Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Raffi Cavoukian
Natalie Garside

GET UPDATES FROM Natalie Garside
 

Who Decides What Books Teens Read?

Posted: 09/27/11 03:47 PM ET

There is something uniquely polarizing about banned books for teens and children. When an adult decides to buy a book, the conflict of its content exists only between themselves and social mores. When a teen or child reaches for a book, immediately involved is a parent or caregiver. On the one hand you've got authors, fiercely passionate about telling the truth in their writing, in acknowledging the realities faced by teens and children no matter how dark or brutal. On the other you have adults willing to stand between that content and their child, to protect them from and nurture in them feelings and realities unconnected to anything unpleasant. The battle between these two ideologies may be a healthy one.

Recently Meghan Cox Gurdon's "Darkness Too Visible" article in the Wall Street Journal ignited a fury of response in the Young Adult (YA) writing community when it chastised local bookshops for exposing teens to depravity, violence and abuse. She highlighted titles like Go Ask Alice a diary of a teen's spiral into drug abuse, rape and prostitution and went so far as to site S.E. Hinton's The Outsiders as "launching the industry" on YA novels with its tale of "class tensions, family dysfunction and violent, disaffected youth."

Lauren Myracle's Shine about gay hate crimes in a small southern community, and Cheryl Rainfield's Scars about a 15-year-old who copes with memories of childhood sexual abuse by cutting herself, also made Cox Gurdon's list when they were on the table for banning by the U.S. library system. She thought their profanity and content crossed the line when parents and caregivers were trying to exercise "judgement" and "taste" in what their children were exposed to. The move to ban them fell through. She was honest about how cornered parents feel when teachers, libraries and authors themselves accuse such censorship as banning the truth and reality of the world from children and teenagers. She acknowledges that the landscape is changing in literature and it is harder than ever for a parent to have any real control over what their children are influenced by via literature, television and movies.

Authors of Young Adult books immediately took up arms. Sherman Alexie, author of the semi-autobiographical YA book The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-time Indian countered with his own article, "Why the Best Kids Books Are Written in Blood," describing the profound experiences he had touring high schools and talking to teens about the real issues they deal with. He talked about resilience and hope and the need for teens and children to connect with others about their experiences. And he highlighted that darkness already exists in children's lives and needed to be acknowledged.

"I have yet to receive a letter from a child somehow debilitated by the domestic violence, drug abuse, racism, poverty, sexuality, and murder contained in my book. To the contrary, kids as young as 10 have sent me autobiographical letters written in crayon, complete with drawings inspired by my book, that are just as dark, terrifying, and redemptive as anything I've ever read."

Books like Laurie Halse Anderson's Speak whose heroine struggles to find the courage to tell the truth about being raped at a party and Chris Lynch's Inexcusable told from the perspective of a teen football player who can't understand why what he has done is considered rape, made his list of books he wishes had been available when he was an abused teen and felt unredeemable.

The Twittersphere lit up during this exchange with the hashtag #YASaves filled with comments from YA Authors, teen readers, booksellers, teachers and parents talking about the incredible influence and experience of reading on their lives. Authors like Cassandra Clare whose Mortal Instrument series features an urban fantasy landscape where teens confront issues of family dysfunction, loss, and sexuality weighed in on their own teen experiences and the dark places within them, claiming that difficult content confronted in kids and teen books plays a vital role in helping them cope.

Ellen Hopkins, whose series of poetic , free-form YA books , beginning with Crank cover the horrors of drug abuse and are particularly well-received in Canada, tweeted, "It is ludicrous to assume a teen who reads about cutting will choose to self-harm."

Other responses cautioned against painting Cox Gurdon's article too harshly: "Cox Gurdon isn't saying: Never read young-adult books. She's saying: Know what's in those books, and use judgment, as you would with movies."

Malinda Lo, author of Ash, a Cinderella retelling featuring a gay heroine who falls in love with a royal huntress, tweeted, "The subtext of Gurdon's essay is that YA literature has a responsibility to teens to show them a moral world. The problem is: Whose morals?"

Responses were varied as illustrated in the book blog Bookshelves of Doom's post, "A round up of WSJ #YASaves responses."

An incredible dialogue opened up between two groups of people who love children and teens: parents and caregivers who cherish and protect them, and authors who are determined to keep vigil with all of the feelings and experiences teens and children have through the stories they tell.

Natalie Garside is the Inventory Analyst for Teen Books at Indigo Home Office. She is a sometimes blogger on the Indigo Teen Blog and @NatalieGarside is her Twitter.

 
There is something uniquely polarizing about banned books for teens and children. When an adult decides to buy a book, the conflict of its content exists only between themselves and social mores. Whe...
There is something uniquely polarizing about banned books for teens and children. When an adult decides to buy a book, the conflict of its content exists only between themselves and social mores. Whe...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
melissasusan24
08:52 PM on 09/29/2011
I know that my parents let me have absolute free reign with my library card and what I wanted to read, I read. I occasionally read books that were not appropriate (I devoured VC Andrews when I was about 10 because the stories were insane and Stephen King's novels a year or two later) I'm a well-adjusted honors college student, but I can't imagine that approach would work for all children.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dawn Castle
A liberal is your fellow American not your enemy.
07:16 PM on 09/29/2011
My mom tried. Didn't work.
xzwq
don't let cons forget GWB. they ruined america
12:46 PM on 09/28/2011
Don't worry, your kid doesn't want to read anyways. Television and video games made sure of that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Circe
05:11 AM on 09/28/2011
There needs to be an inter- generational dialog about books and reading. While it is important to expose teens and even younger children to literature, reading has got to be fun or nobody would read.

