Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Peggy Holroyd

GET UPDATES FROM Peggy Holroyd
 

Geothermal Energy: A No-Brainer for Canada?

Posted: 07/13/11 10:26 AM ET

Geothermal energy generates about 10,000 megawatts of the world's electricity, enough to power 10 million homes. But in a "World on Fire," Sarah McLachlan and the folks at the Canadian Geothermal Energy Association would like to see this number increase dramatically. McLachlan lent her song of the same name to promote geothermal energy in Canada.

The association says Canada alone could generate 5,000 megawatts of geothermal generated electricity by tapping into already mapped heat sources of Earth energy. The association is hosting an annual conference and investment forum in September 2011 to promote the geothermal industry in Canada.

How much geothermal electricity is generated in Canada today? None, zip, nada! There are serious proposals, pilot projects and ideas, but so far none are producing electricity.

The Geological Survey of Canada released a report in June 2011 on the geothermal resource potential in Canada and found that the in-place potential for geothermal power could exceed one million times Canada's current electricity consumption.

Government policy and financial support has been weak for this industry as evidenced by the fact that Canadian companies -- including four listed on the TSX -- are building projects in the U.S. and abroad, but not in Canada. In fact, the Canadian Geothermal Energy Association says 27 per cent of the geothermal projects in the U.S. are being built, managed or financed by Canadian companies!

Just as it supports renewable energy much more than Canada, the U.S. government has created a much more favorable environment for this clean energy industry.

What's so cool about geothermal energy?

Geothermal energy is clean energy that produces almost no air emissions and has a very small footprint. Energy is produced at a constant rate, which means it can provide baseload power that can supplement other forms of renewable energy such as wind, solar or hydro.

Geothermal energy is scalable from a small one megawatt system that serves a small community to a large-scale project that could provide electricity and heat to an entire city.

The highest temperature geothermal resources are in British Columbia, Alberta, Northwest Territories and Yukon. Geothermal systems could be connected to local transmission lines and could provide an alternative to diesel-generated heat and electricity systems in small remote communities.

Despite the high potential for geothermal development, particularly in western Canada, there is no electrical production in Canada as of 2010. Electricity has been produced in tests at the Meager Creek facility in British Columbia, but this 100 megawatt project was stalled in 2010 and is still not producing energy. A pilot project for production of electricity and heat from oil and gas wells in Swan Hills, Alberta, is under development.

In spite of a lack of political leadership in Canada, interest in geothermal is starting to emerge. The proposed Fort Liard Geothermal Demonstration project will provide one megawatt of electricity and one megawatt of heat to this community in the NWT. The project is a joint venture between the Acho Dene Koe First Nation and Borealis GeoPower. Together they qualified for $10 million to $20 million in funding from the Federal Clean Energy Fund.

A major project is proposed for Yellowknife, NWT. The proposed community energy system would produce 52,000 megawatts per year and heat 40 commercial buildings in dowtown Yellowknife. This would offset the use of 7.5 million litres of heating oil per year. The City qualified for $14.1 million in federal support, but its residents would not approve borrowing the money necessary to get the project up and running. The City is working with a private developer and is presently seeking to confirm whether the federal support is still there.

The many faces of geothermal energy

So far we have been talking about geothermal-generated electricity, but that is only part of the story. Geothermal heat can also be used to heat the places we live and work or the machines or processes that make things for us.

Throughout Canada, closer to the surface, we have low-temperature heat - 5 C to 12 C just below the surface of the ground -- that can be extracted by heat exchangers or heat pumps, called geoexchange systems. Just like the heat pump that takes heat out of your fridge and pumps it into the air, heat pumps can also take low-temperature heat out of the ground and make your house toasty warm.

More than 30,000 geoexchange systems are installed in residences and 6,000 in businesses across Canada. A system generally costs $20,000 to $25,000 for a home but can pay for itself in three to 10 years.
The deeper the geothermal resource, the hotter the temperatures. Most electricity installations use geothermal temperatures between 100 and 200 C. However, as technology improves and costs go down, we can do more with our lower-quality resources. A project in Chena, Alaska uses water at only 73.3 C to produce electricity that has replaced their polluting and expensive diesel generators.

Geothermal costs low?

The reliability of geothermal energy is one of its best features. The capacity factor, or the reliability of energy production, for geothermal is up to 97 per cent, which is similar to nuclear.

Time to turn up the heat with geothermal energy

There is a large role for provincial, territorial and the federal governments in helping to develop geothermal resources in Canada. A full national geothermal resource assessment is needed to help identify the best opportunities for geothermal energy projects in Canada.

