Sometimes you can better appreciate your own life by knowing how others see you.
We all have problems and worries, but these can take a different perspective when viewed through the eyes of others who aren't intimately involved in your life.
This is true of countries as well as individuals -- and I'm not thinking of Third World countries, or homeless refugees seeking peace and security.
We in Canada wrestle with what we view as endemic problems, exacerbated by politicians who make promises that won't be kept, and/or warnings that rarely materialize.
We may think we are over-taxed, with average working people struggling to keep abreast of rising costs and reduced services and limited income. And it's true. Garbage collection costs keep rising with pick-ups less frequent; mail delivery used to be twice daily with stamps costing less; banking never used to have all the extra charges it has today.
And so on. A new washing machine lasted decades; cars didn't deteriorate as fast as they do now; built-in obsolescence was unheard of.
Since the 2008 recession, Western economies have had a tough time.
We've all heard of the Euro crisis on the continent, with Greece, Portugal and Spain threatened with default bankruptcy. Mismanagement.
It's small comfort to Canadians that the U.S. is having a tougher time than we are (our banking system is the world's best).
Still, it's reassuring when a knowledgeable and respected entity like the Wall Street Journal tells its readers that Canada is faring better than Americans, and that "Canada shows how mistakes can be reversed with sound policies." Hmm. That's good to know.
That assessment may not please the NDP or Liberals, but it should give pause to Canadians who bitch and grumble as a sort of Pavlovian reflex to whatever happens in their own country.
Among the virtues that the WSJ sees in Canada is Finance Minister Jim Flaherty's view that to "raise taxes, increase government spending, and shun new trading opportunities" would "kill jobs, impose crushing deficits and cripple our economy."
So, Canada's proposal of one policy to exploit national resources (e.g. the Keystone XL pipeline) is sound, while the U.S. has multiple reviews that have stymied progress. The question begs: Why pay extortionary foreign oil prices if we can develop our own oil resources, while protecting the environment?
The WSJ (and anyone with half a brain) sees the value of Canada raising the eligibility for Old Age Security from 65 to 67 -- starting in 2023, for heaven's sake. That's pretty modest and 11 years down the road.
And Canada's 15 per cent corporate tax is so much better than America's 35 per cent corporate tax that hurts the domestic economy and encourages businesses to invest in countries that don't inhibit enterprises but keep wages low.
When outsiders remark that Canada is being well and responsibly governed, we in Canada could do worse than take note.
The Warren Kinsellas of our country can whine that Conservatives are mean, unethical, cheat, and like "winning elections at all costs," but to the rest of the world, (and the WSJ) we're pretty lucky in our government.
Would Liberals or the NDP do better? Un-unh.
We've got a country and government that the rest of the world envies, and from which our own citizens benefit, even while we snipe and snarl at one another and think we are having it tough.
I remember very clearly co workers telling me how Canadians could be getting 40 year mortgages, etc, etc right up til the housing market tanked. It was only then Prime Minister Harper started putting on the brakes, etc.
so let's not pretend the Tories didn't inherit the sound economic base from the previous govenment.
Frankly if Flarherty had been finance minister when the bankds wanted to do mergers to become some "superbank"...he likely have just said "sure fine whatever"
and we'd be struggling along with the rest today
Of course, that just makes us look like the guy who came in 66th in a marathon, jumping and around cheering because we beat number 67.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204795304577221242776874710.html
"The Canadian government's plan to increase spending cuts isn't necessary and could do more harm than good to one of the developed world's few strong economies, analysts at two of the world's leading ratings firms warned"
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204795304577221242776874710.html
Care to highlight that one? Hm?
Formerly knowledgeable and respected. Since Murdoch took it over -- not so much.
Is it too much to ask for a little integrity in our politicians? Especially from a Conservative party (aka Canadian Alliance, aka Reform) that has deep Christian ideological roots (thou shall not lie, thou shall not steal, thou shall not bear false witness against thy neighbour). It's obvious that they don't practice what they internally preach. Kind of scary if one thinks about it.
Yes, Canada is doing well relative to other countries. We have a voice. Our 'whining' works.
That's a real achievement.
Next we'll be declaring our record on human rights is the envy of North Korea.
The Mafia also has a very efficient way of making money, because they don't give a damn about the laws of society. Our governemtn is efficient becasue they don't give a damn about democratic limits. So long as the great leader does well, Don Carleone or Rt Hon Harper, the party and to a degree the rest of us also do well.
But when the leader does bad everyone suffers because there is nobody to tell him or his inner circle no. I don't just mean stupidity, like Fredo or MacKay, or greed like Clement or Tesso but even just revenge, personal or ideological resentment like Sonny in his red hot temper or Harper is his cold robotic rages.
The point of my rambling is that I detest this willingness to embrace a 'philosopher king' at his word that he'll be great and just and true and honest always. It never works and with power so centralized it only takes one small drop in the bucket to amke big waves for us on the edges.