An ad in the Globe and Mail reveals the extent of harm the Harper Conservatives have inflicted on Statistics Canada. Because of poor quality, Statistics Canada is not releasing data at finer spatial scales because the Harper Conservatives killed the mandatory long-form Census and replaced it with a voluntary survey of dubious quality.
The Conservatives' attack on the Census not only cost Canadians their most valuable source of information, it also led to the departure of Canada's leading civil servant, Dr. Munir Sheikh, who in July 2010 resigned his position as Canada's chief statistician to protect the integrity of the institution he led.
It happened exactly four years ago with the government's decision to eliminate the long-form Census that collected information about housing, transport, employment, income and other key attributes required by various tiers of governments to plan and deliver public services. The Conservative government's decision has cost millions more to taxpayers to collect poor quality data. Even worse, now Canadians have to pay even more to private vendors to get the same or better data.
Academics, economists, statisticians and others unanimously criticized the government's flawed decision to eliminate the long-form Census. They were of the view that eliminating the long form would create a permanent break in the Census because the change in survey methodology would make it impossible to conduct any longitudinal study comparing statistics over time. Furthermore, the voluntary survey would result in sampling errors and self-selection biases that could not be fixed.
The government cited unsubstantiated privacy concerns to eliminate the long-form, which, however, did not make any sense. The government wanted to replace the long-form Census, which is administered to a 20 per cent random sample, with a voluntary survey to be administered to 33 per cent of Canadians. How asking the same questions to a much larger population would address privacy concerns defied logic and exposed the complete lack of reason in the thinking of Canada's Conservative government, which has since then continued to weaken Statistics Canada by cutting its funding.
Dr. Sheikh, being the head of Canada's statistical agency, advised the government that no matter how large the sample size of the voluntary survey may be, it could not replace a mandatory Census. His concerns were ignored. Dr. Sheikh ultimately resigned.
It is, however, important to note that Dr. Sheikh resigned not because the government failed to listen to its top bureaucrat. He respected the government's authority to ignore the advice of civil servants. Instead, he resigned because the government tried to misrepresent facts to Canadians about the accuracy of the planned voluntary survey.
Canada's then Industry Minster, Tony Clement, told the news media in July 2010 that Statistics Canada had assured him "[I]f you do these extra things: the extra advertising and the extra sample size, then yes, we [Statistics Canada] can do our job." Dr. Sheikh had never advised the government as such. His advice was exactly the opposite, which he repeated for the record in his resignation letter:
"Let me first of all say that it is the right of the government to make decisions, which if lawful should be implemented by any department of the government... The fact that in the media and in the public that there was this perception that Statistics Canada was supporting a decision that no statistician would, it really casts doubt on the integrity of that agency, and I as head of that agency cannot survive in that job."
Therefore, four years hence, we have the proof. The data are no good. It does not mean that NHS data are useless. It means that the data are inferior in quality than the one collected in earlier Census. Even more ridiculous is the fact that the poor quality data has cost Canadians millions more than it would have had the government not interfered with the Census. The Auditor General of Canada reported that the 2011 NHS cost Canadians $22 million more than the long-form it replaced and produced inferior data.
So not only did the taxpayers paid more for poor quality data, government departments and not-for-profits have to dole out even more money to private data vendors to gain access to the same data. A lose-lose situation for Canadians, which still has not dissuaded the Conservatives from repeating the same mistake in 2016.
At the fourth anniversary of the demise of Canada's long-form Census, Canadians should know that a lot is at stake at the next federal elections. The Conservatives' refusal to acknowledge their mistakes and correct the course has hurt the integrity of national institutions that Canadians cherish. Voters should remember this when they head to polls in the next federal elections.
ALSO ON HUFFPOST:
The number of seniors aged 65 and over in Canada increased 14.1 per cent to nearly five million, a faster rate of growth than that for children aged 14 and under (0.5 per cent) and people aged 15 to 64 (5.7 per cent).
Seniors accounted for a record high of 14.8 per cent of the Canadian population in 2011, up from 13.7 per cent five years earlier.
The number of children aged 4 and under increased 11 per cent, the highest growth rate for that age group since the latter half of the baby boom between 1956 and 1961. It marks the first time in 50 years that Canada has seen an increase in small children in every province and territory.
Seven of the 10 municipalities with the highest proportion of seniors were in British Columbia.
In 2011, the proportion of seniors was the highest in the Atlantic provinces, Quebec and British Columbia.
For the first time, there were more people in Canada aged 55 to 64 -- typically the age group where people leave the labour force -- than aged 15 to 24, when they typically enter it.
In 2011, people aged 15 to 64 -- the working-age population -- represented 68.5 per cent of the Canadian population, the highest proportion of all G8 countries except Russia.
People aged 100 or older comprised the second fastest-growing age group in Canada, after those aged 60-64; there were 5,825 centenarians in 2011, an increase of 25.7 per cent since 2006.
Nearly one in five people were aged 65 and over in Peterborough, Ont. (Shown here), and Trois-Rivieres, Que.; in Calgary, the ratio was less than one in 10.
Among smaller communities, the Vancouver Island community of Parksville, B.C. (shown here) and Elliot Lake, Ont., had the highest proportion of seniors -- 38.6 per cent and 35.1 per cent, respectively, more than twice the national average of 14.8 per cent.
Follow Murtaza Haider on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@regionomics