On paper you'd think geothermal energy would be a no-brainer for Canada. The resource exists, the environmental benefits are significant, the costs can be low, it works in remote locations and geothermal energy plays well with new clean-energy grids. Now is the time to turn up the heat on geothermal energy development in Canada.

Note: The Pembina Institute removed the Geological Survey of Canada estimates for geothermal power costs and is looking for updated numbers.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 40
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:27 PM on 07/14/2011
One way of reducing the costs of geothermal for homes ( I know the article is talking about MW power generation) is with multiple new home and building complexes, drill deep holes before constuction so multitude of dwellers can tap into the heat with in the earth through a single well thus reducing drilling costs. This way the costs are buried in the capital costs of the buildings and spread through out the length of the mortgage.
04:52 PM on 07/14/2011
"The Geological Survey of Canada released a report in June 2011 on the geothermal resource potential in Canada and found that the in-place potential for geothermal power could exceed one million times Canada's current electricity consumption. "

I didn't download the article, but this figure really smells fishy. The 5000-megawatt figure mentioned earlier in the article is the output of five -- count 'em, 5 -- large nuclear power reactors (which put out about 1000 MW, typically). That would put a nice dent in the electricity needs, but it's nowhere near a million times the power needed to run Canada.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rory Canfield
Rwy'n ysbaddu fy cath, nawr mae'n ryddfrydol
03:07 PM on 07/14/2011
Geothermal is at best a community type resource. Large scale is troublesome, maintenance heavy and also has some less than desireable side effects with toxic gases and heavy mineral laden waste water and 15% less efficient at generating power than a comparable fossil system. A residential, small commercial geothermal system though, much lower maintenance and very efficient and an excellent choice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
01:57 PM on 07/15/2011
But N☢ Trillion Dollar Eco-Disasters like Nuclear!
11:02 PM on 07/13/2011
Does anyone know what % of geothermal energy Japan uses . I know they do it but not sure the amount. I was shocked that they were so reliant on nuclear power and of course we all know what happened with that...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
01:22 PM on 07/15/2011
A Trillion Dollar GIANT Disaster
Fanned and Fav'd!
10:46 PM on 07/13/2011
For reasons unknow no government subsidzes this. And few people seem to know about. Just take out a bank loan and the loan and your heating bills will disappear in short order. All green energy is way cheaper than nuclear or coal.
05:51 PM on 07/14/2011
You must have been daydreaming as you typed.

Clean and green Nuclear is cheaper than coal and much cheaper than wind solar or geothermal.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
12:30 AM on 07/15/2011
no, nuclear is more expensive than any other power except clean coal. Not including apocalyptic nuke disasters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
03:19 PM on 07/15/2011
Sell that Nuclear Baloney (NB) to Japan!
09:02 PM on 07/13/2011
Wave Energy is the most concentrated of the renewables. A 15 metre high wave can yield 1.5 MW for every metre of wave front. This is greater than hydo in which most dams flood vast areas of land.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
12:26 PM on 07/15/2011
It just needs R & D money to make it happen!
We should redirect some of President Obama's 60 Billion for the Nuclear Industry to make it a reality ASAP!
07:56 PM on 07/13/2011
It would be nice if there was some, or even all, of the money through tax breaks and subsidies currently going to big oil, could be redirected to clean energy such as geothermal, wind, and tidal power. Just too bad there is not the political will to do it.
05:53 PM on 07/14/2011
Wind power gets enormous $tens of billions in subsidies. There would be no wind power without subsidy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
12:28 PM on 07/15/2011
Each day wind gets less expensive
and
N☢ Trillion Dollar Eco-Disasters to worry about!
What is that worth?
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
12:31 AM on 07/15/2011
Yup. Wind gets the most but coal gets 5 times as much and nukes twice as much.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
07:09 PM on 07/13/2011
Great article. The only major downsides of geothermal electricity are earthquakes and fracking. Your links did not work very well. I would like to see the source for the 34 cent's per KWH for nuclear.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
12:29 PM on 07/15/2011
Always asking for info, what is your estimate and how about a link for it from you!
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:47 PM on 07/15/2011
Iv'e seen 34 cents but it was questionable analysis. I want it to use against the pro nuke folks!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doubleB
04:49 PM on 07/13/2011
Geothermal is the "redheaded stepchild" of renewables. It gets virtually no air-time, yet is the least expensive, most reliable, and takes up the lowest landmass footprint. It's currently the only renewable that can serve as a baseload. Some geographic areas are better and less costly to put it than others... but with binary technology, we can put it about anywhere. A 2006 report from MIT said that with a $1b investment across a decade, we could have 10% of our electric from geothermal by the year 2030. That's about 1% of what we currently subsidize fossil fuels with. The US (and moreso Canada...) needs to prioritize geothermal.
06:07 PM on 07/14/2011
Yup Hotspring geothermal's been around for a long time in fact thousand of years.. Nothing new. Wonder why Hawaii gets 99% of its energy from super expensive petrol when last I looked the place is one giant volcano.

