Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Peter Worthington

GET UPDATES FROM Peter Worthington
 

In Canada, Serve Intruders Tea Before Defending Yourself

Posted: 09/05/2012 9:55 am

The law that says a person shouldn't use excessive force when battling an intruder or making a citizen's arrest is pretty good in theory, but ludicrous in practice.

And yet it's the law. Even the new Citizen's Arrest and Defence Act (dubbed the "Lucky Moose" bill) which supposedly expands the legal powers of a citizen making an arrest -- as David Chen did when his Lucky Moose Mart in the Kensington area of Toronto was victimized by a thief that he took down by force -- is inadequate.

In Chen's case, he was initially charged with kidnapping and assault when he tackled a thief and called the police. In the charges against Chen, the thief (whose sentence had been served) gave evidence against him. Judicial insanity.

Eventually Chen was cleared and is now, justifiably, something of a folk-hero.

Now we have another case of a guy (Moses Mahilal, 26), bringing his girlfriend to her home at 3 a.m. and finding a guy in the process of robbing the place where she lived with her mother.

Mahilal, who probably knows nothing about the Lucky Moose bill, grabbed knife from the kitchen and raced upstairs where he caught the guy, hiding and loaded with stolen property. Mahilal didn't waste any time in attacking and stabbing him.

The thief, Kino Johnson, 33, ran away with Mahilal after him. Johnson landed in hospital, and at his trial was sentenced to 20 months in jail and two years probation.

His record includes convictions for assault, robbery and theft, so clearly he's a potentially dangerous guy. I doubt there's a reasonable citizen in this country who doesn't identify with Moses Mahilal's reaction, and feels that anyone burglarizing a home takes his chances, and no tears wept if he's caught and manhandled.

Oh, Johnson is quoted in the Toronto Star saying that with a knife wound in his chest he could've died.

At his trial, Johnson expressed gratitude to God (I'll bet!), and that he wanted to be a good person and turn his life around.

Baloney, some will say.

He should have thought of that before breaking into the house after midnight.

Frankly, I doubt the courts (or prison system) have seen the last of this guy.

What's outrageous is that Mahilal, the guy who thwarted the burglar, has been charged with aggravated assault. Yes, that he used excessive physical force rather than ask (or listen to) explanations from the burglar as to how he'd lost his way or was sleep walking , or something.

Undoubtedly Mahilal was angry at the invasion, but also he was brave. He didn't know if the guy was armed-- and if he was armed it'd likely be a gun. Mahilal was in attack mode, defending his girlfriend and her mother. As his lawyer has pointed out, in other circumstances the Mahilal would be regarded as a hero and get a medal.

Let's hope there's some sanity when his case comes up.

It should have been dismissed, but due process doesn't work that way.

Lecture him, if the court thinks that is appropriate, but also commend him for his actions. Many of us hope we would act similarly if faced with such an unnerving situation, but fortunately most of us will never know.

 
FOLLOW CANADA
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:27 AM on 09/08/2012
Those who say that victims should not defend themselves from criminals and let justice take its course are 100 % correct. I mean, women being raped shoud not defend themselves, fight off or harm the rapist, they should let the rapist finish his business and afterward let justice take its course right? I assume They also should not scream too loud because it might ruin the rapists orgasm!!!!

Now those same idiots will say, "well not in that case...." but that's the part they don't understand, once the law says you can't it means you can't for everybody and everything. Wake up people, you have one life to live and the right to protect that life no matter what law will ever be put in place.

Better judge by 12 than carried by 6!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dennis Schmunk
04:01 PM on 09/05/2012
I empathise with home owners finding themselves at risk from invaders but without a charge being laid how can the merits of self defense be evaluated.

Honestly, it appears that Worthington would have our country endorse 'stand your ground' laws similar to those that have resulted in unarmed boys being shot to death in Florida and elsewhere simply on grounds of suspicion.

Our laws are not weak although some judges do carry the rights of the accused to extremes. Leave it at that Mr Worthington and stop inciting for a police state by exploiting the sensational.
11:12 PM on 09/11/2012
Thank you. My thoughts exactly.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hal Wood
03:18 PM on 09/05/2012
The prosecutor did not have to charge the person protecting his home and family. There was a case in Alberta where a man broke into someones home and ended up dead by the homeowner. The public was outraged that the prosecutor was going to charge the homeowner with manslaughter. The outrage helped and no charges were filed. So this is a case of a bad prosecutor who needs to be removed.
02:36 PM on 09/05/2012
Honestly, if someone broke into my house I'd probably go after them with a weapon, too. Being a white woman, though, I wonder if I'd have the same charges applied to me, or if these charges are pressed on a case-by-case basis?

In Mahilal's case, I hope he gets off - he had his girlfriend and her mother to protect, he was doing the right thing.

Deadly force should be legal if someone breaks into your house. That may give a few people pause if it's allowed.

I seem to remember a case a few years back where a person (woman?) used a sword on someone who broke into her place to steal her computer and she was hit with weapons charges or something? Honestly, if I had a sword in my house in that situation, I'd have kept swinging until the robber stopped moving, then called the police. God knows they can take hours to arrive in those situations.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MoonJoy
My micro-bio is empty.
01:30 PM on 09/05/2012
Calling 9-1-1 was not an option?
We're always told NOT to face down burglers - because they might be armed, and are usually desperate, thus dangerous.
The smart thing to do would have been to turn around, girlfriend and her mother in tow, get out of the house and call the cops.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pax333
12:22 PM on 09/05/2012
I agree with you, Peter. I'm sure there will be many rant and rave posts to come but the simple fact of the matter is a person should be allowed to defend themselves when threatened in their home or business.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:21 PM on 09/05/2012
Worthington, as a retied military officer of 25 years service, everything I learned in the service and your writing has convinced me that you are without a doubt, devoid of the needed good judgement to know when and how much force to use. Your waxing on this subject is a stunningly good example of writing devoid of substance, or based on experience. Leave this discussion to people who know and are competent in this area. You are neither.
photo
Turdinthepunchbowl
I float, therefore I am
04:50 PM on 09/05/2012
Bingo.