The classics from Sophocles to Homer from Shakespeare to Ibsen, from Austen to Dickens to Twain, Hawthorne, Melville and Joyce are relevant because their themes are universal. Reading the classics helps the reader to learn about how a story is put together. It establishes critical thinking and gives a basis for comparison so that they can separate the literary wheat from the chaff. These are square meals for the brain.

There are also modern classics. Everybody has their own list. If you're grounded in the established classics, you'll know how to choose the new ones. These come the brain as tantalising, hip, new dishes, some will be discarded after one taste, others will become part of your literary diet forever.

Then there are the brain's "junkfood" books. Fabulous good reads, mostly formulaic, au courant but will likely become just as fabulously dated and less interesting in 5 years time. A steady reading diet of these does to the brain what McDonalds can do to the waistline.

Banning or fobidding books only makes them far more interesting---excellent for reverse psychology but useless as prevention. The most important thing is to be willing to talk with young people about the books they are reading.
10:49 PM on 09/27/2011
I was sexually assaulted at 16 and had to struggle through my father's alcoholism and emotional abuse from his girlfriend. Books saved me because they reflected my life. If the library hadn't carried books like Go Ask Alice or even nonfiction, such as resources on Alateen, I never would have had access to anything but pretty fantasy books because my dad didn't want to believe he was sick, because I was limited by what he and my mother thought was appropriate for a teenager to read. Banning books, no matter their content, does far more harm than good. It ignores the realities of life. Parents may think they're protecting their children by weeding out what they "can't handle" by protesting its presence in the classroom or the library or by simply not buying it, but they're only hurting them by limiting their experience and refusing them a source of strength and hope. Considering my mother, who I've always been very close with and has always been very involved in my life, didn't find out about my molestation until almost two years after the fact you can't just brush off these experiences as being a small percentage of cases and say that your child is "normal" and has never suffered these things. I come from a middle-class, white family, grew u in a safe neighborhood, and lived a normal childhood. It didn't protect me. It hasn't protected many friends and peers who grew up under the same or better conditions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
teacherfor25
I say it like I see it.
09:07 PM on 09/27/2011
I think teenagers should be able to select their own reading material. The key word is teenagers (13 and older). I often have parents ask me what I think about certain books, or if I have read this book or that. I will tell the parents what I know about the book(s), but that the decision is ultimately theirs to make. I suggest reading the book first, or at the same time as their child so they can discuss the book as they read it. Of course, I teacher eighth graders, so I would probably respond differentl­y if the kids were in high school. Older teenagers should be able to select anything they want to read. They will read what they want to ready anyway.
xzwq
don't let cons forget GWB. they ruined america
12:48 PM on 09/28/2011
Let them read anything they want, no matter the age. If they actually want to read, why put a stop to it because someone decides something is bad or wrong? People who decide those sorts of things are the same people who think SpongeBob is g.a.y and e.v.i.l.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
teacherfor25
I say it like I see it.
06:23 PM on 09/28/2011
Teenagers, yes. I can't recommend certain books for preteens and younger. My youngest daughter was able to any book she picked up at the age of six. Was I happy she could read well? Yes. Did I want her to read the books I was reading (true crime, mystery, etc.----adult literature)? No. There are limits.
08:19 PM on 09/27/2011
I think parents should only intervene if it's a little kid trying to read a book that's obviously too mature for them. Teenagers should choose what they want. I would never have gotten into reading if my parents dictated what I could and couldn't read. Adults also don't seem to understand that teenagers have no problem with adult themes and think that we need to be sheltered from everything that isn't all sunshine and rainbows because we'll somehow become depressed or think that cutting ourselves is a good idea because we read a book on the subject.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael T Campbell
American neither Liberal or Conservative.
05:30 PM on 09/27/2011
I don't think a parent should dictate what a child reads but I do think that the parent should be aware of what they are reading and discuss with the child the issues you may have with the book so that the child has another perspective. Also discuss with the child why they are interested in that particular text. This will give you as a parent a look into your child's mind. Once you tell a child you don't want them reading a particular book or piece you are just increasing their curiosity in that book.
GraceNotes
We live for books.
01:46 PM on 09/27/2011
If you look at the list of the most banned books of the past year, the majority of them are books written for children or young adults, such as Crank, The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, and others. The only adult book I can remember from the list is Nickel and Dimed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
celtics
01:10 PM on 09/27/2011
Unfortunately pandora's box is wide open for those hoping to protect their kids from what they read due to the internet, TV and movies. One solution is to read and watch what the kids are involved with so you can try to have have compare-notes, non-judgmental conversations about some of the subject matter. This way adults are a little more tuned in to being a teenager today, and the kids still have a parent to talk with. As an aside, 99% of teen fiction seems to be written by adults. My theory is some of them are still trying to figure things out from sometime back when. It's just easier to air it out now that it was then.
10:57 PM on 09/27/2011
Might also have to do with the fact that even good writing by teenagers is usually not of a quality to be published. Teens haven't had their grasp of language and artistry in writing fine-tuned yet. It often doesn't happen until they take a writing class in college, where they can move beyond mechanics and begin practicing writing artistically.
09:58 PM on 09/26/2011
I think it is ultimately up to the teen to choose what they should read. Teenagers are human beings that are figuring out who they are, who they want to be as adults. Unless they are doing something self destructive, they need to be given freedom to make their own choices. These books aren't just good for helping a teen cope with issues; they are also good for a teen who has a friend struggling with these issues. YA books can comfort teens as well as make them more compassionate toward others, so all teens should be able to read them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:07 AM on 09/26/2011
Balance. Unremitting misery is as pointless as endless, saccharine happiness. Teenagers are no different to adults and few of us choose to read one type of literature forever.

Balance is everything.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jessjesskk
Benevolent Zombie Power
02:11 AM on 09/26/2011
Three simple answers to the article question
1. google search engine
2. amazon
3. facebook