BCHydro tried to interest power producers in bidding on geothermal power at world famous Meager Hot Springs. Despite receiving hundreds of bids on run of the river and wind power they got not a one for the geothermal. Why do you suppose that is?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doubleB
09:02 PM on 07/14/2011
The Big Island gets about 20% of its electricity from geothermal... and they just signed an agreement to expand by 8 MW this year. But yea, it is a mystery. Maybe it's because there isn't a whole lot of money to be made when you don't have a fuel cycle or a lot of capital equipment needs?

I'm not familiar with Meager Hot Springs.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
04:38 PM on 07/13/2011
Where you don't have live hot springs, or recently frozen/injected magma/lava, geothermal is notoriously difficult.

Being very generous, at 10W per square meter, you need a hundred times the collecting area of solar thermal, or ten times the collecting area of solar electric power. A GW plant needs to tap 100 square kilometers of earth's heat flux. That does mean that each city could support itself in its own footprint, but it's not easy to do: dissolved metals in the returning water, huge loss of water in the ground, and the need for pumping, which requires a significant fraction of the available energy.

In good locations, it's excellent, but they are isolated and in the west.
02:21 AM on 07/14/2011
For a new home construction, air to ground systems are wery cost effective for home heating and can be reversed in the summer for cooling and a/c (ie a single unit). Air to air systems are also very effective and some what cheaper to install. They only operate to about -6C where as ground systems operate independant of the outside air temperature if the extraction tubes are burried deep enough. I guess it depends on the area a lot and local regulations. Sepage into ground water of the exchange medium is always a concern.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
02:52 AM on 07/14/2011
That's different. That small-scale, closed-loop heat-pump technology is excellent.

I understand that the main article discusses deep geothermal heat being used to run a power station.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jake Thomas
elastic
02:42 PM on 07/13/2011
There is too much short term gain in the oil business for our country to invest in this option.
02:08 PM on 07/13/2011
More junk science from the Big Oil supported Pembina and its staff of Global Warming Deniers

Ya must have slipped a decimal point the actual cost of nuclear power in Canada is under 3 cents a kwh according to the IAEA and OPG.All Candu nukes started in the last twenty years have been built on time on schedule at less than $2B/Gw or 2 cents a kwh cheaper than coal or NG.

http://www.cnnc.com.cn/tabid/168/Default.aspx

Since their nuke cost estimate is absurd I would guess their geo power estimate is just as bad which is why nobody is doing it in Canada eh.

Large scale geothermal involves drilling real deep into the earth, injecting water and pumping up the superheated steam polluted with sulfer. Unfortunately, nobody has developed a pump that works at 450 degrees C, the water injection cracks the hot rocks causing lots of small and very scary earthquakes, and turbines that can handle a regular dose of sulfuric acid Nice idea but not viable as yet and not for a long time.

Your car will be powered by a Mr. Fusion unit first.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doubleB
04:45 PM on 07/13/2011
Binary systems don't have to deal with the sulfur and other trace pollutants coming to the surface. If I remember correctly, the plant referenced in Chena, Alaska uses this technology.

The threat of earthquakes is overblown. There is a commonly acceptable threshold on the Richter scale, and seismic activity can be controlled with water temperature and pressure, depending on the geology you're drilling into. Oil companies have been doing this for decades.

Big Nuke... just like Big Oil and Big Coal... doesn't account for all the costs they place on taxpayers. They don't dispose of the waste properly, they don't protect for natural disasters, and they aren't protected from terrorism. There's a reason no private insurance company on the planet will insure it. We don't do it safely... and if we did, the cost would make it completely infeasible. As if the costs they're currently hiding don't make it infeasible as is...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
02:00 PM on 07/15/2011
Fanned and Fav'd!
Keep up the factual posts..
+ add a link or two for others t learn from!
10:02 AM on 07/13/2011
i have been down in the mines in sudbury --over a mile below surface --the rocks are warm to the touch and it is hot -----yet the company does not tap into this resource nor do the try to capture the energy of the rising air in the super stack --maybe a geothermal company can make them an offer
02:23 AM on 07/14/2011
This is intersting since it could be coupled with a nother system say solar thermal.
09:45 AM on 07/13/2011
Nothing new here, where it makes sense it has been done for over 100 years. SanFran gets much of its elect from Geothermal and when I was in NZ toured a large GeoThermal plant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geothermal_electricity