefitted from the amazing advantages of motor transportation.

We have cars that move us around, trucks that carry the goods we produce, tractors that harvest fields, boats that supply us with goods from all around the world.

Filmmakers understandably need a villain to create an interesting storyline. But they displayed a remarkable lack of imagination -- and perhaps a genuine misunderstanding of how the world really works -- by choosing one of the most innovative industries in the world.

 

Follow Michel Kelly-Gagnon on Twitter: www.twitter.com/iedm_montreal

The Disney-Pixar film Cars 2 has recently been released and my four-year-old son and I went to see it a few days ago. Like the previous installment, it is very well done. Loosely inspired by the Jame...
The Disney-Pixar film Cars 2 has recently been released and my four-year-old son and I went to see it a few days ago. Like the previous installment, it is very well done. Loosely inspired by the Jame...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:44 PM on 07/13/2011
Well written. As for the comment on Bio-fuels show me one economic analysis where the entire bio-fuel process is of net economic value (plz include taxation which will through this arguement entirely out the window). Without gov't subsidy production of any bio-fuel could not compete with petrol and wouldn't (and shouldn't) exist if the gov't wants to get to work on balancing the books. The reason there is big oil is because the capital constraints and profit margin being in the 10% range, doesnt exactly bring a whole bunch of new competition lining up at the door.. You can blame the taxation and market speculation on the crude market if your sniveling at the pump prices.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
arcsong
David Archer Toronto based Composer, Guitarist
04:01 PM on 07/12/2011
Can Mr. Kelly - Gagnon really be so naive as this and his other recent articles suggest? Or is it that he believe his readers are such simple folk as to be so easily and artlessly manipulated? Or maybe this is not a genuine viewpoint at all - but rather a paid for opinion or some kind of foolish marketing experiment?

I don't know, but I'm seriously considering all of the above.

Perhaps - when Mr Kelly - Gagnon feels his next turn coming on - he might enlighten us on Ru*pert Mur*doch's stellar contributions to journalistic integrity.
01:34 PM on 07/12/2011
I live in the belly of the beast, like a biodegradeable germ.

1. The Oil industry has earned, taken, and reocorded the largest corporate profits in company history of the world over the last 8 years. Don't believe me ? Do some homework.

That's right kids.

2. Oil is an awesome resource with many uses that has bouyed America to world power. HOWEVER, it's increasingly rare existence and demand is creating an unhealthy geopolitical environment for most countries.

Make sure you get a pamphlet on Veterans Healthcare horror stories because you'll be living them when your son comes back from Iraq.

If he comes back.


3. And oil companies are and have been spending millions buying patents and suppressing Bio-Fuels mass production for YEARS. Oil is wonderful BECAUSE you said it drives us to grandma's for Thanksgiving for American apple pie, well.............SO DOES BIOFUEL. And it does it cheaper and doesn't pollute.

4. Oil comanies make MILLIONS of dollars with ENORMOUS support from government. They could spend an extra 1 mil to ensure safe operating. Do they ? EXXON, BP, ALASKA....should I go on ? They don't spend money on safety unless they lose profits.

5. Yes, adjusted for inflation gas is low in America. But not anymore. Realty is harsh. Bio-Fuels cost $.15 cents a gallon. Let me guess you drive a Hummer. Would you rather pay $4.5/gallon or .15 cents a gallon ?

Make sure you explain THE WHOLE truth to your son.
03:19 AM on 07/12/2011
While Apple and Coca-Cola also make billions they don't receive government subsidies(as far as I know) like big oil does. Perhaps the subsidies should end and then big oil can become even more "innovative" like protecting the environment that it so rely's on.
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
04:05 PM on 07/11/2011
Slavery played a big role in construction, should we celebrate that as well?
03:31 PM on 07/11/2011
right and they dont fund agencies that deny the climate is changing ----and deep water drilling is perfectly safe
photo
Jay from Ottawa
sovereignty sale, 1.3T OBO
03:08 PM on 07/11/2011
Is it just me, or is he saying he loves human innovation as opposed to saying he loves oil as the title suggests ... or is it just that he doesn't believe human innovation goes anywhere beyound oil ?

Guess what Mr.Writer ... War brought the world much more innovation than any other industry, so why not come out and say you love war ? if it's the human innovation behind the industry you admire so much ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kristopher Leang
training to take down the elite
01:12 PM on 07/11/2011
woooow propaganda much... somehow he went from "explaining" (and i use quotations ebcause he said he would explain but veers to another topic completely) to just saying what a useful and amazing endevour getting oil is... off topic much???

"They must constantly find ways to become more efficient and more productive or face the risk of losing markets shares to their competitors" and... does this stop the environmental damage and damage to the small towns and communities in foreign countries you have to research to find out about..

so he did nothing to dispell the truth about the coldhearted oil companies who will ignore any human suffering for thier profits.. i mean we knew we wouldnt see any coherent defence (because there is none) and frankly you didnt write one. this isnt "journalism", this is big oil propaganda hype. niceee try