Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mubin Shaikh

GET UPDATES FROM Mubin Shaikh
 

Will it Take Another Attack for Canada to Take Terrorism Seriously?

Posted: 05/30/2012 1:36 pm

The Canadian government has recently announced a plan to establish grants of $1-million to academic institutions to "study" terrorist threats to Canada. The scheme is named after the Air India plane, Kanishka that was hit by Sikh terrorists in 1985, resulting in the death of 329 people, mostly Canadians.

Twenty-seven years after the worst attack on Canadian interests, the best this government has been able to come up with is $10-million dollars to fund academics to study what we already know?

Even more than a decade since 9/11, the Canadian government has fallen woefully behind other nations when it comes to anti-terrorism funding and where to best allocate the resources. And while most nations have assisted at-risk communities in some way, the current Canadian government has done nothing of the sort to help those affected most.

While there is no doubt of the value of academics when it comes to research on the effects of ethno-nationalist conflicts and diaspora communities, this funding scheme is essentially reinventing the wheel since there is already a huge body of literature around the Air India bombing -- not to mention that scathing rebuke and criticism of agencies like the then-newly formed Canadian Security Intelligence Service and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. The latter agency is hands-down among the most broken of Canadian institutions and ultimately both are free of any meaningful oversight to this day.

This lack of oversight is actually part and parcel of the current Canadian government approach to national security -- that it's frankly none of the business of Parliament and somehow remains the sole right of political parties to decide what they want to do in terms of accountability of national security operations and by extension, I would add, how and where funding opportunities should be allocated.

This remains a very counter-productive aspect of national security mechanisms in Canada because national security MUST always be a non-partisan issue and deserves to be kept in balance with other national interests.

Before the Conservative government majority, certain Liberal members of Parliament, notably Derek Lee (his credentials regarding oversight are impeccable and has literally written the book on Parliamentary procedure) was involved in trying to set up the "Office for National Security Accountability" and it was supposed to be a non-partisan venture involving select members of the Parliament -- elected by the people -- to make sure we had our eye on the ball at all times.

It would have allowed for a fact-based approach to national security versus the ideologically driven approach of the current government. Sadly, after all was said and done, more than 10 years after 9/11 and 27 years after the Air India bombing, this current government continues to pursue an ideologically-driven approach which ignores the findings already available regarding "resiliency of communities" and incredulously demands that we still need to think about whether or not foreign ethnic, sectarian or nationalistic conflicts abroad affect minority communities here; of course they do! Do we need millions in funding to go towards trying to figure out what we already know?

I would strongly suggest to the Canadian government to actually get out in the communities affected (not just the two officers for "Community Outreach" the RCMP managed to think could cover the entire province of Ontario) and build some credibility as opposed to thinking we can just legislate away these problems or that somehow bullets and bombs can destroy ideology and curb radicalization. None of this has worked in the past 10 years and no amount of money and the research that comes from it, will have traction on the ground and the ground is where it counts when it comes to diasporas, not the halls of academia.

 
FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
The Canadian government has recently announced a plan to establish grants of $1-million to academic institutions to "study" terrorist threats to Canada. The scheme is named after the Air India plane, ...
The Canadian government has recently announced a plan to establish grants of $1-million to academic institutions to "study" terrorist threats to Canada. The scheme is named after the Air India plane, ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 27
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:50 PM on 06/27/2012
LOL! this is a joke bro!
10:06 PM on 05/31/2012
Mubin, you make a very important point in the need for law enforcement to engage communities, furthermore law enforcement should engage at risk members as well (particularly youth). However, the government should focus on both the local issue and international issues.

Canada has lost its place as a judicial and even handed broker on global issues. Foreign grown terrorism will stop if people outside canada dont view Canada as a threat. The government needs to build inroads in local communities as well as bridges overseas.
09:37 AM on 06/01/2012
Bridges? Why would the Canadian government want to build bridges overseas? The Afghans don't want bridges, they want to be left alone.
02:51 PM on 06/27/2012
Exactlly!
photo
Billk29
Justified Ancient of Mu
07:32 PM on 05/31/2012
We don't want to be afraid of our own shadows like people in some other countries are . No more terrorist fearmongering thank you.
03:15 PM on 05/31/2012
What is it that you think we already know? When you speak of the "resiliency of communities" what "communities" are you talking about? How are you suggesting the Canadian government "build credibility"? The only thing I've understood from your blog is that you're promoting further expenditure in anti-terrorism efforts, but then you're in the business, so you should be able to provide more specifics? For now, it just sounds like a whole lot of ranting without any substance.
12:19 PM on 05/31/2012
We're going to have to take you seriously first and that's a tiresome, pointless job.
11:39 AM on 05/31/2012
I have the answer to stop all possible future Canadian terrorism: Stop holding Uncle Sam's jacket. That's the solution. I'll take the 1 million dollars now.
09:36 AM on 05/31/2012
He is mad because the $10M budget went to the academics, not to unemployed "counter-terrorism" experts on EI. Hey, Mubin, you are supposed to send out job applications regularly or you will lose your EI benefits. SecuriGuard is always hiring so you might give them a shout. They are always on the lookout for experts in countering unlawful acts, like not paying your parking tickets for instance.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Mubin Shaikh
03:41 PM on 05/31/2012
Thanks but I am not unemployed and not on EI either. :)
09:17 AM on 05/31/2012
Continued: And the the kinda targets terrorists need to earn points are simply not here, not because we don't have targets, but because it's Canada, it's meaningless in the minds of their people to sacrifice ones life to try to hit here, they might as well hit Norway or Sweden or switzerland.
09:11 AM on 05/31/2012
Terrorism is just war with a different name attached and the fact of the matter is that no nation spends a whole lot of cash to handle these issues until they actually rear their heads. To answer your question will it take another attack for us to take it seriously as you want us too? Yes

