In recent weeks, environmental groups have published two reports to express their fear that the St. Lawrence River is becoming a high-risk area due, in particular, to commercial shipping activities. To support their arguments, they refer, among other things, to shipping accidents that occurred elsewhere in the world, years ago. These groups certainly have every right to voice their fears with regard to certain economic activities. However, given their insistence on the scientific nature of their documents, I feel it is necessary to rectify some of the "facts" they cite, which, unfortunately, are neither true nor up-to-date.
Increase in traffic
The reports indicate that shipping traffic on the St. Lawrence has increased considerably over the past few years. This is not so. Official statistics show that, in 2005, 4793 vessels transited the River. This number dropped to 4748 in 2014. While there are, in fact, annual variations in shipping traffic, clearly we are far from the spectacular upswing referred to.
Information circulating in recent months holds that ships on the St. Lawrence are getting bigger and bigger. Allow me to point out that, despite erroneous media reports, not a single super oil tanker has travelled here. It is true, however, that larger vessels have been authorized to navigate the River. This authorization was granted following a risk analysis whose recommendations were presented in public consultations during which no objections were raised. The recommendations were then implemented in keeping with a series of requirements dictated by Transport Canada and the Canadian Coast Guard. This information is public and easily accessible on the Canadian Coast Guard website.
Over and above the new requirements imposed on larger tonnage vessels, it is important to remember that commercial navigation is a highly regulated mode of transport. In addition to national regulatory requirements (reinforced by comprehensive, regular inspections), international conventions also apply here since Canada is a member of the International Maritime Organization (IMO). The IMO is the United Nations specialized agency (170 member states) responsible for adopting shipping safety and security standards and preventing marine pollution by ships and port facilities.
Good practices implemented by the industry
The maritime industry has implemented good practices which have, unfortunately, not been mentioned in these reports or the media. For example:
- A sustainable navigation strategy that seeks to harmonize navigation practices with protection of St. Lawrence River ecosystems.
- Green Marine--a continuously improving voluntary program set up by the maritime industry to improve its environmental record and targeting priority issues that could impact the environment.
- A voluntary speed reduction measure for commercial ships, designed to limit navigation's impact on riverbank erosion. Initiated in 2000, these guidelines have been widely observed since their adoption. Currently, the compliance rate borders on 98 per cent (proven compliance through monthly readings by the Canadian Coast Guard).
- A voluntary speed reduction measure to attenuate the risk of collision with marine mammals.
SODES' mission is to "Protect and promote the economic interests of the St. Lawrence maritime community from a sustainable development perspective." Currently, it seems that some people would have us believe that the interests of economic players are diametrically opposed to environmental protection and sustainable development. Despite its unequalled environmental performance, marine transport is accused of causing impacts for which it is not solely responsible.
Using worst-case scenarios to implement the necessary prevention tools is certainly a prerogative. It is what the industry does. Taking only disasters into account to alarm the public without having to prove one's allegations is an entirely different matter. We do well to doubt the objectivity of an argument when the only hypothesis studied is major incidents, ignoring any measures implemented to avoid them. Would it not be more useful to support good practices rather than glossing over them? This way, we could encourage other sectors to follow suit in working towards them.
Is it still possible to have domestic economic activity that is not deemed impossible to reconcile with sustainable development imperatives? To my mind, we need to remember the three elements that constitute sustainable development: maintain environmental integrity, ensure social equity and target economic efficiency. We will achieve this goal if we work together, based on accurate information.
ALSO ON HUFFPOST:
Casa Loma" width="52" height="52"/>
It’s hard to miss the giant castle in downtown Toronto but, if you’re not looking, you just might. In 1911 owner Sir Henry Pellatt commissioned the house, which would take three years and $3.5-million to complete. The turn of the century structure reminds visitors and locals of a time when Toronto was truly grandiose.
Joseph Schneider House" width="52" height="52"/>
Downtown Kitchener is home to an eclectic array of quiet architectural wonders, with turn of the century factories interspersed with the new housing developments. It is home though, to the Joseph Schneider House, which is the area’s oldest known homestead. It serves as a symbol of an old way of life, of its Germanic and Mennonite heritage, and how far the new tech hub city has come.
Craigdarroch Castle" width="52" height="52"/>
Overlooking Victoria, B.C., this majestic structure is sure to be attention grabbing. Craigdarroch Castle stands as a reminder of a “bonanza castle”, a point in history when rich industrialists built massive homes during the pinnacle of their wealthy time. Built in 1887 but not completed until 1890, this castle still stands as a reminder of that time.
Castle Kilbride " width="52" height="52"/>
Castle Kilbride is a stunning landmark in Southwestern Ontario. Named after industrialist’s James Livingston’s birthplace in Scotland, the home stands as a token of heritage and tradition in a rural community. Built in 1877 in Baden, the ornate interior design is just as striking as the towering structure itself.
Sun Life building " width="52" height="52"/>
The Sun Life of Canada Assurance building (as it and the company were called in 1914) was the pinnacle of downtown Montreal, but caused a stir when the grand building shifted locations from its traditional financial district location to its current Dorchester Square. It was the largest building of its era in the British Empire at the time and was completed in 1933. It stands as a symbol for Canada’s financial growth.
Cape Spear Lighthouse " width="52" height="52"/>
Newfoundland’s legacy can be captured in the Cape Spear Lighthouse in Blackhead. It points east toward the vast ocean and Ireland and west back toward the whole of Canada –if you believe in folk tales like that. The oldest existing lighthouse in the province (constructed in 1836) was and still is to the vital mariner community.
Alberta’s Government House" width="52" height="52"/>
Alberta’s Government House in Edmonton, opened in 1913, holds a history of politics within its walls and is an important, distinct building in the community. The grand building was initially a residence for Alberta’s Lieutenant Governor Generals and has then evolved several times over into a cultural and government office.
Church of Our Lady of Good Hope" width="52" height="52"/>
This exquisite and impressive church in the Northwest Territories is sure to catch any visitor’s eye. The Gothic Revival Style church was first built in 1865 but not completed until 1885 and remains one of the oldest surviving building styles of its kind.
Follow Nicole Trépanier on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Sodesqc