Monday, on the front page of The Hill Times--the weekly newspaper of Parliament Hill -- one read this headline:
"PM could be ensconced in power until 2020, say experts"
The 'expert' turned out to be a political columnist.
And, frankly, the scenario appeared far-fetched -- even to someone like myself who wrote in 2000 that Stephen Harper could one day be prime minister of Canada!
This is not to say that Mr. Harper is not in a strong position -- having brought his united party to a majority in the House of Commons and relegated the Liberals to third party status.
Yet, as has often been observed, a week is a long time in politics...
For one thing, Mr. Harper faces visceral media criticism. That said, measures disliked on the whole by journalists -- abolition of the long-form census for example -- tend to solidify his political base and clearly did not cost him his job in the last election.
Today the government's crime legislation is a matter of some controversy in Ottawa. The reality, however, is that many Canadians feel in their gut that punishment should fit the crime.
Nor do I think criticism of the Conservatives' Middle East policy will matter more in the next election than in the last.
True, that policy is lambasted by former diplomats who continue to press for Canada to side with the Palestinians.
However, Canadians shrugged off our loss of a seat on the UN Security Council -- a matter of deep concern to these former diplomats.
True, Mr. Harper was criticized in the media after the Deauville G8 summit for insisting that the communiqué not refer only to one element of President Obama's speech on the Middle East; viz., the 1967 borders. Rather, according to a report in Le Monde, Mr. Harper insisted that any such language be accompanied by a reference to Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people. Tellingly, that position was adopted last week by the international Quartet in their bid to re-start Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations.
Mr Harper was careful at the Deauville G8 not to allow any breach to develop between himself and President Obama, continuing his exemplary handling of Canada-U.S. relations.
Wisely, he's refused to be drawn into U.S. domestic politics, even when pressed -- as in the debate over the president's health care law.
His handling of the Keystone pipeline has been astute -- explaining to Americans through U.S. media that it's in their interest to build the pipeline while reassuring them that Canada will never use the resource politically or as a strategic asset.
At the same time he's made it clear that Alberta's oil sands will be developed one way or another, with its product shipped to Asia if not to the U.S.
Right now, the biggest threat on Mr. Harper's horizon is the state of the economy.
In this regard, it's worth observing that his success at the polls in 2015 depends more on decisions at the upcoming G20 in Cannes than by what was spent on hosting the summits in Canada last year.
In part, Mr. Harper owes his re-election to those summits, which brought home to Canadians the international scale of the problem. But the global economy could get a lot worse between now and the next election and there's no assurance that Canada will be spared, even relatively.
Much will depend on whom the Liberals and NDP choose as their next leaders -- and, in particular, their economic credibility.
But even if everything goes right for one or both of the opposition parties, they still could split the vote again in the next election as they did in the last.
In Quebec, the routing of the Bloc Quebecois and uncertainty about whether the NDP can consolidate its hold, particularly after the passing of Jack Layton, creates an opening for Mr. Harper. As to claims that he's written off Quebec, there's no doubt that the province's political weight in the federation has declined. However, politics will always be a game of addition not subtraction, and no leader of a competitive party would ever write off a province as populous as Quebec.
Follow Norman Spector on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@nspector4
Harper set to cut $2.2-billion cheque for Quebec over HST
Don't drag the Bank of Canada into the political fray
This should read, ...the global economy WILL get a lot worse ... .
There is no way to avoid a default by Greece and that could very easily be followed with defaults by Italy, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, and (if they don't soon get their act together) the US.
BTW, for anyone interested in the French version of the column, here's a link to it in Le Devoir's Thursday edition
http://www.ledevoir.com/politique/canada/332446/quel-avenir-pour-m-harper
On the tough on crime stance, you state "Today the government's crime legislation is a matter of some controversy in Ottawa. The reality, however, is that many Canadians feel in their gut that punishment should fit the crime." Come on Norman, you know big chunks of the bill are completely unsupportable by evidence, will cost vast sums of taxpayer money and are being passed as the antidote to the fear Harper sells through his focus-grouped political machine.
Best of all, this gem - "True, that (Conservatives' middle east) policy is lambasted by former diplomats who continue to press for Canada to side with the Palestinians. You're a smart guy Norman, so you know full well that what you wrote is intellectually dishonest. To characterize a balanced, nuanced approach to the middle east as siding with the Palestinians is beneath you as a person.
I wish you would use your position and influence to make reasonable arguments in favour of conservative ideals, rather than pedal this manipulative crap. We have a government to do that for us.
Look how quickly and easily the right wing took over the internet, making it virtually impossible to have a political conversation online without being accosted by professionally organized trolls, tasked with interrupting political discourse and applauding the government.
I would like to believe that it is more difficult to fake votes, than it is to fake supporters, HOWEVER, BC’s shaky right wing is hurriedly trying to introduce internet voting in time for the next provincial election.
I can’t imagine any system of voting that would be easier to rig.
If public discourse becomes sufficiently obstructed — between troll interference and the con’s war on public broadcasting — could those in power simply project a deceitful facade of electoral support, and steal an election?
There are a lot of third-world dictatorial practices that no longer look foreign to Canadians, and it would take an oblivious fool, in the throes of a particularly dull-witted day, to rely on these cons to exercise any measure of self-restraint.
Seems odd to accuse someone of being a tyrant when he is making government less intrusive.
You could literally read ANYTHING into it.
Perhaps you just thought I could do with an example to demonstrate the point of my second paragraph (and possibly the last one, as well)?
http://wwwÂ.vancouverÂsun.com/neÂws/Canada+Âbest+reputÂation+worlÂd+study/54Â66035/storÂy.html
"OTTAWA — Canada has the best reputation in the world, says a study measuring public perceptionÂs of 50 countries around the world, released on Tuesday.
The Reputation Institute study measures the trust, esteem, admiration and good feelings the public holds towards 50 countries, as well as perceptionÂs of peoples' quality of life, safety and attention to the environmenÂt.
Results from 42,000 respondentÂs worldwide ranked Sweden next, followed by Australia, SwitzerlanÂd and New Zealand, the reputation management firm said. "
After all, this is a liberal site....