There was a time when you could board a plane with the same sort of security that you did a bus. There was a time when leaving your doors open when you weren't home was normal. When convenience stores didn't need cameras and church charities raised money using candy machines based on the honor system. Stuff happened to change that, cause and effect. Should Canada spend precious resources on more anti-terror measures? Well my question to you would be since you do not know what the nations intelligence agencies and their allies around the world are up too, how could you possibly know what's "too little" or how seriously it's being taken. Let's be honest if AL Qaeda wanted to get to Canada they would have by now. We are more likely to be dealt a blow by a radical faction of Al-GreenPeace trying to destroy a oil pipeline then middle east or Sikh terrorists. It's just harder to call Canadians infidels and they earn far less political capital for it. They would sooner bomb a Oregon farmhouse then a Toronto bus. When your planning attacks 3-10 years apart you gotta pick your targets
11:07 PM on 05/30/2012
So, what you're saying is that there has been one major terrorism incident in Canada, ever, and we're not worried enough about it. We did have a few (18) people running around the bush in the winter in Toronto, but good old fashioned police work fixed

You know what kills more Canadians than terrorism?

Moose. Kiddie Pools. Law abiding citizens that lose it one day and shoot their wife. Workplace accidents. Lyme disease. Kinda like nuclear power. Everyone is very afraid of it, but it kills fewer people than oil, coal, natural and solar power.
09:45 AM on 05/31/2012
And drunk driving. And Nickelback.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Mubin Shaikh
03:41 PM on 05/31/2012
Read past just the title of the article. :)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:49 PM on 05/30/2012
Not sure what the author of this article is trying to say. Fund more anti-terrorism activities, but not in academia. Don't fund bombs and bullets, but get people on the ground.

Any democratic government should keep its intelligence agency non-partisan, but the former counterintelligence agent could perhaps stop some former habits of illusiveness and bring about a few more specific examples of threats along with some more clarity to his article. Otherwise, no one will develop an opinion on your article, informed or not. Plus accusing the Conservatives of an ideological driven mandate using the halls of academia is a bit far-fetched? Don't you think?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Mubin Shaikh
03:43 PM on 05/31/2012
Thanks for your feedback. I am trying to say that giving 10 mil to academia to study what we already know (causes of terrorism, nature of threats facing Canada) seems to be problematic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:14 PM on 06/05/2012
I'll agree with you on that, this type of money will most likely be given to someone who will write up a report on what arms or agenda to further. Using this so-called study, which will probably be framed using data and information gathered to support whatever the agenda is, they will then buys the desired amount of arms or technology and use the study to also change or manipulate laws. It is more of setting the stage, the report comes out, then the action will be taken using the study to back up the more dubious parts of agenda...
09:34 PM on 05/30/2012
This only serves underworked over paid members of the intelligentsia, who after having lived the ivory tower lifestyle are pretty much out of touch with such issues.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:19 PM on 05/30/2012
Mubin Shaikh,

why aren't you a counter terrorism operative anymore?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Mubin Shaikh
03:47 PM on 05/31/2012
Operational experience has its place in the toolbox and I am a better and more informed person for having acquired it but I am more interested in studying this subject from the big picture perspective at a post graduate level outside of Canada.

Cheers!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:57 PM on 05/31/2012
Thanks for the answer; I was just curious :3

You've apparently led a very intense and full life already

Have you heard of someone called Scott Atran?
photo
1846
Deir Yassin Survivor
07:25 PM on 05/30/2012
Mubin evidently wishes to make anti-terrorism an industry in Canada.
Fear mongering is the vehicle for his agenda and it sounds much like the media spewed by the USA in the Bush years.
I would say that an unbiased foreign affairs policy by Canada will do much more in protecting Canadians.
02:55 PM on 05/31/2012
... and getting the hell out of Afghanistan ... and NATO for that matter.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Mubin Shaikh
03:48 PM on 05/31/2012
Actually, the article makes more points about accountability and oversight at the Parliamentary level than it does about making an industry out of counter terrorism. I totally agree that an unbiased foreign policy will do much more in protecting Canadians, thank you!
06:04 PM on 05/30/2012
Give me a break. Nobody's mad at Canada, altho Harpo is working hard to change that. We may need protection soon.